Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
1.6K
Furious Boyfriends Catch Creep Taking Photos Of Their Girlfriends At A Store, Make Him Regret It Instantly
Two videos of a group of shoppers confronting a creep taking photos of young women have gone viral on TikTok and social media platforms like Twitter. TikToker Daisy, aka @dayskae, uploaded the videos on her account showing how a man was taking dozens of photos of her and her twin sister right out in the open, in a store in Michigan.
Daisy was out with her twin sister and both of their boyfriends when they realized what was happening. The group confronted the creep and demanded that he delete the photos. The first video got over 271k views on TikTok while the second one went even more viral, amassing over 3.5 million views. Scroll down to have a look at how everything happened, Pandas.
While one of the boyfriends made sure that the man delete all the numerous photos he took of the guy’s girlfriend and her sister, the other boyfriend went off to find a store employee to inform them of what’s happening. When the employee confronts the creep about why he was doing what he was doing, he replied that it was out of boredom.
RELATED:
Two sisters and their boyfriends were shopping at a store when they suddenly noticed a man taking photos of the young women
Image credits: dayskae
They immediately confronted the creep
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
The gang demanded that the older man delete all of the photos
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Meanwhile, one of the boyfriends went off to find a store employee
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
The other guy made darn sure that all of the photos of his girlfriend and her sister were deleted
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Here’s what happened when the employee finally showed up
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Image credits: dayskae
Most people who saw the videos were shocked that someone would take photos of random women right out in public, even though they should definitely have known better at his age.
On the other hand, some internet users defended the man, saying that there was supposedly nothing illegal about taking photos in public. However, that argument quickly falls apart when you learn that the man had taken a whopping 69 photos of the two young women.
Unfortunately, Daisy’s TikTok account got banned for “multiple Community Guidelines violations.” We’re unsure if the ban had anything to do with the two viral videos. Some TikTok users were curious to know what led to the ban and what happened to the man in the video. There doesn’t seem to be an update from Daisy since she uploaded the videos in late August (yet!).
One of the people who helped Daisy’s videos go viral is Twitter user Fifty Shades of Whey who shared one of them on his account. Some people on Twitter suggested that the group should have called the police instantly instead of getting the man to delete the photos, as they could be considered evidence of his wrongdoing.
You can watch both of the viral videos in full right over here. Here is part 1
@dayskaeGirls be careful out there and watch your back! This creep was taking pictures of my twin sister and it.. glad we weren’t shopping alone 😵💫 #fyp♬ original sound – Daisy ❁
And right over here is part 2
@dayskaethis is such a sick world we live in. 😡 #creep#fyp#watchout#bc#foryoupage♬ original sound – Daisy ❁
Previously, Bored Panda spoke about harassment in public with Emily May, the Co-Founder and Executive Director at ‘Hollaback!’, an organization that aims to put an end to harassment in all of its forms. She said that most young women who are victims of harassment blame themselves for their experience. This can especially be true for teenagers who might be scared to talk about what happened with their family and most trusted friends.
“In the same way we tell our teenage kids that if they get drunk and don’t feel safe driving home we will pick them up from wherever they are, no questions asked—we also need to tell our kids that if someone harasses them we will never, ever blame them for it or punish them for it. This is important for creating a safe space so that they have a trusted adult they can process these experiences with,” May explained that unconditional support is what’s needed.
May said that rebuilding a sense of security after being harassed can be challenging and some victims do not regain it at all.
“One thing that can help you build a sense of safety, however, is community. Take the time to get to know the good folks in your neighborhood and build positive relationships with not just your neighbors, but the people who deliver the mail, the trash folks, the guy that mows your neighbor’s lawn, etc. The more people you know, the more people will have your back if something happens again. Knowing this can increase your sense of safety and belonging in your community,” she said.
Here’s how some internet users have been reacting to the situation at the store
Image credits: hotfiretees
Image credits: Plvannest
Image credits: jayblackisfunny
What do you think ?
WiTchY_WoMaN 3 years ago
Legal or not, I wouldn't want some stranger taking pictures of me...Just cause it's legal does not mean you have to be ok with it...
Valisbourne Spiritforge 3 years ago
Pretty sure that taking pictures of people in a public space is not illegal. Morally or ethically dubious perhaps, but not illegal. Getting into someones face, threatening them and/or their property IS illegal. Honestly, as much as I sympathize with the "gang" here, I'm not sure they were in the right, legally speaking.
Troux 3 years ago
In the US it would be extremely rare to be arrested for being threatening in these circumstances. If cops were present, they - as moral, non-robots - would most likely try to follow up on the creep more than anything - get his information and look into his past behavior and maybe tip off the sex crimes department to keep an eye on him. He would also most likely be banned from the store, for whatever that's worth. His biggest risk is non-legal trouble - people finding his identity and going after him in various ways.
Load More Replies...
Mike Crow 3 years ago
If anyone with knowledge of law can help with this. I am not talking moral or ethics but is it legal to take photos of people in public without permission? I was at a horse show taking photos or riders and some were children but all were in the ring. Those outside the ring we asked their (or their parents) permission.
Carbonel 3 years ago
As far as I’m aware, it is not illegal to take a picture of someone in a public place. What you then go on to do with that image then enters a whole new sphere of legality. But just taking a pic? Nope, so long as the pics are not indecent and you’re not harassing anyone for the pic. https://www.blpawards.org/competition/photo-rights
Load More Replies...
Jeffrey 3 years ago
So he took pictures of you, and you take pictures of him, bully him, and threaten him LOL. #niceguycontrollingBF
Beth Ellis 3 years ago
I'm conflicted on this one. Social media is full of pics being taken without permission, but its OK when its for a good cause Ike catching someone in a handicap parking spot, or letting their dog poop in the park? And why do men need to defend the women? Can't we defend ourselves just fine? Sure the red shirt guy is a creep, but I could say the same thing about so many other photo situations. Why is one creepy b ut the other is not? It just seems hypocritical to me.
Helenium 3 years ago
i used to get some great photos of people like documentary style not like inappropriate but i wouldnt do it now id get lynched, its sad that you cant do this and not be accused of being a wierdo i see so many people id love to take a photo of, people look great when they dont know theyrebeing watched
Luis 3 years ago
If taking pictures like that is illegal, then all the paparazzis should be in prison... Kreepy? Yes! Illegal, no. Actually the old man could call the cops for harassment, the guy can't even dare to ask (legally, not morally) to see his phone...not even the FBI had permission to see the phone of the bomber from the Boston marathon, the FBI had to hire hackers, to be able to see the info from his iPhone...are you going to stop and demand to see the pictures of every new user of the new Facebook glasses?
Picture Queen 3 years ago
Look at the young man's body language. He's holding his arms tightly trying to control himself from knocking this perv out! I for one would feel very comfortable & safe with him around. He stands up for people. I give this guy a lot of props!
Danimal 3 years ago
double standards rear their ugly head again.... i agree dudes a creep. however, how many forums on this sight and similar are of people who have no idea they are being photographed?? how many times have you sent a pic of someone ridiculous to a friend? whether its for spank bank, humiliations, or comedy, they are all the same thing. Be consistent.
Mad Mar 3 years ago
Very smart young man to be aware of his surroundings, see something and say something, and to stand with arms folded as not to make any gestures in a threatening way. No swearing really. Just delete it all an be ashamed for being pervy. Glad the boys stood up for the women. But now they will forever be watching out for this. It's a human trust issue that the women have to overcome now. Good boys. Clap clap clap
Rob Woodman 3 years ago
Bad boys. They bullied and borderline assaulted a person and put his picture on social media (which they were upset about?) for no reason.
Load More Replies...
Ronnie Beaton 3 years ago
I admire the young man's restraint. I have two nieces in their 20s, and I discovered some creep had been taking sneaky pics of them, then I would probably have knocked the guy's teeth down his throat and to hell with the consequences.
Angie Chan 3 years ago
I know awhile ago in Japan, they made it so that the shutter sound on a phone could not be disabled because of pervs taking photos. We should do that here, but too many creeps in power would make up some excuse about how we are hurting the perverts.
Ben Moss 3 years ago
There is no such thing as a right to not be photographed. The Supreme Court upheld this years ago. You can’t get mad at someone for f*****g looking at “your girl” wear a burka if you want to be ignored, otherwise deal with the fast that you might be *gasp!* photographed. if I were that fella, I’d have told those “bros” to go f**k themselves
S 3 years ago
If this perv is a lawyer, then I caught him doing the same thing to me 10 years ago. I got his disgusting a$$ banned from the restaurant we were at. My bf, the bartender, the chef, some patrons, and the owner all publicly backed me up. Legal or not (it is in California) it is disgusting and unsettling. It took me weeks to stop worrying that he was going to kidnap me.
Felix Feline 3 years ago
Public property Some museums do not allow photography. It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public property, within reasonable community standards. Photographing or videotaping a tourist attraction, whether publicly or privately owned, is generally considered legal, unless explicitly prohibited by a specific law or statute. Private property Photography may be prohibited or restricted by a property owner on their property. However, a property owner generally cannot restrict the photographing of the property by individuals who are not within the bounds of the property. Photography on private property that is generally open to the public (e.g., a shopping mall) is usually permitted unless explicitly prohibited by posted signs. Even if no such signs are posted, the property owner or agent can ask a person to stop photographing, and if the person refuses to do so, the owner or agent can ask the person to leave; in some jurisdictions, a person who refuses to leave can be arrested for criminal trespass, and many jurisdictions recognize the common-law right to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser; a person who forcibly resists a lawful removal may be liable for battery, assault, or both.
