Guy Reveals 12 Things That A Lot Of People Thought Happened Years Ago, But Are In Fact More Recent
InterviewWith people being constantly busy, things changing every day, and various events happening all the time, time flies super fast. So sometimes it might seem that some of the things that we just witnessed or experienced happened a long time ago. And it turns out that the same logic can be applied to some of the greatest inventions and concepts that we know today.
This TikTok account called @idea.soup decided to share some of the things that only were discovered recently even though we might think that they are quite old and have been here for ages.
Idea Soup is where people can find interesting educational content on various topics. Its creator Michael R McBride is the one who makes and shares this content with people on various social media platforms.
More Info: TikTok

Image source: idea.soup
This post may include affiliate links.
We didn’t know how mountains formed until 1966. And not just mountains, earthquakes and volcanoes too. Like we were putting men into space and yet every time there was an earthquake, we were just like “What the hell is going on?”
Yes, we did know. We just didn't know how to prove it until the late '60s. Alfred Wegener proposed the theory in the early 20th century (1912 if I'm not mistaken).
Just looked it up, was ~1915. His hypothesis now considered disproved but he was in the ballpark.
Load More Replies...Tectonic plate theory and such were much older. Mass acceptance and education, not so much.
Not really. Plate Tectonics was first proposed in the 1960s. Continental Drift is older - ~1920s - and the first concept that the continents had moved dates to the 1500s, but without any real understanding of the process. As for mass acceptance, by the time I took my 1st geology class (1975), Plate Tectonics was pretty much fully accepted. There were holdouts, but the vast majority of geologists understood that PT was the best explanation for what we saw.
Load More Replies...Geologists had formed theorems about how geological events created certain phenomenon. "Plate tectonics is a scientific theory that explains how major landforms are created as a result of Earth’s subterranean movements. The theory, which solidified in the 1960s, transformed the earth sciences by explaining many phenomena, including mountain building events, volcanoes, and earthquakes." National Geographic Up until then some scientists considered mountains to be "bubbles" of earth. However, "Developed from the 1950s to the 1970s, the theory of plate tectonics is the modern update to continental drift, an idea first proposed by scientist Alfred Wegener in 1912 which stated that Earth's continents had "drifted" across the planet over time.May 26, 2021" Live Science.com
Load More Replies...Actually, the USGS started their earthquake research in 1906, and Leopold von Buch theorized about volcanoes and how mountains were formed in the 19th century,
I call BS on this one, at least in the language. The theory of plate tectonics was first postulated in 1912, however, it did take almost 50 years for it to be accepted. Volcanology as a science has been around since the 19 century and has been pretty spot on with the theories, though technology didn't exist to prove it (crust, mohorovicic layer, mantle, core, etc.) until the mid 20th century.
Plate Tectonics was proposed in the 1960s, but the concept of Continental Drift (not the same thing) was much earlier.
Load More Replies...I undertand plate tectonic theory was around for a long time but it was extremely hard to get it accepted by the bulk of scientists who could not get away from their largely religiously-oriented theories of a static Earth. I remember it was still "controversial" even into the 1970s. Just as, later, it came to be that we were finding evidence of a lot of catastrophic geologic events suddenly changing landscapes, and it had to slowly battle its way against the geologists who insisted that all real geological change is extremely slow over periods of millenia and eons. You have ultraconservative people obstructing thought in every field in every time.
Science always obscures new thought as it conflicts with seniority.
Load More Replies...Bored Panda contacted the creator of Idea Soup Michael McBride to find out more about the project and his love for science. McBride shared that the idea to create videos about some of the things that were discovered only recently was born out of curiosity and interest in science. “I'm fascinated by how science is not an institution, but rather an organic, ever-evolving body of knowledge. The fact that we discovered these things recently is evidence that science is working! The beauty of the field is that it is constantly questioning itself”, shared the creator.
Most women in America couldn’t open a credit card until 1974. But if you think that’s bad, women didn’t get the right to vote in Switzerland until 1991.
Women in Switzerland fought for their right to vote for decades. The first time it was seriously considered was in 1959 when a referendum was held to conclude the matter and the voters, who were only men at the time, decided against giving the right of vote to women by 654,939 votes (66.9%) to 323,727 (33%).
Women continued their protests and after another referendum women got the right to vote in 1971 and Switzerland became one of the last countries in Europe to recognize women as equal members to men in the political sphere.
However, Switzerland consists of 26 cantons and the last canton to give the right to vote was that of Appenzell Innerrhoden and it happened in 1991. This fact means that the whole country of Switzerland provided women with the right to vote only in that year.
Thats not fully correct: It was only the state of Appenzell Innerrhoden that didn't allow women to vote until 1991. The canton was then overruled by the constitutional court after women filed a lawsuit. But we still were freaking late to the party by only introducing it in 1971 - It even had to pass a peoples (men's) voting.
Some Americans complain about the divorce rate being so high now. It was lower in the 60s, but that happens when you make women captive and completely financially dependant on their spouses. That doesn't mean their home lives were any better.
Yes, precisely. Tellingly, female suicide rates declined by nearly 20% when divorces became easier to obtain. Marriages weren't happier back then; they were just harder to leave. https://www.nber.org/digest/mar04/divorce-laws-and-family-violence
Load More Replies...Wow! Woman still can't go for a walk alone at night without being scared of being attacked! 2021!
Have you read The Power by Naomi Alderman? Women all over the world develop the power to electrocute others. The men respond: "Now they will know that they are the ones who should not walk out of their houses alone at night. They are the ones who should be afraid."
Load More Replies..."After 100 years of feminist struggle, on 7 February 1971 Swiss women won the right to vote and stand for election."
Women wren't allowed an independent bank account until after my older sister was born...
I still remember not being able to sign a lease, open a checking account, or get a credit card in my name without a man's co-signature.
It took us until 2002 to confirm what was at the center of the Milky Way. We are rotating around a supermassive black hole, but we didn’t know that until after Britney Spears had released her first album.
Yes, most are just plain wrong, the rest are open to interpretation. When theorized vs. when accepted into general knowledge vs. when proven beyond all doubt.
Load More Replies...Kind of misleading, but yet not so...they key word is "confirm". We knew exactly what was at the center.
If you had asked way before this I could have told you it's chocolate-malt nougat
I never understood how people can say: "Oh look, there's the milky way!" How can you see the milky way in the skies as a blurry, white field, if you're actually in the middle of it?
I am always impressed when a physicist tells me that he has "confirmed" ANYTHING about physics. My professor of physics said in class one day that the ONLY place that a "law" of physics works is RIGHT HERE ON EARTH. What happens on other planets is open to conjecture and "forget" about other systems, galaxies and don't even think about the "laws" of physics at the center of ANY galaxy.
At least we aren't orbitting around Britney Spears' first album, so we should be thankful for that at least!
Didn't you know? The galaxy is the disc... the CD. And it's her first album. ♡
Load More Replies...We didn’t (fully) sequence the human genome until four months ago. We had not mapped one human’s full DNA until May 2021. The Human Genome Project which completed in 2003? Yeah, they were missing 15% of DNA base pairs. Very bold of them to call that complete. That’s like a frat guy in a group project’s version of complete.
Well i mean DNA is insanely complex, so although it is the 2020’s, I’m glad we got this now rather than later
The irony in this, is that there are a lot of parts in the DNA with repeating paterns. These simple repeating paterns were the hardest to sequence:)
Load More Replies...Honest question to anyone who is scientifically inclined: I think it's very neat that we did this, but can someone explain the implications? Like, what sort of things are we hoping to learn or develop from mapping this? (Sorry if that's a stupid question. It's been a long time since science class.)
