Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
275
Matt Smith Slammed For Comments About Trigger Warnings: “Be Thankful You Don’t Have PTSD”
Matt Smith recently opened up about his thoughts on trigger warnings and how “everything” is being “dumbed down” for the audiences of today.
The House of the Dragon star believes the growing trend of trigger warnings is robbing the audience of the chance to feel raw emotions.
While speaking to The Times of London, the 41-year-old actor spoke about how he was “scarred” by some of the movies he watched as a kid, and he didn’t seem to mind if such a trend continued with younger generations.
Highlights
- Matt Smith criticized trigger warnings, arguing they dilute emotional impact and hinder storytelling.
- He reminisced about being scarred by movies he watched as a child, suggesting such experiences aren't entirely negative.
- “Isn’t being shocked, surprised, stirred the point?” he asked. “Too much policing of stories and being afraid to bring them out because a climate is a certain way is a shame."
- Critics of Matt's stance argue that trigger warnings are essential for protecting trauma survivors from distressing content.
RELATED:
Matt Smith revealed he is not a fan of trigger warnings, fearing they dilute the emotional impact of storytelling
Image credits: Photo by Mike Marsland/Getty Images for Sky/NOW
“Isn’t being shocked, surprised, stirred the point?” the Doctor Who star asked. “Too much policing of stories and being afraid to bring them out because a climate is a certain way is a shame. I’m not sure I’m on board with trigger warnings.”
Matt, who plays Daemon Targaryen in HBO’s Game of Thrones prequel series, was asked about playing polarizing characters during an interview with the UK outlet.
“That’s the f—ing point,” he said. “We should be telling morally difficult stories, nowadays in particular.”
The star plays Daemon Targaryen in HBO’s House of the Dragon, the prequel series of the Game of Thrones
Image credits: Image credits: HBO
View this post on Instagram
“It’s ok to feel uncomfortable or provoked while looking at a painting or watching a play, but I worry everything’s being dialed and dumbed down. We’re telling audiences they’re going to be scared before they’ve watched something,” he continued.
The actor also reminisced about going to “a local video shop” when he was young and watching erotic thrillers when he wasn’t supposed to.
“I used to go to a local video shop and get Slither, Basic Instinct, Disclosure—all these erotic thrillers. I was way too young to be watching them. I watched Friday the 13th when I was nine,” he said.
“Actually, that scarred me. Absolutely ruined me,” he added.
“Too much policing of stories and being afraid to bring them out because a climate is a certain way is a shame,” the 41-year-old actor said. “I’m not sure I’m on board with trigger warnings”
Matt Smith says “I’m not sure I’m on board with trigger warnings.”
“It’s ok to feel uncomfortable or provoked while looking at a painting or watching a play, but I worry everything’s being dialed and dumbed down. We’re telling audiences they’re going to be scared before they’ve… pic.twitter.com/SFzxN3jDNd
— Variety (@Variety) September 3, 2024
The trend of trigger warnings arose as a way of protecting viewers, especially trauma survivors, from content that could evoke distressing memories or emotional reactions.
Supporters of trigger warnings believe they are a compassionate way to ensure that sensitive individuals can engage with content safely and at their own pace. On the other hand, critics argue that trigger warnings can hinder the raw impact of storytelling and art and also diminish the ability to provoke unfiltered emotions.
Not all netizens agreed with Matt’s take on trigger warnings, as one Reddit user said: “If you don’t ‘get’ trigger warnings, be thankful that you don’t have PTSD and STFU.”
Some netizens didn’t agree with his comments, with one saying: “The fact that he just completely contradicts himself tells me he’s just randomly spitballing”
View this post on Instagram
“I would’ve appreciated a trigger warning for several movies I’ve watched. But okay Matt,” said another, while a third wrote, “As a wise man once said ‘if you don’t see the point in the trigger warning, it wasn’t for you in the first place.’”
“Lol the last sentence. The fact that he just completely contradicts himself tells me he’s just randomly spitballing,” one said.
Another pointed out, “Trigger warnings aren’t about being shocked, they’re about being re-traumatized.”
“Gonna gently disagree, I’m all for having art protected but I do think some kind of heads up for general audiences is fair (specifically with depictions of extreme violence/sexual abuse),” said another.
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
Sky Render 3 months ago
The sighted man sees no use in putting braille on signs as he can read them just fine. The men who run countries see no value in women's rights and health as they themselves have rights and healthcare that is catered to them. The men with no food allergies sees no point in the packaging of his food telling him that it contains wheat or soy, as wheat and soy cannot incapacitate or kill him. This is, at its core, why minority rights are so hard to get anything done for. Because the majority sees no value in it as it has no immediate benefit to them. Even enough it can be life-changing for those it will benefit. Before you protest something you see as a boondoggle, please consider who it does benefit. Thank you.
Apatheist Account2 3 months ago
This is a bit general and, I would argue, out of date. We have a lot of accommodation for disability these days - ramps, parking spaces, toilets, even laws about new build properties. We have beeping road crossings and reversing lorries. If anything, people are now bending over backwards to help minorities these days (eg the vocal trans lobby), and we have way more food information than we ever used to or most of us need. The only barrier is corporate interest; we are winning the battles against smoking and oil, but there's still a way to go on many others.
Load More Replies...
Apatheist Account2 3 months ago
I still have mental images of the child-catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, first seen when I was about six. Traumatised at the time? Definitely. Did it make me wary of strangers offering sweets? Absolutely, and growing up in the 1970s it definitely kept me away from what my mother called "funny men".
Sterelle Passe 3 months ago
No other way to get such a point across to kids eh? Everything gotta come across thru trauma. Yea. F****d.
Load More Replies...
Camilla Koutsos 3 months ago
Why “slammed”? Can’t we just point out to thoughtless fortunate people that some of us are living with trauma?
Sky Render 3 months ago
The sighted man sees no use in putting braille on signs as he can read them just fine. The men who run countries see no value in women's rights and health as they themselves have rights and healthcare that is catered to them. The men with no food allergies sees no point in the packaging of his food telling him that it contains wheat or soy, as wheat and soy cannot incapacitate or kill him. This is, at its core, why minority rights are so hard to get anything done for. Because the majority sees no value in it as it has no immediate benefit to them. Even enough it can be life-changing for those it will benefit. Before you protest something you see as a boondoggle, please consider who it does benefit. Thank you.
Apatheist Account2 3 months ago
This is a bit general and, I would argue, out of date. We have a lot of accommodation for disability these days - ramps, parking spaces, toilets, even laws about new build properties. We have beeping road crossings and reversing lorries. If anything, people are now bending over backwards to help minorities these days (eg the vocal trans lobby), and we have way more food information than we ever used to or most of us need. The only barrier is corporate interest; we are winning the battles against smoking and oil, but there's still a way to go on many others.
Load More Replies... Apatheist Account2 3 months ago
I still have mental images of the child-catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, first seen when I was about six. Traumatised at the time? Definitely. Did it make me wary of strangers offering sweets? Absolutely, and growing up in the 1970s it definitely kept me away from what my mother called "funny men".
Sterelle Passe 3 months ago
No other way to get such a point across to kids eh? Everything gotta come across thru trauma. Yea. F****d.
Load More Replies... Camilla Koutsos 3 months ago
Why “slammed”? Can’t we just point out to thoughtless fortunate people that some of us are living with trauma?
You May Like 30 Times People Encountered A Celebrity And It Was An Absolute Pleasure 50 Hollywood Secrets Revealed By People Who’ve Worked With Celebrities Behind The Scenes 23 Times A Scandal Cost Celebrities Partnerships With Big-Name Brands
Mantas Kačerauskas
Rugile Baltrunaite
Neilas Šurkus
Related on Bored Panda
53
13