Stepsis Demands 20YO Split Her Inheritance, Family Piles On With Manipulation When She Says No
They say money talks, but in some families, it screams “Let’s see how greedy we can get.” As soon as there’s a sniff of cash, suddenly everyone’s got an opinion on fairness, and the relatives you barely know start popping up like ads on a free streaming service. Add a will to the mix, and you’ve got yourself a front-row seat to some top-tier family theatrics.
One Redditor recently found herself caught in the middle of a family inheritance dispute messier than a spaghetti dinner without a napkin.
More info: Reddit
When it comes to inheritances, family bonds get tested harder than a college student during finals week
Image credits: Ivan Samkov / Pexels (not the actual photo)
One college student inherited a large amount of money from her grandmother, but her stepsister thinks she’s entitled to a part of the cash
Image credits: TheHottieBrunette
The woman refuses to share her inheritance with her stepsister, as she uses the money to pay for college, but is being called selfish by her family for being “unfair”
The OP (original poster), a 20-year-old college student, unexpectedly received a life-changing inheritance from her late grandmother. It was enough to cover her tuition and give her financial breathing room during a time when most people are surviving on ramen noodles and thrift store finds.
The OP’s half-sister, a 24-year-old woman from her dad’s side, discovered the inheritance and demanded a slice of the pie. Why, you might ask? Well, apparently, “It’s only fair, we’re family.”
But grandma wasn’t exactly rolling out the welcome mat for this half-sibling. They met maybe twice, and let’s just say their relationship could be summed up as “nonexistent.”
Yet, suddenly, stepsis dearest felt entitled to a share of the inheritance and even roped in other family members to guilt-trip the OP into giving her a cut. I don’t know about you, but I’d be pretty mad at this point.
Because, you see, when it comes to an inheritance, it’s all about what’s legally outlined in the will. If grandma specifically named the OP as the sole beneficiary, then that’s the final word, no matter how much the half-sibling stomps her feet.
Sure, it might feel unfair to the other sibling, but a will is a legally binding document designed to honor the wishes of the person who passed away.
While the law is different from country to country, and even from one state to another, legal experts say that courts rarely overturn a clear directive unless there’s evidence of foul play. So, sorry, stepsis, unless you’ve got a lawyer and some solid proof, that ship has sailed.
Image credits: Alexander Grey / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
So, when the OP refused to share, she got stuck between accusations and manipulations. Her half-sibling claimed she was being selfish, and her dad’s side of the family pressured her to “do the right thing.” Sounds like emotional manipulation to me. You know, that art of using subtle tactics to control or influence someone’s emotions, to make that person do what you want. And boy, did the OP’s family have a talent for it.
Suddenly, she was the villain for wanting to keep her inheritance, and they were the innocent victims just asking for a “fair” share. Emotional manipulation is a type of mistreatment that’s about making someone question their own decisions, to control how they feel and what they do.
And, in our story, or in the context of inheritance disputes in general, it can involve guilt-tripping, victimizing, or making someone feel morally obligated to share something they rightfully own.
But is it really selfish to hold onto something that was clearly left to her with purpose? Grandma, who was deeply close to the OP, had the chance to include the half-sibling in her will but didn’t. So why would our OP feel guilty for honoring Grandma’s wishes? After all, wills are there for a reason, and this one seems pretty straightforward.
So, what would you do in the poster’s shoes? Would you share the cash or keep it all to yourself? Let us know in the comments!
Netizens side with the woman, saying she doesn’t have to share the money, as her grandma could have added the stepsister to the will if she really wanted to
Image credits: Liza Summer / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Image credits: Melinda Gimpel / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
So it's not fair that OP is getting a financial head start? It's also not fair that OP lost her grandmother that she was very close to. Life isn't fair, get used to it.
And that her life was greatly damaged by cheating sob.
Load More Replies...The dad's side of the family (aka. cheating bastard's people) can chimp in with money, if they feel sorry for the half-sister, who has nothing to do genetically with the grandma leaving the inheritance for her blood-grandaughter.
It's the OPs Grandmother, not the 1/2 sister's. They're unrelated. Also, as has been pointed out the G'mother's will didn't include the step sister, so she should mind her own business and stop harassing the recipient of the money. If the step sister had said nothing, the OP could have offered her some of her own accord. However, demanding money from the inheritance is the height of impudence and deserves to be ignored.
What everyone seems to miss in this story (and the similar ones that regularly pop up) is that it's not about whether grandma liked the other person or not. It's actually about whether the OP likes her sister. It's irrelevant whether the money came from her dead grandma, a shared dead grandma, a lottery ticket, five years of hard work or she just found it on the street. Realistically the only question should be: does she like her sister enough that she's willing to either give or loan her some portion of the money.
Load More Replies...So it's not fair that OP is getting a financial head start? It's also not fair that OP lost her grandmother that she was very close to. Life isn't fair, get used to it.
And that her life was greatly damaged by cheating sob.
Load More Replies...The dad's side of the family (aka. cheating bastard's people) can chimp in with money, if they feel sorry for the half-sister, who has nothing to do genetically with the grandma leaving the inheritance for her blood-grandaughter.
It's the OPs Grandmother, not the 1/2 sister's. They're unrelated. Also, as has been pointed out the G'mother's will didn't include the step sister, so she should mind her own business and stop harassing the recipient of the money. If the step sister had said nothing, the OP could have offered her some of her own accord. However, demanding money from the inheritance is the height of impudence and deserves to be ignored.
What everyone seems to miss in this story (and the similar ones that regularly pop up) is that it's not about whether grandma liked the other person or not. It's actually about whether the OP likes her sister. It's irrelevant whether the money came from her dead grandma, a shared dead grandma, a lottery ticket, five years of hard work or she just found it on the street. Realistically the only question should be: does she like her sister enough that she's willing to either give or loan her some portion of the money.
Load More Replies...
36
10