Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
38
Poster Calling Breast Cancer Charity A ‘Scam’ Goes Viral, Then Someone Explains Why It’s Wrong
Breast cancer is a serious health problem in society. But that doesn’t stop some people from using the illness as an excuse to siphon off money from emotionally distraught and charitable individuals. Or at least that’s the criticism some internet users shared after ‘exposing’ one breast cancer charity for being a ‘scam.’ There are some big, glaring holes in this belief, however, and it shows that some individuals rush to conclusions before doing their research.
Internet users shared a ‘fact card,’ stating that the largest and best-funded breast cancer organization in the United States, the Susan G. Komen charity is, allegedly, a ‘scam’ that is geared towards making a profit for its CEO and, supposedly, not meant helping out ill people.
The charity, which has been known by several different names throughout its 37 years of existence, is linked to some controversy. However, lots of people have also pointed out that the criticism the charity faces is outdated, taken out of context, factually incorrect, and not applicable.
To learn more about breast cancer, read through Bored Panda’s previous article on the topic that also includes an in-depth interview with the National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF), as well as useful and informative resources about the illness.
More info: Komen.org | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
RELATED:
This ‘fact sheet’ started an intense discussion online…
According to Snopes, the idea that Komen is using only a fifth of the money people donate to fund breast cancer research is technically (almost) correct, but the implication is wrong. In 2009 and 2010, Komen spent 20.9 percent of all proceeds on research. But it also spent 39.1 percent on public health education, 13 percent on health screening services, 5.6 percent on treatment, 10 percent on fund-raising costs, and 11.3 percent on administrative costs.
Not only is the criticism geared towards Komen outdated, but it’s also intrinsically flawed. Some people believe that charities only help the ill by funding research. This is not the case. Organizations like Komen deliver a wide array of services to support people with breast cancer. It’s not just the research that’s important.
…and some internet users rushed to criticize the charity
As for the criticism that the charity’s CEO earns 684,000 dollars a year, this is factually wrong. In September 2017, Paula Schneider became the president and CEO of Komen, and she earned 137,155 dollars in March 2018. But even if Schneider would earn more money, it wouldn’t make her corrupt or the charity’s mission somehow less important: large charities tend to have CEOs with large salaries, which is a question of size, not a question of transparency.
From 2011 to 2017, the Komen charity’s revenue dropped by four-fifths, which led to some state chapters having to be closed. It’s also no secret that the charity’s reputation in the US has had some ups and downs, which can be expected of any large organization. No company or charity is perfect, but they should be criticized based on facts, not opinions taken out of context.
Some people jumped on the blame bandwagon…
…while others pointed out that criticism has no basis
What do you think ?
Full Name 5 years ago
I really dislike the term "breast cancer awareness". You're raising money for whatnow? We all know what breast cancer is by now. Say the money is for early detection methods are research for a cure or whatever. I do also have to get sad at how nobody seems to give a f**k about prostate cancer. The insides of mens buttholes just don't hold the same mass appeal as 2nd base does.
Jenica Thomas 5 years ago (edited)
While I think awareness is important I also do agree about the lack of for prostate cancer. My father was recently diagnosed. I haven't yet had much time to really dig in and find good research for him, but so far all my searches are littered with other information regarding other cancers, mostly breast cancer. I'm not denying the need for this information to be out there. It certainly DOES. I just wish it was also this direct for other types of cancer. Prostate cancer is fairly common, I can't even imagine if you or a loved one are diagnosed with something rarer. Finding information and support on that must be so difficult.
Load More Replies...
chi-wei shen 5 years ago
They had the audacity to sue more than 100 charity organizations for the use of the phrase "for the cure" and for the use of pink. This alleged trademark infringement was a strategic move against other competing charities to achieve a better position for fundraising. At the same time they have no problem putting their pink ribbon on carcinogenic products and pay their CEO a salary that's clearly above the salary of comparable organizations. Susan G. Komen isn't a fraud, but it is a very bad choice if you want to donate money.
Rissie 5 years ago
They do seem to forget that public image is something to cherish greatly.
Load More Replies...
Roman Hans 5 years ago (edited)
“large charities tend to have CEOs with large salaries” No. Their salary takes away from the charity. If they believed in the charity, they would take less. If they think they deserve the money rather than the charity, why would I give them mine?
Monika Soffronow 5 years ago
Keep dreaming in wish-it-was-like-this land. Rissie is right. No charity organization operates in a world that somehow functions differently from the rest of the universe. That said, there ought to be a cap on CEO salaries overall. Over the past 50 years, the CEO salary increase has been many times that of average incomes.
Load More Replies...
Full Name 5 years ago
I really dislike the term "breast cancer awareness". You're raising money for whatnow? We all know what breast cancer is by now. Say the money is for early detection methods are research for a cure or whatever. I do also have to get sad at how nobody seems to give a f**k about prostate cancer. The insides of mens buttholes just don't hold the same mass appeal as 2nd base does.
Jenica Thomas 5 years ago (edited)
While I think awareness is important I also do agree about the lack of for prostate cancer. My father was recently diagnosed. I haven't yet had much time to really dig in and find good research for him, but so far all my searches are littered with other information regarding other cancers, mostly breast cancer. I'm not denying the need for this information to be out there. It certainly DOES. I just wish it was also this direct for other types of cancer. Prostate cancer is fairly common, I can't even imagine if you or a loved one are diagnosed with something rarer. Finding information and support on that must be so difficult.
Load More Replies... chi-wei shen 5 years ago
They had the audacity to sue more than 100 charity organizations for the use of the phrase "for the cure" and for the use of pink. This alleged trademark infringement was a strategic move against other competing charities to achieve a better position for fundraising. At the same time they have no problem putting their pink ribbon on carcinogenic products and pay their CEO a salary that's clearly above the salary of comparable organizations. Susan G. Komen isn't a fraud, but it is a very bad choice if you want to donate money.
Rissie 5 years ago
They do seem to forget that public image is something to cherish greatly.
Load More Replies... Roman Hans 5 years ago (edited)
“large charities tend to have CEOs with large salaries” No. Their salary takes away from the charity. If they believed in the charity, they would take less. If they think they deserve the money rather than the charity, why would I give them mine?
Monika Soffronow 5 years ago
Keep dreaming in wish-it-was-like-this land. Rissie is right. No charity organization operates in a world that somehow functions differently from the rest of the universe. That said, there ought to be a cap on CEO salaries overall. Over the past 50 years, the CEO salary increase has been many times that of average incomes.
Load More Replies...
Related on Bored Panda
56
46