Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Tumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists Agree
User submission
9.2K
139.1K

Tumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists Agree

Tumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists AgreeSomeone Says That 8-Hour Workday Shouldn’t Be A Norm Anymore And Scientists Are Backing It UpSomeone Brings Up Fact That An 8-Hour Workday Isn't Productive, Scientists AgreeTumblr User Points Out That Psychologists Have Proved That 8-Hour Workday Is Not Productive, Nor EfficientTumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists AgreeTumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists AgreeTumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists AgreeTumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists AgreeTumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists AgreeTumblr Users Point Out That 8-Hour Workday Concept Isn’t Working Anymore And Scientists Agree
ADVERTISEMENT

The transition to new manufacturing processes in Europe and the U.S. from the late 1760’s to 1840’s – the industrial revolution – brought many changes to the lives of the working class. Prior to the revolution, the majority of the workforce were in the agricultural business, but as the cities and factories grew, many of them left for urban areas. The factories had to produce their products 24/7, therefore it was expected that the employees would work fourteen to sixteen hours a day. Wages were dismal, especially for women and children. Workers had only one day off a week. The workday of eight hours didn’t become common until the early 20th century, thanks to activists who introduced “Eight hours labor, eight hours recreation, eight hours rest” idea. However, should the standards of the previous century be applied to the modern working life? The 8 hour workday still raises questions for many, especially for those familiar with the research that suggests that this standard is neither efficient, nor productive.

RELATED:

    Image credits: Jesús Corrius

    One Tumblr user, who has named themselves northw0man, has started a discussion on the social platform, suggesting that we should reconsider the standard working time.

    Other person jumped into the topic too, providing with a link of a recent research about the link between productivity and working time.

    The research points out a significant finding: the average worker, who works 8 hours a day, is only productive for 2 hours and 53 minutes. While evaluating nearly 2,000 office employees, the study has also revealed that for most of the time they’re at work, people aren’t working. Surprising? The researchers then lay out, that more than 1 hour is spent on reading news, checking social media takes about 44 minutes and talking with co-workers about non-work-related topics, takes up about 40 minutes of time. Searching for new jobs, smoking breaks, making calls, hot drinks, texting, eating and making food also accumulates for a lot of lost time. Therefore, it may be implied that the majority of time spent in the office is unproductive. If we take away all of the unproductive time from 8 hours, only 4 are left.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The user named thesnarkbait also brought their two cents on the topic, mentioning the research done in Gothenburg, Sweden. It pointed out that the nurses that participated in a 6-hour workday for the research, showed improved productivity, indicated improved work–life balance and even their patients noticed a boost in quality of care. However, it seems as if employers are not very keen on acquiring the new, suggested standards.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    What do you think? Should we strive for shorter working hours? After all, it seems as if it’d be definitely a win-win situation, both for the employer and employee.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    139Kviews

    Share on Facebook
    Neringa Utaraitė

    Neringa Utaraitė

    Author, Community member

    Read more »

    Neringa is a proud writer at Bored Panda who used to study English and French linguistics. Although she has many different interests, she's particularly drawn to covering stories about pop culture as well as history. While not at the office, this Panda enjoys creepy movies, poetry, photography and learning how to play the piano.

    Read less »
    Neringa Utaraitė

    Neringa Utaraitė

    Author, Community member

    Neringa is a proud writer at Bored Panda who used to study English and French linguistics. Although she has many different interests, she's particularly drawn to covering stories about pop culture as well as history. While not at the office, this Panda enjoys creepy movies, poetry, photography and learning how to play the piano.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    Kimberly Young
    Community Member
    5 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Also, take into account modern commuting time. I spend close to 3 hours per day commuting, and I sure as hell don't count that towards my "recreation" time. And at my job, there are days when I have 0 productive hours. Shorter days, flex time, and telecommuting would make hella sense!

    Jonathon Smith
    Community Member
    5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I had a job where we were regular forced to do 12 hour days (often 7 days a week). Over the course of a few months we figured out that we were not getting any more work done than on the days we did 8 hours. In another instance, I had a new supervisor who would set each worker a goal and that when it was done, we could go home. Didn't matter if we took 2 hours or 12, he would consider it a full days work. I have never worked on a happier or more efficient site. Got far more done than normal. But the managers above him didn't like it and he got fired.

    Kjorn
    Community Member
    5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    at the same rate i couldn't affort my rent at a 6 hours a day pay. and i wouldn't be the only one.

    KatHat
    Community Member
    5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think part of the point is that salaries and overall compensation should be living wages regardless. It's definitely part of the problem right now.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Kimberly Young
    Community Member
    5 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Also, take into account modern commuting time. I spend close to 3 hours per day commuting, and I sure as hell don't count that towards my "recreation" time. And at my job, there are days when I have 0 productive hours. Shorter days, flex time, and telecommuting would make hella sense!

    Jonathon Smith
    Community Member
    5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I had a job where we were regular forced to do 12 hour days (often 7 days a week). Over the course of a few months we figured out that we were not getting any more work done than on the days we did 8 hours. In another instance, I had a new supervisor who would set each worker a goal and that when it was done, we could go home. Didn't matter if we took 2 hours or 12, he would consider it a full days work. I have never worked on a happier or more efficient site. Got far more done than normal. But the managers above him didn't like it and he got fired.

    Kjorn
    Community Member
    5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    at the same rate i couldn't affort my rent at a 6 hours a day pay. and i wouldn't be the only one.

    KatHat
    Community Member
    5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think part of the point is that salaries and overall compensation should be living wages regardless. It's definitely part of the problem right now.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Related on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda