50 Terrible But Funny Maps That You Wouldn’t Find In A Geography Book (Best Of All Time)
Interview With ExpertMost of us, if not all, are aware of what a typical map looks like. It usually represents a part of the Earth, showing the locations of countries, cities, and natural landmarks like rivers and mountains, as well as man-made features like roads and buildings.
However, some cartographers try to mix it up and stray from the norm, creating not-so-conventional maps that, at first glance, have no usefulness at all. How many Switzerlands fit in Brazil and tomato Europe vs. potato Europe are just a few examples awaiting you on the best-of-all-time list of Terrible Maps. Scroll down to find them, and don’t forget to upvote the ones you think failed at geography the most!
Bored Panda also reached out to cartographer and designer Liz Cox, who kindly agreed to answer a few questions about all things maps.
This post may include affiliate links.
Fun fact: Much of the southern states of the united states of america used to be part of Mexico. So Texans complaining about foreigners in "their" country are really misinformed
When asked what inspired her to become a cartographer, Liz told us, “I have always been a right-brained, creative person and was set on pursuing music and creative writing. I was also obsessed with geography, memorizing random facts about different countries and learning about new cultures around the world was my nerdy fun (I used to even paint teeny flags on my toenails).”
“Undiagnosed ADHD had me bouncing around from interest to interest most of my life. Cartography was never something I planned to get into, but it was the perfect fit for my neuro-spicy brain. I get to continually learn about new places, use a ton of creativity and love of graphic design, and challenge myself with analytical skills. It's really the perfect fit for me,” Liz fondly shared.
It turns out the terrible maps with a pinch of humor are not only enjoyed by an occasional passerby but also by the specialists themselves. “I LOVE the Terrible Maps account and am so excited to buy the book,” Liz tells us.
“After stressful days digging through unorganized data for mapping, sending co-workers some of these map memes is the best way to lighten up the environment. I am never disappointed with the newest "Terrible Map." I love seeing the dad-humor-infused maps and think we could all use a LOT more giggling in our lives!”
This is closer. For a non-U.S. person, Florida and Disney World are one in the same.
And like, all rivers eventually flow into the ocean, man, so like, all the waters of this big blue marble are connected. Whooooooaaaa.
The book Liz talks about is Terrible Maps: Hilarious Maps for a Ridiculous World. It’s Michael Howe’s child of labor—the guy behind the Terrible Maps social media project. Online, it's described as the ultimate gift book for budding geographers or anyone who wants to have a laugh.
So if you prefer having a physical book related to your interests it might be worth checking out. “Ever wondered about the average jean colour across the United States? Or what ‘pedestrians’ look like in Denmark? What unites Brokenwind, Upton Snodsbury and Crackpot? And have you ever tried to take a train in Antarctica? Well, Terrible Maps is the book for you!” the description further reads.
The founders of the USA did not trust the majority of people. So many systems were put in place to hinder the majority from exerting its will.
Load More Replies...senate= so every state is equal. House of Representatives= according to population. genius
That's why their is the House of Representatives. This is to make sure everywhere and everyone is represented equally and you don't have people making decisions when they don't live there. This just shows a plethora of ignorance.
Yes, but it effectively gives Wyoming and its ilk veto power over the majority of the population. Also, since the House hasn't increased in number, Wyoming is still overrepresented even there. Also, since the formula for Electoral votes is senate+house, Wyoming has a disproportionate influence on elections. This is not ignorance. This is overrepresentation of small states. Common sense dictates that if California splits into 'LA' and 'Not LA', its representation shouldn't increase, as there's the same number of people as before. But it does! Also, it's "there".
Load More Replies...You realize we have the House of Representatives exactly because of this? California - 52 representatives. Alaska, Delaware, the Dakotas, Vermont, Wyoming - 1 apiece. It was a brilliant compromise.
Republic of states. Design is California can govern itself very different than Vermont. States come together for military, post office, patents, treaties. If US had true democracy, states would have split apart long ago.
It's the fault of our public schools that people do not understand the importance of each state having two senators.
Now look at what the House can accomplish on its own
Load More Replies...Maybe the meme maker doesnt have a clue as to why it was done this way, and thinks they're being clever.
Don't you love it when people proudly broadcast their own smug stupity. Meme maker probably sat back after making this and w***ed off while staring at it.
Load More Replies...Disagree. It isn't just the head count. It is representation by region. If California had all the reps they would vote themselves water from neighbor states. If (hypothetically) the "pig states" from that other map had all the reps, they would vote themselves laws that favored the pig farmers. Or, to put it another way, do you really want all of California's laws to be nation wide? Everything under the sun causes cancer, half your garden equipment outlawed, etc. It's not a perfect system but it is trying to find balance so all areas are represented.
Um, yes, I do want a lot of California's laws to be nationwide. Sure, maybe everything does cause cancer - or has warnings - but they have those warnings anyhow. It's not like California bans smoking. You just get warnings, but I get those already. Also, you get abortion access, a smaller gender pay gap[1], the fourth-highest national life expectancy[2], less gun violence per capita[3], and a reasonable minimum wage? Count me in! *SOURCES* [1] bls.gov/regions/west/news-release/womensearnings_california.htm [2] cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/life_expectancy/life_expectancy.htm [3] giffords.org/lawcenter/resources/scorecard/?scorecard=CA. Note: source advocates stricter gun laws.
Load More Replies...I've always thought our congress would work better if both chambers only had 2 each per state like the Senate and they had to run on the entire state, no districts. We could easily still divide up duties and checks and balances for each chamber. Also campaign finance reform, universal term limits, and a completely redone tax code that doesn't coddle the rich. There's my plan 'Murica.
Heck no. Then it would be an oligarchy of small states, like Wyoming, over California, Texas et cetera. It's bad enough for California as it is. Though the redone tax code is good and the campaign finance reform could be. edit: the redone tax code is a good idea.
Load More Replies...I'm guessing that the same disproportionality also exists for presidential elections.
Not as extremely, but yes, the electoral college empowers voters in the least populated states. A vote cast in Wyoming, Vermont, or the Dakotas is equal to about 4 votes cast in Texas or California.
Load More Replies...I'm not saying it's a good system. But the whole point is that the Senate isn't population based, in order to ensure small states aren't powerless. The house is for the people, and population based.
I will say that this is kinda wrong because this was the reason the House of Representatives were made. We have two houses the senate and the House of Representatives and this is just about the senate
There were only 13 colonies at the time. The two senators per state is then balanced by the representatives in the House, based on population. Pay attention to your Constitution.
When the Constitution went into effect, the USA had about the same population as Brooklyn today, the vote only belonged to white land owning men, and in several states "white land owning man" also implied "person owning." The Senate was devised to protect the interests of slave owners, and even the House was skewed by the Three Fifths Compromise
Load More Replies...because some people do not understand the concept of a Bi-Cameral government. We have 2 houses, a lower house and an upper house. Lower house in by population proportional and handles issues that affect based on population size like spending and taxes, and the upper house, equal representation by state, handles issues that each state has a equal investment in. Now to keep each house in check, each one when they pass a bill, needs to get the other one to sign off on it, thus keeping the two bodies in check, plus 2 other branches of govt. This is the reason why small population states arent completely ignored, otherwise literally 7 states today would control the whole country, and the rest would get screwed over. It protects small states from the big ones taking advantage over them, while at the same time making sure the big states still get representation by population. Also only 45% of the Constitutional delegates owned slaves, and this was Franklin's idea, a abolitionist
But if those seven states have most of the people, shouldn't they have the say? The electoral college makes no sense to me. I get the house of Representatives, though.
Load More Replies...The stated purpose of the two senators per state idea was to ensure that smaller, less populated states would have equal say in the laws. The House of Representatives is the proportional body.
The house of Representatives is based on population, not the Senate.
The Senate is not based on population, the House of Representatives is. California should have the same number of House members as all the gold states.
Yeah, but Congress makes up for this with the House of Representatives. Remember that Congress is bicameral: Senate (2 Representatives per state) - House of Representatives (dependent upon population).
If it wasn't like this, New York and California would decide all national elections. The rest of us wouldn't matter.
The electoral votes c**p needs to go away. A lot of the time the person that people vote for doesn't even win.
This map is highly inaccurate. It was only men in the original 13 colonies, all along the eastern seaboard, who came up with the United States' form of government. Most of these locations are omitted from the gold highlights. And most of the highlighted areas were not part of the United States at the time.
Flip the political lean of these largely populated states - flip the ones complaining...
The government those white slave owners came up with was the best - for them. And its the only way their modern day counterparts can ever hold power.
Get rid of the electoral college, stop taking away a felons voting rights, and create new parties!!!
US has more than 2 parties. They just aren't popular enough to make a difference.
Load More Replies...Liz describes these particular maps by saying, “I think a terrible map that fits into this specific realm is all about the factual display of data with the perfect twist of wit and absurdity.”
But if we’re talking about a terrible map intended for actual professional use, Liz believes that incorrect information, bad data, poor analysis, and horrid design skills can greatly contribute to a map becoming user-unfriendly and even unusable.
To check out how the opposite of terrible maps looks, make sure to check out our previous publications about the most informative maps that weren’t taught in schools.
Can we all just agree to adopt YYYY-MM-DD? It's good for computer files
Map of earth if there was no land
These were just as funny as I remember them... From the last time they did this list recently 🤨😐😶
BP is like a young toddler: "People laughed when I said this joke, I should say it again and again and again"
Load More Replies...I remember when BP was more about fun than spreading and fueling hate speak
Some are interesting, but I could do without the pointless ones (Roman air bases etc).
It's the Terrible Maps Twitter account. It's 95% silly jokes and light trolling. It's called "Terrible Maps" not "Unusual Maps" for a reason.
Load More Replies...These were just as funny as I remember them... From the last time they did this list recently 🤨😐😶
BP is like a young toddler: "People laughed when I said this joke, I should say it again and again and again"
Load More Replies...I remember when BP was more about fun than spreading and fueling hate speak
Some are interesting, but I could do without the pointless ones (Roman air bases etc).
It's the Terrible Maps Twitter account. It's 95% silly jokes and light trolling. It's called "Terrible Maps" not "Unusual Maps" for a reason.
Load More Replies...