Company In Panic Mode After HR Step In To Stop Critical Worker’s 8% Raise, So He Quits
A linchpin, sometimes spelled “lynchpin,” is a generally small fastener used to keep wheels and basically everything else from flying off of an axel while it’s in motion. When we think about a vehicle, we might think of its engine or any other sizable part, but remove the linchpin and the whole thing will come undone. And as many people have already experienced, some employees punch way above their pay grade in importance.
One netizen shared just such an example, where an overworked and absolutely vital IT worker was denied a raise and decided to pursue a job elsewhere. The company very quickly learned to regret undervaluing this person, but it was too little, too late.
Certain workers are the beating heart of an organization
Image credits: cottonbro studio (not the actual photo)
One worker shared their experience watching a company fall into disaster after they lost a crucial worker over a denied raise
Image credits: Kampus Production (not the actual photo)
Image credits: Jules Amé (not the actual photo)
Image credits: u/theredranger132
Bad managers care more about preserving their position than keeping the company running well
Image credits: Jo Szczepanska (not the actual photo)
While OP does not provide the exact reasoning behind these decisions, it’s pretty clear that somewhere “upstairs” someone messed up and seems to be refusing to see reality. There are a number of possibilities. The HR team is so stubborn that they will tank the company over this issue, or that someone making that decision believes that “giving in” is equivalent to admitting they were wrong. However, there is also the third possibility, often true for management, the belief that they can’t ever be wrong and as a result refuse to entertain reality. There is some evidence to suggest that very often, managers do have an inflated perception of self, which comes with the inability to deal with mistakes or bad ideas.
While on paper it makes little sense, very often less-skilled individuals will manage to find ways to the top through manipulation, networking and just being louder than anyone else. Individually, this is a viable strategy, but it often comes with the ever-present knowledge that you are not actually suited for a role. Toxic managers who feel this way will try their utmost to hide their lack of confidence by creating negative outcomes for employees. While they might be able to maintain this game for a while, the end result is often that it gets taken too far, such as in OP’s story. The cost of such a manager’s mistake will be paid by the company, in this case creating a disaster, as reported by OP.
In general, the fact that there was just one person as a linchpin to so many projects is a management failure on so many levels. Even if this employee was happy to carry such a weight on their shoulders indefinitely, accidents happen, people get sick, injured, or need to go on vacation. More realistically, even if this worker is relatively happy, they will burn out. While we often associate burnout with poor working conditions, which absolutely do cause it, this problem can strike even motivated employees. Even if OP’s coworker wasn’t leaving, he would likely need to take a break after a year or two anyway.
Undervalued workers tend to not stay at jobs for long
Image credits: Microsoft 365 (not the actual photo)
Seeing as this worker covered so many projects, burnout, a new job or even death would all basically mean the same level of disaster for the company. The middle option really should not be a surprise for anyone involved, as it’s pretty common knowledge that workers who feel undervalued are simply more likely to leave. While it’s possible to argue about what exactly “undervalued” looks like, this IT worker broke it down to its basics. He found competing salaries for what were probably easier jobs, then was denied a raise. Even worse, he was denied a raise after his boss said it would be approved. So instead of looking like it maybe “wasn’t possible,” this worker literally saw someone in a higher position veto a well-deserved raise.
This is, unfortunately, more common than not, as over half of US workers who voluntarily quit or left their jobs cited bad management as a key issue. This can manifest itself in a million different ways, but not approving a reasonable, well-deserved raise is as clear as it gets. The weird power dynamic of this company doesn’t help either, as it’s not exactly common practice that HR can overrule certain decisions that easily. OP is right to be exploring a new job, as this structure seems set up to fail. Even if the company survives this storm and OP keeps their job, there is likely going to be another disaster, as trusting management to learn from their mistakes is, well, a mistake.
OP gave some follow-up details
Other commenters shared their confusion at the company’s decision
What exactly can you do to HR. HR is that powerful. India produces thousands of IT guys every year and there is always someone smarter and cheaper. HR know this that's why they never budge.
Load More Replies...Something is upside down in that company. HR's task is to handle conflicts between the company and the employess, or between two employess, or be the link that can translate the messages from the management into something the employess can handle etc. it is NOT them that should make financial decitons, and definitely not setting salaries. But somehow they have ended up with too much power, and is making decitions which they do not have the qualifications or competences to make. The CIO ought to step up, especially in this day and age where there is a lack of people with IT/programming skills and such people is therefore their weight worth in gold... and if he does not have the backbone for that, the CEO should step in before the entire company is falling apart, instead of playing best buddy with HR while his company is in flames.
HR's job is to protect the company from lawyers. Full stop. These guys have inverted the priority of the departments, vis a vis HR and IT. Without IT, you have nothing in today's climate.
Load More Replies...the company I work for hasn't given any raises at all in 4 years. it's been at the same rate (11$), and we have a very high turnover rate. for comparison where I live and the job I do average pay is about 17$ an hour for entry level employees. currently I am the one who has been with the company the longest and I have only been here 10 months. we have been told by management there is no raise coming. we also had a companywide meeting stating that if we wanted to make 13$ an hour, we needed to work like we are making 20. so, they want 20 dollars an hour worth of work out of us, but they only want to pay for 14$ worth of said work. and they wonder why on average people on last 3-4 months. everyone that was here when I started has already moved on making more money elsewhere. I will be too, soon enough.
This makes me wonder is the head of HR is married to the CEO and one is getting a bonus for keeping costs down.
What on earth. This is the Titanic. Everyone needs to find a different job here.
Seen this happen a few times and watch CEO's burn with anger when me and the board tell them: no happy customers no bonus. No improvement in operation, no pay increase (on the C*O level). No happy employees, no external hires (fix the internals first). .. HR should only be there to resolve conflicts and do payroll. If that IT person is not rated for a pay increase. Then maybe he needs another classification of a worker that has a higher paygrade..
Before judgment... person one (have to be PC now so i cant say male/female.....) left when? Person two left when? Did they post hiring pad? When did third person leave? If it was days between one one three. Nope. It it were months/years. Okay. Need more information
Eh HR could perceive the IT team as antisocial sexist misfits, would have been true at certain times in the past and be keen on getting rid of them. They could rightly or wrongly see them as blocking or invalidating needed HR policy changes. They could have a child who is graduating with a CS degree in two months who will be looking for a job, they could have an uncle who owns an 3rd party IT firm. You never know.
I work in HR and this doesn't sound right. HR doesn't operate unchecked in a vacuum. The power trip unbudging behavior, if it is accurate as presented in this histrionic account, is coming from the CEO. If the CEO wanted to change the policy or approach, they would. This reeks of speculation and assumption. If this 8% raise high noon showdown is really happening with this much of the organization's attention on it, there is no way the company can budge. The CEO loses control of the organization if he backtracks. Think it through and play the tape to the end. This is a Zero sum game and the house always wins.
I'm tired of these same ols stories all the time BP You use to have so much more fun stuff
I come here for the best of Reddit. ThePoke is better for Twitter highlights. Funny pics are major snoozeville anywhere.
Load More Replies...What exactly can you do to HR. HR is that powerful. India produces thousands of IT guys every year and there is always someone smarter and cheaper. HR know this that's why they never budge.
Load More Replies...Something is upside down in that company. HR's task is to handle conflicts between the company and the employess, or between two employess, or be the link that can translate the messages from the management into something the employess can handle etc. it is NOT them that should make financial decitons, and definitely not setting salaries. But somehow they have ended up with too much power, and is making decitions which they do not have the qualifications or competences to make. The CIO ought to step up, especially in this day and age where there is a lack of people with IT/programming skills and such people is therefore their weight worth in gold... and if he does not have the backbone for that, the CEO should step in before the entire company is falling apart, instead of playing best buddy with HR while his company is in flames.
HR's job is to protect the company from lawyers. Full stop. These guys have inverted the priority of the departments, vis a vis HR and IT. Without IT, you have nothing in today's climate.
Load More Replies...the company I work for hasn't given any raises at all in 4 years. it's been at the same rate (11$), and we have a very high turnover rate. for comparison where I live and the job I do average pay is about 17$ an hour for entry level employees. currently I am the one who has been with the company the longest and I have only been here 10 months. we have been told by management there is no raise coming. we also had a companywide meeting stating that if we wanted to make 13$ an hour, we needed to work like we are making 20. so, they want 20 dollars an hour worth of work out of us, but they only want to pay for 14$ worth of said work. and they wonder why on average people on last 3-4 months. everyone that was here when I started has already moved on making more money elsewhere. I will be too, soon enough.
This makes me wonder is the head of HR is married to the CEO and one is getting a bonus for keeping costs down.
What on earth. This is the Titanic. Everyone needs to find a different job here.
Seen this happen a few times and watch CEO's burn with anger when me and the board tell them: no happy customers no bonus. No improvement in operation, no pay increase (on the C*O level). No happy employees, no external hires (fix the internals first). .. HR should only be there to resolve conflicts and do payroll. If that IT person is not rated for a pay increase. Then maybe he needs another classification of a worker that has a higher paygrade..
Before judgment... person one (have to be PC now so i cant say male/female.....) left when? Person two left when? Did they post hiring pad? When did third person leave? If it was days between one one three. Nope. It it were months/years. Okay. Need more information
Eh HR could perceive the IT team as antisocial sexist misfits, would have been true at certain times in the past and be keen on getting rid of them. They could rightly or wrongly see them as blocking or invalidating needed HR policy changes. They could have a child who is graduating with a CS degree in two months who will be looking for a job, they could have an uncle who owns an 3rd party IT firm. You never know.
I work in HR and this doesn't sound right. HR doesn't operate unchecked in a vacuum. The power trip unbudging behavior, if it is accurate as presented in this histrionic account, is coming from the CEO. If the CEO wanted to change the policy or approach, they would. This reeks of speculation and assumption. If this 8% raise high noon showdown is really happening with this much of the organization's attention on it, there is no way the company can budge. The CEO loses control of the organization if he backtracks. Think it through and play the tape to the end. This is a Zero sum game and the house always wins.
I'm tired of these same ols stories all the time BP You use to have so much more fun stuff
I come here for the best of Reddit. ThePoke is better for Twitter highlights. Funny pics are major snoozeville anywhere.
Load More Replies...
69
26