ADVERTISEMENT

Most of us, if not all, are aware of what a typical map looks like. It usually represents a part of the Earth, showing the locations of countries, cities, and natural landmarks like rivers and mountains, as well as man-made features like roads and buildings. 

However, some cartographers try to mix it up and stray from the norm, creating not-so-conventional maps that, at first glance, have no usefulness at all. How many Switzerlands fit in Brazil and tomato Europe vs. potato Europe are just a few examples awaiting you on the best-of-all-time list of Terrible Maps. Scroll down to find them, and don’t forget to upvote the ones you think failed at geography the most!

Bored Panda also reached out to cartographer and designer Liz Cox, who kindly agreed to answer a few questions about all things maps.

#1

Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

Terrible Maps Report

Add photo comments
POST
james stevenson
Community Member
5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Fun fact: Much of the southern states of the united states of america used to be part of Mexico. So Texans complaining about foreigners in "their" country are really misinformed

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
RELATED:

    When asked what inspired her to become a cartographer, Liz told us, “I have always been a right-brained, creative person and was set on pursuing music and creative writing. I was also obsessed with geography, memorizing random facts about different countries and learning about new cultures around the world was my nerdy fun (I used to even paint teeny flags on my toenails).”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “Undiagnosed ADHD had me bouncing around from interest to interest most of my life. Cartography was never something I planned to get into, but it was the perfect fit for my neuro-spicy brain. I get to continually learn about new places, use a ton of creativity and love of graphic design, and challenge myself with analytical skills. It's really the perfect fit for me,” Liz fondly shared.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    #9

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    It turns out the terrible maps with a pinch of humor are not only enjoyed by an occasional passerby but also by the specialists themselves. “I LOVE the Terrible Maps account and am so excited to buy the book,” Liz tells us.

    #10

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    ADVERTISEMENT
    #12

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    That's going to look stupid in 60 million years

    Terrible Maps Report

    “After stressful days digging through unorganized data for mapping, sending co-workers some of these map memes is the best way to lighten up the environment. I am never disappointed with the newest "Terrible Map." I love seeing the dad-humor-infused maps and think we could all use a LOT more giggling in our lives!”

    #13

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    taarna23
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Still accurate but messes with my head. But, now it looks like a map in a JRPG.

    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #14

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Jeff White
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is closer. For a non-U.S. person, Florida and Disney World are one in the same.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #15

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Pandemonium
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    And like, all rivers eventually flow into the ocean, man, so like, all the waters of this big blue marble are connected. Whooooooaaaa.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu

    The book Liz talks about is Terrible Maps: Hilarious Maps for a Ridiculous World. It’s Michael Howe’s child of labor—the guy behind the Terrible Maps social media project. Online, it's described as the ultimate gift book for budding geographers or anyone who wants to have a laugh.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    #16

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Parmeisan
    Community Member
    5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    All of my efforts in learning geography have paid off in immediately understanding this joke rather than looking at it for 2 seconds and then deciding "that country must be called Togo". Worth it!!

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu

    So if you prefer having a physical book related to your interests it might be worth checking out. “Ever wondered about the average jean colour across the United States? Or what ‘pedestrians’ look like in Denmark? What unites Brokenwind, Upton Snodsbury and Crackpot? And have you ever tried to take a train in Antarctica? Well, Terrible Maps is the book for you!” the description further reads.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    #20

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    AJZombieJag
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The founders of the USA did not trust the majority of people. So many systems were put in place to hinder the majority from exerting its will.

    Load More Replies...
    Ikey Solomon
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    senate= so every state is equal. House of Representatives= according to population. genius

    Tom DeFriez
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That's why their is the House of Representatives. This is to make sure everywhere and everyone is represented equally and you don't have people making decisions when they don't live there. This just shows a plethora of ignorance.

    Jess Smith
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes, but it effectively gives Wyoming and its ilk veto power over the majority of the population. Also, since the House hasn't increased in number, Wyoming is still overrepresented even there. Also, since the formula for Electoral votes is senate+house, Wyoming has a disproportionate influence on elections. This is not ignorance. This is overrepresentation of small states. Common sense dictates that if California splits into 'LA' and 'Not LA', its representation shouldn't increase, as there's the same number of people as before. But it does! Also, it's "there".

    Load More Replies...
    rorschach-penguin
    Community Member
    5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You realize we have the House of Representatives exactly because of this? California - 52 representatives. Alaska, Delaware, the Dakotas, Vermont, Wyoming - 1 apiece. It was a brilliant compromise.

    I'm a Jimmy
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Republic of states. Design is California can govern itself very different than Vermont. States come together for military, post office, patents, treaties. If US had true democracy, states would have split apart long ago.

    Frank Tereschak
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's the fault of our public schools that people do not understand the importance of each state having two senators.

    Norma
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Now look at the number of Representatives. This is only half the equation.

    John Harrison
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe the meme maker doesnt have a clue as to why it was done this way, and thinks they're being clever.

    Taibhse Sealgair
    Community Member
    5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Don't you love it when people proudly broadcast their own smug stupity. Meme maker probably sat back after making this and w***ed off while staring at it.

    Load More Replies...
    David
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Disagree. It isn't just the head count. It is representation by region. If California had all the reps they would vote themselves water from neighbor states. If (hypothetically) the "pig states" from that other map had all the reps, they would vote themselves laws that favored the pig farmers. Or, to put it another way, do you really want all of California's laws to be nation wide? Everything under the sun causes cancer, half your garden equipment outlawed, etc. It's not a perfect system but it is trying to find balance so all areas are represented.

    Jess Smith
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Um, yes, I do want a lot of California's laws to be nationwide. Sure, maybe everything does cause cancer - or has warnings - but they have those warnings anyhow. It's not like California bans smoking. You just get warnings, but I get those already. Also, you get abortion access, a smaller gender pay gap[1], the fourth-highest national life expectancy[2], less gun violence per capita[3], and a reasonable minimum wage? Count me in! *SOURCES* [1] bls.gov/regions/west/news-release/womensearnings_california.htm [2] cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/life_expectancy/life_expectancy.htm [3] giffords.org/lawcenter/resources/scorecard/?scorecard=CA. Note: source advocates stricter gun laws.

    Load More Replies...
    Austin L
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've always thought our congress would work better if both chambers only had 2 each per state like the Senate and they had to run on the entire state, no districts. We could easily still divide up duties and checks and balances for each chamber. Also campaign finance reform, universal term limits, and a completely redone tax code that doesn't coddle the rich. There's my plan 'Murica.

    Jess Smith
    Community Member
    5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Heck no. Then it would be an oligarchy of small states, like Wyoming, over California, Texas et cetera. It's bad enough for California as it is. Though the redone tax code is good and the campaign finance reform could be. edit: the redone tax code is a good idea.

    Load More Replies...
    Ace
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm guessing that the same disproportionality also exists for presidential elections.

    Phobrek
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not as extremely, but yes, the electoral college empowers voters in the least populated states. A vote cast in Wyoming, Vermont, or the Dakotas is equal to about 4 votes cast in Texas or California.

    Load More Replies...
    Trophy Husband
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm not saying it's a good system. But the whole point is that the Senate isn't population based, in order to ensure small states aren't powerless. The house is for the people, and population based.

    two-sided llama
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I will say that this is kinda wrong because this was the reason the House of Representatives were made. We have two houses the senate and the House of Representatives and this is just about the senate

    nomnomborkbork
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    There were only 13 colonies at the time. The two senators per state is then balanced by the representatives in the House, based on population. Pay attention to your Constitution.

    Andy Frobig
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    When the Constitution went into effect, the USA had about the same population as Brooklyn today, the vote only belonged to white land owning men, and in several states "white land owning man" also implied "person owning." The Senate was devised to protect the interests of slave owners, and even the House was skewed by the Three Fifths Compromise

    Load More Replies...
    David
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    because some people do not understand the concept of a Bi-Cameral government. We have 2 houses, a lower house and an upper house. Lower house in by population proportional and handles issues that affect based on population size like spending and taxes, and the upper house, equal representation by state, handles issues that each state has a equal investment in. Now to keep each house in check, each one when they pass a bill, needs to get the other one to sign off on it, thus keeping the two bodies in check, plus 2 other branches of govt. This is the reason why small population states arent completely ignored, otherwise literally 7 states today would control the whole country, and the rest would get screwed over. It protects small states from the big ones taking advantage over them, while at the same time making sure the big states still get representation by population. Also only 45% of the Constitutional delegates owned slaves, and this was Franklin's idea, a abolitionist

    Thom Serveaux
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    But if those seven states have most of the people, shouldn't they have the say? The electoral college makes no sense to me. I get the house of Representatives, though.

    Load More Replies...
    Robert Trebor
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The stated purpose of the two senators per state idea was to ensure that smaller, less populated states would have equal say in the laws. The House of Representatives is the proportional body.

    Pamela Keown
    Community Member
    4 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The house of Representatives is based on population, not the Senate.

    Mark Hastings
    Community Member
    4 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The Senate is not based on population, the House of Representatives is. California should have the same number of House members as all the gold states.

    Shaunn Munn
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yeah, but Congress makes up for this with the House of Representatives. Remember that Congress is bicameral: Senate (2 Representatives per state) - House of Representatives (dependent upon population).

    HolyDiver
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The electoral college is meant to keep the United States from becoming a single state. Each state has their own laws. California makes laws for California, not the entire nation.

    Melanie Allen
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If it wasn't like this, New York and California would decide all national elections. The rest of us wouldn't matter.

    Beth Wheeler
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The electoral votes c**p needs to go away. A lot of the time the person that people vote for doesn't even win.

    Lyone Fein
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This map is highly inaccurate. It was only men in the original 13 colonies, all along the eastern seaboard, who came up with the United States' form of government. Most of these locations are omitted from the gold highlights. And most of the highlighted areas were not part of the United States at the time.

    Who cares what I think, but...
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Flip the political lean of these largely populated states - flip the ones complaining...

    Michael Largey
    Community Member
    5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The government those white slave owners came up with was the best - for them. And its the only way their modern day counterparts can ever hold power.

    Anonymouse
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    now compare house of representatives - this is only half the story

    Andrew W.
    Community Member
    5 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The 40 million people in CA don't know what is best for the other 40 million which is why a Democratic Republic is better than a democracy which can be twisted into totalitarianism (which is what the creator of this map is implying they want).

    The.Butterfly.Effect.530
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Get rid of the electoral college, stop taking away a felons voting rights, and create new parties!!!

    2late4me
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    US has more than 2 parties. They just aren't popular enough to make a difference.

    Load More Replies...
    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu

    Liz describes these particular maps by saying, “I think a terrible map that fits into this specific realm is all about the factual display of data with the perfect twist of wit and absurdity.”

    But if we’re talking about a terrible map intended for actual professional use, Liz believes that incorrect information, bad data, poor analysis, and horrid design skills can greatly contribute to a map becoming user-unfriendly and even unusable.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    To check out how the opposite of terrible maps looks, make sure to check out our previous publications about the most informative maps that weren’t taught in schools.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    #37

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    MathIsLife
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Can we all just agree to adopt YYYY-MM-DD? It's good for computer files

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #47

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    Jessica S
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Not true. Japan, France and others lost conflicts with those "farmers". The Vietnamese were well conditioned to war by the time America stepped in.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #49

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    What pedestrians look like across Europe

    Terrible Maps Report

    Continue reading with Bored Panda Premium
    Unlimited content
    Ad-free browsing
    Dark mode
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #58

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Map of Roman air bases in 2nd century ad

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    John Dilligaf
    Community Member
    5 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Historical fact - Romans were very good at camouflaging their air bases. Which is why they cannot be ;located on this map.

    View More Replies...
    View more commentsArrow down menu
    #59

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    Terrible Maps Report

    Add photo comments
    POST
    #61

    Best-Terrible-Maps-All-Times

    2,066 Americans were asked to point out Ukraine on a map

    Terrible Maps Report

    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda