Good message? Of course not! Good food for thought? Oh yeah! Let's think of it as an invitation to empathize, for men to try and immagine themselves in our shoes. Does this make you feel uncomfortable? Well, guess what... I dunno wether this will be effective in the way I'm telling about it, and I DO NOT wish for this to be the new marketing standard, but from an artistic and philosophic point of view, you can't deny this is interesting. It makes you think, it brings people to discuss. And btw, we don't need to do this step for the sake of feminism, what we need is simply treating all models with respect in their marketing rappresentations as well as in their personal/professional lives, but I do have a feeling that sometimes projects like these are neccessary. It's a waking slap on the face of society.

"they are someone's brothers and sons.. " oh really? Because naked women in ads are not sisters and daughters. They are created by some kind of 3D printer and they are connected to nobody...

What suits?

Im an artist and dont view the human body as many do in a sense of "objectification".. I see them as a form of art, like a painting or sculpture as inspiration...

I volunteer as a tribute to be used as a prop by beautiful ladies

Just a advertising agency trying to be an edgelord. Obviously worked because people are talking about it. How do I feel about this as a man? Nonchalant at best. Sex sells, diet coke have done this for years.

meow

The problem is not objectification but knowing the difference between fantasy and reality. I don't see anything bad in half-wishing for some perfect scenarios where all our needs are satisfied nor in enjoying those dreams recreated in any medium. It's bad if you project those fantasies onto real people and feel entitled to have them fulfilled. Many men are very entitled and feel women owe them, or world owes them, hard to tell. Plenty of women feel like that too, although slightly different rules apply. I'm not sure if banning fantasies is the best way to go.

The better way would be have a men behind, yes. But not naked.. From my point of view, it looks like just a "You did it to us, we did it to you !"... Wich is pointless. Feminism is about Equality, yes. That makes the thing "Equal" but... Every "equality" is not good to make cause it can make the things worst.

love it, get over yourselves if you dont, yes if there was a woman naked in the shot everyone would have complained even more. stop reading too much into ads, rather appreciate them for there beauty and if they offend you, page over or scroll down, no one is forcing you to look at them

Wait ... They were selling CLOTHES somewhere in those ads? I didn't notice. Stupid, distracting, ultimately unsuccessful ploy by bitter feminists.

Maybe I just haven´t noticed it, but I honestly don´t remember the last time when I´ve seen a completely naked woman in an ad. Definitely some naked skin, both women and men, but not completely naked with just covering their private parts. I´m myself against objectification of both women and men.

Most of us are just trying to blow our load and move on. So please, objectify us more 😂😂😂

objectivise women? Feminists rage. Do the same to men? Feminists cheer. Double standards much ? ;)

You have to know the history of this brand ! Her older brother Suit supply is famous here with his extreme sexists campaigns every year they come with naked women being threatens as object , the younger sister now follow the same steps !!!!

I think having naked people in ads - male OR female - is a complete fail. Who cares what the clothed person is wearing, all any viewer is going to see is the naked body. And just because it's not ok to objectify women, it doesn't mean it's ok to objectify men. This makes feminists no different or better than the men who objectified women. We will never move on from the mistakes of the past if people keep going out and making the same mistakes, allegedly to prove a point. The only point they proved is that they themselves are as sexist as the men they protest. Congratulations.

If equality is truly the desired goal for women, tearing men down is not the way to achieve that. Revenge elevates nothing.

It looks like someone dressed up 3 mannequins gaven them skin and a face and put them in different poses. Honestly I find it quite funny.

This is the same problem They have with gay. Straight Neanderthal men don't like being treated like they treat women.

I was on a college campus the other day. The way the young women there were dressed was pretty shocking. Teeny shorts, itty bitty skirts, barely there tops without undergarments. I guarantee most of the men present were completely happy with the situation, other than some of the dads! If we can accept and even encourage this kind of attire in women then why would we be squeamish about ads with bare males? I am NOT a feminist but I do see hypocrisy in any offense taken to these ads when no one even notices bare women anymore. Guess I wish they would ALL leave something to the imagination...

I actually thought Charli XCX's music video "boys" was interesting because it showed boys in the same way girls are usually portrayed

Because we aren't desensitized to men being viewed this way, it REALLY hits you. You see how truly dehumanizing this is.

There's a subgenre of porn dedicated to this. Kinda old news (CFNM). With what is available on the internet, I can't see how people get so easily offended.

I love it!

This campaign is also a hint towards the past. SuitStudio is owned by the company Suitsupply, which caters to men and have been doing so for 15-20 years now. It was a nice start-up making well tailored fashionable suits affordable. They grew rapidly and they are not some label from some billion dollar company. They have had similar ad campaigns for over a decade with men in suits and naked women. And it works: everybody who has been to this company (they have shops in quite some business cities now) can recognize the company from the way the pictures are made. It's typical that people start judging and talking about the Feminism part of the campaign. It is a campaign to sell Suits to women. It is for business-women who complain that it is so much harder to find affordable good looking business clothing.

I don’t have a problem with the ads themselves. Using naked men instead of naked women is not a problem to me. The problem I have is the mentality of the feminists who call this social awakening. Using the same social tactics of the enemies you say you abhor you makes you no better than them. I’ve said the same about white face. Just admit you were you were looking at the dollar signs and be done with it.

Mysterious fb comment above about the ad sending the message that it's ok to treat men like walking wallets. Talk about missing the point. The women in the ad are clearly not seeking money from these men...

Great looking suits. Exceptional female models. Tastefully presented male models.

Good grief. It's not that the man is naked. It's that he allows a woman to put her high heel on what makes him male. It's on purpose to devalue his manhood. Now the other way around, men are not interested in placing their shoe on a woman's vaginal opening and devaluing her femaleness. We want women to be all female! Nasty women these days don't want men to be men, so much so they act afraid if a man's penis is exposed.

Wait where did I miss naked women in ads?._. Or is it me not paying enough attention to ads in general? Showing half-naked boobs is old as the world but can't quite recall men with their feet on naked girls. That aside...that looks like some really fun bdsm games for the people who're into that kind of stuff ;) Not sure how well that appeals to the rest of the clientbase though, personally I'm more for equal/equal-ish relationships.

Omfg why people so Sensitive when it comes to guys they don’t feel the same females so whatever what’s the difference there is none if yall gone who admitted to feeling on females on record but get mad cause a couple guys naked grow the f**k up

What damn century are we living in?! How is it that people's thinking are still so backward?! Why is it ok for female to pose naked in ads but not ok for male to do it?! Give me a break! 😠

None of these ads would make me want to buy the suit. The women look more like dominatrices than anything else. These ads are more of a reversal of Shades of Grey than anything else.

What I find weird is that everybody is screaming about sexism when guys are naked and in weak positions, but nobody lifts even an eye brow when women are. Hypocrisy at its finest! I think it does the men who likes too look att womens bodies in ads a world of good, to suddenly find themselves in the very place of women. Maybe we will see a change, and not use women's bodies gratuitously to sell s**t. Grow the f**k up!!

lol so ridiculous this doesn't do anything cuz men were never made to seduce, but its the nature of a woman. it's not affect anything tho

The problem with feminists is! They do not contrast their points equivalently gender for gender! Meaning, those women will say things like, "how would you feel if someone talked to your mother or sister like that?" And the truth is, if you're a man trying to holla at a woman, that woman is not your mother nor your sister! She's not your relative! What man likes the idea of any man trying to get in good with their mother or sister? See the logic?! Many of you feminists use talking points that don't match up evenly when it comes to making you all's points about y'all mistreatment from men! Photos of naked men are offensive to straight men if they're plastered all out in the open! Same as nude photos of women would be offensive to straight women if they were plastered out in the open for them to see! Plastering nude photos of men out in the open is not the same as nude photos of women in a magazine or in privately designated source material!

This AD campaign is done very tastefully and celebrates the beauty of the male body. I would love to see more of this in the future. Culturally, we do not celebrate the male form enough. This nakedness is a pure celebration of the male body in all of his wonderful porportions.

Using either as objects is disgusting. And never in "male" adverts do the men rest their feet on the naked women, or lie down holding their a**e.

Practice what you preach.

These men are models. If they have no problem posing then where is the problem.

Some guy got work and then got paid. His body, his decision. I couldn't give less of a f**k either way. If you don't like it, don't look.