ADVERTISEMENT

Science is deemed a very serious discipline that is quite incompatible with humor. And rightly so, as it requires composure and concentration to gather data, analyze, interpret, and test it so discoveries and innovations that we live with today can be made. However, sometimes it can be beneficial to combine the two, especially when learning about it so the information doesn’t go in one ear and out the other.

The Facebook group “The Darker Side Of Science” has mastered doing exactly so—blending fun and science. Bored Panda has gathered their best posts in the list below, which is full of “bad experiments, worse scientists, studies you wish to god you could unsee, and much, much more.” Scroll down to find them, and don’t forget to upvote the ones you found to be unexpectedly dark.

While you’re at it, make sure to check out a conversation with science comedian Brian Malow, who kindly agreed to tell us the secret to combining comedy with science.

#1

Dark-Science-Side-Memes-Pics

Ravell Lumbar Report

Add photo comments
POST
Nizumi
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

As a woman, I really wish this would stop making the rounds. The only women I know who have 28 day cycles are on the Pill. Those of us who aren't on the pill all have wildly varying cycles. My own cycle of over 30 years varies from 18 to 197 days. But you know what does have an almost unvarying, unchanging 28 day cycle - THE MOON. Now - take from that what you will - but I would posit tracking the moon would be far more useful than family planning in 10,000 BC.

Gabriela Cink
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think you are right with the moon. But i can tell you i could create calendar with my cycle XD 28 days 99% of time and no pills.

Load More Replies...
Ace
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

TBF 28 days is also the length of a lunar month, so it _could_ have been something to keep track of the moon's phases.

cugel.
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This appears to have no corroborative evidence, and is pure speculation.

Nicole Weymann
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yes, it is - but then so is the assumption about *man's* first calendar (if you take "man" to mean "male human"). She admits as much by saying "I would suggest..." The point is that "human/man" is often taken to mean "male", and this preconception influences researchers and scientists - which was a sort of epiphany to Sandi Toksvik.

Load More Replies...
Christian Golden
Community Member
5 days ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yeah, women have been getting the fuzzy end of the lollipop since time out of mind. But I'd suggest this is more likely to be a lunar calendar, rather than a menstrual one. Which is not to say what gender its maker was.

Max Fox
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The lunar cycle is 29.5 days. So no, it wasn't a lunar calendar either. It was stick with 28 notches.

Load More Replies...
TruthoftheHeart
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For those who aren't aware a woman has her period about every 28 days so that is why we would mark a calendar like that

BWC
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Because that's the cycle of the moon. Multiply by 13 and it's almost a solar year.

Load More Replies...
Donkey boi
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Many ancient civilisations (including the Chinese, Assyrian, Souhern Arabians, Babylonians) used this system as it broke the year up evenly and coincided with the solar/lunar cycle. It has been suggested converting (back) to that calendar and was re-proposed as recently as the early 1900's, such as the proposed Cotsworth Calendar. Where there are 13 months, each consisting of 4 weeks of 7 days (and a separate new year day). I'm not saying they are wrong about the bone, in the case of early humans, it is probably a more logical explanation, but I think it is a wonderful twist of fate that the cycles marry up so well.

Hana Hajská
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Or... It is just a bone with 28 incisions. It is quite daring to assume a record of some cyclic event when we have only one bone with one set of incisions.

Gary Mitchell
Community Member
4 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I believe tides are governed by a 28 day cycle (4 complete cycles of 2 High and 2 low tides) so very important to keep track of this if you live in a Hunter-Gatherer culture and your stamping ground is around a tidal estuary or along the sea (So this bone is known as the Ishango bone and was found in a site known as the "Fisherman Settlement" near a river that is at the headwaters of the Nile). Equally likely to have been created and owned by a female or a male tribe member, of course. But then what do I know, I'm neither a Paleolithic tribesperson or Sandi Toksvig.

Heffalump
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

A man who wanted to keep track of the phases of the moon might. Months being 30/31 days to mesh with the solar year is a relatively recent thing.

Christian Golden
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Maybe, just maybe, what's being overlooked is the work of the first woman in astronomy. And her waterproof lunar calendar.

Scott Rackley
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Surely not marking the moon cycle, you know, the biggest thing in the sky. Nah.

Barry
Community Member
5 days ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not to put down women's contributions to science but 28 days is also a lunar month and it's way easier to measure time by the moon than the sun. That's a way more plausible hypothesis than a menstruation calendar.

Bryan Wright
Community Member
1 day ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Sorry, I can't stand smug for herself Toksvig. If she really is a treasure, they should have left her where they found her.

Max Fox
Community Member
4 days ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I will repeat - only 13% of all women have a 28 day cycle, and a lunar cycle is 29.5 days. They both are wrong, and they both suffer from typical sociology issues. Sociologists have an annoying tendency to base their "theories" on high school-level science. They also have a tendency to look for deep meanings in every artifact that they find which was left behind by "primitive" people. Of course, that deep meaning somehow always supports the cultural biases of the sociologist themselves. What these ones seem to lack is the humility to admit "I have no idea". We also have no idea whether it was a man or a woman - notches have no gender, nor do tools.

Logan Thorpe
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

how? this is purely speculation with 0 proof to back anything up in this post. just because its on the internet doesnt mean it true

Load More Replies...
Mark
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The man that marks 28 days is probably the man that looks at the sky and goes ‘hmm that big white thing in the sky disappears every 28 days or so. Seems important’

Kat
Community Member
6 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

And i can almost guarantee you every other woman he knew already understood the significance of it when she realized her body was in sync with that big white thing in the sky

Load More Replies...
Bret Sander
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Or men who wanted to mark time for the sowing and reaping of crops, or when the herds of prey animals pass through their valley,

Lady of the Loft
Community Member
5 days ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is probably correct...until we started putting "c**p" in our bodies. Stating this for the US only. Our food has antibiotics, fillers and who knows what else which has completely changed our bodies.

View more commentsArrow down menu

“No! Do not attempt to combine science with humor! It’s far too dangerous. It should be left only to professionals, like me! Oh, sorry, I was being territorial. It’s a reflex,” jokes science comedian Brian Malow

“Of course, science can be combined with humor! In fact, they are a perfect marriage. Science and humor are more similar than most people realize. They are both about finding patterns and connections leading to discovery and surprise," this time he seriously says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Malow likes to compare jokes to Newton’s Third Law of Motion, as for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction. “Science and comedy have this in common!” he says.

“So, if you’re a scientist, you already have the same basic skills for being funny. The key is to be yourself. Don’t TRY to be a comedian. Just be yourself and let your personality shine through, with a little passion, humanity, and humor.”

ADVERTISEMENT

For those who worry about credibility when mixing humor and science, Malow says that scientists don’t need to become comedians or clowns. They just need to relax, be themselves, and let their sense of humor shine through a bit.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I give science communication seminars and workshops aimed at helping scientists communicate with the public. And, first of all, I’m not encouraging scientists to become comedians or clowns. You don’t need to be telling JOKES, per se. And there are some easy ways for a scientist to add a little humor to a presentation: You can share a funny quotation or cartoon, for instance. As long as it’s on topic and can lead into your subject,” explains Malow.

“There is no reason you can’t be credible and also have a personality and sense of humor. Scientists are actually human, even if some people don’t realize it. For the most part, I advocate for scientists to be prepared, focused, and relaxed on stage— so the best side of their personality can shine through, along with some passion, humanity and even humor. Just be yourself and let the humor emerge naturally; don’t try to force it. And being funny and likable will help make audiences more receptive and interested in what you have to say.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Malow himself tries to balance scientific accuracy with entertainment by providing actual facts and avoiding misinformation at all costs. “I would only talk about certain science myths and misconceptions if I’m going to address them and make sure we all know they aren’t true. I don’t find it limiting to be scientifically accurate. And I love turning people onto science ideas. And the truth is usually more interesting than any fiction.”

ADVERTISEMENT

We were also curious to know if he ever found a scientific topic that felt too complex or unfunny to joke about throughout his career. “The National Science Foundation once asked me to develop some climate change material—and it was a challenge! Sometimes it’s hard to see past the tragedy to find the humor. But eventually, I found some funny angles on a bunch of climate topics,” he shared.

However, he believes that anything can be approached with humor if the right angle can be found. “Even delicate topics can be poked fun at if your approach isn’t mean-spirited. That’s one of the keys. Comedy doesn’t have to come at the expense of others. Don’t punch down. I don’t mock science or scientists….I find a way to celebrate science because I love it. And I’ve found that I’m able to draw people into science with my sense of humor.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Malow strongly agrees that comedy can inspire more people to engage with science. “Look at how successful Neil deGrasse Tyson has been. He’s an astrophysicist but he loves comedy and he’s funny himself. He also features comedians like me on his show, and he’s built a fan base of millions. 

At my own science comedy shows, sometimes an audience member might believe that science is hard or boring. But if I can keep them entertained and interested—and laughing—for an hour, then maybe I could change their mind just a little bit. One thing I like to say is that music is not just for musicians, art is not just for artists, and science is not just for scientists!” 

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda

Lastly, I want to leave you with one of Malow’s jokes that proves that science and humor can be a compatible combination.

“I noticed whenever my mom would lose weight, my dad would gain weight. And when my dad lost weight, my mom gained weight. It’s like the conservation of mass - within our family! You never actually lose weight… you just give it to someone else. Fat can be neither created nor destroyed. It’s one of the basic laws of the universe.”

And make sure to tune in on the History Channel in November, where he will be appearing on a TV show called “The Unbelievable," hosted by Dan Aykroyd.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#50

Dark-Science-Side-Memes-Pics

KakapoJay Report

Note: this post originally had 70 images. It’s been shortened to the top 50 images based on user votes.

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda