Platonic Best Friends Marry Each Other To Raise A Family Together – Spark A Discussion Over Marriage
According to Stephanie Coontz, who teaches history and family studies at the Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash., the idea of love as a primary reason for marriage began to spread in the late 18th century and early 19th century, partly due to the French and American revolutions.
Brought to us by the enlightenment thinkers, the “right to personal happiness” has set its roots in western society and now romantic unions have become the ideal.
But not all partnerships are like that. Recently, TikTok user Jay Guercio released a video, explaining the relationship she’s in herself; Guercio calls it a platonic marriage, a legal union based on spiritual connection or practical love, rather than on sexual or romantic love.
Image credits: thelovelyjaybird
@thelovelyjaybird#stitch with @izacabela @kayem332 platonic relationships are just as valid as romantic ones. #marriage #platoniccouple #bestfriends #raisingkids #fyp♬ original sound – Jay Guercio
Here’s a transcript of the video
Image credits: thelovelyjaybird
The notion that a couple would marry out of love was considered almost anti-social and subversive in many civilizations. Parents would even disown their kids for doing it. “The Greeks thought lovesickness was a type of insanity, a view that was adopted by medieval commentators in Europe. In the Middle Ages, the French defined love as a ‘derangement of the mind’ that could be cured by sexual intercourse, either with the loved one or with a different partner,” Coontz writes in her 2005 book, Marriage, A History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage.
The main reasons couples wed were to make political alliances, to raise capital, to expand the workforce, and for a whole array of other purposes.
“Too much love was thought to be a real threat to the institution of marriage,” Coontz explained in an interview. “Earlier proponents of marriage were as horrified by the idea of a love match as late 20th-century people were by (the) idea of same-sex marriage.”
So Guercio and her wife Krystle’s arrangement isn’t anything new. Furthermore, marriage is a voluntary, legal union of a couple as spouses. They tie the knot because they want to, and the law says nothing about it being sexual or not.
Image credits: thelovelyjaybird
Relationship expert Amie Leadingham told Brides that different couples enter a platonic commitment for different reasons. “Some people may not want to get married to a romantic partner,” Leadingham said. “They want stability with a partner they trust and more flexibility in their lives. I think this is a great solution for those that fall into that category. Having someone that has your back and you can trust is a wonderful feeling.”
Co-parenting aside, some practical reasons for a platonic relationship could be that people think they could take care of each other into old age or split their expenses better. They can file taxes together, be considered next of kin if medical problems arise and if things don’t work out, they can divorce like any other married couple. “I believe everyone should have their choice in how they want their marriage to be,” Leadingham added.
Here’s what people said after hearing Jay’s story
74Kviews
Share on FacebookThis is awesome. I'm not gonna go into their dating other people because I feel like that's a dynamic they need to have discussed. I am however a huge fan of the idea. Family is about love and support...once you have that...that's it. Even the kids, are they loved and supported? Yes, well then it's a family. There are traditional families out there that meet the traditional criteria but fail at both love and support.
To realize that I am not alone in desiring something like this is very enlightening. For years (I am 50+, grandma, married once for 7 years, single for 18 years now) I have said that I would love to "marry" one of my closest friends. I want the one-on-one social, familial and partner intimacy but -- because I am not sexually attracted to the same gender -- not the sexual intimacy. Everyone has always looked at me as if I am completely off my rocker. I am envious.
This is wonderful. I believe that there shouldn't be a limit of who can go into an oficial commited relationship. Why making it only for romantic partners? For example my two grandaunts are 92 and 91 and have lived together their entire lives. They even share bedroom. How are they less of a couple than me and my partner who love each other but have been togheter "just" for 7 years? When i registered with my partner as "samenwonen" (living together) the belgian police even came to our home to see if we lived in the same house an even shared bedroom. (They only do that to couples with an immigrant person) I have colleagues that even had their wardrobes inspected to see if their clothes were in the same room. Why cannot I sleep in a different bedroom? Why my aunts cannot be a couple just because they dont have sex together? Its absurd
that's outrageous, the government shouldn't have that sort of intrusive control over what people do in their own homes. :(
Load More Replies...This is awesome. I'm not gonna go into their dating other people because I feel like that's a dynamic they need to have discussed. I am however a huge fan of the idea. Family is about love and support...once you have that...that's it. Even the kids, are they loved and supported? Yes, well then it's a family. There are traditional families out there that meet the traditional criteria but fail at both love and support.
To realize that I am not alone in desiring something like this is very enlightening. For years (I am 50+, grandma, married once for 7 years, single for 18 years now) I have said that I would love to "marry" one of my closest friends. I want the one-on-one social, familial and partner intimacy but -- because I am not sexually attracted to the same gender -- not the sexual intimacy. Everyone has always looked at me as if I am completely off my rocker. I am envious.
This is wonderful. I believe that there shouldn't be a limit of who can go into an oficial commited relationship. Why making it only for romantic partners? For example my two grandaunts are 92 and 91 and have lived together their entire lives. They even share bedroom. How are they less of a couple than me and my partner who love each other but have been togheter "just" for 7 years? When i registered with my partner as "samenwonen" (living together) the belgian police even came to our home to see if we lived in the same house an even shared bedroom. (They only do that to couples with an immigrant person) I have colleagues that even had their wardrobes inspected to see if their clothes were in the same room. Why cannot I sleep in a different bedroom? Why my aunts cannot be a couple just because they dont have sex together? Its absurd
that's outrageous, the government shouldn't have that sort of intrusive control over what people do in their own homes. :(
Load More Replies...
115
52