664Kviews
Photographer Uses 166-Year-Old Technique To Shoot Kids, And The Result Is Haunting
Spanish artist Jacqueline Roberts swims against the tide, reviving 19th-century photography techniques in the digital era. Jacqueline's photography art mostly revolves around the psychological and emotional transition from childhood to adolescence, and the technique she uses further intensifies the eerily change, making the haunting photos look like something you'd find in your darkest dreams.
Wet plate photography (also known as the collodion process), is said to have been invented in 1851, almost simultaneously, by Frederick Scott Archer and Gustave Le Gray. Although the process required a portable darkroom, it combined desirable qualities of the calotype process (enabling an unlimited number of prints from a single negative) and the daguerreotype (creating a sharpness and clarity that could not be achieved with paper negatives). The technique quickly became really popular and was used for portraiture, landscape work, architecture, and other types of photography.
"For me, wet-plate children photography is a fascinating process on so many levels," Roberts told Film's not Dead. "From preparing the chemistry, cutting the glass, flooding the plate, developing and fixing to finally holding in my hands the beautiful photos. I love the ceremonial aspect of it, as much as the craft involved."
The self-taught artist often chooses kids as the subjects for her black and white photos but for other photo ideas and reasons than the majority of photographers. "I disagree with the common perception that sees children as 'cute-innocent- creatures'. I find this notion condescending and manipulative. What I love about them is their rawness, their fresh unawareness, their uncompromising ability to be as they are."
Probably the best result of Jacqueline's work is her brilliant book called Nebula.
More info: jacquelineroberts.com | Facebook | Instagram
This post may include affiliate links.
Conceptually beautiful, but also sexualizes the girl by her position, her dress being pulled up and undergarment showing. While the boys are a totally different tember. Longer pants. I think it has become so much the norm in this day and age most of us don't recognize it.
Does anyone else see the eyes..? There are like 3 or 4 just floating in the black.
This double exposure is hands down the most stirring in the collection. Beautifully done.
Seen too much as a child, and the eyes are already aged beyond his years..
I remember photos like this of my mom and her older sisters playing outside in the summers.
"Photographer Shoots Kids Using..." That title will give me nightmares too. O_o (joke)
I think 'dreamy' may be more appropriate than 'nightmarish'. I love how this style gives a flowing movement to the images. Something you rarely see in modern photography. Too much of it looks set up and still for the perfect photo. These are, of course, set up too, but the feel of it isn't as superficial and you just get lost in them
Asserting that the eyes are photoshopped displays an ignorance of classic photography techniques. Study antique photos, find similar images.
These would be less haunting or sad like or creepy if any of the subjects were smiling. Just sayin'.
Smiling for photos was not "appropriate" in the original era of this photo technology.
Load More Replies...Why on earth would these give me nightmares?! What an odd thing to say....
Now, I want to see all the "out-takes", where they are laughing, smiling, and being silly. ;)
Horrible and depressing, what's wrong with people these days that all they can do is come up with depressing looking things.
These pictures are so beautiful! They look Vintage and that is my favourite.
The eyes in each of these pictures are the most beautiful part, such clarity and light is beautiful
I love traditional photographs, but I would like to see these kids happy for a change.
We won't shoot them then. We'll just photograph them (which is what shoot means is photograph here)
Load More Replies...Most pictures have the eyes photo shopped, but its interesting take on kids photography.
Haha. I thought the writer was shooting the children, as in killing them. That gave me a fright. I was like:"wtf, boredpanda?"
Shooting is photos. I do understand with English language what one word can mean two things so very different of course it's confusing we need more words
Load More Replies...I thought it was frowned upon to shoot kids.. WHABAM! (yeah, I see I'm already late with this joke, but I had to)
You expected a dismal type of photograph series to have smiles? there's nothing creepy about them, they look depressed and sad which was the feel I'm sure he was going for.
Load More Replies..."Photographer Shoots Kids Using..." That title will give me nightmares too. O_o (joke)
I think 'dreamy' may be more appropriate than 'nightmarish'. I love how this style gives a flowing movement to the images. Something you rarely see in modern photography. Too much of it looks set up and still for the perfect photo. These are, of course, set up too, but the feel of it isn't as superficial and you just get lost in them
Asserting that the eyes are photoshopped displays an ignorance of classic photography techniques. Study antique photos, find similar images.
These would be less haunting or sad like or creepy if any of the subjects were smiling. Just sayin'.
Smiling for photos was not "appropriate" in the original era of this photo technology.
Load More Replies...Why on earth would these give me nightmares?! What an odd thing to say....
Now, I want to see all the "out-takes", where they are laughing, smiling, and being silly. ;)
Horrible and depressing, what's wrong with people these days that all they can do is come up with depressing looking things.
These pictures are so beautiful! They look Vintage and that is my favourite.
The eyes in each of these pictures are the most beautiful part, such clarity and light is beautiful
I love traditional photographs, but I would like to see these kids happy for a change.
We won't shoot them then. We'll just photograph them (which is what shoot means is photograph here)
Load More Replies...Most pictures have the eyes photo shopped, but its interesting take on kids photography.
Haha. I thought the writer was shooting the children, as in killing them. That gave me a fright. I was like:"wtf, boredpanda?"
Shooting is photos. I do understand with English language what one word can mean two things so very different of course it's confusing we need more words
Load More Replies...I thought it was frowned upon to shoot kids.. WHABAM! (yeah, I see I'm already late with this joke, but I had to)
You expected a dismal type of photograph series to have smiles? there's nothing creepy about them, they look depressed and sad which was the feel I'm sure he was going for.
Load More Replies...