Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

New AI Tells If A Person Is Perceived As ‘Trustworthy’ Based On Their Face And Some People Find It Problematic
User submission
491
35.3K

New AI Tells If A Person Is Perceived As ‘Trustworthy’ Based On Their Face And Some People Find It Problematic

Interview
ADVERTISEMENT

French researcher Nicolas Baumard shared news about his and his colleagues’ latest research only to create a fierce storm of debate. Now, Twitter users are divided about how to react to the algorithm that automatically evaluates the  ‘perceived trustworthiness’ of faces in historic European portraits.

Some people were interested to read Baumard’s insights about rising perceived trustworthiness levels in paintings over time and how they correlated to the appearance of liberal values and better living standards. But others went on the warpath. Some Twitter users branded the algorithm as ‘racist’ and linked it to phrenology. Meanwhile, others said that critics may not have read or understood the paper fully and rushed to conclusions.

Bored Panda reached out to the researchers. According to head researcher Lou Safra, the algorithm never intended to detect who is trustworthy or not but who would be perceived as trustworthy or not. “These are of course two different things: someone may appear untrustworthy and be very nice and, on the opposite, someone may be always looking nice and exploit people’s trust all the time. We were interested in measuring whether people want to look friendly.” Read on for Safra’s other insights and clarifications.

You can read the full research paper right here.

RELATED:

    This tweet saying that the research and the algorithm were allegedly ‘racist’ went viral

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: bdoulaoblongata

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    One of the study’s researchers put the algorithm into context and explained everything in detail

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    “When people take a picture of themselves for professional purposes, they may choose a particular pose and facial expression in order to advertise that they are competent in their job. However, they may choose a different pose and facial expression if they choose a picture for social media because they want to convey a different message. The type of message people were willing to convey is exactly what we were interested in, but at the historical level,” Safra gave an example.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Researcher Safra explained: “We based our analysis on existing data in social cognition showing that people from different cultures agree on some of the facial features that are associated with more or less perceived trustworthiness—it thus seems that some of the elements guiding impressions of trustworthiness are ‘shared’ by different cultures. Of course, it does not imply that everybody will agree on whether or not a specific face appears trustworthy.”

    The researcher continued: “First impressions people form from faces are indeed influenced by individual-specific features (such as the persons you met before and the type of social interaction you had with them) but they are also influenced by these ‘shared’ elements. Based on the fact that these ‘shared’ elements are used by people from different cultures and based also on theoretical work on the evolution of emotional expression, we made the hypotheses that some of these ‘shared’ elements were also perceived as displays of trustworthiness in the past.”

    According to Safra, if we asked today’s participants how trustworthy a sitter on a painting of the 16th century looks, they might use cues such as the outfit and painting style or even their knowledge about this period for making inferences. “In other words, cues that had a completely different meaning in the 16th century. This is why we designed an algorithm that is blinded to these irrelevant cues and that only produces perceived trustworthiness scores based on the ‘shared’ elements,” Safra said.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “More precisely, we trained our algorithm on avatars representing people from different ethnicities and that have been shown to vary in their degree of perceived trustworthiness in different populations—this was completely automated (we did not decide which trait to include) and based on previously validated research. Our goal was really to create a tool for measuring how much people from the past wanted to advertise trustworthiness in their portraits— nothing to do with inferring their actual level of trustworthiness or with profiling.”

    Image credits: baumard_nicolas

    While some Twitter users have said that the researchers are essentially conducting phrenology, this isn’t the case: it’s not about detecting personality traits from the shape of the skull but about detecting the facial expressions chosen by the painter or the subject. These expressions show what people choose to signal as their cultural environment changes.

    Baumard’s research found that perceived trustworthiness in portraits between the years 1500 and 2000 increased, alongside a drop in interpersonal violence, as well as the rise of democratic values in Western Europe. Among these liberal values are religious tolerance and political freedom.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    What’s more, the research suggests that the rise of displays of trustworthiness is closely linked to increased living standards. These include better economic performance, lower crime rates, and more inclusive institutions.

    So, in short, as people have more and more money, and their quality of life increases, they’re more likely to trust others and to display themselves in a trustworthy manner. And this is expressed more and more through the paintings that artists draw.

    According to the researchers, their results were consistent with other research documenting the so-called ‘Smile Revolution’ and “a rise of prosocial displays in paintings and in novels.” Baumard also drew attention to their findings that those people who live in places where trust and cooperation are higher displayed higher levels of trustworthiness in their selfies.

    People had a lot to say about the results and both criticized and defended the research

    Image credits: YOONGIIll

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: tymwol

    Image credits: Meliseymo

    Image credits: YoungOG_RV

    Image credits: ApplecookedDane

    Image credits: DrUnicornPhD

    Image credits: miniMaiasaura

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: SamColl58124830

    Image credits: ravlun

    Image credits: AyoSwain

    Image credits: AyoSwain

    Image credits: deep_sea_blob

    Image credits: alienjames2000

    Image credits: Kaldorei_Life

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Kaldorei_Life

    35Kviews

    Share on Facebook
    Jonas Grinevičius

    Jonas Grinevičius

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Storytelling, journalism, and art are a core part of who I am. I've been writing and drawing ever since I could walk—there is nothing else I'd rather do. My formal education, however, is focused on politics, philosophy, and economics because I've always been curious about the gap between the ideal and the real. At work, I'm a Senior Writer and I cover a broad range of topics that I'm passionate about: from psychology and changes in work culture to healthy living, relationships, and design. In my spare time, I'm an avid hiker and reader, enjoy writing short stories, and love to doodle. I thrive when I'm outdoors, going on small adventures in nature. However, you can also find me enjoying a big mug of coffee with a good book (or ten) and entertaining friends with fantasy tabletop games and sci-fi movies.

    Read less »
    Jonas Grinevičius

    Jonas Grinevičius

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Storytelling, journalism, and art are a core part of who I am. I've been writing and drawing ever since I could walk—there is nothing else I'd rather do. My formal education, however, is focused on politics, philosophy, and economics because I've always been curious about the gap between the ideal and the real. At work, I'm a Senior Writer and I cover a broad range of topics that I'm passionate about: from psychology and changes in work culture to healthy living, relationships, and design. In my spare time, I'm an avid hiker and reader, enjoy writing short stories, and love to doodle. I thrive when I'm outdoors, going on small adventures in nature. However, you can also find me enjoying a big mug of coffee with a good book (or ten) and entertaining friends with fantasy tabletop games and sci-fi movies.

    Denis Tymulis

    Denis Tymulis

    Author, Community member

    Read more »

    Denis is a photo editor at Bored Panda. After getting his bachelor's degree in Multimedia and Computer Design, he tried to succeed in digital design, advertising, and branding. Also, Denis really enjoys sports and loves everything related to board sports and water.

    Read less »

    Denis Tymulis

    Denis Tymulis

    Author, Community member

    Denis is a photo editor at Bored Panda. After getting his bachelor's degree in Multimedia and Computer Design, he tried to succeed in digital design, advertising, and branding. Also, Denis really enjoys sports and loves everything related to board sports and water.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    Darwinist
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think the Biden VS Trump one is bias since you need a grumpy picture of both for a fair comparison.

    Darwinist
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well anything about politics here is definitely wrong. Not saying any of them are better than the other because politicians are crappy biologists.

    Load More Replies...
    Hans
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Do not politicise scientific research, paricularly if you do not fully understand it!

    Daria Z
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think that whether we trust people with certain facial features or not depends mostly on our personal experience. Some faces may appear more aggressive (higher levels of certain hormones do change our facial expression), and who would trust an aggressive person? In most cases, one would be wary or would try to stay away, I think.

    WilvanderHeijden
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Basically it's just another storm in a glass of water. In 48 hours everyone will fight another anti-racist, anti-sexist or pro- or anti- abortion battle.

    Forty Seven Pandas
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yup. We're a generation of online activists. Most will not risk anything worse than having a comment disliked, but things rarely go beyond that.

    Load More Replies...
    Scyth
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Isn't trustworthiness a personal feeling one has towards the other? For example, if a person was betrayed at some point in his life by, let's say, a ginger, he might have unconscious bias towards ginger people. And I don't think it's possible to accurately analyze personal feelings.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Of course it is not possible to accurately analyze personal feelings - on an individual level. That is the point of this research: to statistically sum up vague feelings of "are gingers trustworthy" into a clear cut yes/no/maybe. So if one ginger has betrayed you, and all the other have not betrayed anybody, then your opinion is irrelevant.

    Load More Replies...
    Thomas
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I still don't see the link with racism: software that copies the human perception isn't racist. Maybe human perception can be questioned but a machine that copies behavior doesn't know anything about race. The problem with race is that anyone that looks at a reason to be offended jumps on it: we worked in facial recognition a few years ago and it was performing poorly on black skin.. just some evil racist software, right. No one questioned that maybe the universe's physics are racist then because black skin isn't as reflective and shadows are not as visible and contrast is lower. I think every camera that uses light to capture images must be racist then. Not everything is racism but idiots jump on it right away.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Early films were engineered to have a colour sensitivity that would be more suitable for pale skin. Racism? Or just a tell tail of systematic racism (whites being richer, and more likely customers of the film manufacturers). Is there a similar issue with facial detection algorithms? Is the initial sobel filtering to detect edges in a face the best way for feature extraction? Or just the best way the early researchers could think of (because again due to systemic racism, they probably stared at a pale face in the mirror every morning)? The problem everybody seems to have is to mix up "hatered based", systematic and "can't help my gut feeling" racism. They are three very different things.

    Load More Replies...
    Chris DiFonso
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's VERY important to read and understand that this is about "perceived trustworthiness." The word, "perceived" is the key. The study's author isn't claiming that the attributes accurately reflect whether a person is trustworthy. The study is about PERCEPTION.

    Zophra
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Hmmm... I do not think this method is very "trustworthy."

    Luiza NP
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don’t understand how it would be possible to conclude that a certain feature in different cultures and different time periods can represent the same thing (“perceived trustworthiness”). I mean, they cannot make a time machine and run the experiment with the people that lived at that era. They are just guessing/assuming. And I don’t think it is correct to assume that social cooperation and trust increased after the “enlightenment” era. The cultural changes went from a “collectivist” view to a more individualistic and competitive comprehension of society.

    Aunt Messy
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is old hat. I read a similar paper done 40 years ago. People are freaking out...why again? They're talking about PERCEIVED trustworthiness, not actual. It's about first impressions and reading facial expressions, not inherent characteristics. ...///... I guess we can always trust the stupid and the vapid to misinterpret everything they ever see.

    enjoyinglife
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This article is biased, racial (why all white? Afraid of BLM?) And just a worthless waste of time.

    Marnie
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    AI is going to be the next thing that causes racial inequality. We'll fix the whole incarceration thing and other things, then AI will come along. It never ends. Also, AI causing injustice is its true danger, not that it will take over the world. Police departments are already putting it to frightening use. Of course, there will be 20 years of injustice as a result before we even think of fixing laws to address it.

    Anna Repp
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It all boils down to the old "you should smile more" stance that all women genuinely hate. Shoot me with your rubber bullets, but I'm not walking around smiling all the time!

    Jessica
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Trustworthiness for me only comes from one physical feature and that's the kind cold or crazy eyes. The rest is just various levels of not their fault features but making serial killer eyes is something trustworthy people can turn on and off

    Jessica
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Like the girl from the crazy girlfriend memes she turns them on for that video and has normal eyes the rest of the time but people like Charles Manson couldn't ever turn them off even when his freedom depended on it

    Load More Replies...
    Truth Monster
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    AIs are only as good as the data they are given, and abstract concepts like "trustworthiness" even before you add race is problematic. When you add in race, and especially cross-race data, the AI cannot avoid the all-too-human problem of bias.

    Kenny Kulbiski
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I dunno, in the first picture the trust worthy looking guy looks like the type of person that would leave you hanging in the wind at the first sign of trouble. No scientific proof just my hanging in the wind expertise.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Call me racist, but I agree. I can trust that he means good, but I just know that when the s**t hits the fan, he won't deliver. Weird how much our gut feel can tell.

    Load More Replies...
    Laugh or not
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The aim and means of the study confuse me. Do they want to see how the frequency of représentation of 'trustworthiness' change over time (most of the analysis) or do they want to see how the représentation of trutsworthiness change over time (some of the paragraphs)? Plus you can't say that certain traits inherently represent trustworthiness. At most, you can say that over time, people were shown with less tension and agressivity - which is globally true is Western art.

    LittleMissLotus
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment has been deleted.

    Charlotte Stewart
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why absolutely no mention of how the "untrustworthy" faces were usually frowning, whereas the "trustworthy" faces were generally smiling.

    Lora Mad
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I wouldn't trust the rightmost, because he looks moronic and beyond stupid, and I don't trust moronic people, their decisions and actions. The most trustworthy to me is the one right next to the neutral one, to the right of it.

    Cori
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Am I the only one who feels like this 'study' was entirely pointless? I find handwriting analysis way more interesting and I think it's a bit more reliable as well.

    Jo Choto
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    And they managed to concoct that entire cocktail without a single black person being studied.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe there weren't too many paintings of black people back then that could now be analyzed?

    Load More Replies...
    El Dee
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    The only way this is useful is as codifying people's biases. However, trying to codify 'trustworthiness' isn't going to be possible. This is psuedo science..

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Since this is trying to codify "perceived trustworthiness", I think your conclusion of "pseudo science" is both wrong and unnecessarily hateful. Also jumping to the a priori conclusion of real trustworthiness not being codifyable is a bit premature? Or how much work have you done in the field?

    Load More Replies...
    John L
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    So, when will we be getting a study on NY senator Chucky Schumer? He looks like the ideal politician to get the highlight study.

    Leszek Niedziela
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    Since the portal is getting most of the viewers throug Fb and tries to be politically correct to the brim, it slowly moves towards BoringPanda.

    Darwinist
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think the Biden VS Trump one is bias since you need a grumpy picture of both for a fair comparison.

    Darwinist
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well anything about politics here is definitely wrong. Not saying any of them are better than the other because politicians are crappy biologists.

    Load More Replies...
    Hans
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Do not politicise scientific research, paricularly if you do not fully understand it!

    Daria Z
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think that whether we trust people with certain facial features or not depends mostly on our personal experience. Some faces may appear more aggressive (higher levels of certain hormones do change our facial expression), and who would trust an aggressive person? In most cases, one would be wary or would try to stay away, I think.

    WilvanderHeijden
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Basically it's just another storm in a glass of water. In 48 hours everyone will fight another anti-racist, anti-sexist or pro- or anti- abortion battle.

    Forty Seven Pandas
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yup. We're a generation of online activists. Most will not risk anything worse than having a comment disliked, but things rarely go beyond that.

    Load More Replies...
    Scyth
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Isn't trustworthiness a personal feeling one has towards the other? For example, if a person was betrayed at some point in his life by, let's say, a ginger, he might have unconscious bias towards ginger people. And I don't think it's possible to accurately analyze personal feelings.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Of course it is not possible to accurately analyze personal feelings - on an individual level. That is the point of this research: to statistically sum up vague feelings of "are gingers trustworthy" into a clear cut yes/no/maybe. So if one ginger has betrayed you, and all the other have not betrayed anybody, then your opinion is irrelevant.

    Load More Replies...
    Thomas
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I still don't see the link with racism: software that copies the human perception isn't racist. Maybe human perception can be questioned but a machine that copies behavior doesn't know anything about race. The problem with race is that anyone that looks at a reason to be offended jumps on it: we worked in facial recognition a few years ago and it was performing poorly on black skin.. just some evil racist software, right. No one questioned that maybe the universe's physics are racist then because black skin isn't as reflective and shadows are not as visible and contrast is lower. I think every camera that uses light to capture images must be racist then. Not everything is racism but idiots jump on it right away.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Early films were engineered to have a colour sensitivity that would be more suitable for pale skin. Racism? Or just a tell tail of systematic racism (whites being richer, and more likely customers of the film manufacturers). Is there a similar issue with facial detection algorithms? Is the initial sobel filtering to detect edges in a face the best way for feature extraction? Or just the best way the early researchers could think of (because again due to systemic racism, they probably stared at a pale face in the mirror every morning)? The problem everybody seems to have is to mix up "hatered based", systematic and "can't help my gut feeling" racism. They are three very different things.

    Load More Replies...
    Chris DiFonso
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's VERY important to read and understand that this is about "perceived trustworthiness." The word, "perceived" is the key. The study's author isn't claiming that the attributes accurately reflect whether a person is trustworthy. The study is about PERCEPTION.

    Zophra
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Hmmm... I do not think this method is very "trustworthy."

    Luiza NP
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don’t understand how it would be possible to conclude that a certain feature in different cultures and different time periods can represent the same thing (“perceived trustworthiness”). I mean, they cannot make a time machine and run the experiment with the people that lived at that era. They are just guessing/assuming. And I don’t think it is correct to assume that social cooperation and trust increased after the “enlightenment” era. The cultural changes went from a “collectivist” view to a more individualistic and competitive comprehension of society.

    Aunt Messy
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is old hat. I read a similar paper done 40 years ago. People are freaking out...why again? They're talking about PERCEIVED trustworthiness, not actual. It's about first impressions and reading facial expressions, not inherent characteristics. ...///... I guess we can always trust the stupid and the vapid to misinterpret everything they ever see.

    enjoyinglife
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This article is biased, racial (why all white? Afraid of BLM?) And just a worthless waste of time.

    Marnie
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    AI is going to be the next thing that causes racial inequality. We'll fix the whole incarceration thing and other things, then AI will come along. It never ends. Also, AI causing injustice is its true danger, not that it will take over the world. Police departments are already putting it to frightening use. Of course, there will be 20 years of injustice as a result before we even think of fixing laws to address it.

    Anna Repp
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It all boils down to the old "you should smile more" stance that all women genuinely hate. Shoot me with your rubber bullets, but I'm not walking around smiling all the time!

    Jessica
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Trustworthiness for me only comes from one physical feature and that's the kind cold or crazy eyes. The rest is just various levels of not their fault features but making serial killer eyes is something trustworthy people can turn on and off

    Jessica
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Like the girl from the crazy girlfriend memes she turns them on for that video and has normal eyes the rest of the time but people like Charles Manson couldn't ever turn them off even when his freedom depended on it

    Load More Replies...
    Truth Monster
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    AIs are only as good as the data they are given, and abstract concepts like "trustworthiness" even before you add race is problematic. When you add in race, and especially cross-race data, the AI cannot avoid the all-too-human problem of bias.

    Kenny Kulbiski
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I dunno, in the first picture the trust worthy looking guy looks like the type of person that would leave you hanging in the wind at the first sign of trouble. No scientific proof just my hanging in the wind expertise.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Call me racist, but I agree. I can trust that he means good, but I just know that when the s**t hits the fan, he won't deliver. Weird how much our gut feel can tell.

    Load More Replies...
    Laugh or not
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The aim and means of the study confuse me. Do they want to see how the frequency of représentation of 'trustworthiness' change over time (most of the analysis) or do they want to see how the représentation of trutsworthiness change over time (some of the paragraphs)? Plus you can't say that certain traits inherently represent trustworthiness. At most, you can say that over time, people were shown with less tension and agressivity - which is globally true is Western art.

    LittleMissLotus
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment has been deleted.

    Charlotte Stewart
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Why absolutely no mention of how the "untrustworthy" faces were usually frowning, whereas the "trustworthy" faces were generally smiling.

    Lora Mad
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I wouldn't trust the rightmost, because he looks moronic and beyond stupid, and I don't trust moronic people, their decisions and actions. The most trustworthy to me is the one right next to the neutral one, to the right of it.

    Cori
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Am I the only one who feels like this 'study' was entirely pointless? I find handwriting analysis way more interesting and I think it's a bit more reliable as well.

    Jo Choto
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    And they managed to concoct that entire cocktail without a single black person being studied.

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe there weren't too many paintings of black people back then that could now be analyzed?

    Load More Replies...
    El Dee
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    The only way this is useful is as codifying people's biases. However, trying to codify 'trustworthiness' isn't going to be possible. This is psuedo science..

    Electric Ed
    Community Member
    4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Since this is trying to codify "perceived trustworthiness", I think your conclusion of "pseudo science" is both wrong and unnecessarily hateful. Also jumping to the a priori conclusion of real trustworthiness not being codifyable is a bit premature? Or how much work have you done in the field?

    Load More Replies...
    John L
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    So, when will we be getting a study on NY senator Chucky Schumer? He looks like the ideal politician to get the highlight study.

    Leszek Niedziela
    Community Member
    4 years ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    Since the portal is getting most of the viewers throug Fb and tries to be politically correct to the brim, it slowly moves towards BoringPanda.

    Related on Bored Panda
    Related on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda