Hayley I still find that an extremely dangerous argument to make. The conceptual equivalent would be to accept money from someone to kill an old man and justifying it by using the money to build a hospital for others. Using blood money from an evil action for good doesn't justify the evil action itself, no matter how much rich old men like to think so.

Hayley, you appear to support the argument of allowing hunting if the money goes toward conservation. The fallacy in that argument is in saying that you can pay money to do anything as long as it's ultimately used for the betterment of others. If, say, someone had offered him the chance to kick a few African children around instead as long as he pays a sum of money, is it justifiable for him to kick the children around if the money goes toward building schools for those children?

Sheralyn, I don't like that it happens. And I don't want it to look like I do. I'm just stating facts that the death of an old animal that's

Ah right. That makes sense too!

I want to add that this is very important because wildlife preservation in Africa is very underfunded.

Going to die anyway you might as well use it to save other animals

It's allowed because when you acquire a legitimate permit the money from the permits can be used to care for other animals.

It is Join the army and hunt Isis!

The dark web is a scary place Anna

African elephants are.