Woman Refuses To Help Husband’s Mistress And Affair Child: “I Didn’t Care”
The passing of a loved one or spouse is one of the most devastating moments you’ll ever experience in life. But learning that they might not have been quite the person you thought they were can pour salt on the wound. It’s a heartbreaking realization that your partner had been unfaithful to you. If that resulted in the birth of a child outside your marriage… that entire relationship with them can be incredibly difficult to navigate.
An anonymous woman turned to the AITA online community for advice about a particularly sensitive situation. She explained how she enforced strict boundaries with her deceased husband’s ‘affair child,’ including setting up a trust fund for her and allowing her to live in one of her properties rent-free. However, the problems popped up when the child’s mother started demanding more money. Read on for the story in full.
Losing your partner is beyond painful. But it can be a very confusing time if you uncover that they had been unfaithful
Image credits: Pressmaster (not the actual photo)
A woman wanted to know if she was too harsh for refusing to support her husband’s ‘affair child’ beyond what she’d already promised
Image credits: alexandrabeganskaya (not the actual photo)
Later, she gave an update as her story began going viral online
Image credits: RepresentativeOwn638
Typically, affairs happen between people who spend a lot of time around each other. There are also multiple reasons that explain infidelity
This entire issue wouldn’t exist if the woman’s partner had been faithful to her all those years ago. There are many different factors that influence a person’s willingness to cheat and to do so repeatedly.
Cheating is far more widespread than you might think at first glance, but many people regret it. Technopedia notes that a whopping 21% of people in monogamous relationships admitted to cheating. Meanwhile, 16% of married people also shared that they have been unfaithful in their marriage.
Affairs typically happen with people you know. As per Technopedia’s findings, 33% to 40% of affairs happen with a friend. Meanwhile, 29% to 31% happen with a colleague. Overall, the majority, or 64% of those who cheated, actually regretted having their affairs.
There are four main reasons why someone might be unfaithful. According to Lucia F. O’Sullivan writing in Psychology Today, these are: sexual dissatisfaction, emotional dissatisfaction, feeling neglected, and feeling anger.
In short, an individual is likely to cheat if they want more variety or more frequent lovemaking, stop seeing their partner in a positive way, feel overlooked or rejected, or want to punish their partner for being mistreated.
That’s not to say that there’s always an ‘excuse’ for infidelity. In some cases, just the existence of the opportunity to cheat can make some spouses forget their vows.
O’Sullivan notes in her post that cheating is habitual. It’s likely that your partner may cheat again if they started a relationship with you when they weren’t single at the time. Meanwhile, if they have a history of cheating, it’s likely that they might ‘stray’ again. This is not a certainty of course (people do change), but the probability is definitely higher.
Generally, cheaters are individuals who are narcissistic, have low agreeableness, and have socio-sexual attitudes (i.e., they are interested in multiple partners).
Image credits: Becca Tapert (not the actual photo)
Inheriting a large sum of money can create many problems for you because others will likely try to claim part of it for themselves
Whenever large sums of money or access to power are involved, it brings out who people truly are inside. You can see the best and the worst of humanity. If you inherit a large amount of cash or a piece of property, you’re likely to see some of your relatives, friends, acquaintances, coworkers, and complete strangers angling to grab a bit of what you have.
Unless you practice stealth wealth (i.e., live a middle-class-looking lifestyle and avoid unnecessarily luxury purchases), there’s no hiding your inheritance. It can be very stressful to have people constantly come to you begging for money to help fix their problems.
Some of those issues are legitimate and you’ll want to help those people out because you genuinely care about them. Other problems are exaggerated or non-existent and come from folks who are envious of your ‘good’ luck, but who forget that a loved one of yours passed away for you to inherit that money. It can sometimes be hard to distinguish who has good intentions and who is just a great actor.
So, you have to be very clear, intentional, and upfront with your boundaries. For example, if you get a sizeable inheritance or win the lottery, set aside a specific amount of money that you’re willing to share with your family and loved ones, as well as how much you want to give to charitable organizations you support.
When large sums of money are at play, you should get everything in writing. For instance, if you decide to set up a trust fund for one person or give someone else some medical assistance, have your financial advisor or lawyer draft a contract. In it, you want to make it very clear that you’re offering up this money but will not give them anything else in the future.
It might sound like going overboard, but these sorts of contracts can save you a lot of headaches in the future when someone comes asking for more money because they have new needs and wants. In this particular case, the author of the viral online post had made her terms of support for her husband’s other child very clear from the get-go and stuck to her boundaries.
What are your thoughts on the tense situation, dear Pandas? Do you think the woman was right to stick to her boundaries or do you think she should have prioritized having a deeper relationship with her husband’s child and the mom? Have you ever been in a situation where someone you’re supporting keeps coming to you for more money? How did you handle things then? If you have a moment, we’d like to hear your thoughts in the comments.
Image credits: Invest Europe (not the actual photo)
The woman later replied to many people’s questions and shared some more sensitive details
After reading about the tense situation, many internet users came out in support of the author
A few internet users were not convinced that this was the right way to approach things. Here’s their take
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
The YTA people are wild…is the OP really responsible for her deceased husband’s affair child’s education? I don’t think so!
As usual, the YTAs are completely off their minds. OP has already been extraordinarily generous.
Did the YTA people read the bit where she a. Gave them a free house for 18 years, b. Gave them a college fund and c. Didn’t stop her children from getting to know affair baby, just didn’t actually facilitate it herself. In what way is that punishment?! Why do these YTA people not see all the blame sitting on the side of the affair lady (and the cheating husband) truly no good deed goes unpunished
NTA. Speaking as one of 3 kids (1, 3 & 5 yrs) abandoned (emotionally & financially) by my (so-called) dad who had an affair - and then divorced my SAHM (1960s) mum to marry his mistress and then stopped paying the mortgage, and changed his name in an attempt to avoid child maintenance. He had his own business, and his kids from his 2nd wife went to private boarding school - basically, scum. YTAers can FO.
If you can afford to pay even on child's 4 year college, you aren't middle class.. But the rest of what she said was sensible.
People don't know what financial class they actually belong too. Lower upperclass' favorite line is "I'm NOT RICH DAMMIT"
Load More Replies...Kid sprung on her at the FUNERAL!!! Supported for 18 years, lived rent free and is still broke. Time to get a lawyer in and walk away. They're not going easily.
What the actual ? Rent free on OP property + trust fund ? Is she bonkers ? I have a child with my ex wife who cheated on me, twice... Recently had coffee with her as we ran into each other as i was returning guardianship of our child to her, she seeked my financial help for the 2 other affair kids she had... She got pissed & stormed off when i asked her if she smoked a whole tree ! No effing way in hell !
Mistress had 18yrs to figure everything out. OP doesn't owe a damn thing, and was extremely generous to the point of saintly for even doing a college trust fund and giving them a rent-free place to live. Mistress needs a slap.
OP is a f*****g saint. The slag and her brat wouldve been out in cold immediately.
I dunno, she admits she only helped to avoid them coming after a share of her husband's estate and to show her kids generosity. She was generous when she didn't need to be but not really a saint when she did it for her own gain, not to actually help them. IMO a saint would do it for the sake of others, not themselves.
Load More Replies...You and she agreed on terms. Now she wants another handout. She had 18 years to get her act together and failed to. Tell mil and sil to stepup to the plate or shut up. You have done more than enough for your cheating husband's mistress
F*** those YTA people. If one does the math, and figures a relatively low rent of $1000/month (we paid nore than that 25 years ago for a house), the mistress should have saved at least $200,000. So... what did she do with her money? Even $500/month put in savings would give her 6 figures.
How do you go 18 years rent free and have no money. Evict her and be done with the whole thing.
No one is being "punished" in the entire scenario. The OP is not taking anything from the AP and her child. They never had it to begin with and, there's always a risk when getting into a sexual relationship with a married individual. The AP could have taken the matter to a court but she probably made out better with those years of rent-free living than by having a court seize a portion of the man's estate for the kid. I'm sure the AP didn't have it easy, but again, there's risk involved.
You should have severed relations with them years ago. Put a share from the life insurance and accident money into a professionally managed trust and wash your hands of them . The amount would have been calculated according your local laws - probably a third divided by the number of children.
I thought America didn't have inheritance laws like they do in Europe? Especially when it's a middle class family. What right does the mistress and her offspring have to a single penny? That's beside the point. The widow did more than she should have, and isn't a monster. She can't cover the costs for EVERY child in need, only her own children. And this child isn't hers. Maybe his mother should save up her money she's not paying for rent, and send him to school that way.
She had 18 years to save money she wasn't paying towards rent. She can go jump in a lake.
I do not understand why OP gave them one single Cent, if she did not have to - neither the child nor its mother have anything to do with her
Ok, so the YTA crowd believes that OP has any responsibility toward an unrelated child, more precisely, an unrelated young adult (as OP lets the child to live rent-free on her property, but they have to pay when the child turns into a legal adult.) Do I understand it correctly? On the other hand, in my country the children would have inherited equal share of the deceased father's wealth (only the father's, OP's assets don't count.) If OP has two kids, then the lovechild would have inherited one-third of the deceased's possessions, but nothing else (no rent-free living, no college fund.) Moreover, until the lovechild turns 18, his mother couldn't have spent the inheritance at all.
All this back and forth about which family members are responsible for what, how the poster and her husband were "strong middle class" -- all that DOES. NOT. MATTER. What matters is the law in their state for division of intestate inheritances. If she is correct, and that she as spouse is the sole beneficiary, then that's that. IF NOT then GET A LAWYER immediately, and see if you can quantify the value of the rent. [Edit to add Google check: looked at US law of intestate succession, and in most cases it's spouse PLUS children -- OP may be in trouble, here....]
Does it say children of the marriage, or any children, etc?
Load More Replies...OP has absolutely no obligation to them aside from what the child was due in inheritance (I don't know the applicable laws here). Assuming that obligation has been met through the trust fund, whatever they did with that money is not her concern. And although it is not the child's fault, at the same time she has no ties to OP and needs to look elsewhere for support.
MIL & SIL need to open their wallets. This woman owes the affair partner and her child nothing.
I feel no sympathy for the AP. She had 18 years to get some rent money saved up for when her kid turned 18 years old and was warned she would have to pay rent or move out at that time. This is on the AP mother. OP is NTA and did more than I would have.
The entitlement of people! She was more that generous. The affair woman should have been saving the rent money she didn't have to pay. She could have bought a house, paid for the kids medical. SMH
Ummm, MIL and SIL? Your husband is dead, you don't have a MIL or SIL.
As usual, these aren't real. Come on - think about it. Who, in their right mind, would do what this woman claims to have done? Not in a million years....
There are some amazing & exceptional people in this world.
Load More Replies...The YTA people are wild…is the OP really responsible for her deceased husband’s affair child’s education? I don’t think so!
As usual, the YTAs are completely off their minds. OP has already been extraordinarily generous.
Did the YTA people read the bit where she a. Gave them a free house for 18 years, b. Gave them a college fund and c. Didn’t stop her children from getting to know affair baby, just didn’t actually facilitate it herself. In what way is that punishment?! Why do these YTA people not see all the blame sitting on the side of the affair lady (and the cheating husband) truly no good deed goes unpunished
NTA. Speaking as one of 3 kids (1, 3 & 5 yrs) abandoned (emotionally & financially) by my (so-called) dad who had an affair - and then divorced my SAHM (1960s) mum to marry his mistress and then stopped paying the mortgage, and changed his name in an attempt to avoid child maintenance. He had his own business, and his kids from his 2nd wife went to private boarding school - basically, scum. YTAers can FO.
If you can afford to pay even on child's 4 year college, you aren't middle class.. But the rest of what she said was sensible.
People don't know what financial class they actually belong too. Lower upperclass' favorite line is "I'm NOT RICH DAMMIT"
Load More Replies...Kid sprung on her at the FUNERAL!!! Supported for 18 years, lived rent free and is still broke. Time to get a lawyer in and walk away. They're not going easily.
What the actual ? Rent free on OP property + trust fund ? Is she bonkers ? I have a child with my ex wife who cheated on me, twice... Recently had coffee with her as we ran into each other as i was returning guardianship of our child to her, she seeked my financial help for the 2 other affair kids she had... She got pissed & stormed off when i asked her if she smoked a whole tree ! No effing way in hell !
Mistress had 18yrs to figure everything out. OP doesn't owe a damn thing, and was extremely generous to the point of saintly for even doing a college trust fund and giving them a rent-free place to live. Mistress needs a slap.
OP is a f*****g saint. The slag and her brat wouldve been out in cold immediately.
I dunno, she admits she only helped to avoid them coming after a share of her husband's estate and to show her kids generosity. She was generous when she didn't need to be but not really a saint when she did it for her own gain, not to actually help them. IMO a saint would do it for the sake of others, not themselves.
Load More Replies...You and she agreed on terms. Now she wants another handout. She had 18 years to get her act together and failed to. Tell mil and sil to stepup to the plate or shut up. You have done more than enough for your cheating husband's mistress
F*** those YTA people. If one does the math, and figures a relatively low rent of $1000/month (we paid nore than that 25 years ago for a house), the mistress should have saved at least $200,000. So... what did she do with her money? Even $500/month put in savings would give her 6 figures.
How do you go 18 years rent free and have no money. Evict her and be done with the whole thing.
No one is being "punished" in the entire scenario. The OP is not taking anything from the AP and her child. They never had it to begin with and, there's always a risk when getting into a sexual relationship with a married individual. The AP could have taken the matter to a court but she probably made out better with those years of rent-free living than by having a court seize a portion of the man's estate for the kid. I'm sure the AP didn't have it easy, but again, there's risk involved.
You should have severed relations with them years ago. Put a share from the life insurance and accident money into a professionally managed trust and wash your hands of them . The amount would have been calculated according your local laws - probably a third divided by the number of children.
I thought America didn't have inheritance laws like they do in Europe? Especially when it's a middle class family. What right does the mistress and her offspring have to a single penny? That's beside the point. The widow did more than she should have, and isn't a monster. She can't cover the costs for EVERY child in need, only her own children. And this child isn't hers. Maybe his mother should save up her money she's not paying for rent, and send him to school that way.
She had 18 years to save money she wasn't paying towards rent. She can go jump in a lake.
I do not understand why OP gave them one single Cent, if she did not have to - neither the child nor its mother have anything to do with her
Ok, so the YTA crowd believes that OP has any responsibility toward an unrelated child, more precisely, an unrelated young adult (as OP lets the child to live rent-free on her property, but they have to pay when the child turns into a legal adult.) Do I understand it correctly? On the other hand, in my country the children would have inherited equal share of the deceased father's wealth (only the father's, OP's assets don't count.) If OP has two kids, then the lovechild would have inherited one-third of the deceased's possessions, but nothing else (no rent-free living, no college fund.) Moreover, until the lovechild turns 18, his mother couldn't have spent the inheritance at all.
All this back and forth about which family members are responsible for what, how the poster and her husband were "strong middle class" -- all that DOES. NOT. MATTER. What matters is the law in their state for division of intestate inheritances. If she is correct, and that she as spouse is the sole beneficiary, then that's that. IF NOT then GET A LAWYER immediately, and see if you can quantify the value of the rent. [Edit to add Google check: looked at US law of intestate succession, and in most cases it's spouse PLUS children -- OP may be in trouble, here....]
Does it say children of the marriage, or any children, etc?
Load More Replies...OP has absolutely no obligation to them aside from what the child was due in inheritance (I don't know the applicable laws here). Assuming that obligation has been met through the trust fund, whatever they did with that money is not her concern. And although it is not the child's fault, at the same time she has no ties to OP and needs to look elsewhere for support.
MIL & SIL need to open their wallets. This woman owes the affair partner and her child nothing.
I feel no sympathy for the AP. She had 18 years to get some rent money saved up for when her kid turned 18 years old and was warned she would have to pay rent or move out at that time. This is on the AP mother. OP is NTA and did more than I would have.
The entitlement of people! She was more that generous. The affair woman should have been saving the rent money she didn't have to pay. She could have bought a house, paid for the kids medical. SMH
Ummm, MIL and SIL? Your husband is dead, you don't have a MIL or SIL.
As usual, these aren't real. Come on - think about it. Who, in their right mind, would do what this woman claims to have done? Not in a million years....
There are some amazing & exceptional people in this world.
Load More Replies...
42
40