ADVERTISEMENT

With people being constantly busy, things changing every day, and various events happening all the time, time flies super fast. So sometimes it might seem that some of the things that we just witnessed or experienced happened a long time ago. And it turns out that the same logic can be applied to some of the greatest inventions and concepts that we know today.

This TikTok account called @idea.soup decided to share some of the things that only were discovered recently even though we might think that they are quite old and have been here for ages. 

Idea Soup is where people can find interesting educational content on various topics. Its creator Michael R McBride is the one who makes and shares this content with people on various social media platforms. 

More Info: TikTok

Image source: idea.soup

#1

Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

We didn’t know how mountains formed until 1966. And not just mountains, earthquakes and volcanoes too. Like we were putting men into space and yet every time there was an earthquake, we were just like “What the hell is going on?”

TheMuuj Report

Chef Latte
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Humans are stupid. Thank god I’m a homo sapien

Not A Panda
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yes, we did know. We just didn't know how to prove it until the late '60s. Alfred Wegener proposed the theory in the early 20th century (1912 if I'm not mistaken).

Jo Johannsen
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Just looked it up, was ~1915. His hypothesis now considered disproved but he was in the ballpark.

Load More Replies...
Leo Domitrix
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Tectonic plate theory and such were much older. Mass acceptance and education, not so much.

Gregory Mead
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not really. Plate Tectonics was first proposed in the 1960s. Continental Drift is older - ~1920s - and the first concept that the continents had moved dates to the 1500s, but without any real understanding of the process. As for mass acceptance, by the time I took my 1st geology class (1975), Plate Tectonics was pretty much fully accepted. There were holdouts, but the vast majority of geologists understood that PT was the best explanation for what we saw.

Load More Replies...
Jo Johannsen
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

At the very least, this is extremely oversimplified.

lara
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is not true/factual.

lara
Community Member
4 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Geologists had formed theorems about how geological events created certain phenomenon. "Plate tectonics is a scientific theory that explains how major landforms are created as a result of Earth’s subterranean movements. The theory, which solidified in the 1960s, transformed the earth sciences by explaining many phenomena, including mountain building events, volcanoes, and earthquakes." National Geographic Up until then some scientists considered mountains to be "bubbles" of earth. However, "Developed from the 1950s to the 1970s, the theory of plate tectonics is the modern update to continental drift, an idea first proposed by scientist Alfred Wegener in 1912 which stated that Earth's continents had "drifted" across the planet over time.May 26, 2021" Live Science.com

Load More Replies...
Kathy Richardson
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Actually, the USGS started their earthquake research in 1906, and Leopold von Buch theorized about volcanoes and how mountains were formed in the 19th century,

Madzdad the bard
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I call BS on this one, at least in the language. The theory of plate tectonics was first postulated in 1912, however, it did take almost 50 years for it to be accepted. Volcanology as a science has been around since the 19 century and has been pretty spot on with the theories, though technology didn't exist to prove it (crust, mohorovicic layer, mantle, core, etc.) until the mid 20th century.

Gregory Mead
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Plate Tectonics was proposed in the 1960s, but the concept of Continental Drift (not the same thing) was much earlier.

Load More Replies...
Paul Davis
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I undertand plate tectonic theory was around for a long time but it was extremely hard to get it accepted by the bulk of scientists who could not get away from their largely religiously-oriented theories of a static Earth. I remember it was still "controversial" even into the 1970s. Just as, later, it came to be that we were finding evidence of a lot of catastrophic geologic events suddenly changing landscapes, and it had to slowly battle its way against the geologists who insisted that all real geological change is extremely slow over periods of millenia and eons. You have ultraconservative people obstructing thought in every field in every time.

lara
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Science always obscures new thought as it conflicts with seniority.

Load More Replies...
Ana Jesus
Community Member
4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Plate tectonics was only demonstrated in post wwii when submarines started picking up magnetic anomalies along rifts. This brought back Wegner continental drift hypothesis, and then it was 10 years to fully buid and consolidate the model.

View more comments

Bored Panda contacted the creator of Idea Soup Michael McBride to find out more about the project and his love for science. McBride shared that the idea to create videos about some of the things that were discovered only recently was born out of curiosity and interest in science. “I'm fascinated by how science is not an institution, but rather an organic, ever-evolving body of knowledge. The fact that we discovered these things recently is evidence that science is working! The beauty of the field is that it is constantly questioning itself”, shared the creator.

RELATED:
    #2

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    Most women in America couldn’t open a credit card until 1974. But if you think that’s bad, women didn’t get the right to vote in Switzerland until 1991.
     
    Women in Switzerland fought for their right to vote for decades. The first time it was seriously considered was in 1959 when a referendum was held to conclude the matter and the voters, who were only men at the time, decided against giving the right of vote to women by 654,939 votes (66.9%) to 323,727 (33%).
     
    Women continued their protests and after another referendum women got the right to vote in 1971 and Switzerland became one of the last countries in Europe to recognize women as equal members to men in the political sphere.
     
    However, Switzerland consists of 26 cantons and the last canton to give the right to vote was that of Appenzell Innerrhoden and it happened in 1991. This fact means that the whole country of Switzerland provided women with the right to vote only in that year.

    Håkan Dahlström Report

    T.
    Community Member
    4 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Thats not fully correct: It was only the state of Appenzell Innerrhoden that didn't allow women to vote until 1991. The canton was then overruled by the constitutional court after women filed a lawsuit. But we still were freaking late to the party by only introducing it in 1971 - It even had to pass a peoples (men's) voting.

    Andy Acceber
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Some Americans complain about the divorce rate being so high now. It was lower in the 60s, but that happens when you make women captive and completely financially dependant on their spouses. That doesn't mean their home lives were any better.

    Kitty Jordan
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes, precisely. Tellingly, female suicide rates declined by nearly 20% when divorces became easier to obtain. Marriages weren't happier back then; they were just harder to leave. https://www.nber.org/digest/mar04/divorce-laws-and-family-violence

    Load More Replies...
    rekkaplex
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Wow! Woman still can't go for a walk alone at night without being scared of being attacked! 2021!

    Katchen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Have you read The Power by Naomi Alderman? Women all over the world develop the power to electrocute others. The men respond: "Now they will know that they are the ones who should not walk out of their houses alone at night. They are the ones who should be afraid."

    Load More Replies...
    Tracy Wallick
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Marital rape wasn't outlawed in the US until 1993.

    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "After 100 years of feminist struggle, on 7 February 1971 Swiss women won the right to vote and stand for election."

    Leo Domitrix
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Women wren't allowed an independent bank account until after my older sister was born...

    Faith Hurst-Bilinski
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You are only surprised by this if you have a penis.

    Not A Panda
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    1971, get your facts straight.

    Riley Quinn
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I still remember not being able to sign a lease, open a checking account, or get a credit card in my name without a man's co-signature.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #3

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    It took us until 2002 to confirm what was at the center of the Milky Way. We are rotating around a supermassive black hole, but we didn’t know that until after Britney Spears had released her first album.

    John Fowler Report

    Chef Latte
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    …these comparisons are killing me LMAO

    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes, most are just plain wrong, the rest are open to interpretation. When theorized vs. when accepted into general knowledge vs. when proven beyond all doubt.

    Load More Replies...
    Paul Davis
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Thank God for Britney Spears helping us figure that out, then

    Dave P
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That is because they didnt have a space telescope powerful enough to confirm what they knew from Physics from before then

    Robert Martens
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I thought everyone knew it was rich caramel and nougat.

    Scott Rackley
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Kind of misleading, but yet not so...they key word is "confirm". We knew exactly what was at the center.

    Full English
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If you had asked way before this I could have told you it's chocolate-malt nougat

    Verena Abt
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I never understood how people can say: "Oh look, there's the milky way!" How can you see the milky way in the skies as a blurry, white field, if you're actually in the middle of it?

    OmMarol
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Britney Spears released her 3rd album in 2001. Tomorrow is its 20th anniversary

    lara
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I am always impressed when a physicist tells me that he has "confirmed" ANYTHING about physics. My professor of physics said in class one day that the ONLY place that a "law" of physics works is RIGHT HERE ON EARTH. What happens on other planets is open to conjecture and "forget" about other systems, galaxies and don't even think about the "laws" of physics at the center of ANY galaxy.

    Robert T
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    At least we aren't orbitting around Britney Spears' first album, so we should be thankful for that at least!

    Daria B
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Didn't you know? The galaxy is the disc... the CD. And it's her first album. ♡

    Load More Replies...
    View more comments
    #4

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    We didn’t (fully) sequence the human genome until four months ago. We had not mapped one human’s full DNA until May 2021. The Human Genome Project which completed in 2003? Yeah, they were missing 15% of DNA base pairs. Very bold of them to call that complete. That’s like a frat guy in a group project’s version of complete.

    Petra B. Fritz Report

    Chef Latte
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well i mean DNA is insanely complex, so although it is the 2020’s, I’m glad we got this now rather than later

    Joris Rombouts
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The irony in this, is that there are a lot of parts in the DNA with repeating paterns. These simple repeating paterns were the hardest to sequence:)

    Load More Replies...
    Kitty Jordan
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Honest question to anyone who is scientifically inclined: I think it's very neat that we did this, but can someone explain the implications? Like, what sort of things are we hoping to learn or develop from mapping this? (Sorry if that's a stupid question. It's been a long time since science class.)

    Katchen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I have a degree in molecular biology and I work in genomic sequencing: having a map of the genome means you have a reference book for where things go, so if you sequence just a snippet of a patient’s genome (the whole genome is 3,000,000,000 base pairs), you can know what part of the genome you’re looking at, and if there have been rearrangements. The most common sequencing method generates a bunch of short reads (~250 base pairs) that have to be bioinformatically arranged in order, and having a reference genome helps build that order. A common mutation leading to cancer is called a fusion, where two chromosomes are cut in two and stuck back together, like a green and red gummy bear swapping heads.

    Load More Replies...
    Jess Thompson
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I’m guessing COVID accelerated this research.

    Vexorg2
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Nope. It's been going on for years and if anything COVID slowed things down at the very end since everyone was working from home.

    Load More Replies...
    Randy Klefbeck
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Corn has more differential genetic material than humans.

    Rick Desper
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is getting stupid. The vast majority of our DNA is non-coding. And...given each human's DNA is distinct, why would we care about "one human's full DNA"?

    Wei Lee
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ...so what's the problem with an itty-bitty Coronavirus?

    Bill Karp
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    good thing in a way, because it would have been manipulated to the bad sooner.

    lara
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    This is not true.

    lara
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Many people believe that American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick discovered DNA in the 1950s. In reality, this is not the case. Rather, DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher. Then, in the decades following Miescher's discovery, other scientists--notably, Phoebus Levene and Erwin Chargaff--carried out a series of research efforts that revealed additional details about the DNA molecule, including its primary chemical components and the ways in which they joined with one another. Without the scientific foundation provided by these pioneers, Watson and Crick may never have reached their groundbreaking conclusion of 1953: that the DNA molecule exists in the form of a three-dimensional double helix. Nature.com

    Load More Replies...
    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT

    If you’re curious to know the process of making these videos, McBride revealed that it might take from 15 minutes to 10 hours depending on the research that has to be done and the time used for editing. He also added a simple yet effective take on how he creates videos: “I don't really have any process for finding facts—I'm just an incredibly curious person and I love learning. As I come across things, I share them.”

    ADVERTISEMENT
    #5

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    The Heimlich maneuver wasn’t invented until 1974. I mean, this was so recent that Dr. Heimlich was alive until 2016. He could have played Minecraft.

    ocean yamaha Report

    snipergun
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He also used first time his own maneuver only when he was 96 in practice, when he saved female resident in retirement home where he was.

    Rachel Čebra
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "my life's work... it's finally my time to put it into practice !!" though scary, I can imagine he was a little excited !

    Load More Replies...
    Auntriarch
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How do we know that he didn't play Minecraft

    Melanie Kirk
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Heimlich Maneuver, is trademarked, if you make money off teaching it (eg: first aid courses) you have to pay royalties to the Heimlich family. When you take first aid, they call it "abdominal thrusts" or they have to pay

    Lee Macro
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's also no longer called the Heimlich Maneuver anymore. For various reasons, it's now just called abdominal thrusts

    Paul Davis
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It was sure great of Heimlich to copyright that maneuver so that no one is supposed to be able to talk about it without handing him money.

    Jessica Rabbit
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And the doctor that invented it had never actually performed it out of necessity until after it was a wide spread method.

    Perry Schafer
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The Heimlich maneuver is not recommended treatment anymore.

    Thomas Sweda
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It was actually discovered by two guys, you know, just kinda, you know, playing around.

    okpkpkp
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    A lieutenant sitting across from me in a US Army Mess Hall started to choke on our Easter ham. The Padre, a Major, was sitting next to him. I saw the LT waving his arms, hitting the Major in the face. The Padre jumped up, grabbed the LT, and "Heimliched" him. The ham flew out of his mouth and all ended well. This was 1977/78.

    Bonnie Edwards
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Useful information: A video put up by a paramedic recommends, if you're choking and on your own, get on your knees and do a heavy belly flop onto the ground, preferably while tensing your stomach muscles. Obviously not suitable if you're pregnant.

    View more comments
    #6

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    America’s first seatbelt laws were only in 1984 and New Hampshire still doesn’t even have them.

    Mechanic Base Report

    More Thinking Needed
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The 'Live Free Or Die" state. Those New Hampshirites ain't kidding.

    Walter Brameld
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    When it comes to seatbelts, for them it's "Live Free *And* Die".

    Load More Replies...
    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not as if we didn't know they saved lives, just had too many stubborn people refusing to wear the mask...er...seatbelt.

    BorPand8
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Hey, at least New Hampshire has a 77% vaccination rate (at least one dose, 63% with two doses)

    Load More Replies...
    Leo Domitrix
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Federal law, US Title 49, chapter 301, 1968, mandated the installation of seatbelts. In 1984, New York state said, "We can make money ticketing people who don't wear them!" and there we are. Clarifying on this b/c we had seatbelts by law waaaay before 1984.

    Ben Smith
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You had seatbelts, but no law requiring their use.

    Load More Replies...
    Paul Davis
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Remember that when seatbelts were first introduced in most cars in the 1950s people were really angry about the idea they would be required to use them. And many politicians promised they would never be required by law. Spoiler: they became required by law.

    Dave P
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is acutally false. 1984 was the first time they mandated DRIVERS, but children were mandated before. In New Hampshire anyone under 18 must be seat belted, but adults have a choice.

    Chich
    Community Member
    4 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Have seen the results of not wearing a seatbelt several times. Trust me, buckle up.

    Rachel Čebra
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not true... those under 18 must buckle in NH, anyone over 18 has a choice. If they choose to ignore that seatbelts save lives... well, then... they have to deal with the consequences of that choice. Live Free Or Die, baby.

    Seabeast
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I remember one of my male relatives insisting that it was safer to be thrown clear of the vehicle in a crash. Not surprisingly, he's a covid denier/anti-masker/antivaxxer.

    Rod Egret
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Car insurance is not mandatory in NH....

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #7

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    Smoking wasn’t banned on all US flights until the year 2000 and pilots were actually exempt. They can still legally smoke on airplanes today.

    Amaury Laporte Report

    Beta
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Come on chef latte you don’t have to comment on everything

    Muff_Fluff
    Community Member
    4 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    ... but he's funny! Most of the time, at least. Not this time.

    Load More Replies...
    Mistralok
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    A man who has tens of thousands of lives in his hands; works with only a couple of hours of sleep a day... I will gladly flip my Zippo for him!

    Andy Acceber
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Heck, if a pilot needs a cigarette to navigate through a Mid-Atlantic storm, I won't begrudge her one. I still hope airlines will eventually phase out pilot smoking too though.

    JP
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well, to be fair, I don't want my pilot jonesing for a cigarette while he's trying to fly or land the plane!

    Mike Ieva
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If my pilot needs a smoke to take me alive to my destination, I'm more than ok with that :)

    Don't Look
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    No dumbass pilots cannot legally smoke on an airplane. Any airplane, really any pilot (many levels of pilot/certification). Aside from the FAA rules about it, smoking can lend to hypoxia. Now, they might not get arrested or even reprimanded but it is against the FAA mandate to smoke on an airplane and most pilots don’t actually smoke.

    Dave P
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Actually it was banned in the mid 1990s, not 2000, and pilots can only smoke if they are having nicotine withdrawal symptoms and have no nicotine patches around. It is to prevent the plane from crashing

    Demongrrrrl
    Community Member
    Premium
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I remember sitting in the back row of a transatlantic flight, which is where the smokers would cluster (in

    Demongrrrrl
    Community Member
    Premium
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    front of the lavatory. I thought I would die of smoke inhalation.

    Load More Replies...
    Craig Reynolds
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Have you ever seen how stressed and distracted a smoker can get if they don't have access to their cigarettes for an extended period? You do NOT want a stressed and distracted pilot!

    Granny
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What ever that Pilot needs to relax

    View more comments
    #8

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    We didn’t know why the ocean was salty until 1979. We were just like: “Yup, whole planet’s covered in this stuff. No idea where it comes from.”

    Chris Dodds Report

    Chef Latte
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    …I still don’t know why

    Sky Render
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Basically because rocks vs. water is a battle that water always wins in the long run. The motion of the water against rocks wears them down over time, and the eroded material doesn't just vanish; it gets mixed into the water that caused that erosion.

    Load More Replies...
    Paul Werner
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I thought it was salty because nobody waves back at it

    littlesaresare
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The ocean is salty because there is salt in it. Mystery solved.

    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    For what it's worth, water is a universal solvent and there is a heck of a lot of it. Salts abound on earth as well, so seems straightforward enough?

    Rannveig Ess
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The idea that salt was gradually deposited in the sea by rivers was first suggested by the British astronomer Edmond Halley in 1715. https://www.britannica.com/story/why-is-the-ocean-salty

    Anne Nielsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That is a lie - I was taught that in school as a child - in the 1960 ties. My teacher told me that even freshwater contains a very smal amount of salts and minerals (not just NaCl) and it stays, when the water evaporates. We even made experiments.

    Mazer
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    More shenanigans This makes no sense, all sailors knew the oceans were salty, which is one of the reasons ships did not carry much grease water, it was easily tainted by salty ocean spray.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda

    McBride also revealed what is one recently discovered thing that shocked him the most: “The theory of tectonic plates—it blows my mind that we weren't sure how mountains formed or earthquakes occurred until the '60s!”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Which one of these recent discoveries do you find most shocking? Leave your thoughts in the comments down below!

    #9

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    We didn’t know that a meteor killed the dinosaurs until 1991. That’s the same year that Home Alone came out.

    Sadie Hart Report

    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Technically, since no humans witnessed it, no dinosaurs left autobiographical records of their own, and the aliens refuse to share their footage, we still don't KNOW.

    Trillian
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Geological evidence is a whole lot more reliable than human witnesses

    Load More Replies...
    Roxy Eastland
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Seriously, these are just made up. I remember it being in the news in the 70s about the meteor theory. FFS.

    Rannveig Ess
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Every "fact" site I read, and even books (because most parrot the stuff online) have sooo many inaccurate, debunked or false stuff in them.

    Load More Replies...
    Mike Ieva
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The meteor didn't kill ALL the dinosaurs... Many of them evolved into present birds...

    Marina Bailey
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    They mentioned the theory that a meteor killed the dinosaurs in "V" (the first mini-series), which came out in 1984. A person below gives a better explanation about the iridium and whatnot than I ever could.

    Ben Smith
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Home Alone came out in 1990.

    Faith Hurst-Bilinski
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Except that this was taught heavily when I was in middle and high school and I graduated in 1989 so....

    Peter Kovak
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I finished geology in 1986 and, as far as I remember, we were presented the theory of possible meteor that brought the extinction of dinosaurs.

    Debbie Burton
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Really?? We talked about it at Primary school.... late 60s to 70s

    John Meise
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    We still don't know that lol. It's a theory 🙄 ... Pretty sure it's a very solid theory and there's a lot of evidence to support it, but it's still a theory.

    Llama_flower93
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The word theory isn't an alternate use of "idea" in the science world. The theory of relativity isn't just an idea, it's a proven science, but they still call it a theory for some reason.

    Load More Replies...
    Pete Nosal
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm 70 and we learned that in elementary school

    View more comments
    #10

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    We didn’t have wheeled luggage until 1970. Which means that astronauts that went to the moon had to carry their own suitcases.

    Elizabeth Masek Report

    Chef Latte
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Modern Problems require wheels. ALL modern problems

    Muff_Fluff
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Lengthy textbooks annoying you? Run them over! Preferably with an 18-wheeler.

    Load More Replies...
    Robert T
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It wasn't until mass travel where you carried your own suitcase that we decided we needed it - before that the porters would move your luggage - if they were lucky on a trolley or barrow!

    Dave P
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Actually wheeled luggage had been around since the 1700s, it wasn popular until the 1970s. Big difference

    Vicky Z
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes and i read somewhere that they were not popular because mostly men were traveling and didn't think it masculine to have wheels on their luggage... when women started to travel, wheels became popular and more companies started using them

    Load More Replies...
    Andy Acceber
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm pretty sure astronauts didn't carry suitcases, at least not the kinds we usually think of. With everything so planned out for space travel, I doubt they just threw a bunch of personal stuff in a Samsonite and chucked it onboard before the moon launch.

    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "However, around 1954, the Polish/Croatian painter Alfred Joseph Krupa invented a wheeled suitcase..."

    Andrea Kaehlin
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    wrong. Wheeled luggage is much much older. You could find them even on titanic (Which caused problems...) But trolley suitcases arent that old.

    Dale Yule
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Apparently we did. It came out in the US during the 40s, I think. It didn't take off as it was seen as effeminate.

    Harry Holloway
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    astronauts did not have suitcases...

    backatya
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Astronauts didn't have suit cases. It must have been a women who originally wrote the article

    Sergio Bicerra
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Just a couple of years ago I gave our old travelling suitcase to goodwill. It weighted more empty than my full bags today. It was a samsonite with a very very hard cover and a lot of metal.

    View more comments
    #11

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    We didn’t know that babies could feel pain until 1987. When Back to the Future came out, we were not using anesthesia on babies.

    Tamaki Sono Report

    Laurel Eddy
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    we knew. babies cry when they're hurt. apparently we didn't care

    Rissie
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well by your standards babies were not feeling pain because they did use muscle relaxants. No crying there. No, but seriously, dosing and monitoring is hard and was harder then and kept the myth alive that babies wouldn't feel or remember or have any measurable effects of the stress. Just like today. We do a lot of things that cause unnecessary stress while performing medical procedures. Huck the whole US health system is one big stress inducing system. People don't seek help because they will become bankrupt.

    Load More Replies...
    Dave P
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Actually this is 100% False, they knew babies could feel pain hundreds of years ago. The reason why they did not use anesthesia on babies is they didnt know how to properly administer it without killing the baby (With adults it is very tricky with a high error rate, this isnt an exact science). It was in 1987 they finally figured out how to give it to babies WITHOUT KILLING THEM. THe myth about pain came around later, but is not based in any fact

    Anna Banana
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I choose to believe your version, because the other one doesn't make sense. Why would somebody even posit it as a theory randomly? We all know that humans can feel pain, what sort of mental gymnastics would you even have to engage in to decide that there is a certain age when that might not be true anymore, even though it is true for all the other ages?

    Load More Replies...
    Jo Johannsen
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "We" (the Establishment) might not have admitted to knowing, but every mother in history knew her baby felt pain. However, as today, she was considered a silly, hysterical female.

    Seabeast
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well, there are still doctors who mistakenly believe that a woman's cervix has no nerve endings and can't feel pain, so I'm surprised that they relented on babies.

    Jess Thompson
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think the actual premise was “they won’t remember the pain”. Now, however, we know past trauma can show up later in life in a variety of different manifestations, whether the trauma is Remembered or not. Scary s**t.

    Beth Arriaga
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And THIS is why I did not get my two sons circumcised. Doctor said 'babies don't feel pain like we do' and also that it would only take a few moments. Ugh, you do it to yourself first, then circle back Doc.

    Pooja San
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well circumcision is just unnecessary 🙄 for anyone, except when having medical issues like gangrene etc which can't be treated with medication. I didn't circumcise my daughter. People don't do that nowadays right? I really hope so...

    Load More Replies...
    Martha Meyer
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why on earth would anyone even assume that babies can't feel pain? It makes absolutely no sense.

    Elizabeth Butler
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Also many assume animals don't feel pain. How can they be so blind??????????

    Load More Replies...
    Donkey boi
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    No.... It would be more accurate to say 'For a short time we believed babies couldn't feel pain.' People largely believed that infants were more sensitive to pain than adults, for centuries! The change of opinion was all the fault of one woman, Myrtle McGraw! After the development of anaesthesia it was readily given to children and infants in the 1940's. The problem was that the risk to the patient was VERY high and death or brain damage was extremely common. Most surgeons did not want to risk the patients life for simple procedures, so searched for an answer. Along comes Dr McGraw, she stuck pins in babies and because some didn't cry, that meant that babies didn't feel pain (and the shocked/surprised look apparently wasn't related either). Everyone was happy to accept her answer because she was a renowned child psychologist.

    Joanna Werman
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That is nuts. If you pinch a baby they cry. Not that I've done it. Would slicing into them without anesthesia, no problem. Nuts

    Marcellus II
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It is nuts, it is a made-up item. Just this week it appeared (correctly) in another BP list: In 1987, the US college of surgeons forbade operating on babies without anaesthetics... Up to then, many surgeons assessed the balance of risk/reward to not using anaesthetics, because of the significant chance of overdosing and killing the baby (low chance of reviving when anything goes wrong).

    Load More Replies...
    Mazer
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    We did know, doctors just rationalized it

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #12

    Things-Discovered-More-Recently-Than-You Think

    We didn’t know how anesthesia worked until 2020. We were just ragdolling people into unconsciousness with no idea how it actually worked.

    Thirteen Of Clubs Report

    Corey Smith
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well, that's just not true. Maybe mechanisms for some few general anesthetics remain to be fully described, but we certainly knew how many of them work and we also knew very well how most of the locals work.

    Rissie
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The effects were known, the understanding of the actual interaction of the drugs was not. And for that matter, understanding what that interaction does on any other level is unknown now. We observe and we try to understand. It's how we roll.

    Load More Replies...
    Dave P
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not true, we have peer reviewed scientific studies from the 1930s. And actually we knew how it worked due to Nazi Experiments on Jews, and they have a lot of info from that. But we knew for years.

    Chef Latte
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    WAIT WE ACTUALLY LEARNED HOW IT WORKED BRUH IVE BEEN TOLD THAT IT STILL WASN’T FIGURED OUT

    Sasha
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well to be fair this is true for almost all medicine. We have some vague general idea how it works but its no where fully understood. Even mega common stuff like the ibuprofen you buy over the counter, we dont know all the exact mechanisms of action. The common "mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell" joke i always found extra funny. There were all these diagrams in my hs textbooks, then i went to uni for biology. I was asking specific questions about the atp cycle in class, and the teacher pretty much agreed that while we get how the major steps of the cycle work, when it comes to the smaller individual molecular steps we often have no clue. We kinda get what is happening, but HOW its happening? No f*****g clue. Heck this might sound really funny, but we only recently fully understood the mechanism behind how your washing machine washes your clothes (its true, look it up)

    Jen Perea
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That is a gross exaggeration.

    Muff_Fluff
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So how does it work? I didn't think we knew how it worked yet, must have been dated information.

    Corey Smith
    Community Member
    4 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Lidocaine blocks Na+ channels. Isoflurane blocks glutamate receptors. Propofol activates GABA receptors. Morphine activates delta-opioid receptors and on and on and on. Some have off-target effects but we know how most anesthetics work. And it was NOT since 2020. *waits for vaccine misinformation on BP too

    Load More Replies...
    Beta
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I trusted you doctors!

    Loz
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Here's an accessible reference - I also thought we still didn't know https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/scientists-unravel-the-mystery-of-anesthesia

    Loz
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/scientists-unravel-the-mystery-of-anesthesia

    Daniele Ribolla
    Community Member
    4 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    it seems a weird statement to me... 🙄

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda