Father Punches Comedian In The Face Over “Disgusting” Joke About His Three-Month-Old Son

Yeah the people who see it as a sexual comment about an infant are the ones to worry about, because that's not what was said at all. They are reading their own interpretation into it, and outing themselves

Again, you think that it's creepy when old men talk about how they'll have sex with a young girl when the young girl grows up, but this "comedian's" comment was OK. Why? Because the baby's father is a raging homophobe?

1) Yes, because the father is a raging homophobe, and the jibe was aimed directly at him. 2) Because old men talk about their *own* fantasies, whereas the comedian directly mentioned choices the child *might* make on their own *when they're an appropriate age". The two are as unrelated as your current sexual fantasies and any sexual behaviour I might have 18 years from now.

So by your logic anyone who talks about a kid growing up to get married is also off limits. He said nothing sexual about the child, he said the kid could grow up to to do it, and he used language he knew would hurt a fragile pathetic Nazi loving homophobe. So many people here seem h3ll bent on defending the homophobe Nazi they have thrown reading comprehension out the window..or never had it to begin with

How exactly does not wanting my female daughter be associated with male genitilia in her mouth make me homophobic? As clearly stated, I am against that guys views. I am against him. Not his child. You can go insulting people (though personally I think you shouldn't), you can say HE might grow to like big Black c***s, but leave the kid out of it. Hope you can read and understand my reply.

I genuinely still am not understanding Wanderwoman. I'm not trying to be dense, but as far as I know the father here is a well known anti-lgbqt activist. He's posting his son's birthday on FB. A "comedian" attacks the father with "No-one will be able to prevent that baby from being gay". Is there any controversy in that part?

That first part wasn't the problem. The COmedian then went on to describe explicit sexual acts that the baby will engage in when he grows up. THAT is what wasn't OK.

... and because it "wasn't ok" the father has the right to violently attack the "comedian". Great. Then you also support the father's other activities, like beating up gay people. The father finds LGTB people offensive, so he has the right to attack them, too. That's what you are defending.

Maria: Furthermore, let's say the father did not use violence to attack, and only Twitter responses. What could they possibly be? "My boy will NEVER be gay", "My boy will NEVER be attracted to black people" There's nothing that could be said that wouldn't immediately mark him as the far-right person he is. Maybe violence was the least embarassing option for the puncher. Not that I support it

Max: He didn't describe explicit sexual acts that the baby *will* engage in. But, as written, the *possibility* that he will engage in them when he's grown. There's obviously some disconnect on how the two of us read this, because I doubt we're far apart on wanting to protect the child. If I write "there's a possibility that when my child is grown he will meet a gay black man and have sex with them" do you still find that offensive? Genuinely curious, because I can't figure out how there's such disagreement on this.

Dunno why you (and likely me too) are being downvoted.

Again, for the fvckteenth time. Why is it creepy when some old creep does a public countdown until a girl is legal, but describing sexual acts that a baby will engage in when he grows up is suddenly OK? Are are you going to claim that I'm homophobic. because evidently, everybody who dares to disagree with you is suddenly a homophobe?

The worst part of this story is I'm just discovering how stupid so many people are. Who said "describing sexual acts that a baby will engage in when he grows up is suddenly OK"? Jesus Christ, people, learn to read and to interpret what you read. It was not OK, and the comedian is the un-funniest person on Earth. Does it give a violent neo nazi the right to attack him? If you think it does, you are the same kind of rubbish as the neo nazi.

Research points to sexualtiy being more nature than nurture, so the baby is probably gay or straight, but won't know for a while.

Precisely the point. There's nothing to prevent.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Being gay and being sexually active are different. Same doe straight people. Most evidence points to born this way for sexual preference, especially in men, although babies can't tell gender so I would argue we are all born pan.

Stick to the topic at hand will you.