Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Why Artists Don’t Need To Worry About Being Replaced By A.i. – Yet
User submission

Why Artists Don’t Need To Worry About Being Replaced By A.i. – Yet

ADVERTISEMENT

I have been using a Stable Diffusion A.I. as a kind of sketchbook to plan out paintings. But there are some fairly severe limitations – at least when using the free version, as I have been. I thought I could demonstrate these limitations by creating a “Fashion Dolls of the Last 200 Years” scrapbook. Since Barbie wasn’t invited until 1959, I prompted the A.I. to create an image of what a fashion doll might have looked like for each decade since 1820.

 

In the images below, you’ll see some of the repeated problems that the A.I. had in creating images – the hands are TERRIBLE, and the dolls often have either no legs or else 3 legs! The faces mostly don’t look like Fashion Dolls at all – and are sometimes kind of SCARY …

 

Overall, I was impressed with the costumes, although I didn’t check for historical accuracy! Most of them looked sewed by hand, in a very my-doll kind of way – and I was often amused by the rooms, which often include portraits or weird dolls in addition to some ‘period’ furniture. I scored each image out of 10 for how ‘normal’ it looked and for creative elements that I appreciated.

 

Here’s the website for Stable Diffusion, in case you want to play with it yourself: https://stablediffusionweb.com/#demo

More info: stablediffusionweb.com

For each doll, I included a prompt like this: fashion doll dressed in 1820s clothing & 1820 hairstyle sitting in a dollhouse room. After that, I only changed the decade. I mostly like this one, aside from the 2-tone hair – I actually Like 2-tone hair, but don’t think it was historically appropriate. 7/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1830s – not too bad, aside from the hands. 8/10

1840s – hands wrong, scary face, and only one leg. 1/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1840s – hair wrong, 3 legs?? (I liked the doll ‘portrait’ to her right, as well as the diorama behind her.) 6/10

1850s – not bad overall – the hairdo was fascinating, if not accurate. I find it interesting that this particular doll was made bustier than most. 9/10

1860s – not bad, overall. The face isn’t very fashion doll-like, and the hands are weird, but overall, I give this one a thumbs-up. 9/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1870s – interesting haircoloring! This costume is one of the ones that remind me of the costumes I used to sew by hand for my own fashion doll. 8/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1880s – interesting hair, sort of a normal face – but a split skirt?? And, of course, lobster hands. 7/10

1880s – when you input your prompt, you get 4 images. I usually just download the best of them, but I downloaded this one because of the weird Mistakes! (See next image for her cleavage!!) I wonder why the A.I. put miniature dolls into most of the rooms – and what kind of creature is in this one?? 7/10

1880s – closeup of ‘cleavage’ and alien hands 0/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1890s – pretty good overall. I’m not sure why all of these dolls have articulared arms and legs – Mattel first came out with these in 1999 and “Made to Move” Barbie was released in 2015 – so maybe there are more source images for the A.I. to use?? 8/10

1900 – otherwise known as Hooker Fashion Doll? I LOVE the haircolor – but suspect it wasn’t that common in 1900 … 6/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1900s – this one seems more reasonable for the time – except for the short skirt! 8/10

1910 – you might have noticed that the fashion doll’s EYES are WONKY in most of these images. 8/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1910 – hairdo and dress type are wrong, but I’m fascinated by the cowboy behind her in the corner – and, actually, I find her face more likeable that a lot of fashion doll faces! 8/10

1910 – aside from the wonky eyes, I liked this image. 9/10

1920s – there is just SOOO much WRONG with this image! Scary murder-face, giraffe neck, hands for feet, and a Mini-Me doll with an oversized head. This is the stuff Nightmares are made of! (Just scroll past, please!) 0/10

1930s – wonky eyes & hands – but cute outfit. NO LEGS, though …. (I do love the little half-doll with the lavender hair on her side table …) 5/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1940 – What’s with the eyeshadow/eyebrows?? And the small detail of 3 LEGS?? (It seems to me if I was programming an A.I. to make images of people, I would limit the number of human appendages to 2 Maximum …) 3/10

1940 – I love the hair and outfit! Eyes are wonky, but I give this one 9/10.

1950s – suddenly, we’re inspired by 1950s TV shows in black & white?? (Not to mention the fact that one of her arms ends in the chair and the other in the doorway…) 5/10

1950s – this one is kind of Adorable! I like the hair, outfit – and even the side-eye! But she has been given Karashian hips – Why?? 8/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1960s – Barbie was invented in 1959, so from here on out, I expected that the images would be more realistic. I mean, if the A.I. images are amalgamated from a database of images, there were actual fashion dolls to use at this point. So while I give this one 10/10 for cuteness, makeup and hair – it doesn’t really look like a Barbie, does it? 9/10

I960s – in the late 1960s, Mattel introduced the first black fashion doll. I would have wanted this doll – but why does she have a bird’s nest her head?? 9/10

1960s – Too bad Mattel hasn’t released an older, magnificent black fashion doll like this one! Love her hair! – and outfit, and makeup (aside from the wonky eye) 9/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1970s – I mean, lots of people in the 70s were doing drugs, but the A.I. was TRIPPIN’ when it made this fashion doll with extra arm parts and scary legs … 3/10

1980s – overall, actually pretty good (giraffe neck aside). She looks a bit like Britney Spears. 9/10

1980 – Mattel released a hispanic fashion doll. The A.I. did a pretty good job on this image – aside from the TINY feet – and the miscegenation of a dollie-toy … 8/10

1990 – Nice face and hair – but extra hands and no legs! 3/10

1990 – so I tried again. Good face and hair – but the camera angle looks like a paparazzi shot! And those Calves!!) 2/10

ADVERTISEMENT

1990 – third try. At first, looks mostly normal, at least. Until your realize that her legs are the same length as a real human being (short), and they don’t actually LINE UP with the rest of her body … 4/10

2000 – I did notice that as the time I was inputting got closer to the present, the dolls looked more and more realistic. This one is actually one of the best! 9/10

2000 – I call her “New Age Dashion doll” – she could have her own YouTube channel to talk about chakras and crystal healing! 10/10

2010 – again, pretty good – if a bit buck-toothed … 9/10

ADVERTISEMENT

2020 – Yoga Fashion Doll (wonky eye and extra fingers aside) – I would join her for yoga, wouldn’t you? 9/10

2020 – I updated the black fashion doll to see what the A.I. would do with the prompt. LOVE her hair, makeup and outfit! 10/10

2020 – known as Oriental fashion doll when she was released by Mattel in 1980. The A.I. messed this one up majorly! I even added “realistic hands and feet” to see if the wonky images were my fault for not asking for normal appendages! But NO! Spider hand, hair hanging in mid-air, and NO LEGS! Cute face, eyes, and hair, though 2/10

ADVERTISEMENT

2020 – another prompt for an Asian fashion doll – and I get this cliche. Cute face, hair and outfit – but NO LEGS again! 2/10

2020 – I prompted “curvy fashion doll” – released in 2016, this doll was working against the complaints about fashion dolls setting unrealistic images for girls. I like the Adele hair on this one – but it loses points for the wasp-waist … 7/10

2020 – I prompted “hijab” fashion doll – because Mattel released a Muslim fashion doll in 2018 – but got Error. So I tried “ethnic fashion doll” and got some like this one. Amazing hair, nice makeup an outfit. Excellent overall 9/1010

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on Facebook
Catherine Maven

Catherine Maven

Author, Community member

Read more »

I am an artist, writer and ESL teacher. I have wacky dreams which often lead to art or stories. Right now, I am focusing my creative energies on upcycling furniture and glass into fun and funky - but USEFUL - items!

Read less »
Catherine Maven

Catherine Maven

Author, Community member

I am an artist, writer and ESL teacher. I have wacky dreams which often lead to art or stories. Right now, I am focusing my creative energies on upcycling furniture and glass into fun and funky - but USEFUL - items!

Ieva Midveryte

Ieva Midveryte

BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Hello Pandas! My name is Ieva, though it's often mistaken for the word 'Leva,' and in Lithuanian, it means 'loser' (insert the pain emoji). While I don't take offense if you accidentally call me a loser, I thought I'd share something interesting with you, which I also do professionally at work.Anywayyy, my favorite part here is introducing you to creative people who deserve just as much recognition as famous celebrities. Besides that, I also enjoy memes and funny, lighthearted posts, and occasionally, I find myself drawn to a bit of internet drama.

Read less »

Ieva Midveryte

Ieva Midveryte

BoredPanda staff

Hello Pandas! My name is Ieva, though it's often mistaken for the word 'Leva,' and in Lithuanian, it means 'loser' (insert the pain emoji). While I don't take offense if you accidentally call me a loser, I thought I'd share something interesting with you, which I also do professionally at work.Anywayyy, my favorite part here is introducing you to creative people who deserve just as much recognition as famous celebrities. Besides that, I also enjoy memes and funny, lighthearted posts, and occasionally, I find myself drawn to a bit of internet drama.

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda