Natalie Portman’s Oscar Outfit Honors Snubbed Female Directors
Even though celebrity life may not be everyone’s cup of tea, the Oscars ceremony is a real guilty pleasure for many of us mere mortals. It’s the night when everyone gets fancy and dressed up, we get to hear some wonderful speeches, and also see our favorite movies get recognized by the film community. Furthermore, we get to satisfy our inner fashionistas, feasting our eyes on spectacular outfits. One of those spectacular outfits showcased this year belongs to Natalie Portman and carries a very special meaning within it. Portman decided to celebrate all the female directors that were not recognized and have their names intricately embroidered on her fabulous cape.
Natalie Portman wore a black and gold dress accompanied by a black cape that was embroidered with the names of women directors who were not acknowledged in the Best Director category
Names on Portman’s cape included Lorene Scafaria, the director of Hustlers, Lulu Wang, The Farewell’s director and Greta Gerwig, the director of Little Women
This is how she explained her fashion choice
Ron Howard: “We are honored … to be here to present the award for best director.”
Natalie Portman, done with this shit: “And here are the all-male nominees.” 🔥 pic.twitter.com/8JboypiADo
— David Mack (@davidmackau) January 8, 2018
Furthermore, it was not the first time she spoke about the issue of the Academy nominating only male directors
Natalie Portman embroidered her Dior cape with all of the female directors who weren’t nominated for #Oscars. Check out her explanation here. pic.twitter.com/kyyo2wVMZf
— Amy Kaufman (@AmyKinLA) February 10, 2020
People were inspired by her outfit
106Kviews
Share on FacebookI'm a woman but in all honesty, those films didn't deserve to be nominated for Best Director. I mean Hustlers? Come on.
I'll accept that as fair if you can honestly say you saw Hustlers.
Load More Replies...Doesn't it come to her mind, that maybe they weren't nominated because they had stronger opponents, whose work was better and it has nothing to do with them being women?
And it's pure coincidence that women's work just never lives up to the Oscars' standards? When only five women directors have ever been nominated in the Oscar's history while utter mediocrity has been nominated more than once, there definitely seems to be a problem. If it was a question of quality only, there would not be such a large disparity between men and women nominees.
Load More Replies...'Making a statement', but still going to the Oscars, supporting Hollywood, working with those male directors, living the good life with the money she earns from that rotten world, etc.
Yes, but she is making a political statement that could effect her future career opportunities. So it's not without cost.
Load More Replies...I'm a woman but in all honesty, those films didn't deserve to be nominated for Best Director. I mean Hustlers? Come on.
I'll accept that as fair if you can honestly say you saw Hustlers.
Load More Replies...Doesn't it come to her mind, that maybe they weren't nominated because they had stronger opponents, whose work was better and it has nothing to do with them being women?
And it's pure coincidence that women's work just never lives up to the Oscars' standards? When only five women directors have ever been nominated in the Oscar's history while utter mediocrity has been nominated more than once, there definitely seems to be a problem. If it was a question of quality only, there would not be such a large disparity between men and women nominees.
Load More Replies...'Making a statement', but still going to the Oscars, supporting Hollywood, working with those male directors, living the good life with the money she earns from that rotten world, etc.
Yes, but she is making a political statement that could effect her future career opportunities. So it's not without cost.
Load More Replies...
162
78