Around a gazillion new movies are released every year, but when you watch them, do you sometimes catch yourself thinking “Hmm, have I seen this one before?” And you might have! Well, almost. Today we’re looking at the most iconic movies that have hit the cinemas more than once. From animation to 3D, from old-school to amazing CGI, it’s your turn to decide if the movie industry should leave the classics in the archives or make bigger and better revamps of the movies we love.
This post may include affiliate links.
"Dumbo"
The scene where Mrs. Jumbo is in jail and she still cradles Dumbo and she's crying and he's crying and I'm crying just thinking about it.
"The Mummy"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mummy_(1932_film) This is the original
"Jumanji" vs. "Jumanji: Welcome To The Jungle"
Can’t choose, they both are really good. The sequel did honor to the original imo.
"The Karate Kid"
The new one is called the KARATE kid, but he gets taught kung-fu. Make it make sense.
"A Man Called Ove" vs. "A Man Called Otto"
Haven't seen either, but I've loved Tom Hanks since Bosom Buddies.
"Ghostbusters"
"It"
Anyone who thinks Bill Skarsgard was scarier than Tim Curry needs their heads examined by Top Men.Top. Men.
"A Star Is Born"
The older version with Judy Garland and James Mason was better. But there was the original in 1937, with Janet Gaynor and Fredric March.
"Blade Runner" vs. "Blade Runner 2049"
Who gives a damn about whether you think harrison ford or ryan gosling is hot? The first movie is based on an amazing book, the second movie is a sequel. They're both good, the first is better and the poll options we're offered here are stupid.
"Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" vs. "Tomb Raider"
"Charlie And The Chocolate Factory" vs. "Wonka"
W***y Wonka & the Chocolate Factory from 1971 is the original
"Taxi"
For real? The New York one is EMBARASSING. It takes away all the scoundrel charme of Naceri for some generic run-of-the-mill ghetto girl stance, and the impossible to like Fallon character. The original is campy, fun and ridiculous on purpose, the american version is just trashy.
"West Side Story"
I love the musical. Saw it twice during the latest touring revival - it is simply the best musical ever produced. The original movie is an abomination. Natalie Wood (who I love) in brown-face and dubbed? Nope. Spielberg did West Side Story properly. He even included the best musical piece "Transition to Scherzo" which is usually left out.
"Pinnocchio"
"Disney's Pinocchio"? Both movies are from Disney (Also were is the Guillermo del Toro option?)
"Cats"
Are you kidding with this one? The 2019 film is literally one of the worst movies ever made
I'll die on the hill of W***y Wonka, The Lion King and Aladdin should NEVER be remade! I know that they do this to keep the trademark but leave original perfection alone.
The overwhelming majority of remakes can't hold a candle to the originals. Most of the remakes that end up being actually good are not actually remakes of the original movies, but rather a new adaptation of the same novel / source material (like IT, Dune or even The Thing). Makes sense, in a way - if an original movie flops, nobody would want to touch it for a remake. If it's a hit, then the remake will often be done purely for cash-grabbing purposes and would face an uphill battle, having to live up to the standards set by the original.
Verry p*ssed about that Jumanji one. That is a sequel - not a remake. And I love all three....
In virtually all cases, the original is better. Instead of remaking already-good movies, perhaps they should remake BAD movies to try to get them right. And sequels aren’t remakes. Harrison Ford playing the same character in BR2049 as in Blade Runner should be a clue that it was a sequel….
Remakes aren't always bad just because they don't live up to the original. I love Cowboy Bebop (anime original), but I also liked the Netflix version. Sure they were different, but that doesn't take away the thrill. You just got to look at them for what they are, different.
No mention of Robocop? The original is one of the greatest sci-fi movies of all time. The remake, while not awful, just made me wonder--how do you put Michael Keaton, Gary Oldman, and Samuel L. Jackson in the same movie and have it just come out as "Meh"?
The worst remakes are those that "fix the problems from the original" and are made for "modern audiences" to be honest.
This would have been more fun without the cringey over-written choices. I liked the new Dune, but I'm not like "Timotheeee squeeeee!"
Judge Dredd (Sylvester Stallone) or Dredd (Karl Urban)? Our house is divided on this one. Edit: do not understand the downvotes as I'm just asking which one people prefer. Note, I didn't pick sides.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: remakes are stupid. Either you slavishly copy the original, in which case it's pointless, or you do things differently, in which case it's wrong.
The two movies I can think of where the remake is equal/'better' are "Invasion of the body snatchers" -the 70's remake and "The Manchurian candidate"-the remake with Denzel Washington. Neck in neck to remake 'better'.Put better in ' because eye of the beholder etc
Why not take a good book that was made into a crappy movie and try again? I am looking at you Eragon...
Thanks for hightlighting just how many movies I haven’t seen
I don't consider Oceans 8 or the Ghostbusters 2016 as remakes, just separate stories and both are great movies!
I quit when Johnny Depp was referred to as the original. You blew it, Julija. Smh.
Remake? Did you know "The Wizard 0f Oz" is a remake? It was originally filed as a B&W silent movie in 1925. I saw it - it's AWFUL!
The newest Lara Croft wasn’t a remake - it was a prequel. The are all excellent, and I hope they do more!
Most of these are not remakes. They are sequels or prequels. One is even a series compared to a movie. Two of them even had actual movies they were remade after. Oceans Eleven had an original year's ago with Dean Martin and Sammy Davis Jr. Also the Wonka movie was not a remake. Do your research. The original was with Gene Wilder.
I'll die on the hill of W***y Wonka, The Lion King and Aladdin should NEVER be remade! I know that they do this to keep the trademark but leave original perfection alone.
The overwhelming majority of remakes can't hold a candle to the originals. Most of the remakes that end up being actually good are not actually remakes of the original movies, but rather a new adaptation of the same novel / source material (like IT, Dune or even The Thing). Makes sense, in a way - if an original movie flops, nobody would want to touch it for a remake. If it's a hit, then the remake will often be done purely for cash-grabbing purposes and would face an uphill battle, having to live up to the standards set by the original.
Verry p*ssed about that Jumanji one. That is a sequel - not a remake. And I love all three....
In virtually all cases, the original is better. Instead of remaking already-good movies, perhaps they should remake BAD movies to try to get them right. And sequels aren’t remakes. Harrison Ford playing the same character in BR2049 as in Blade Runner should be a clue that it was a sequel….
Remakes aren't always bad just because they don't live up to the original. I love Cowboy Bebop (anime original), but I also liked the Netflix version. Sure they were different, but that doesn't take away the thrill. You just got to look at them for what they are, different.
No mention of Robocop? The original is one of the greatest sci-fi movies of all time. The remake, while not awful, just made me wonder--how do you put Michael Keaton, Gary Oldman, and Samuel L. Jackson in the same movie and have it just come out as "Meh"?
The worst remakes are those that "fix the problems from the original" and are made for "modern audiences" to be honest.
This would have been more fun without the cringey over-written choices. I liked the new Dune, but I'm not like "Timotheeee squeeeee!"
Judge Dredd (Sylvester Stallone) or Dredd (Karl Urban)? Our house is divided on this one. Edit: do not understand the downvotes as I'm just asking which one people prefer. Note, I didn't pick sides.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: remakes are stupid. Either you slavishly copy the original, in which case it's pointless, or you do things differently, in which case it's wrong.
The two movies I can think of where the remake is equal/'better' are "Invasion of the body snatchers" -the 70's remake and "The Manchurian candidate"-the remake with Denzel Washington. Neck in neck to remake 'better'.Put better in ' because eye of the beholder etc
Why not take a good book that was made into a crappy movie and try again? I am looking at you Eragon...
Thanks for hightlighting just how many movies I haven’t seen
I don't consider Oceans 8 or the Ghostbusters 2016 as remakes, just separate stories and both are great movies!
I quit when Johnny Depp was referred to as the original. You blew it, Julija. Smh.
Remake? Did you know "The Wizard 0f Oz" is a remake? It was originally filed as a B&W silent movie in 1925. I saw it - it's AWFUL!
The newest Lara Croft wasn’t a remake - it was a prequel. The are all excellent, and I hope they do more!
Most of these are not remakes. They are sequels or prequels. One is even a series compared to a movie. Two of them even had actual movies they were remade after. Oceans Eleven had an original year's ago with Dean Martin and Sammy Davis Jr. Also the Wonka movie was not a remake. Do your research. The original was with Gene Wilder.