Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
283
“No Way Those Kids Are Theirs”: Outrage After Harry And Meghan Share Pic Of Kids In Holiday Card
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry wished the world a happy holiday season by offering a peek into their family life.
For the first time in years, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex included their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, in their seasonal greeting, but they did so with a notable twist that underscores their commitment to privacy.
Highlights
- Meghan Markle and Prince Harry shared a holiday card featuring their kids for first time in years.
- “We wish you a very happy holiday season and a joyful new year,” said the family of four.
- In true Sussex fashion, Archie and Lilibet’s faces remained hidden, a move aligned with their ongoing efforts to protect their privacy.
- “Harry has been reluctant to show his children publicly, not out of a desire to hide them but to protect their privacy and safety from potential threats,” a friend of the couple said.
While some royal fans praised the photo for its warmth and beauty, others criticized it and went as far as saying there is “no way those kids on the card are theirs.”
RELATED:
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry shared their 2024 holiday card, wishing fans a “happy holiday season”
Image credits: Chris Jackson/Getty Images
On December 16, the Sussexes released a holiday card featuring a collage of six photographs, which included the royal couple during their trips to Columbia and Nigeria this year.
One of the pictures also showed the family of four with their three beloved dogs—Guy, Pula, and Momma Mia. The scene was idyllic: the children, Archie, 5, and Lilibet, 3, joyfully running toward their parents in an outdoor setting.
Yet, in keeping with their cautious approach, the children’s faces remained hidden, emphasizing their ongoing effort to shield them from public scrutiny.
“On behalf of the office of Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Archewell Productions and Archewell Foundation. We wish you a very happy holiday season and a joyful new year,” read the message accompanying the heartfelt images.
The collage of photos they shared marked the first time in years that their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, have been featured
Image credits: Netflix
Image credits: Netflix
The holiday card sparked discussions online, with supporters applauding the couple’s commitment to privacy, while critics questioned its authenticity.
“I’m sure Diana would be so proud of Harry for protecting his family. It’s a beautiful picture,” one social media user commented, while another said, “Beautiful photo beautiful family and I applaud them for protecting their children in today’s world!!”
Other comments took a harsher tone, with one accusing the famous mother-of-two, saying it’s the “best acting she ever did.”
The card includes an idyllic photo of the family of four, along with their three beloved dogs—Guy, Pula, and Momma Mia
Image credits: Archewell Foundation
“Something off about that picture. I’m a retired nursery teacher & I’ve never seen a 3 Yr old that big & Archie looks like a completely different child-again,” one bluntly said.
Another wrote, “There is no way those kids on the card are theirs … the girl looks like she’s 6 or seven and the boy looks too old to be 5.”
The recent holiday card marks the first time in three years that Archie and Lilibet have appeared in their holiday card.
The last memorable instance was in 2021, when the family shared a holiday portrait by debuting the first public photo of Lilibet, who had been born just months earlier.
In true Sussex fashion, Archie and Lilibet’s faces remained hidden, a move aligned with their ongoing efforts to protect their privacy
Image credits: Archewell Foundation
In 2020, Meghan and Harry announced that they were stepping back as “senior” royals. They then left the UK to raise their family in a quieter setting in the US.
Since stepping back from royal duties and settling in Montecito, California, the couple has been steadfast in raising their children outside the media spotlight.
A friend of the couple recently told People that Harry’s approach to parenting stems from a desire to safeguard his kids from “kidnapping or harm.”
“Harry has been reluctant to show his children publicly, not out of a desire to hide them but to protect their privacy and safety from potential threats,” the friend told People.
The card sparked intense online debate, with critics accusing the photo of being staged or inauthentic
Image credits: Netflix
“He wants them to lead as normal a life as possible without the fear of kidnapping or harm,” they added.
This protective instinct is personal for Harry, who has often spoken about his late mother, Princess Diana, and the relentless media intrusion she faced, according to the friend.
“As a dad and husband, Harry is determined to ensure that history doesn’t repeat itself,” the source added.
The Duke’s concerns about security have pushed him to fight for increased protections for his family, particularly in the UK.
Earlier this year, he lost a legal challenge to secure automatic security for himself and his loved ones when visiting his home country. He reportedly plans to appeal the decision.
“Our kids are young; they’re three and five. They’re amazing. But all you want to do as parents is protect them,” the Duchess of Sussex said earlier this year
Image credits: Chris Jackson/Getty Images
The couple also launched The Parents’ Network, in association with the couple’s charitable Archewell Foundation this year. The group, which includes parents who have directly or indirectly lost a child after exposure to online threats, offers families help to protect children from digital harm.
During the launch, Meghan also expressed her wish to protect her two young children as well during the conversation.
“Our kids are young; they’re three and five. They’re amazing. But all you want to do as parents is protect them,” she told CBS News Sunday Morning during the August launch.
“And so, as we can see what’s happening in the online space, we know that there’s a lot of work to be done there, and we’re just happy to be able to be a part of change for good,” she continued.
“Girl child looks [the] same size as [the] boy child – aren’t they like 2 years apart?” asked one social media user
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
Dilly Millandry 5 days ago
Some of those people commenting have clearly never heard of perspective... making the little girl look taller or as tall. She's much nearer the photographer. As for showing their faces - entirely up to them. No idea quite why people get so bent out of shape about seeing photos of children they're not related to and will never have any involvement with. Oh, and of course the children can be red-headed!!! FFS.
Elladine DesIsles 3 days ago (edited)
This was my first thought too, and I completely agree; not only is Lilibet closer to the camera, they are running down a hill which further tricks the eye, and Archie has both legs bent. Lilibet's proportions are accurate for a 3 to 3-and-a-half year old child. And for the children to have reddish hair (though to me it honestly doesn't look as brilliantly red as all of the headlines are suggesting - maybe that's my screen?), Meghan just has to be a carrier of the recessive gene that causes red hair in people with European ancestry, which of course she has. That gene can be passed down for generations before being inherited by both parents and therefore expressed. For both kids to be redheaded wasn't statistically the most probable outcome, since the chances should be 50% for each child to be reheaded or a carrier. But it's no less likely than my brown-eyed father having two blue-eyed daughters.
Load More Replies...
Rose the Cook 5 days ago (edited)
They will be damned if they do or damned if they don't. Anyone in the public eye is considered fair game for b****y comment and Meghan in particular comes in for a lot..
Apatheist Account2 5 days ago
She deserves opprobrium for the way she appeared to con her way into a title without doing anything to earn it, then ran away with it.
Load More Replies...
Philenzortia 5 days ago
FFS BP The country is called COLOMBIA!!! It isn’t that hard. There isn’t a country in the world called Columbia! Do your freaking research. We are not called Columbians we are called Colombians.
Ruth Watry 4 days ago
I have a friend who's 2 year old boy wears the same clothing as their 5 year old (size five).
Juanita Sullivan 4 days ago
Wow! Why would anyone think those are not their kids? Some people are just always looking for something wrong. Sad. People complain about the size of the kids. The angle of the camera needs to be taken into consideration. Also, kids grow fast and the general public hasn't seen them in a while. Someone complained about why the kids had red hair. Really? Who cares? Harry and Meghan don't want their kids to go thru what Harry went thru as a royal and always having to be on and no life really. They are doing a great job.
Jane No Dough 4 days ago
How does this c**p wind up in the NEW "Top Posts" category? It had already been downvoted to 0 when they created the category. BP is really going out of their way to bury our opinions. We are NOT interested in your shopping tips, BP! I know I am not interested in viewing ANY celebrity gossip garbage. I am only here to make sure you didn't cancel my downvote from this morning and to leave this comment!
Spencer's slave no longer 4 days ago
Henry has no beard in this picture and he hasn't been clean shaven since about 2015.
Dilly Millandry 5 days ago
Some of those people commenting have clearly never heard of perspective... making the little girl look taller or as tall. She's much nearer the photographer. As for showing their faces - entirely up to them. No idea quite why people get so bent out of shape about seeing photos of children they're not related to and will never have any involvement with. Oh, and of course the children can be red-headed!!! FFS.
Elladine DesIsles 3 days ago (edited)
This was my first thought too, and I completely agree; not only is Lilibet closer to the camera, they are running down a hill which further tricks the eye, and Archie has both legs bent. Lilibet's proportions are accurate for a 3 to 3-and-a-half year old child. And for the children to have reddish hair (though to me it honestly doesn't look as brilliantly red as all of the headlines are suggesting - maybe that's my screen?), Meghan just has to be a carrier of the recessive gene that causes red hair in people with European ancestry, which of course she has. That gene can be passed down for generations before being inherited by both parents and therefore expressed. For both kids to be redheaded wasn't statistically the most probable outcome, since the chances should be 50% for each child to be reheaded or a carrier. But it's no less likely than my brown-eyed father having two blue-eyed daughters.
Load More Replies... Rose the Cook 5 days ago (edited)
They will be damned if they do or damned if they don't. Anyone in the public eye is considered fair game for b****y comment and Meghan in particular comes in for a lot..
Apatheist Account2 5 days ago
She deserves opprobrium for the way she appeared to con her way into a title without doing anything to earn it, then ran away with it.
Load More Replies... Philenzortia 5 days ago
FFS BP The country is called COLOMBIA!!! It isn’t that hard. There isn’t a country in the world called Columbia! Do your freaking research. We are not called Columbians we are called Colombians.
Ruth Watry 4 days ago
I have a friend who's 2 year old boy wears the same clothing as their 5 year old (size five).
Juanita Sullivan 4 days ago
Wow! Why would anyone think those are not their kids? Some people are just always looking for something wrong. Sad. People complain about the size of the kids. The angle of the camera needs to be taken into consideration. Also, kids grow fast and the general public hasn't seen them in a while. Someone complained about why the kids had red hair. Really? Who cares? Harry and Meghan don't want their kids to go thru what Harry went thru as a royal and always having to be on and no life really. They are doing a great job.
Jane No Dough 4 days ago
How does this c**p wind up in the NEW "Top Posts" category? It had already been downvoted to 0 when they created the category. BP is really going out of their way to bury our opinions. We are NOT interested in your shopping tips, BP! I know I am not interested in viewing ANY celebrity gossip garbage. I am only here to make sure you didn't cancel my downvote from this morning and to leave this comment!
Spencer's slave no longer 4 days ago
Henry has no beard in this picture and he hasn't been clean shaven since about 2015.
You May Like Teen, 16, Jailed For 12 Years For Attempted Homicide Of 14-Year-Old Boy, Attacked By Mistake Husband’s Reaction To Pregnancy Surprise Has Internet Talking: “An Incredibly Hard Watch” Bruce Willis Seen In Emotional Thanksgiving Photo With Daughters Amid Dementia Battle
Karina Babenok
Karina Babenok
Binitha Jacob
Related on Bored Panda
-16
22