Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Scientists Discover The Unfortunate News That Face Shields Are Almost 100% Ineffective
1.4K

Scientists Discover The Unfortunate News That Face Shields Are Almost 100% Ineffective

ADVERTISEMENT

Japan has put together a really good computer and, unlike most of us who finish our PC builds, they aren’t using it for games. Riken, a government-backed research center in Kobe conducted a study on the spread of coronavirus by using Fugaku, the world’s fastest supercomputer, and determined that nearly 100 percent of airborne droplets less than 5 micrometers in size escaped through plastic shields (one micrometer is one-millionth of a meter). Additionally, about half of the larger droplets measuring 50 micrometers found their way into the air.

Image credits: Shutterstock/winnievinzence

A simulation using Fugaku, the world’s fastest supercomputer, found that almost 100% of airborne droplets of less than 5 micrometers in size escaped through plastic face shields

Image credits: Florida Atlantic University

Additionally, about half of the larger droplets measuring 50 micrometers found their way into the air

Image credits: Florida Atlantic University

Florida Atlantic University has explained the numbers visually with a cool and comprehensive video

Image credits: Florida Atlantic University

Makoto Tsubokura, computational science team leader at Riken, said the simulation combined airflow with the reproduction of tens of thousands of droplets of different sizes, from under 1 micrometer to several hundred micrometers.

He warned against wearing plastic face shields as an alternative to masks.

“Judging from the results of the simulation, unfortunately, the effectiveness of face guards in preventing droplets from spreading from an infected person’s mouth is limited compared with masks,” Tsubokura told The Guardian.

Image credits: Florida Atlantic University

Image credits: Florida Atlantic University

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Florida Atlantic University

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is especially true for small droplets of less than 20 micrometers,” Tsubokura said, explaining that all of the much smaller aerosol particles were found to escape through the gap between the face and the face shield. “At the same time, it somehow works for the droplets larger than 50 micrometers.”

Fugaku, which cost over $1.2 billion and can perform more than 415 quadrillion computations a second, recently also found that face masks made from non-woven fabric are more effective at blocking the spread of COVID-19 via airborne droplets than those made of cotton and polyester

You can wear shields but use a mask as well

Image credits: Official U.S. Navy Page

Here’s what people said after hearing the big news

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on Facebook
Mindaugas Balčiauskas

Mindaugas Balčiauskas

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

I'm a visual editor at Bored Panda. I kickstart my day with a mug of coffee bigger than my head, ready to tackle Photoshop. I navigate through the digital jungle with finesse, fueled by bamboo breaks and caffeine kicks. When the workday winds down, you might catch me devouring bamboo snacks while binging on the latest TV show, gaming or I could be out in nature, soaking up the tranquility and communing with my inner panda.

Read less »
Mindaugas Balčiauskas

Mindaugas Balčiauskas

Author, BoredPanda staff

I'm a visual editor at Bored Panda. I kickstart my day with a mug of coffee bigger than my head, ready to tackle Photoshop. I navigate through the digital jungle with finesse, fueled by bamboo breaks and caffeine kicks. When the workday winds down, you might catch me devouring bamboo snacks while binging on the latest TV show, gaming or I could be out in nature, soaking up the tranquility and communing with my inner panda.

Rokas Laurinavičius

Rokas Laurinavičius

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Rokas is a writer at Bored Panda with a BA in Communication. After working for a sculptor, he fell in love with visual storytelling and enjoys covering everything from TV shows (any Sopranos fans out there?) to photography. Throughout his years in Bored Panda, over 300 million people have read the posts he's written, which is probably more than he could count to.

Read less »

Rokas Laurinavičius

Rokas Laurinavičius

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Rokas is a writer at Bored Panda with a BA in Communication. After working for a sculptor, he fell in love with visual storytelling and enjoys covering everything from TV shows (any Sopranos fans out there?) to photography. Throughout his years in Bored Panda, over 300 million people have read the posts he's written, which is probably more than he could count to.

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
mark-mckenzie_1 avatar
anarkzie
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They are meant to be worn with a face mask, the mask stops your droplets getting out and the covering stops other peoples droplets getting in.

ifitsrusteditsmine avatar
Paul Martin
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The title of this post is misleading. A Face shield is ment to protect YOU from other people's droplets. A face mask with expiration valve is ment to protect YOU against other people's droplets. If you use a face shield and/or a mask with expiration mask you are being an A*s#ole because you are spreding your germs and protecting yourself against other people's germs.

bp_10 avatar
WilvanderHeijden
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's amazing how idiots manage to draw the wrong conclusions based on the results of a test."If face shields don't work, why are we wearing masks? " SMH. It was obvious to any THINKING person that face shields wouldn't stop the spreading. It's protecting against droplets. A face mask does contain the spreading that's why professionals wear them both. It seems that common sense is anything but common.

Load More Comments
mark-mckenzie_1 avatar
anarkzie
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They are meant to be worn with a face mask, the mask stops your droplets getting out and the covering stops other peoples droplets getting in.

ifitsrusteditsmine avatar
Paul Martin
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The title of this post is misleading. A Face shield is ment to protect YOU from other people's droplets. A face mask with expiration valve is ment to protect YOU against other people's droplets. If you use a face shield and/or a mask with expiration mask you are being an A*s#ole because you are spreding your germs and protecting yourself against other people's germs.

bp_10 avatar
WilvanderHeijden
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's amazing how idiots manage to draw the wrong conclusions based on the results of a test."If face shields don't work, why are we wearing masks? " SMH. It was obvious to any THINKING person that face shields wouldn't stop the spreading. It's protecting against droplets. A face mask does contain the spreading that's why professionals wear them both. It seems that common sense is anything but common.

Load More Comments
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda