Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Tone-Deaf CEO Says He Fired 90% Of Staff Because Of New AI, Gets Slammed Online
17

Tone-Deaf CEO Says He Fired 90% Of Staff Because Of New AI, Gets Slammed Online

Interview Tone-Deaf CEO Says He Fired 90% Of Staff Because Of New AI, Gets Slammed OnlineCEO Slammed For Replacing 90% Of Support Staff With AI ChatBotCEO Brags About Results After Replacing 90% Of Staff With AI, Twitter Doesn’t Go Easy On HimTone-Deaf CEO On Blast After Celebrating AI Innovation, Which Left 90% Of Support Staff JoblessPeople Are Calling Out This CEO Who Bragged About Replacing 90% Of Staff With AIPeople Are Disgusted By The Lack Of Empathy Of This CEO Who Replaced 90% Of Staff With AICEO Brags About Firing 90% Of Staff Because Of New AI, Receives Backlash For Tone-Deaf Message“The Struggle Was Real”: CEO Dragged For Firing 90% Of Support Staff In Exchange For AICEO On Blast After Celebrating AI Innovation, Which Left 90% Of Support Staff Jobless
ADVERTISEMENT

It was not that long ago that the murmurs of Artificial Intelligence crept into our general conversation, just like computers did back in the late ’70s. And as technological advancements go, this naturally sparked fears that A.I. will take our jobs. Despite the reassurance from tech bros that “It’s really nonsense” and we have nothing to worry about, the day has come when they get to eat their own words.

A couple of days ago, Suumit Shah, the CEO of the e-commerce platform Dukaan, boasted about replacing 90% of his support staff with an A.I. chatbot. “Time to first response went from 1m 44s to INSTANT!” he gleefully wrote. No surprise, then, that this has sparked an online backlash, with Shah trying to fend off thousands of online haters. In one of his replies, the CEO said, “It was a tough decision.” Sure. But no amount of broken-heart emojis will make up for all the employees that were sacked from their positions because of cost-saving 1s and 0s.

It’s no secret that with the rise of A.I., our fears of being replaced by 1s and 0s naturally rise as well

Image credits: Matheus Bertelli (not the actual photo)

After one tech CEO decided to boast about replacing almost all supporting staff with a ChatBot named “Lina”, it wasn’t the salutes that showered him

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: suumitshah

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: suumitshah

Image credits: Sora Shimazaki (not the actual photo)

The fear of A.I. taking over is getting too real – even Elon Musk says so

We all saw it coming to this, right? Not to sound too gloomy, but we all have been watching Netflix’s Black Mirror, sensing that it doesn’t sound too sci-fi with all the rapid advancements in A.I. and layoffs dominating headlines. After all, even Elon Musk, who only a few days ago announced a new venture that aims to create AI that can “understand the universe,” warned everyone about becoming too dependent on artificial intelligence. He might be responsible for massive layoffs at Tesla and Twitter. Also, for making A.I. powerful enough to crush the best-of-the-best at one of the most difficult video games there is. But at least man is no fool enough to replace human workers with self-learning machines (yet).

ADVERTISEMENT

The bad news is, people have a right to worry. While tech experts around the world try to calm everyone down, promising that there’ll be harmony between A.I. and humans, almost half of the employees (49% to be exact) fear they will be pushed overboard thanks to cost-effective automatons, according to a new survey by Microsoft.

For all those who aren’t worried that ChatGPT isn’t eyeing their position, then, a recent Goldman Sachs report has some bad news – some of which is evident by today’s headline. According to it, the automation and advancement of A.I. will replace the equivalent of 300 million jobs worldwide this year, with legal and administrative workers most likely to be susceptible to this disruption.

While it’s undeniable that things will drastically change – if they haven’t already – with the rapid advancement of A.I., according to Philip Torr, professor of engineering science at the University of Oxford, automation could have a positive impact on the workplace. Particularly in cutting down the unnecessary workload. “In general, technology has airways led to more work,” he told Bored Panda in an email. “Due to technology, we now work more than we ever had. In the middle ages, for example, peasants only worked 15 to 20 hours a week.” In other words, it’s not that the number of jobs will change, he says, but roles that will be in demand.

ADVERTISEMENT

As expected, the Twitter audience didn’t shy away from giving their two cents on CEO’s clumsy announcement

Image credits: arnob1

Image credits: GrowthNotesHQ

Image credits: vivekdhonde

Image credits: _glnarayanan

Image credits: vishnu_sheth

Image credits: ChokhraParth

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: TruthGPTBot

Image credits: sid_sarasvati

Image credits: neelesh_salian

Image credits: santoshp

Image credits: DThompsonDev

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: LmaoGPT

Image credits: jijojosein

Image credits: whysaloni

Share on Facebook
Ignas Vieversys

Ignas Vieversys

Writer, Community member

Read more »

Ignas is an editor at Bored Panda with an MA in Magazine Journalism. When he is not writing about video games or hunting for interesting stories, chances are that you will find Ignas at the movies.

Read less »
Ignas Vieversys

Ignas Vieversys

Writer, Community member

Ignas is an editor at Bored Panda with an MA in Magazine Journalism. When he is not writing about video games or hunting for interesting stories, chances are that you will find Ignas at the movies.

Justinas Keturka

Justinas Keturka

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

I'm the Visual Editor at Bored Panda, responsible for ensuring that everything our audience sees is top-notch and well-researched. What I love most about my job? Discovering new things about the world and immersing myself in exceptional photography and art.

Read less »

Justinas Keturka

Justinas Keturka

Author, BoredPanda staff

I'm the Visual Editor at Bored Panda, responsible for ensuring that everything our audience sees is top-notch and well-researched. What I love most about my job? Discovering new things about the world and immersing myself in exceptional photography and art.

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
CatWoman1014
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I absolutely hate and I can’t stress this enough HATE AI customer support.

Roman Hans
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Me too. Usually it's a waste of time, to the point I won't even start with it because I know it'll end with, "Sorry, you need to talk to a person." In this case it's weird he doesn't give specifics of how good the bot is. 80% answered correctly, so only 20% pissed off? 50% correct? The writer is a salesman & as such I'm realllllly questioning his story.

Load More Replies...
James016
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

There is one comment in the thread that sums it up. The bot wasn’t answering the questions properly so he didn’t renew his subscription. This ceo is looking at how quickly queries are resolved but that does not mean anything. Are customers getting the right answers and coming away happy or is the bot just closing the queries and marking them as resolved?

Anony Mouse
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ridiculous. I'd bet a million that 90% of the "resolved" tickets were people who gave up and closed the chat when they realized it was a poorly functioning bot.

Load More Comments
CatWoman1014
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I absolutely hate and I can’t stress this enough HATE AI customer support.

Roman Hans
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Me too. Usually it's a waste of time, to the point I won't even start with it because I know it'll end with, "Sorry, you need to talk to a person." In this case it's weird he doesn't give specifics of how good the bot is. 80% answered correctly, so only 20% pissed off? 50% correct? The writer is a salesman & as such I'm realllllly questioning his story.

Load More Replies...
James016
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

There is one comment in the thread that sums it up. The bot wasn’t answering the questions properly so he didn’t renew his subscription. This ceo is looking at how quickly queries are resolved but that does not mean anything. Are customers getting the right answers and coming away happy or is the bot just closing the queries and marking them as resolved?

Anony Mouse
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ridiculous. I'd bet a million that 90% of the "resolved" tickets were people who gave up and closed the chat when they realized it was a poorly functioning bot.

Load More Comments
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda