Target Shopper Reveals A Startling Difference Between Girls’ And Boys’ Clothing Functionality At Target, Goes Viral On TikTok
Interview With AuthorAs a parent, one of our missions is to provide what’s best for our little ones. Be it the kryptonite of every 7-year-old, veggies, or comfy clothing. But perhaps there’s an underlying reason why kids love to fight over getting dressed every morning? Why this universal little-kid behavior turns every parent’s morning into a 35-minute negotiation about what they should wear and what’s appropriate for their rapidly blooming identity?
While theories range from the “it’s what the kids just do” phrasing to deep-level cognitive behavior, Meredith Alston, a TikToker with 12,700 followers, may have found yet another culprit. On her recent run to Target, this mom noticed there was a stark difference between boys’ and girls’ clothing — not only in their gender-specific pastel colors but also the difference in durability and functionality.
Seeing that no one has raised this point before — besides the occasional mention of the infamous ‘Pink tax‘ — Meredith published a now-viral video where she calls out one of America’s largest retailers for encouraging parents to (subconsciously) enforce gendered ideals on their kids from early on. Not surprisingly, the video quickly caught the attention of over 2 million TikTok users and ignited an important discussion.
Noticing a stark difference between the durability of girls’ and boys’ clothing at Target, this mom decided to make an in-depth comparison video which quickly went viral
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Image credits: naptown_thrifts
Gone are the days when gender dictates the way people dress. World-class celebrities like Harry Styles and Kid Cudi are confidently going on stage rocking dresses; some, particularly Celine Dion, are dedicating entire clothing lines to gender-neutral clothing. And then there are stores (John Lewis) that, unlike Target, get rid of gender labels from their children’s clothing altogether. No surprise that gender-fluid clothing and the share of the number of products labeled “genderless, gender-neutral or unisex” has more than doubled in the US since 2020, according to the latest data by the leading online fashion trend-analysis company WGSN.
Still, some of these choices are hidden behind a ‘pay-wall’ that not all families can afford — the culprit that inspired Meredith Alston, the Indianapolis-based mother of two little daughters, to create the viral TikTok. Speaking about it, she told Bored Panda she became aware of this issue many years before gender-neutral clothing made headlines. “I noticed it when I was pregnant in 2013, making my baby registry,” Alston told us. “As my children get older, it has just become an increasingly consequential issue for us because the consequences become more severe.”
One of these consequences, she tells us, became apparent when children, “mostly girls,” were being removed from classrooms due to schools’ dress code policies. “It isn’t just an inconvenience for parents — there are real-life implications. Until now, I just haven’t had to platform to really bring this issue to light.”
What started as an accidental viral video with over 2 million views quickly became a three-part series
@naptown_thrifts Don’t even get me started on the text that’s on little girl’s clothes vs the boy’s clothing 🙃 #targetstyle#target#thrifttok#targetfinds#targettok♬ Monkeys Spinning Monkeys – Kevin MacLeod & Kevin The Monkey
@naptown_thrifts Reply to @kristabrewer this is not unique to @target as we all well know. #targethaul#kidsclothes#targetfinds#targetrun#targetstore#shopwithme♬ Crazy – Patsy Cline
@naptown_thrifts Reply to @victoria_loves_lotr to be fair, no one likes dinosaurs. #targetfinds#shopwithme#targetrun#kidsclothes#target#genderneutralclothing♬ Roxanne – Instrumental – Califa Azul
Other parents noticed this as well and shared their own experiences with this large-scale problem
Many will know Meredith from her passionate thrift shopping videos — a past-time activity that was ingrained in her since the early days. “My dad used to take me thrifting with him all the time,” she explained. “I was so embarrassed that we could only afford to shop secondhand, especially because my other friends didn’t have to.”
Today, Meredith and her dad are “thrifting best buddies” and this activity largely remains Meredith’s main content on TikTok.
“When this one took off,” Alston said, “I was actually quite nervous because I did get a lot of negative pushback. What really surprised me though was that the pushback seems to be coming from mothers who don’t have daughters who are upset about the lack of variety they encounter when shopping for their sons.”
The solution, she believes, is to start making clothing for children that are “equally functional, durable, and practical.” “For small children, especially kids who must adhere to a dress code, it only makes sense to separate their clothing by size, function, and season,” Alston told. “But it isn’t a radical idea that girls are just as active as boys. It’s time that their clothing reflects that reality.”
219Kviews
Share on FacebookThey really need to make it illegal to separate clothes for children by sex. Kids have the exact same body shape until puberty, there is nobreason (except sexism) to have two different sections. Just have them separated by type (sweater, skirt, jeans...) and let people chose which colour and shape they want
One of the reason they do this is to make a lot more money.
Load More Replies...I fail to see why manufacturers do not recognize that if they made girls/womens clothing with proper pockets, etc that they would get a larger part of the market. Are they that clueless? What am I missing?
They do this on purpose so people don't reuse clothing for their next child when it's of a different gender. And they profit from using less and more flimsy fabric for girl's clothes, yet making it more expensive.
Load More Replies...Like with pockets. If women get any, we can barely fit a piece of gum in there. Men´s pockets can fit their phones, keys, a can of Monster Energy, a medium-sized cat, the entire LOTR trilogy, a new microwave, and snacks. And they would still have another pocket for another large cat and a wallet.
I specifically started going with Levi's due to them having okay pockets in women's jeans. Then they shortened the f-ing pockets. I still buy them because the fit is *chef's kiss* but like...come on. More than half of my stupid big phone hangs out of my pocket and I have to take it out when I low squat to grab something off the bottom shelf. Or sit. Or exist. My phone's pocket is my hand.
Load More Replies...And then they'll say "well just buy from the boys' section" which is fine and well until you hit puberty but after that boys' or men's pants just don't quite fit right since our hips are shaped differently....
It's not even an option before puberty. My daughter wants purples and yellows in her wadrobe. Not an option in the boys section (which also sucks for my son by the way who hates dark blues and blacks). Wearable gender neutral clothes is not rocket science. I would love to see kids gendered clothes vanish. My idea of clothing utopia is to walk into the kids section and see a shirt with a dinosaur in every colour and a shirt with a unicorn in every colour and durable pants in every colour and no mention anyone of boy or girl. Just kids.
Load More Replies...Same frustrations with my daughter's clothes. And no, we can't buy boys' clothing anymore because the length and waist proportions aren't the same, the stuff that is long enough is usually too wide.
Wait until she looks at the childrens' bathing suits. Long trunks for the boys, and little bikinis for the girls. Start 'em young!
I remember when ASDA started selling black lacy bras for little girls.
Load More Replies...Absolutely! There are two major problems with kids clothes. Girls clothes are absolutely shorter, tighter, flimsier fabric and all and all less functional. I have 3 kids, the older two are boys and the youngest is a girl. Her wardrobe is at least half hand me downs from her brothers and it so clear how much better it is. The boy clothes are often in decent shape after being worn by 3 kids, but new things bought just for her I often have to toss because of holes. Some of the replies hit on the other problem with kids clothes though. Clothes for both genders suffer from very narrow stereotypes. Boy clothes are mostly dark drab colors and limited to the themes of sports, dinosaurs, trucks and videogames. Girl clothes are almost exclusively pastel and heavy on the themes of hearts and unicorns. Both genders deserve more options!
The struggle is real. I was appalled when my oldest girl first moved from the toddler sizes to the big kid section (size 6 +) and suddenly it was a flood of very short skirts, shirts that showed midriff &/or slouched off the shoulder, and nearly impossible to find a swim suit that wasn't a bikini. I stopped shopping at some stores entirely because of it. The quality issue is serious, and the sexism in designs and colors (& POCKETS!!!) is annoying, but blatantly sexualizing little girls is just gross. I'm looking at you, Kohl's.
Daughter was 8 at the time. Tried to buy a sweatshirt for Christmas. Everything was crushed velvet and off the shoulder. I stood in line to ask. I asked for regular sweatshirts not s**t clothes. Shocked the whole line behind me who were drinking the koolaid of sexualizing their girls.
Load More Replies...I try to buy up a size to make cropped tops cover my gut and pants cover my butt, but then they don't fit elsewhere. Grant us modesty without sacrifice, designers.
Indeed. I barely every buy womens clothes because they tend to be tight, flowery and impractical.
Load More Replies...They really need to make it illegal to separate clothes for children by sex. Kids have the exact same body shape until puberty, there is nobreason (except sexism) to have two different sections. Just have them separated by type (sweater, skirt, jeans...) and let people chose which colour and shape they want
One of the reason they do this is to make a lot more money.
Load More Replies...I fail to see why manufacturers do not recognize that if they made girls/womens clothing with proper pockets, etc that they would get a larger part of the market. Are they that clueless? What am I missing?
They do this on purpose so people don't reuse clothing for their next child when it's of a different gender. And they profit from using less and more flimsy fabric for girl's clothes, yet making it more expensive.
Load More Replies...Like with pockets. If women get any, we can barely fit a piece of gum in there. Men´s pockets can fit their phones, keys, a can of Monster Energy, a medium-sized cat, the entire LOTR trilogy, a new microwave, and snacks. And they would still have another pocket for another large cat and a wallet.
I specifically started going with Levi's due to them having okay pockets in women's jeans. Then they shortened the f-ing pockets. I still buy them because the fit is *chef's kiss* but like...come on. More than half of my stupid big phone hangs out of my pocket and I have to take it out when I low squat to grab something off the bottom shelf. Or sit. Or exist. My phone's pocket is my hand.
Load More Replies...And then they'll say "well just buy from the boys' section" which is fine and well until you hit puberty but after that boys' or men's pants just don't quite fit right since our hips are shaped differently....
It's not even an option before puberty. My daughter wants purples and yellows in her wadrobe. Not an option in the boys section (which also sucks for my son by the way who hates dark blues and blacks). Wearable gender neutral clothes is not rocket science. I would love to see kids gendered clothes vanish. My idea of clothing utopia is to walk into the kids section and see a shirt with a dinosaur in every colour and a shirt with a unicorn in every colour and durable pants in every colour and no mention anyone of boy or girl. Just kids.
Load More Replies...Same frustrations with my daughter's clothes. And no, we can't buy boys' clothing anymore because the length and waist proportions aren't the same, the stuff that is long enough is usually too wide.
Wait until she looks at the childrens' bathing suits. Long trunks for the boys, and little bikinis for the girls. Start 'em young!
I remember when ASDA started selling black lacy bras for little girls.
Load More Replies...Absolutely! There are two major problems with kids clothes. Girls clothes are absolutely shorter, tighter, flimsier fabric and all and all less functional. I have 3 kids, the older two are boys and the youngest is a girl. Her wardrobe is at least half hand me downs from her brothers and it so clear how much better it is. The boy clothes are often in decent shape after being worn by 3 kids, but new things bought just for her I often have to toss because of holes. Some of the replies hit on the other problem with kids clothes though. Clothes for both genders suffer from very narrow stereotypes. Boy clothes are mostly dark drab colors and limited to the themes of sports, dinosaurs, trucks and videogames. Girl clothes are almost exclusively pastel and heavy on the themes of hearts and unicorns. Both genders deserve more options!
The struggle is real. I was appalled when my oldest girl first moved from the toddler sizes to the big kid section (size 6 +) and suddenly it was a flood of very short skirts, shirts that showed midriff &/or slouched off the shoulder, and nearly impossible to find a swim suit that wasn't a bikini. I stopped shopping at some stores entirely because of it. The quality issue is serious, and the sexism in designs and colors (& POCKETS!!!) is annoying, but blatantly sexualizing little girls is just gross. I'm looking at you, Kohl's.
Daughter was 8 at the time. Tried to buy a sweatshirt for Christmas. Everything was crushed velvet and off the shoulder. I stood in line to ask. I asked for regular sweatshirts not s**t clothes. Shocked the whole line behind me who were drinking the koolaid of sexualizing their girls.
Load More Replies...I try to buy up a size to make cropped tops cover my gut and pants cover my butt, but then they don't fit elsewhere. Grant us modesty without sacrifice, designers.
Indeed. I barely every buy womens clothes because they tend to be tight, flowery and impractical.
Load More Replies...



















































171
115