Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

16th Century Boxwood Carvings Are So Miniature Researchers Used X-Ray To Solve Their Mystery
144.4K

16th Century Boxwood Carvings Are So Miniature Researchers Used X-Ray To Solve Their Mystery

ADVERTISEMENT

There are only 135 known miniature boxwood carvings and they have been puzzling art specialists all over the world. Recently, researchers have gathered some of these tiny religious pieces from museums and private collections to further study their secrets and have found a few very interesting answers.

It is thought that these wooden carvings were made during only a brief time frame, between 1500 and 1530 either in Flanders or the Netherlands. The rise of a new merchant social class in Europe created a market demand for high-quality portable religious carvings. However, soon the Reformation began and a lot of church-related accessories went out of fashion, including the miniature boxwood pieces.

Using micro-CT scanning and Advanced 3D Analysis Software, researchers found out just how intricate these miniature altars really are. The inner layers are pieced together, hiding the joints so completely, that only a microscope or an X-ray can detect them. The pieces also incorporate pins, smaller than a grass seed. However, much of the production process remains unknown, because traces of gold and other decoration materials conceal the X-ray views.

More info: ago. ca | YouTube (h/t: colossal)

RELATED:

    Researchers took these 500-year-old miniature boxwood carvings to the lab to find out their secrets

    They think these miniatures were made between 1500 and 1530 in Flanders or the Netherlands

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The human eye isn’t able to analyze details this tiny

    ADVERTISEMENT

    So researchers used micro-CT scanning and Advanced 3D Analysis Software

    To find out how intricate the pieces really are

    They found joints in the inner layers so tiny that only a microscope or an X-ray can detect them

    And pins, smaller than a grass seed

    ADVERTISEMENT

    But even the advanced technology couldn’t see everything

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Because traces of gold and other decoration materials conceal the X-ray views

    The miniatures were a result of a rising new social class in Europe that created a demand for these high-quality portable religious carvings

    However, soon the Reformation began and a lot of church-related accessories went out of fashion

    Share on Facebook
    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Rokas is a writer at Bored Panda with a BA in Communication. After working for a sculptor, he fell in love with visual storytelling and enjoys covering everything from TV shows (any Sopranos fans out there?) to photography. Throughout his years in Bored Panda, over 300 million people have read the posts he's written, which is probably more than he could count to.

    Read less »
    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Rokas Laurinavičius

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Rokas is a writer at Bored Panda with a BA in Communication. After working for a sculptor, he fell in love with visual storytelling and enjoys covering everything from TV shows (any Sopranos fans out there?) to photography. Throughout his years in Bored Panda, over 300 million people have read the posts he's written, which is probably more than he could count to.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    Little Menace
    Community Member
    7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The miniatures are amazing, however the whole article is rubbish. Especially the grammar and the lack of x-ray pictures. All we see is photos of 'miniatures' but without anything added for scale [a banana would have been fine].

    Adrian Jenkin (MarauderDeuce)
    Community Member
    7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I agree on all counts but especially the x-rays! I mean they're interesting and all but I'd not have bothered if I'd know there wasn't going to be any investigation shows.

    Load More Replies...
    Jurgen Ziesmann
    Community Member
    7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If this is truth: "The human eye isn’t able to analyze details this tiny" and is this is truth: "They found joints in the inner layers so tiny that only a microscope or an X-ray can detect them" - how then was it possible that people 500 years ago looking with nothing than their own eyes could carve them? And what the heck is the size of a grass seed? With perfectly fine length measures available that everyone could understand ... why would you use "the size of a grass seed" as comparison?

    Load More Comments
    Little Menace
    Community Member
    7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The miniatures are amazing, however the whole article is rubbish. Especially the grammar and the lack of x-ray pictures. All we see is photos of 'miniatures' but without anything added for scale [a banana would have been fine].

    Adrian Jenkin (MarauderDeuce)
    Community Member
    7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I agree on all counts but especially the x-rays! I mean they're interesting and all but I'd not have bothered if I'd know there wasn't going to be any investigation shows.

    Load More Replies...
    Jurgen Ziesmann
    Community Member
    7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If this is truth: "The human eye isn’t able to analyze details this tiny" and is this is truth: "They found joints in the inner layers so tiny that only a microscope or an X-ray can detect them" - how then was it possible that people 500 years ago looking with nothing than their own eyes could carve them? And what the heck is the size of a grass seed? With perfectly fine length measures available that everyone could understand ... why would you use "the size of a grass seed" as comparison?

    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Related on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda