“What Is Moral But Illegal?”: 30 People Are Sharing Some Of The Dumbest Laws Around The World
InterviewWe’ve all been faced with a moral dilemma before. Should you be honest with your partner when you know something that will hurt them? Maybe in college your best friend asked you to help them cheat while they were in danger of failing a class and having their scholarship revoked. Perhaps you caught a colleague stealing, but if you reported it, he would get fired and would be unable to pay his rent. Unfortunately, life is full of difficult decisions, and ethics are not black and white.
What tends to be a little clearer is what is against the law, regardless of our personal feelings. 3 days ago, Reddit user Dr_vinci reached out to Ask Reddit and posed the question, “What is moral but illegal?” Readers have since flooded the responses with questionable laws that seem to contradict many people’s moral compasses. Below, you can read some of the answers, as well as an interview with Dr_vinci, and decide if you think these laws are justified or not. Then if you’d like to continue pondering the morality of certain laws, check out this Bored Panda piece next.
This post may include affiliate links.
Where I live, euthanasia. Having had to watch a relative waste away as they could no longer eat properly, had no clue who they were or who anyone else was, and was just so scared…how is making them live or wait until they starve/dehydrate the moral choice?
I am actually passionate about this topic. I believe this is a hard one for so many people, but I believe that the choice should be up to the person when they are of sound mind how they choose to go. As someone that suffers from a handful of conditions that will vastly limit my quality of life and my health as I age, I feel like I should be able to choose not to suffer. I believe that we should have the right to die with as much compassion and dignity as possible.
There’s no question that morals vary from person to person. Most people would be horrified if you mentioned taking your dog outside and shooting it. But when it comes to other animals, public opinion greatly varies. Ask a farmer if it’s okay to kill cattle and use their meat for food, and you’re probably going to get a different answer than if you asked a vegan the same question. Or if you asked someone who is Hindu. What’s interesting about morals is that not only do they vary across cultures and religions, but they also change over time and within the same person, depending on the gravity of a situation.
Morality is even an evolutionary trait, according to some psychologists. Dr. Jean Decety, Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at the University of Chicago, wrote in an article exploring the topic, that "our morality has been formed over thousands of years from the combination of both our genes and our culture, rather than just one or the other. This genetic and cultural evolution has shaped our brains to care for others, react to those who try to harm us, and to create moral rules that help us to live together successfully.”
Dr. Decety went on to say that there are “three main lines of evidence that support the view that our brains are wired for morality”. The first being that “the building blocks of morality have been observed in non-human animals”. Rodents and primates exhibit “prosocial behaviors”, opting to help and console one another when someone is in trouble or distressed. Chimpanzees console victims after fights, and rats choose to help fellow rodents before seeking a food reward. Although monkeys and rats don’t have the same depth of moral code as humans, the fact that they display empathy towards each other suggests that morality is a product of evolution.
In many countries, being LGBT it's illegal. Loving someone or being yourself is against the law.
Yeah if the crooked right wing has their way it will be illegal in United States too.
Grabbing thrown out food from a groceries shop's dumpster.
The next reason Dr. Decety cites to support that we are “wired for morality” is the fact that even babies exhibit early signs of having morals. Psychologists who study human development note that babies start forming social relationships before they’re even a year old. And toddlers as young as 18-months realize when their mothers are upset and try to comfort them with patting, hugging and sharing toys. Impressively, babies even understand the concept of fairness by the time they’re a year old. When a group of 1-year-olds witnessed cookies being distributed to a group, they understood and expected everyone to receive the same amount.
Imagine going to war at 18 for 2 and a half years and you come back home, but still can’t go get a beer.
In Russia now: talking about PEACE and STOPPING WAR. Lots of examples when people are getting arrested because it counts as "justification of Nazism" or "humiliation of russian army and special operation". Savage.
I think the Russian army is doing a pretty good job of humiliating themselves. Well the commanders are.
Next, Dr. Decety mentions that “the parts of the brain involved in moral judgments are beginning to be identified”. Neuroscientists have examined how moral behaviors change in people who have brain lesions, and it has been determined that our brains don’t simply have one moral center. Various parts of the brain handle different aspects of making moral decisions (emotional reactions, self-control, intelligence, caregiving behaviors). When someone experiences trauma to their ventromedial prefrontal cortex in early childhood, they’re more likely to break moral rules and cause physical harm to others. People who have suffered damage to their ventromedial prefrontal cortex “also tend to experience less empathy, embarrassment, and guilt”.
Sleeping in your car when your too drunk to drive.
Pirating content that has been abandoned and can't even be purchased any more. E.g. an out of print book, or a game that isn't sold anymore.
Something that chaps my a$$ is having to pay for a digital copy of music when I have paid for a physical copy. I have CDs and,dare I say cassettes that are damaged or worn out, but still I have to buy a digital copy to hear it.
We reached out to Dr_vinci to hear where the inspiration for this post came from, and he told us he had heard the question somewhere else and was so curious that he decided to start his own discussion around it. When asked if he trusts law enforcement, he told us that he still does, but that the government makes questionable calls sometimes. "I'm fairly happy with the laws we have, other than some weapon regulations." He also notes his frustration with the banning of airsoft guns and "Black Rifle Coffee Company" due to its name. While gun control laws are a controversial topic, Dr_vinci does not consider them a moral issue. "I think there's no problem with us having better guns or switchblades," he told us. Whether you agree with him or not on these issues, it is a great reminder of how relative morality is.
Collecting rain water in my state.
While morality is in our nature, various factors play a part in moral relativism, including cultural differences. Aside from my earlier example of eating meat, a few other topics that can be controversial depending on the culture and religion are dancing, polygamy, gambling, drinking alcohol, abortion, sex before marriage, having children outside of marriage, assisted suicide and gay marriage. Many of us know exactly where we stand on those topics and may not even consider some to be moral issues, but a 2014 study by the Pew Research Center surveyed 40 countries on some of these subjects to see just how opinions varied across the world. Views on extramarital affairs, for example, were similar in most countries. But in France, only 47% of those surveyed considered having an affair unacceptable, and 40% did not consider it a moral issue at all.
Donating blood as a gay man.
I was hospitalized with double pneumonia a couple years ago and twice was given a unit of blood to keep sufficient oxygen circulating. Believe me, I don't care about the donors' race, religion, sexual identity, or social status, I just am thankful to them forever because they probably saved my life. This law is crazy (all blood donations are screened before use). Shout out to all blood donors, bless you!
And yet I am not allowed to give blood (in the U.S.) because thirty years ago I lived in England for six months.
What do these people think is gonna happen? If a gay man give blood it will automatically turn the person who got the blood gay? Bc that’s stupid and not logical
The policy of banning or placing significant restrictions on "men who have sex with men" came about in the 80's as a response to HIV/AIDS being transmissible by blood and, at the time, being much more prevalent in the gay population. The latter no longer being true, and the former being handled with careful testing of every donation, it is far past time for these policies to be completely removed.
Load More Replies...Not in the US. "In December 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) moved from a lifetime ban on gay and bisexual men donating blood to a deferral of one year for any man who has had sex with another man during the past 12 months. According to the Food and Drug Administration, this pre-screening eliminates up to 90 percent of donors who may be carrying a blood-borne disease." Which was updated..."On April 2, 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it was updating its policy regarding blood donations from men who have sex with men, reducing the deferral period from 12 months to three months."
It's going to be reversed now when they reverse all gay rights. No longer will anyone have a right to privacy as well as women no longer having rights to their bodies.
Load More Replies...Why? What's the reason? Somebody tell me WHY the world loses my faith every day 😮💨🙄
I can't donate either, because I had a blood transfusion and there's a very small risk that I might have received blood contaminated with CJD. Even though the blood I received was from my dad, who demonstrably has not developed CJD in the 42 years since, and the transfusion happened 16 days after the completely arbitrary cut off date
Since the blood centers are supposed to test for everything and gay men are no longer singled out as the carriers of anything specifically, this is hogwash. But, just yesterday, some spokesperson for WHO said that Monkeypox was being transmitted via gay men. I find that to be a huge lie since they do not have the research to have anything but a loose theory.
The law changed very recently, on the 16th mars 2022. Before that gay men had to justify of a period of abstinence of 1 year, the period was shortened to 4 month in 2019. And now sexual orientation is not mentioned anymore on the form.
Load More Replies...It's not legal in Iceland 🇮🇸. But some political party is trying to change it.
https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/06/14/which-countries-prohibit-gay-or-bisexual-men-from-donating-blood
Less than half the US population qualifies to give blood at any point in time. If you've been a donor you've signed off on a huge list of reasons that put you or the recipient at higher risk for health concerns. That list is just the first step to minimizing problems and costs in testing.
No. The reason for the law was the crisis of HIV-infected blood; this wasn't a great way to handle it, but the problem was real and tragic.
Load More Replies...also being lesbian i thought (i now know it's not sorry, my brain isn't functioning rn)
Depends on how you define illegal, but bloodbanks used to not take anything from gay men in my country either, but they have changed their policies some years ago. Was about time too. Any woman having 5 one-night-stands per week, doing it bareback up the behind could give blood, but healthy gays couldn't? Ridiculous
So..basically some janky-a*s, methhead can go donate plasma for more money to buy meth (good friend works at a plasma donation center, meth breaks down in the body quickly and they don't drug test) but OH NO gay man, we don't want your help. 🙄 Ay, the burdens of being upright.
You can donate as a gay man, anyone can donate. But you just need to be clean from any STIs. The place that collects blood wants the healthiest blood they can get. More gay men have STIs, so you can donate but need to just be clean
When I gave blood 3 1/2 years ago in Arizona the questionnaire specifically asked if you were gay male or bi or had sex as a man with a man and I asked the tech if that would make it so somebody would not be eligible to donate and they said yes they would never be able to donate if they had had sex with a man but a woman can have sex with a man no problem and donate
Load More Replies...You need to go look up laws regarding blood donation, buddy. It's illegal in plenty of places.
Load More Replies...Not sure of the exact legal foundation, but the blood banks I have donated at in Germany asked and wouldn't take your blood if you said you were homosexual. This included both men and women... go figure that one out
Load More Replies...Why do you assume that a gay man will have diseases that other people won't? It's not the 80s, for crying out loud.
Load More Replies...As an American doctor who takes Medicare, I am not allowed to waive fees for procedures or charge a patient less than what our officially set rates are, even if they don’t have insurance. I’m also not allowed to ask a doctor from a different practice what a certain insurance company pays them for a service, as this has been deemed “anti-trust.”
In some states, feeding the homeless.
That means kindness is illegal in some states. This is America, right?
Morals also shift over time. At one point in time, unmarried men and women could not even be alone in a room together without it being considered sinful. And while slavery is now viewed as an atrocity, it was once widely accepted in the United States and many other countries. Both racism and homophobia were normalized for many years behind the guise of religious morality, but times are changing. Sadly, there is still progress to be made in combatting racism, homophobia and transphobia, but hopefully eventually, these hateful beliefs will be unanimously regarded as immoral.
Donating unsold/uneaten food to shelters at the end of the day at a fast food joint i.e. the donuts at dunkin, we’d have to throw them out every night.
I know of a grocery store near me that used to donate food but then got sued by the place because some bread had a little mold on it. So now they don't donate anymore.
Defending against a bully in school, apparently.
There are schools with "zero tolerance to violence" policies. Which leads to the bullied kid getting punished for fighting back, with the bullies usually being good at provoking them and not getting noticed by the teachers.
Morals can also be fluid for individuals, depending on the desperation of their current situations. When asked point-blank if stealing is wrong, most people would probably say yes. But if you ask a single mother fleeing from an abusive relationship who’s unsure where her child’s next meal will come from, she might justify stealing a sandwich from a grocery store for her daughter. Viewing morality as too black and white and ignoring the nuance of individual situations can lead to dangerous decision making.
Giving thirsty people water in election lines in a certain state in the United States.
Once again, looking at you Republicans. It's sad that you can only win by cheating.
Grabbing thrown out clothes from clothing stores/furniture/appliances, brand new stuff that just didn’t sell or was out of season. Truly wasteful and probably a terrible. My mom used to drive behind strip malls with me as a kid and we’d find all sorts of good stuff, Pier 1 Imports used to have some good stuff, so did Burlington Coat Factory.
In many countries speaking out against the malicious and corrupt actions of the government would certainly fall under the category of moral but illegal.
I bet a lot of Russians can testify to this. Not just them, of course, just a timely example.
Many of the laws mentioned on Reddit may seem harmless at first glance, but they can disproportionately target poor and homeless individuals. In the United States in particular, homelessness has been notoriously criminalized, despite the fact that there are over 550,000 people without homes. Being homeless itself is not illegal, but there are plenty of restrictions around where individuals can camp, loiter, and panhandle. Many businesses also will not allow people to use their restrooms without purchasing something first, leaving homeless people with no access to toilets and running water.
You can be fined 135 € for giving food to (non-ukrainian) refugees in Calais, France.
The irony is that the fine for giving food to pigeons in the same city is ~100 €.
That's just sick. How can giving food to anyone be a crime. Also, what if you give it as friend to friend?
Publishing evidence of government war crimes and other illegal activity.
Taking food out of trash cans and picking up clothes retailers dump behind their stores seem like perfectly harmless ways for the poor to gain resources and reduce waste, but even those acts are illegal in certain places. With no access to food and no money for clothing, it’s ridiculous to criminalize acts of survival. Even those who have cars but are living in poverty are faced with a mountain of restrictions. It can be extremely challenging to find places that allow overnight parking, and sleeping in a car is illegal in many places as well, with the risk of racking up exorbitant parking tickets. For individuals who don’t feel safe returning home, perhaps due to an abusive partner or parent, they should feel secure knowing that there is somewhere to go.
Removing those metal beams that stop homeless people from sleeping on park benches.
Wasn’t it Santa Cruz, CA that voted out all city council or county supervisors who voted for “anti-humanity” (not inhumane, for whatever reason) public development?
In Japan? Recycling someone's garbage without permission. Touching their garbage at all. You could use a discarded couch and save it from the garbage dump, but be arrested for it.
I feel like this needs a bit more of an explanation. In Japan, you don’t just throw anything away. Garbage is sorted into no less than 3 categories (but usually closer to 6-8 categories). There is a size limit to most of those. No one would put a couch out to the curb. You would either have the city pick it up from your place or you would have to bring it to the dump yourself (and pay a butt ton of money for either of those services). Most still-usable items can go to the resale shops. Also most other items have to stripped down and divide into the different garbage types. Like an umbrella. Plastic pieces would go in non-burnable, cloth goes in burnable, metal parts go in the metal/glass bag. So finding a whole item with all its parts would be hard to find anyway. And yes, it takes a while to learn how to sort your garbage here.
Lemonade stands. Your child's lemonade stand can teach them valuable lessons and are pretty harmless but can be shutdown without permit and department of health inspections.
Lastly, sometimes individuals need to break laws intentionally to fight against discrimination. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested five times during his life, fighting for equality. Susan B. Anthony was arrested for voting in New York in 1872. In 2020, over 17,000 people were arrested during Black Lives Matter protests following the murder of George Floyd. In times of injustice, doing something illegal can be the best way to illustrate your strong morals.
Saying gay in FL, assisting trans kids in TX and ID, protecting womens lives with medical care, etc
FVck the patriarchy when I’m of age I’m leaving this sad excuse for a country
Taking a child from a abusive parent while they have custody.
So it's illegal to save children now....good luck when they go down a path of self hate
Sharing medication. I understand that it can be dangerous in some circumstances. But, for example, I work in childcare, and if a child was dying of an asthma attack, I wouldn't be allowed to share my inhaler to potentially save their life. Most people with asthma use the exact same medication, and I don't think a couple of pumps of inhaler would endanger anyone unless they're severely allergic. If I was ever actually in that situation, I think I'd struggle not to share mine. Having the life-saving medication right there and not being allowed to use it seems crazy to me.
While we can be certain that morals will never be universally agreed upon, let's not forget that it's okay to question the laws that are in place. Sure, we agree to abide by them, but that does not require abandoning critical thinking. Let's all weigh the pros and cons of breaking some silly laws, and consider what our consciences think. I listened, and my conscience is saying that adding a quarter to someone else's parking meter will bring some good karma.
Have you ever been caught breaking a law by doing something you considered moral? We'd love to hear about it in the comments, and don't forget to upvote all of the responses you found most shocking.
In Germany: putting your empty beer bottle next to the trash can in cities instead of into the trash can. It's in principle littering, but it makes it so bottle collectors don't have to crawl through the trash (there is a deposit on the bottles).
It isn't just littering that the problem. The bottles can break and cause a hazard. I've seen many smashed bottles.
In my state, KY, it is illegal to marry the same person 3 times. So I would say that would qualify as moral but illegal.
hello, how to we change this? how do we allow children to have right, how do we stop being transexual being illegal and and repressed to camps or really any person needing an operation(transition) or wanting an operation(plastic surgery or sterilization) how do we stop trying to try to maybe defend ourselves against abusers being illegal !!!!!!!?
I would like to know why three things are legal. Why are people able to speculative by properties when we have homeless people. I mean you have buildings bigger than public schools sitting empty because some property group is setting on it to make a bigger sale in ten years. Another is why is their a wage gap between head of company and the lowest on the poll. Honestly who works harder. Get paid your worth not because daddy got you the position. Why is legal to alienate a demographic. Hunk of fat shaming, sex shaming (not type but amount of), height, financial,and age (specifically younger) are legal to discriminate against because they don't fall under protection status. Heck even if it's a technical protected status they still find ways to block like when google did the internal memo no more asian interviews as they were trying to include diversity by depriving others of a chance.
Honestly, I don't see the problem with people killing their abusive S.Os/family. I mean like, there was this 60-something French woman named Jacqueline Sauvage and her husband beat and raped her and her children, so she shot him in the back three times with a hunting rifle after her son killed himself. She got two years and nine months in prison before she was eventually pardoned, how the f**k does that make any sense? She should've been able to put a god damn reverse bear trap on his head and walked free if she wanted to
Bc women are nothing but objects and property. They aren't seen as human let alone ever believed. It takes political maneuvering to help women someone has to benefit in order for anyone to do right by them.
Load More Replies...assisted suicide should be allowed. but i read that it was illegal because there would be a risk of patients becoming emotionally abused into asking for "the end" so the next of kin gets the life insurance
I literally made an account to say this: Don’t. Share. Kids’. Medication. We were camping with a group of kids. We had a kid with an allergic reaction. We were camping. Called an ambulance. Kid was stable but anxious and having trouble breathing. Use the epi pen of another kid… … who started to have a severe allergic reaction 2 minutes later. We almost lost him. How are you gonna tell a parent you killed their child to save another? Think of it. Dont. Do. It. We not an extra epi pen in our kit. (English is not my language. Not in USA)
This article is full of misinformation. Most of these are just stupid people who are incable of understanding the reasons behind the laws. 1st Don't feed stray animals in the city; they will not hunt for food and they will eventually die of starvation; that is not a moral vs legal argument, that is a humane vs stupid person argument. 2nd NEVER take another person's meds. The person who "works in child care" is probably the janitor of a daycare. The possibility, now a days, that your specific medication could have something in it that the other person is allergic to is significant. You really want to watch someone die while you stand there saying "it's just an inhaler, everyone uses the same one"? Be my guest. 3rd Taking a child from any parent is kidnapping... call the f***ing cops go to the house as a witness. 4th How is a lemonade stand a moral issue? Why is it on this list? This is the 21st century, not the f**ing 50's, get the kid an app, or at least a bank account.
I think the possible problem is that our definitions of "moral" will vary depending on various factors (side eyeing certain "Christian" moral guardians)
Load More Replies...hello, how to we change this? how do we allow children to have right, how do we stop being transexual being illegal and and repressed to camps or really any person needing an operation(transition) or wanting an operation(plastic surgery or sterilization) how do we stop trying to try to maybe defend ourselves against abusers being illegal !!!!!!!?
I would like to know why three things are legal. Why are people able to speculative by properties when we have homeless people. I mean you have buildings bigger than public schools sitting empty because some property group is setting on it to make a bigger sale in ten years. Another is why is their a wage gap between head of company and the lowest on the poll. Honestly who works harder. Get paid your worth not because daddy got you the position. Why is legal to alienate a demographic. Hunk of fat shaming, sex shaming (not type but amount of), height, financial,and age (specifically younger) are legal to discriminate against because they don't fall under protection status. Heck even if it's a technical protected status they still find ways to block like when google did the internal memo no more asian interviews as they were trying to include diversity by depriving others of a chance.
Honestly, I don't see the problem with people killing their abusive S.Os/family. I mean like, there was this 60-something French woman named Jacqueline Sauvage and her husband beat and raped her and her children, so she shot him in the back three times with a hunting rifle after her son killed himself. She got two years and nine months in prison before she was eventually pardoned, how the f**k does that make any sense? She should've been able to put a god damn reverse bear trap on his head and walked free if she wanted to
Bc women are nothing but objects and property. They aren't seen as human let alone ever believed. It takes political maneuvering to help women someone has to benefit in order for anyone to do right by them.
Load More Replies...assisted suicide should be allowed. but i read that it was illegal because there would be a risk of patients becoming emotionally abused into asking for "the end" so the next of kin gets the life insurance
I literally made an account to say this: Don’t. Share. Kids’. Medication. We were camping with a group of kids. We had a kid with an allergic reaction. We were camping. Called an ambulance. Kid was stable but anxious and having trouble breathing. Use the epi pen of another kid… … who started to have a severe allergic reaction 2 minutes later. We almost lost him. How are you gonna tell a parent you killed their child to save another? Think of it. Dont. Do. It. We not an extra epi pen in our kit. (English is not my language. Not in USA)
This article is full of misinformation. Most of these are just stupid people who are incable of understanding the reasons behind the laws. 1st Don't feed stray animals in the city; they will not hunt for food and they will eventually die of starvation; that is not a moral vs legal argument, that is a humane vs stupid person argument. 2nd NEVER take another person's meds. The person who "works in child care" is probably the janitor of a daycare. The possibility, now a days, that your specific medication could have something in it that the other person is allergic to is significant. You really want to watch someone die while you stand there saying "it's just an inhaler, everyone uses the same one"? Be my guest. 3rd Taking a child from any parent is kidnapping... call the f***ing cops go to the house as a witness. 4th How is a lemonade stand a moral issue? Why is it on this list? This is the 21st century, not the f**ing 50's, get the kid an app, or at least a bank account.
I think the possible problem is that our definitions of "moral" will vary depending on various factors (side eyeing certain "Christian" moral guardians)
Load More Replies...