Load More Replies...
LazyPanda 3 years ago
I'm so proud of them for confronting him, but also fearful of what the public shaming would drive him to do further in secret. Not sure what could be done about that but if the girls were minors the cops def should've been notified. And he's just taking pics having no idea how old they are
Debra Robinson 3 years ago
OMG THIS IS NOT EVEN A PERSON; IT'S A VILE DISGUSTING FREAK LOSER PSYCHO ASSHOLE EVIL PISSANT IMPRACTICAL JOKE SHITPILE MONSTER UNNATURAL DISASTER TRAGIC ACCIDENT FUCKTARD BITCHWEED CUNTPIE POSSIBLY PEDO CREEP!!!
shep ona 3 years ago
Those women are choosing to share, and choosing what they share, and how, and with whom. This is someone taking pictures without permission, doing god knows what with them.
Load More Replies... 
Troux 3 years ago (edited)
He regrets being caught, nothing more. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say he's got more pictures before them and he'll have more to come, based on how comfortable he was with taking those. 69 pictures is a lot...
Load More Replies...
Requiem 3 years ago
They have no problem filming him with out his permission thinking their making a difference in the world. Go find their tik tok account, youll find LOTS of strangers being in their videos. Being online is forever, young people are too stupid to realize that. My kids friend got busted by his mom for finding his public vandalism being posted on tik tok.
Load More Replies...
lazy panda 3 years ago
This creep had to delete 69 images. 69. That's absolutely disgusting. How would you feel if a man took that many images of your spouse or child???
Load More Replies...
WiTchY_WoMaN 3 years ago
Legal or not, I wouldn't want some stranger taking pictures of me...Just cause it's legal does not mean you have to be ok with it...
Valisbourne Spiritforge 3 years ago
Pretty sure that taking pictures of people in a public space is not illegal. Morally or ethically dubious perhaps, but not illegal. Getting into someones face, threatening them and/or their property IS illegal. Honestly, as much as I sympathize with the "gang" here, I'm not sure they were in the right, legally speaking.
Troux 3 years ago
In the US it would be extremely rare to be arrested for being threatening in these circumstances. If cops were present, they - as moral, non-robots - would most likely try to follow up on the creep more than anything - get his information and look into his past behavior and maybe tip off the sex crimes department to keep an eye on him. He would also most likely be banned from the store, for whatever that's worth. His biggest risk is non-legal trouble - people finding his identity and going after him in various ways.
Load More Replies... Mike Crow 3 years ago
If anyone with knowledge of law can help with this. I am not talking moral or ethics but is it legal to take photos of people in public without permission? I was at a horse show taking photos or riders and some were children but all were in the ring. Those outside the ring we asked their (or their parents) permission.
Carbonel 3 years ago
As far as I’m aware, it is not illegal to take a picture of someone in a public place. What you then go on to do with that image then enters a whole new sphere of legality. But just taking a pic? Nope, so long as the pics are not indecent and you’re not harassing anyone for the pic. https://www.blpawards.org/competition/photo-rights
Load More Replies... Jeffrey 3 years ago
So he took pictures of you, and you take pictures of him, bully him, and threaten him LOL. #niceguycontrollingBF
Beth Ellis 3 years ago
I'm conflicted on this one. Social media is full of pics being taken without permission, but its OK when its for a good cause Ike catching someone in a handicap parking spot, or letting their dog poop in the park? And why do men need to defend the women? Can't we defend ourselves just fine? Sure the red shirt guy is a creep, but I could say the same thing about so many other photo situations. Why is one creepy b ut the other is not? It just seems hypocritical to me.
Helenium 3 years ago
i used to get some great photos of people like documentary style not like inappropriate but i wouldnt do it now id get lynched, its sad that you cant do this and not be accused of being a wierdo i see so many people id love to take a photo of, people look great when they dont know theyrebeing watched
Luis 3 years ago
If taking pictures like that is illegal, then all the paparazzis should be in prison... Kreepy? Yes! Illegal, no. Actually the old man could call the cops for harassment, the guy can't even dare to ask (legally, not morally) to see his phone...not even the FBI had permission to see the phone of the bomber from the Boston marathon, the FBI had to hire hackers, to be able to see the info from his iPhone...are you going to stop and demand to see the pictures of every new user of the new Facebook glasses?
Picture Queen 3 years ago
Look at the young man's body language. He's holding his arms tightly trying to control himself from knocking this perv out! I for one would feel very comfortable & safe with him around. He stands up for people. I give this guy a lot of props!
Danimal 3 years ago
double standards rear their ugly head again.... i agree dudes a creep. however, how many forums on this sight and similar are of people who have no idea they are being photographed?? how many times have you sent a pic of someone ridiculous to a friend? whether its for spank bank, humiliations, or comedy, they are all the same thing. Be consistent.
Mad Mar 3 years ago
Very smart young man to be aware of his surroundings, see something and say something, and to stand with arms folded as not to make any gestures in a threatening way. No swearing really. Just delete it all an be ashamed for being pervy. Glad the boys stood up for the women. But now they will forever be watching out for this. It's a human trust issue that the women have to overcome now. Good boys. Clap clap clap
Rob Woodman 3 years ago
Bad boys. They bullied and borderline assaulted a person and put his picture on social media (which they were upset about?) for no reason.
Load More Replies... Ronnie Beaton 3 years ago
I admire the young man's restraint. I have two nieces in their 20s, and I discovered some creep had been taking sneaky pics of them, then I would probably have knocked the guy's teeth down his throat and to hell with the consequences.
Angie Chan 3 years ago
I know awhile ago in Japan, they made it so that the shutter sound on a phone could not be disabled because of pervs taking photos. We should do that here, but too many creeps in power would make up some excuse about how we are hurting the perverts.
Ben Moss 3 years ago
There is no such thing as a right to not be photographed. The Supreme Court upheld this years ago. You can’t get mad at someone for f*****g looking at “your girl” wear a burka if you want to be ignored, otherwise deal with the fast that you might be *gasp!* photographed. if I were that fella, I’d have told those “bros” to go f**k themselves
S 3 years ago
If this perv is a lawyer, then I caught him doing the same thing to me 10 years ago. I got his disgusting a$$ banned from the restaurant we were at. My bf, the bartender, the chef, some patrons, and the owner all publicly backed me up. Legal or not (it is in California) it is disgusting and unsettling. It took me weeks to stop worrying that he was going to kidnap me.
Felix Feline 3 years ago
Public property Some museums do not allow photography. It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public property, within reasonable community standards. Photographing or videotaping a tourist attraction, whether publicly or privately owned, is generally considered legal, unless explicitly prohibited by a specific law or statute. Private property Photography may be prohibited or restricted by a property owner on their property. However, a property owner generally cannot restrict the photographing of the property by individuals who are not within the bounds of the property. Photography on private property that is generally open to the public (e.g., a shopping mall) is usually permitted unless explicitly prohibited by posted signs. Even if no such signs are posted, the property owner or agent can ask a person to stop photographing, and if the person refuses to do so, the owner or agent can ask the person to leave; in some jurisdictions, a person who refuses to leave can be arrested for criminal trespass, and many jurisdictions recognize the common-law right to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser; a person who forcibly resists a lawful removal may be liable for battery, assault, or both.
Load More Replies... LazyPanda 3 years ago
I'm so proud of them for confronting him, but also fearful of what the public shaming would drive him to do further in secret. Not sure what could be done about that but if the girls were minors the cops def should've been notified. And he's just taking pics having no idea how old they are
Debra Robinson 3 years ago
OMG THIS IS NOT EVEN A PERSON; IT'S A VILE DISGUSTING FREAK LOSER PSYCHO ASSHOLE EVIL PISSANT IMPRACTICAL JOKE SHITPILE MONSTER UNNATURAL DISASTER TRAGIC ACCIDENT FUCKTARD BITCHWEED CUNTPIE POSSIBLY PEDO CREEP!!!
shep ona 3 years ago
Those women are choosing to share, and choosing what they share, and how, and with whom. This is someone taking pictures without permission, doing god knows what with them.
Load More Replies... Troux 3 years ago (edited)
He regrets being caught, nothing more. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say he's got more pictures before them and he'll have more to come, based on how comfortable he was with taking those. 69 pictures is a lot...
Load More Replies... Requiem 3 years ago
They have no problem filming him with out his permission thinking their making a difference in the world. Go find their tik tok account, youll find LOTS of strangers being in their videos. Being online is forever, young people are too stupid to realize that. My kids friend got busted by his mom for finding his public vandalism being posted on tik tok.
Load More Replies... lazy panda 3 years ago
This creep had to delete 69 images. 69. That's absolutely disgusting. How would you feel if a man took that many images of your spouse or child???
Load More Replies... You May Like 30 Of The Most Satirical Posts from The “WomenInMaleFields” Viral Trend 30 Women Share Screenshots Of Cringy Men Hitting On Them, Then Not Taking "No" For An Answer (New Pics) Subway Creep Traumatizes Fellow Passengers, One Woman Savagely Traumatizes Him Back
Rūta Zumbrickaitė
Simona Kinderytė
Justinas Keturka
Related on Bored Panda
140
95