30 Architects Who Did Not Think Their Projects Through And Created Eyesores (New Pics)
Interview With Expert“Measure twice, cut once” sounds like common sense. However, that’s easier said than done. Some ‘professionals’ are in such a hurry to get their jobs done that their results end up negatively impacting a whole bunch of people.
The ‘Bad Planning’ account on X (formerly Twitter) calls out incompetent and negligent architects, planners, surveyors, and engineers who made egregious and long-lasting mistakes. We’ve collected some of the top photos of design eyesores to show you how a failure to plan affects the entire project and everyone living near there. Scroll down to see what that looks like.
Bored Panda wanted to learn more about what poor city planning looks like, so we reached out to Sweden-based urban planner and designer Luka Kodikaitė. She was kind enough to shed some light on the topic and shared her perspective on the negative impact of car-centric cities. Read on for our full interview with her.
This post may include affiliate links.
We wanted to learn more about poor city planning and how it can impact residents in a negative way. According to Kodikaitė, some of the worst examples of poor city planning often prioritize cars over people.
"With the rise of the automobile, cities experienced a shift towards environments heavily reliant on cars for daily commuting, resulting in longer distances, wider roads, and increased parking space at the expense of green areas," the Sweden-based urban planner explained to Bored Panda.
"One infamous case that altered urban planning history is the clash between Jane Jacobs, a grassroots activist, and Robert Moses, a New York City urban planner, regarding the proposed construction of the Lower Manhattan Expressway. Jacobs argued against carving up inner-city communities for the sake of expressways, emphasizing the detrimental impact on neighborhoods and community life," she shared.
"This emphasis on car use is also reflected in the treatment of urban cycling by planners. Cyclists are often marginalized and perceived negatively in comparison to drivers. We see such hazardous examples such as bike lanes placed on high-speed roads or highways, where cyclists are extremely more vulnerable in traffic situations compared to cars."
These car-centric cities can have lots of negative consequences for the people living there, from increased air pollution and traffic congestion to ugly environments and reduced walkability.
"Another detrimental by-product of car-oriented development is the urban sprawl, leading to low-density suburbs lacking essential amenities and perpetuating car dependency while discouraging walkability," Kodikaitė told Bored Panda.
Same person fixing this, as the one fixing electrical wire in the church pic we have seen on BP before?
With all of this in mind, we were interested in finding out how planners and architects can become more aware of making potential mistakes or decisions with negative consequences.
"Unfortunately, in our current economic system, funding decides the quality of the projects. However, there are still ways that planners and architects can influence the outcomes within those frames," the urban planner told Bored Panda.
"One pitfall to avoid is the tendency to adopt a 'one-plan-fits-all' mentality. The same concept applied in one country or community will probably function differently when applied in a different context. An effective approach is to actively involve the community and stakeholders in the planning process. By listening to the people who will inhabit the spaces, unexpected insights can emerge, completely turning around the preconceived ideas that were initially based on well-intended, yet stereotyped, assumptions," Kodikaitė urged planners to approach these decisions from a different perspective and be more involved with the community.
This is a great idea, just change the glass to clear, and his dog or cat can look out St the world.
“On the other hand, in some cases, planners and architects can become too rigidly set in their old ways, adopting the ‘we’ve always done this way, and it worked just fine’ mentality without acknowledging that the current has become outdated. Examples exist in other countries which have data to prove that different models and approaches can be significantly greater, yet planners in other countries refuse to apply it, thinking it would never work on their soil," she pointed out that this sort of narrowmindedness can be detrimental to everyone.
"Lastly, in the current day’s spirit of sustainable thinking, planners ought to work with the future in mind. Designing sustainably long term involves creating adaptable spaces and structures capable of evolving alongside changing needs and circumstances. This approach minimizes resource waste and ensures long-term viability."
According to The World Bank, around 56%—a jaw-dropping 4.4 billion—of all people on Earth live in cities. This trend of urbanization is only going to grow in the coming decades.
By 2050, it’s thought that nearly 7 out of 10 people on the planet will live in cities. However, this brings with it some massive challenges. How do you build cities in such a way as to comfortably accommodate a rapidly rising number of residents?
Seem like a bathroom, may be nice with the fresh air. A more beautiful solution could have existed, though. 😂
You have my vote, such a waste of space and so bad for the environment, I know that a coffee shop without drive-through would still require parking space but at least when ppl leave the car to get the coffee they turn the engine off
Load More Replies...And evidently only 1 person working inside. (1 parked car). Wonder if this was during Covid when only drive-thru windows were open.
During the COVID period people were supposed to work from home as much as possible so I would be surprised that this was taken during that period. And if there is really only 1 person working at the time of that photo, then that is mainly bad management. By the way, I suspect that such a job does not really pay well, so who says whether the employees can afford a car?
Load More Replies...When you see there's a line that long wouldn't you park and walk in?
Not if this image was taken during the pandemic and the inside was closed!
Load More Replies...Clearly they are not allowing people inside, and only the drive through is open. And from the parking lot, it looks like they only have one (possibly 2) people working today.
Has anyone besides Sunny Day realized that this image might be from the pandemic days, even if the repost is dated August 2023? It is a Getty image so it might have been online since 2020.
I get there is a degree of laziness. But, we need to consider other people have other needs than yourself. Like, when I have a small child, it is hard to get them out of the car and carry a hot coffee. I and many others also have physical disabilities and drive thrus make our loves easier. On my good days, when child free, I often do go in. But, employees are generally told to help drive thru first, so the person in side has to wait longer.
Did you know they sell coffee at the grocers? You can actually make it at home!
My guess is that this is a misleading photo. I'm thinking this is a photo taken during the pandemic, when you would have HAD to do drive-thru, and not allowed to park and go inside to get your order.
I hate Starbucks. Why do people waste their time waiting in line like this? If you're going to drink Starbucks, at least use the app and order ahead and just go inside for 30 seconds.
I'm hoping the reason nobody went inside is cuz of COVID and the lobby being closed.
I used to regularly grab lunch at a fast food place (back when I was cheap) whose drive-thru line was always exceptionally long. I’d walk past the cars, go inside and order, and then grab my lunch and walk past the same damn cars that had moved 30 feet.
Why cant Offices have coffee machine? The ones I worked in had them. Cant imagine going out earlier just to que in line for cofee
Wow that long a*s line. People would rather wait in that then go inside?
It looks like the mystery downvoter is here again today. I'm downvoting this message just to steal his fun.
None of you must live where it rains or snows all the time these are a god send could be handled better but bless coffee shacks
I cut through the drive through in front of a car and come out and cut back through behind the same car - shaking my head the whole time...said car being about 15 minutes from the window usually.
Not a single parking spot taken. How lazy have we become that we'd rather sit in a line this long? Nevermind, asked and answered.
At first glance I thought "that's got to be Dutch Bros" then upon closer inspection I think that's a Starbucks sign on the side. Which if it was a Dutch Bros then you would see a worker outside taking the orders.
So is it the best coffee ever, or the worst service. I think it's the cocaine
Time to go make my own coffee right now no wait no sitting in line no creating a road hazard no pumping pollution into the air while I wait... I feel like such a loser.
Yeah well,those aquifers don't judge-they just let it all pour out-like All of those "runoff surfaces .. Ok. Why the hell are these people unable to exit their gas guzzling, exhaust spewing vehicles?!?!!!!
If I even get coffee, I buy it either ready made in the supermarket or outside the supermarket at their coffee machine. Lol
This is nothing compared to "Bigot Chik" on a Saturday afternoon since they're always closed on Sundays.
If you park your car and go inside you will be out in less than 5 minutes.
They should changethe layout, move the entrance to the lower right, and replace the parking lot with a driveway that follows a similar path to the current queue, but inside the boundry line. At least that would take the majority of the queue off road.
I think it's pretty clear that people are at the drive through because the inside is closed, but if it was closed for something like the pandemic it would have been nice if they had used some cones or something to add space to the line, and maybe a "please turn engines off" sign or two.
Load More Replies...We have a few with attractive and scantily clad (bikini or lingerie) here, but they tend to be "huts", not largeish permanent buildings. The large number of empty parking spaces and size of the building.ake me think that the people calling this a pandemic pic are right. It does make me a little crazy that this seems to be mostly for "coffee" though Starbucks does also have breakfast and snack food and a substantial number of drinks beyond what most people can make at home.
Load More Replies...Starbuck's main profit isn't from coffee. It's from selling self-esteem at $7 a pop.
Probably a Tim Horton's - and, yes, you need 3 acres by what I've witnessed.
The worst thing about this is how the people in the cars seem to value not getting out (laziness) over time (you'd get served much more quickly by going into the shop.)
Why do people do this? Are they really this lazy? It is 100× faster to just park and walk in. In-n-out burger is like this too. People will literally wait in the drive through line for hours. I just park and walk in and get my burger or coffee in under 15 minutes
This is actually disgusting to me. Just frickin insane. nobody wants to get out of their car, would rather waste all that time and gas to save them from lifting their a*s from seat of car.
This is clearly a Starbucks and clearly the U.S. The biggest problem is that anyone who wants to drive in to park can't easily do it. Hopefully this picture was taken to find a solution, like widening the entrance, removing some spaces to create double lanes like Chick fil A does in my area, etc. If it were me I would just park across the street to the left and walk across to Starbucks, if I liked Starbucks (I don't). A lot of people love it, clearly, and are just lazy af.
Not one of them smart enough to park and walk in, and every one of them whines about gas prices instead of shutting off the engine for 30 minutes.
Yeah, it's so weird that not a single person parked and walked in. It's almost as if they can't, like because the inside is closed, maybe because of a pandemic or something.
Load More Replies...Would probably be faster to park and go in. but no, almost the whole lot is blocked by those waiting in line.
There's no community any more. Let the children sit in front of their screens, rather than play with neighbourhood children. Then we wonder why they have trouble communicating to one another, are obese and can't play active games. this is an oversimplification, but surely there's a problem when children aren't allowed to play.
There are plenty of issues to consider, from offering plenty of accommodation and good transportation systems to how you integrate green areas into the beating urban heart of the megapolis.
Not only that, but you also have to consider how the architectural and design details affect the population. That includes buildings and roads but also extends to everything from lampposts and benches to how you design trash cans.
There must be something wrong with me, I rather like it. Not much, because it's not an attractive building as such, but preferable to unstaggered ( sorry can't think of the word, only just got up)
At the very least put a garden bed under there and pretend it's meant to look like that.
Your mental and emotional health can vary quite a bit depending on your surroundings. Think about how you’d feel living surrounded by minimalist designs, industrial buildings, and brutalist homes all day, every day. Then consider how you’d feel if you walked past historical buildings, parks, and architecturally unique homes on your way to work or school. Being surrounded by beauty can do wonders for our health and happiness.
The ‘Bad Planning’ account was created nearly 5 years ago, back in July 2019. In the half a decade since its founding, it’s drawn quite a crowd of architecture fans. At the time of writing, the project had a loyal following of 151.5k X users.
The curator of the account calls it a “celebration” of all the low-quality stuff “imposed on our environment.” It’s a way to call out incompetence and thoughtlessness in all the things related to urban planning. It’s also an invitation for all professionals to do better.
But look, it has those little bike gutters on the side so you can walk your bike instead of carrying it. I'd still just carry my bike.
If I were walking on that sidewalk, I would throw that sign into the road way.
Many of the massive mistakes that you can see in the images in this list seem obvious to most of us. So it’s sometimes mind-boggling to see actual professionals who are unable to spot their egregious errors before they end up being integrated into the living, breathing body of the city.
There are a few potential explanations for why these mistakes end up being greenlit.
Probably the most likely explanation for bad designs getting approved is simple carelessness. The people who make the plans and approve them might be overworked, burned out, or demotivated.
So they simply do the bare minimum at their jobs, without thinking about the consequences of their actions. Improving the quality of the plans, then, becomes a question of motivating your workforce. You can do that with fair pay, growth opportunities, acknowledging their hard work, etc.
Uhh Oh BP let a dirty word through. Now all the children will start worshiping Satan.
Alternatively, the architects, planners, and engineers might not have the necessary experience or skills to make the right calls. There are no silver bullet solutions to this problem, aside from hard work, education, and good mentorship.
However, that requires a lot of effort from the individual in terms of research and editing. On top of that, it means that they need to be in an environment where they have lots of support from their colleagues.
Everyone makes mistakes, sure. But those errors shouldn’t be approved just because they're the cheapest or easiest options. Before you finalize any plans or designs, it’s a good idea to run them by your colleagues, professors, or even your family and friends. They can give you some honest feedback. But you have to be open to taking criticism. It’s a skill that can get you far in life.
Why didn't they just run the down pipes down the sides in the corners? So weird.
You might be so close to the designs that you miss something extremely obvious. Asking for feedback on your designs is similar to asking someone to read through an important essay. The other person looks at the entire project from a different perspective.
They might notice that you’ve made an unintentionally silly design decision somewhere, just like they might spot that you’ve misspelled the title on the cover page of your essay. Having people act like your personal focus group is invaluable.
This is an absolute crime! A bay brings in so much light in comparison to a flat window, and this is as ugly as sin!
French balconette with windows (wrong way..), the architect slept during class?
Does BP even know what an architect does? At least half of these have absolutely nothing to do with architecture.
BP is mostly made up of tabloid, vapid influencers with no knowledge of anything. So no, they have no clue what architects or engineers do.
Load More Replies...Yeah, most of these are just about ordinary people messing with their own homes. Nothing to do with architects or engineers. Grow up, BP.
Hats off to the BP "authors" and their intentional mislabeling of this post. The clickbait title got me to read the first 12 or so. If they'd correctly labelled it, I wouldn't have read it at all.
Why are there so many people that seem to hate BP on BP? Just move on already!
Does BP even know what an architect does? At least half of these have absolutely nothing to do with architecture.
BP is mostly made up of tabloid, vapid influencers with no knowledge of anything. So no, they have no clue what architects or engineers do.
Load More Replies...Yeah, most of these are just about ordinary people messing with their own homes. Nothing to do with architects or engineers. Grow up, BP.
Hats off to the BP "authors" and their intentional mislabeling of this post. The clickbait title got me to read the first 12 or so. If they'd correctly labelled it, I wouldn't have read it at all.
Why are there so many people that seem to hate BP on BP? Just move on already!