Never mind that english is my second language, my third is latin and that helped a lot.

19/21. But hey, as a third language I learned not too bad. Probably much better then I would have done with the first language I learned.

18/21 - not bad for a 14 yr old

Cactus is an acceptable plural of cactus.

I stopped on question 1. “Fish” has two acceptable plurals: “fish” and “fishes”. They’re not fully interchangeable—their usage is slightly different—but there is overlap. So both should be marked as correct answers. Don’t make a tricky language quiz if you’re not prepared to research every question and answer to make sure you’re not overlooking something.

15/21 with english as second language, I would say not to bad... but having basic knowledge in latin helped me more than english in this scenario ^^

#9 THAT'S A RAT! I love how often this happens. n4scgse21i...890700.jpg

hmm generally the singular and plural being the same implies a mass noun/substance, whereas the -es ending implies a count noun or creature/entity. Fish (substance/food); fishes (animals), and 'many fish' (animals) ... vs "a lot of fish" (substance or animals)... Same for tuna. Tuna (food), tunas (animals alive still)... etc.

Ahhhh criteria got me! That's the only one I missed haha

Given sheep, fishes and rooves have changed rules recently, I'll pass.

Both cacti and cactuses are grammatically correct plural forms of cactus.

#9 is wrong. Mice IS the correct plural of mouse.

I just missed the last question. I don't think I've ever had more than one "criteria" at a time.

The first one is stupid. WTF is an "everyday plural"? And then the explanation says "fishes" is also correct!

To quote *"Loaves and fishes" is a reference to a biblical story in which Jesus fed a crowd using loaves of bread and fish*