Eastern Europeans have quite un-European looking ancestors. The oldest remains of a modern European, that were discovered in 2002, in the ”Peștera cu Oase” site, in Romania, paint the portrait of a dark-skinned Romanian, with a wide nose and fleshy lower lip, but most strikingly, with Mongolian eyes. The stereotype of the ivory-skinned, fair-haired, brown-eyed inhabitant is rather new for the Western European too. Britain's oldest complete human skeleton, for example, the famed Cheddar Man, had the genetic markers of a person living in the Near East or the Pontic steppe. He most probably had dark, curly/wavy hair, blue eyes and dark to very dark skin, a portrait researchers think is the result of immigration.

Archaeologists may differ in their interpretations of the findings, but the issue at stake remains: is our assumption of biological perpetuity enough to secure our ideals of ethnic continuity upon a certain region? What if our biological perpetuity is not exactly accurate? Would it hurt our national identity? Would it damage our appraisal of the sinuous, oftentimes sacrificial ways in which our ancestors laid the foundations of our current civilization? Would our ancestors' skin color alter our need to connect with them? Would we still look at our immigrant forefathers like we were to stare threat directly in the eye? Then why are so afraid of immigrants today?

Through my visuals, I challenge our perceptions by confronting our negative prejudices with their positive twin. Why not imagine the least cherished members of a certain society – its non-citizens – like they were its most prized nobility? My project invites us to honestly consider how would history differ if both royals and refugees were to be stripped of their privilege and stigma, down to their human core, and then made to exchange places. And from an image to another, a clearer answer starts to emerge. It speaks of empathy, of authentic knowledge, of humbleness and of other-centeredness. It alludes to reclaiming the educational value of history and allowing it to teach us how to treat vulnerable populations with dignity.

Some of our highest ranking historical figures would act out despicable character traits and still manage to secure a place in history. At the same time though, some of the most enriching modern thinkers such as Albert Einstein, Henry Kissinger, Hannah Arendt, share in common a lesser known fact that they were once refugees.

Assuming they were only laudable exceptions to the refugee community and continuing to favor the negative prejudices describing asylum seekers inevitably leads to an insidious calculation: should a person act/be a certain way in order to be worthy of receiving help exactly when they need it most? How would they need to look, what should their attire be? Should their skin glow a certain tone? Should they all be bright? Cultured? Skilled? Ambitious? Should they show no sign of mental distress despite their critical situation? What makes one qualified to receiving support? As cynical as these questions may sound, they are simply an expression of the utilitarian principle overarching Europeans' reluctance towards refugees at the peak of what came to be known as a crisis.

A project co-financed by AFCN.

The project does not necessarily represent the official position of the Administration of the National Cultural Fund. AFCN shall not be held liable for the project's content or any use to which the project outcome might be put. These are the sole responsibility of the beneficiary of the funding.