User submission

Can You Spot The Difference? Chicago Tribune VS. Sun-Times Covers After The Cubs’ World Series Win

After a long 108 years, the Chicago Cubs finally won the World Series on Wednesday! But that’s not the only thing that got people talking lately… What has shocked a lot of people is the difference between the cover photos published by two huge Chicago newspapers – the Chicago Tribune and the Chicago Sun-Times.

Back in 2013, the Chicago Sun-Times dumped its entire staff of full-time photographers to work with freelancers instead. The Chicago Tribune, on the other hand, still has its own staff of photographers. Feasibly, these different views on photography may be the reason why the cover photos of these two newspapers are so shockingly different. People are going to Twitter to discuss the differences. See for yourselves below!

(h/t: petapixel)

Chicago Sun-Times fired ALL their photographers and the image below is worth more than 1000 words

chicago-tribune-sun-times-cover-photos-10

chicago-tribune-sun-times-cover-photos-12

Take a closer look at Chicago Tribune’s front page by their staff photographer Brian Cassella

chicago-tribune-sun-times-cover-photos-1

And now see Chicago Sun-Times (who fired ALL their photographers) front page by an uncredited person

chicago-tribune-sun-times-cover-photos-2

Notice the difference?

chicago-tribune-sun-times-cover-photos-6

3Kviews

This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

Read less »

This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

Read less »

What do you think ?

POST

Troux 8 years ago

Sun Editor: "We were hoping you could buy your own ticket into the game... No? Okay, just poke your camera over the fence and aim for the guys in blue."

1point

iblowsheep 8 years ago

well the Chicago tribune shot may be more dynamic , but the color is s**t

0points

A K Nicholas 8 years ago

That may be due whoever re-photographed the printed paper. The image is on their site http://store.chicagotribune.com/history-made-the-cubs-historic-2016-season.html

0points

Load More Replies...

Eloines 8 years ago

Clearly this person simply doesn't have the equipment necessary to photograph on fields of this size. Plus the fact that he simply wasn't standing on the right side, and you can't just run across the field. It takes careful planning, a bit of luck and investments.

0points

Load More Comments

POST

Troux 8 years ago

Sun Editor: "We were hoping you could buy your own ticket into the game... No? Okay, just poke your camera over the fence and aim for the guys in blue."

1point

iblowsheep 8 years ago

well the Chicago tribune shot may be more dynamic , but the color is s**t

0points

A K Nicholas 8 years ago

That may be due whoever re-photographed the printed paper. The image is on their site http://store.chicagotribune.com/history-made-the-cubs-historic-2016-season.html

0points

Load More Replies...

Eloines 8 years ago

0points

Load More Comments

Related on Bored Panda

Can You Spot The Difference? Chicago Tribune VS. Sun-Times Covers After The Cubs’ World Series Win

Chicago Sun-Times fired ALL their photographers and the image below is worth more than 1000 words

Take a closer look at Chicago Tribune’s front page by their staff photographer Brian Cassella

And now see Chicago Sun-Times (who fired ALL their photographers) front page by an uncredited person

Notice the difference?

Games

Rūta Grašytė

Rūta Grašytė