I have a degree in molecular biology and I work in genomic sequencing: having a map of the genome means you have a reference book for where things go, so if you sequence just a snippet of a patient’s genome (the whole genome is 3,000,000,000 base pairs), you can know what part of the genome you’re looking at, and if there have been rearrangements. The most common sequencing method generates a bunch of short reads (~250 base pairs) that have to be bioinformatically arranged in order, and having a reference genome helps build that order. A common mutation leading to cancer is called a fusion, where two chromosomes are cut in two and stuck back together, like a green and red gummy bear swapping heads.
Load More Replies...Nope. It's been going on for years and if anything COVID slowed things down at the very end since everyone was working from home.
Load More Replies...This is getting stupid. The vast majority of our DNA is non-coding. And...given each human's DNA is distinct, why would we care about "one human's full DNA"?
Many people believe that American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick discovered DNA in the 1950s. In reality, this is not the case. Rather, DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher. Then, in the decades following Miescher's discovery, other scientists--notably, Phoebus Levene and Erwin Chargaff--carried out a series of research efforts that revealed additional details about the DNA molecule, including its primary chemical components and the ways in which they joined with one another. Without the scientific foundation provided by these pioneers, Watson and Crick may never have reached their groundbreaking conclusion of 1953: that the DNA molecule exists in the form of a three-dimensional double helix. Nature.com
Load More Replies...If you’re curious to know the process of making these videos, McBride revealed that it might take from 15 minutes to 10 hours depending on the research that has to be done and the time used for editing. He also added a simple yet effective take on how he creates videos: “I don't really have any process for finding facts—I'm just an incredibly curious person and I love learning. As I come across things, I share them.”
The Heimlich maneuver wasn’t invented until 1974. I mean, this was so recent that Dr. Heimlich was alive until 2016. He could have played Minecraft.
He also used first time his own maneuver only when he was 96 in practice, when he saved female resident in retirement home where he was.
"my life's work... it's finally my time to put it into practice !!" though scary, I can imagine he was a little excited !
Load More Replies...Heimlich Maneuver, is trademarked, if you make money off teaching it (eg: first aid courses) you have to pay royalties to the Heimlich family. When you take first aid, they call it "abdominal thrusts" or they have to pay
It's also no longer called the Heimlich Maneuver anymore. For various reasons, it's now just called abdominal thrusts
It was sure great of Heimlich to copyright that maneuver so that no one is supposed to be able to talk about it without handing him money.
And the doctor that invented it had never actually performed it out of necessity until after it was a wide spread method.
It was actually discovered by two guys, you know, just kinda, you know, playing around.
A lieutenant sitting across from me in a US Army Mess Hall started to choke on our Easter ham. The Padre, a Major, was sitting next to him. I saw the LT waving his arms, hitting the Major in the face. The Padre jumped up, grabbed the LT, and "Heimliched" him. The ham flew out of his mouth and all ended well. This was 1977/78.
Useful information: A video put up by a paramedic recommends, if you're choking and on your own, get on your knees and do a heavy belly flop onto the ground, preferably while tensing your stomach muscles. Obviously not suitable if you're pregnant.
America’s first seatbelt laws were only in 1984 and New Hampshire still doesn’t even have them.
The 'Live Free Or Die" state. Those New Hampshirites ain't kidding.
When it comes to seatbelts, for them it's "Live Free *And* Die".
Load More Replies...Not as if we didn't know they saved lives, just had too many stubborn people refusing to wear the mask...er...seatbelt.
Hey, at least New Hampshire has a 77% vaccination rate (at least one dose, 63% with two doses)
Load More Replies...Federal law, US Title 49, chapter 301, 1968, mandated the installation of seatbelts. In 1984, New York state said, "We can make money ticketing people who don't wear them!" and there we are. Clarifying on this b/c we had seatbelts by law waaaay before 1984.
Remember that when seatbelts were first introduced in most cars in the 1950s people were really angry about the idea they would be required to use them. And many politicians promised they would never be required by law. Spoiler: they became required by law.
This is acutally false. 1984 was the first time they mandated DRIVERS, but children were mandated before. In New Hampshire anyone under 18 must be seat belted, but adults have a choice.
Not true... those under 18 must buckle in NH, anyone over 18 has a choice. If they choose to ignore that seatbelts save lives... well, then... they have to deal with the consequences of that choice. Live Free Or Die, baby.
Smoking wasn’t banned on all US flights until the year 2000 and pilots were actually exempt. They can still legally smoke on airplanes today.
... but he's funny! Most of the time, at least. Not this time.
Load More Replies...A man who has tens of thousands of lives in his hands; works with only a couple of hours of sleep a day... I will gladly flip my Zippo for him!
Heck, if a pilot needs a cigarette to navigate through a Mid-Atlantic storm, I won't begrudge her one. I still hope airlines will eventually phase out pilot smoking too though.
No dumbass pilots cannot legally smoke on an airplane. Any airplane, really any pilot (many levels of pilot/certification). Aside from the FAA rules about it, smoking can lend to hypoxia. Now, they might not get arrested or even reprimanded but it is against the FAA mandate to smoke on an airplane and most pilots don’t actually smoke.
I remember sitting in the back row of a transatlantic flight, which is where the smokers would cluster (in
front of the lavatory. I thought I would die of smoke inhalation.
Load More Replies...Have you ever seen how stressed and distracted a smoker can get if they don't have access to their cigarettes for an extended period? You do NOT want a stressed and distracted pilot!
We didn’t know why the ocean was salty until 1979. We were just like: “Yup, whole planet’s covered in this stuff. No idea where it comes from.”
Basically because rocks vs. water is a battle that water always wins in the long run. The motion of the water against rocks wears them down over time, and the eroded material doesn't just vanish; it gets mixed into the water that caused that erosion.
Load More Replies...For what it's worth, water is a universal solvent and there is a heck of a lot of it. Salts abound on earth as well, so seems straightforward enough?
The idea that salt was gradually deposited in the sea by rivers was first suggested by the British astronomer Edmond Halley in 1715. https://www.britannica.com/story/why-is-the-ocean-salty
That is a lie - I was taught that in school as a child - in the 1960 ties. My teacher told me that even freshwater contains a very smal amount of salts and minerals (not just NaCl) and it stays, when the water evaporates. We even made experiments.
McBride also revealed what is one recently discovered thing that shocked him the most: “The theory of tectonic plates—it blows my mind that we weren't sure how mountains formed or earthquakes occurred until the '60s!”
Which one of these recent discoveries do you find most shocking? Leave your thoughts in the comments down below!
We didn’t know that a meteor killed the dinosaurs until 1991. That’s the same year that Home Alone came out.
Technically, since no humans witnessed it, no dinosaurs left autobiographical records of their own, and the aliens refuse to share their footage, we still don't KNOW.
Geological evidence is a whole lot more reliable than human witnesses
Load More Replies...Seriously, these are just made up. I remember it being in the news in the 70s about the meteor theory. FFS.
Every "fact" site I read, and even books (because most parrot the stuff online) have sooo many inaccurate, debunked or false stuff in them.
Load More Replies...They mentioned the theory that a meteor killed the dinosaurs in "V" (the first mini-series), which came out in 1984. A person below gives a better explanation about the iridium and whatnot than I ever could.
Except that this was taught heavily when I was in middle and high school and I graduated in 1989 so....
I finished geology in 1986 and, as far as I remember, we were presented the theory of possible meteor that brought the extinction of dinosaurs.
We still don't know that lol. It's a theory 🙄 ... Pretty sure it's a very solid theory and there's a lot of evidence to support it, but it's still a theory.
The word theory isn't an alternate use of "idea" in the science world. The theory of relativity isn't just an idea, it's a proven science, but they still call it a theory for some reason.
Load More Replies...We didn’t have wheeled luggage until 1970. Which means that astronauts that went to the moon had to carry their own suitcases.
Lengthy textbooks annoying you? Run them over! Preferably with an 18-wheeler.
Load More Replies...Actually wheeled luggage had been around since the 1700s, it wasn popular until the 1970s. Big difference
Yes and i read somewhere that they were not popular because mostly men were traveling and didn't think it masculine to have wheels on their luggage... when women started to travel, wheels became popular and more companies started using them
Load More Replies...I'm pretty sure astronauts didn't carry suitcases, at least not the kinds we usually think of. With everything so planned out for space travel, I doubt they just threw a bunch of personal stuff in a Samsonite and chucked it onboard before the moon launch.
"However, around 1954, the Polish/Croatian painter Alfred Joseph Krupa invented a wheeled suitcase..."
wrong. Wheeled luggage is much much older. You could find them even on titanic (Which caused problems...) But trolley suitcases arent that old.
Just a couple of years ago I gave our old travelling suitcase to goodwill. It weighted more empty than my full bags today. It was a samsonite with a very very hard cover and a lot of metal.
We didn’t know that babies could feel pain until 1987. When Back to the Future came out, we were not using anesthesia on babies.
Well by your standards babies were not feeling pain because they did use muscle relaxants. No crying there. No, but seriously, dosing and monitoring is hard and was harder then and kept the myth alive that babies wouldn't feel or remember or have any measurable effects of the stress. Just like today. We do a lot of things that cause unnecessary stress while performing medical procedures. Huck the whole US health system is one big stress inducing system. People don't seek help because they will become bankrupt.
Load More Replies...Actually this is 100% False, they knew babies could feel pain hundreds of years ago. The reason why they did not use anesthesia on babies is they didnt know how to properly administer it without killing the baby (With adults it is very tricky with a high error rate, this isnt an exact science). It was in 1987 they finally figured out how to give it to babies WITHOUT KILLING THEM. THe myth about pain came around later, but is not based in any fact
I choose to believe your version, because the other one doesn't make sense. Why would somebody even posit it as a theory randomly? We all know that humans can feel pain, what sort of mental gymnastics would you even have to engage in to decide that there is a certain age when that might not be true anymore, even though it is true for all the other ages?
Load More Replies..."We" (the Establishment) might not have admitted to knowing, but every mother in history knew her baby felt pain. However, as today, she was considered a silly, hysterical female.
I think the actual premise was “they won’t remember the pain”. Now, however, we know past trauma can show up later in life in a variety of different manifestations, whether the trauma is Remembered or not. Scary s**t.
And THIS is why I did not get my two sons circumcised. Doctor said 'babies don't feel pain like we do' and also that it would only take a few moments. Ugh, you do it to yourself first, then circle back Doc.
Well circumcision is just unnecessary 🙄 for anyone, except when having medical issues like gangrene etc which can't be treated with medication. I didn't circumcise my daughter. People don't do that nowadays right? I really hope so...
Load More Replies...Why on earth would anyone even assume that babies can't feel pain? It makes absolutely no sense.
Also many assume animals don't feel pain. How can they be so blind??????????
Load More Replies...No.... It would be more accurate to say 'For a short time we believed babies couldn't feel pain.' People largely believed that infants were more sensitive to pain than adults, for centuries! The change of opinion was all the fault of one woman, Myrtle McGraw! After the development of anaesthesia it was readily given to children and infants in the 1940's. The problem was that the risk to the patient was VERY high and death or brain damage was extremely common. Most surgeons did not want to risk the patients life for simple procedures, so searched for an answer. Along comes Dr McGraw, she stuck pins in babies and because some didn't cry, that meant that babies didn't feel pain (and the shocked/surprised look apparently wasn't related either). Everyone was happy to accept her answer because she was a renowned child psychologist.
That is nuts. If you pinch a baby they cry. Not that I've done it. Would slicing into them without anesthesia, no problem. Nuts
It is nuts, it is a made-up item. Just this week it appeared (correctly) in another BP list: In 1987, the US college of surgeons forbade operating on babies without anaesthetics... Up to then, many surgeons assessed the balance of risk/reward to not using anaesthetics, because of the significant chance of overdosing and killing the baby (low chance of reviving when anything goes wrong).
Load More Replies...We didn’t know how anesthesia worked until 2020. We were just ragdolling people into unconsciousness with no idea how it actually worked.
Well, that's just not true. Maybe mechanisms for some few general anesthetics remain to be fully described, but we certainly knew how many of them work and we also knew very well how most of the locals work.
The effects were known, the understanding of the actual interaction of the drugs was not. And for that matter, understanding what that interaction does on any other level is unknown now. We observe and we try to understand. It's how we roll.
Load More Replies...Not true, we have peer reviewed scientific studies from the 1930s. And actually we knew how it worked due to Nazi Experiments on Jews, and they have a lot of info from that. But we knew for years.
WAIT WE ACTUALLY LEARNED HOW IT WORKED BRUH IVE BEEN TOLD THAT IT STILL WASN’T FIGURED OUT
Well to be fair this is true for almost all medicine. We have some vague general idea how it works but its no where fully understood. Even mega common stuff like the ibuprofen you buy over the counter, we dont know all the exact mechanisms of action. The common "mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell" joke i always found extra funny. There were all these diagrams in my hs textbooks, then i went to uni for biology. I was asking specific questions about the atp cycle in class, and the teacher pretty much agreed that while we get how the major steps of the cycle work, when it comes to the smaller individual molecular steps we often have no clue. We kinda get what is happening, but HOW its happening? No f*****g clue. Heck this might sound really funny, but we only recently fully understood the mechanism behind how your washing machine washes your clothes (its true, look it up)
So how does it work? I didn't think we knew how it worked yet, must have been dated information.
Lidocaine blocks Na+ channels. Isoflurane blocks glutamate receptors. Propofol activates GABA receptors. Morphine activates delta-opioid receptors and on and on and on. Some have off-target effects but we know how most anesthetics work. And it was NOT since 2020. *waits for vaccine misinformation on BP too
Load More Replies...BP, you're slipping. Just having followers does not mean this guy knows what he's talking about. Most of his bits of "knowledge" are verifiably false, a few more are very loose interpretations of the historical timeline, and only a couple don't scream "fake news".
"BP, you're slipping." They are and always were the s**t-post re-post. Their policies and procedures consist entirely of "Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V". Political bias is their religion. Get real.
Load More Replies...We didn't know until 2009 that Pandas could be Bored, until it was discovered by a Lithuanian man.
Basic fact checking out the window....no wonder our kids believe any crap on the Internet now!
Kids? Do you you know how many old people fall for fake news online?
Load More Replies...What was the point of this? The guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
So we can see the guy make bizarre faces and show us he has 2 pairs of ugly glasses? Soooooo much out there that isn't tikTok or FB or old Reddit or sites full of garbage that no one's posted on for 4 years.
Load More Replies...Uhg, I have and it reminds of seeing a college freshman come out a semesters worth of psych 101 talking like they just graduated with that degree.
Load More Replies...BP, you're slipping. Just having followers does not mean this guy knows what he's talking about. Most of his bits of "knowledge" are verifiably false, a few more are very loose interpretations of the historical timeline, and only a couple don't scream "fake news".
"BP, you're slipping." They are and always were the s**t-post re-post. Their policies and procedures consist entirely of "Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V". Political bias is their religion. Get real.
Load More Replies...We didn't know until 2009 that Pandas could be Bored, until it was discovered by a Lithuanian man.
Basic fact checking out the window....no wonder our kids believe any crap on the Internet now!
Kids? Do you you know how many old people fall for fake news online?
Load More Replies...What was the point of this? The guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
So we can see the guy make bizarre faces and show us he has 2 pairs of ugly glasses? Soooooo much out there that isn't tikTok or FB or old Reddit or sites full of garbage that no one's posted on for 4 years.
Load More Replies...Uhg, I have and it reminds of seeing a college freshman come out a semesters worth of psych 101 talking like they just graduated with that degree.
Load More Replies...
