Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

It Took 3 Years To Turn An Abandoned 1929 School Building Into This 31-Apartment Residential House
4.1K

It Took 3 Years To Turn An Abandoned 1929 School Building Into This 31-Apartment Residential House

ADVERTISEMENT

It would be hard to argue that the place a person lives in – a house, a district, a city – shapes that person’s life. However, sometimes while we are planning cities and building houses, we overlook the huge potential of the existing things and concentrate instead on creating something “completely new”. Simply put, we are overlooking the complexity of things that actually make them interesting and engaging. This might have a damaging effect on such structures as cities and houses, the value of which often relies heavily on them being embedded in their history. Old buildings often have a potential for transformation and this man realized it when he reconstructed an abandoned school into this luxury residential house.

RELATED:

    Three men transformed an abandoned school building into a 31-apartment luxury residential house

    Image credits: @jessewig

    The 34-year-old real estate agent was not sure what he would make out of the building when he bought it for $100k in 2019

    Taking both – the history of the building and its potential – into consideration opens the possibility to think about the transformation of a building. Which, in and of itself, is exciting enough, not to mention the additional benefits that might come with it.

    This approach was taken by Jesse Wig, a 34-year-old real estate agent who bought a 50,000-square-foot abandoned school building in 2019. Back then, he paid only $100,000 for it and he was not sure what he would do with it.

    Together with Adam Colucci, a 35-year-old real estate investor, they discussed various ideas – a co-working space, wedding venue, and beer garden, while they finally settled on a residential building.

    After considering various ideas, the two men came to the agreement to turn the building into a residential house

    Image credits: @jessewig

    The men emphasized that they preserved some of the school’s elements to keep the building’s historical significance

    Image credits: @jessewig

    Image credits: @jessewig

    At this point, Dan Spanovich, a 41-year-old developer and multifamily property manager, joined the project. During the transformation process, classrooms were turned into contemporary, open-concept apartments. The auditorium was made into a community space, and there is a gym with a half-basketball court, weights, and indoor cycling bikes in the building.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The three men working on the project emphasized that beyond making it a comfortable living space, it was important for them to keep the building’s historical significance. For that purpose, they worked closely with National Park Services and preserved some of the school’s elements. “We went out of our way to ensure the school kept its historical significance,” Colluci shared.

    Reconstruction of the building started at the beginning of 2020 and wrapped up in October 2021. It contains 31 apartments in total – 27 one-bedroom and 4 two-bedroom apartments. 

    The leasing started just after the reconstruction was finished and was fully occupied in just six months. The rent amounted to $1,400 a month for 1-bedroom units and up to $1,650 for 2-bedroom units.

    After the reconstruction, the building contains 31 one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    The auditorium was made into a community space and there is a half-basketball court, weights, and indoor cycling bikes in the building

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: @jessewig

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    In his article “Stop demolishing useful buildings,” Rafael Gomez-Moriana raises the question of why demolishing old buildings and replacing them with new ones still is widely seen as a sign of “progress” while the transformation of an existing structure is valued less.

    Moriana gives several reasons advocating for the contrary. According to him, demolishing perfectly sound, useful structures harms both the environment as well as our collective memory. Taking the climate change problem into consideration, the common approach should shift to one, that maintains and adapts most of the existing buildings, not only these buildings that are listed as historical heritage, instead of demolishing them.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    However, Moriana notices that the ecological aspect is just one side of the coin, as replacement of the buildings with new ones “often leads to a much more sterile and soulless environment, especially when this is done on a massive scale.”

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    Transformation of the building often helps to avoid harming both the environment as well as our collective memory

    Image credits: bowtiehigh

    Some former school graduates commented online that seeing the transformation felt surreal but wonderful

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Share on Facebook
    Aura Vyšniauskaitė

    Aura Vyšniauskaitė

    Writer, Community member

    Read more »

    Aura is a writer at Bored Panda. She finished her BA in Philosophy at Vilnius University. She lived in Prague for a few years, where she worked in Trade Compliance at DHL Express. Finally, she came back to Vilnius to continue her studies in Philosophy.

    Read less »
    Aura Vyšniauskaitė

    Aura Vyšniauskaitė

    Writer, Community member

    Aura is a writer at Bored Panda. She finished her BA in Philosophy at Vilnius University. She lived in Prague for a few years, where she worked in Trade Compliance at DHL Express. Finally, she came back to Vilnius to continue her studies in Philosophy.

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    I am a visual editor here. In my free time I enjoy the vibrant worlds of art galleries, exhibitions, and soulful concerts. Yet, amidst life's hustle and bustle, I find solace in nature's embrace, cherishing tranquil moments with beloved friends. Deep within, I hold a dream close - to embark on a global journey in an RV, accompanied by my faithful canine companion. Together, we'll wander through diverse cultures, weaving precious memories under the starry night sky, fulfilling the wanderlust that stirs my soul.

    Read less »

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    I am a visual editor here. In my free time I enjoy the vibrant worlds of art galleries, exhibitions, and soulful concerts. Yet, amidst life's hustle and bustle, I find solace in nature's embrace, cherishing tranquil moments with beloved friends. Deep within, I hold a dream close - to embark on a global journey in an RV, accompanied by my faithful canine companion. Together, we'll wander through diverse cultures, weaving precious memories under the starry night sky, fulfilling the wanderlust that stirs my soul.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    Ann Rei
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OK cool. Here's a challenge: how about creating affordable appartements instead of even more luxury cribs? The kommunal spaces are cool but like this it solves no issues in the housing market and just fills more pockets

    Kathryn Baylis
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Exactly. Since they didn’t tear down and build new, you would think they’d be able to make the apartments more affordable. Maybe not fancy with all the extras, but really, what percentage residents actually ever use the gym facilities on a regular basis? Be brutally honest when you answer that question. Yes, I know renovating can get expensive. But so is tearing down, clearing the rubble, and building new. Instead of gentrifying an area, and pushing out residents who can only afford the rent they paid before gentrification——many of whom become the percentage of homeless people who actually work full time jobs (a phenomenon seen in high dollar gentrified places like San Francisco and NYC)—-why not improve crumbling buildings and keep the original paying residents, at the rent amounts they can pay (you know, the recommended 1/3 of their monthly take home income), instead of pricing them out of their homes?

    Load More Replies...
    Angela Jester
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've often thought it was sad that malls and schools that were closed were just left to fall down when they really could be turned into great living spaces. In the case of malls, you could really have almost a real community. Maybe even assisted living for adults who are disabled enough that they can't be truly independent but at the same time don't need a care home situation. Especially if you consider there are already food court kitchens and such.

    Load More Comments
    Ann Rei
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    OK cool. Here's a challenge: how about creating affordable appartements instead of even more luxury cribs? The kommunal spaces are cool but like this it solves no issues in the housing market and just fills more pockets

    Kathryn Baylis
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Exactly. Since they didn’t tear down and build new, you would think they’d be able to make the apartments more affordable. Maybe not fancy with all the extras, but really, what percentage residents actually ever use the gym facilities on a regular basis? Be brutally honest when you answer that question. Yes, I know renovating can get expensive. But so is tearing down, clearing the rubble, and building new. Instead of gentrifying an area, and pushing out residents who can only afford the rent they paid before gentrification——many of whom become the percentage of homeless people who actually work full time jobs (a phenomenon seen in high dollar gentrified places like San Francisco and NYC)—-why not improve crumbling buildings and keep the original paying residents, at the rent amounts they can pay (you know, the recommended 1/3 of their monthly take home income), instead of pricing them out of their homes?

    Load More Replies...
    Angela Jester
    Community Member
    1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've often thought it was sad that malls and schools that were closed were just left to fall down when they really could be turned into great living spaces. In the case of malls, you could really have almost a real community. Maybe even assisted living for adults who are disabled enough that they can't be truly independent but at the same time don't need a care home situation. Especially if you consider there are already food court kitchens and such.

    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Related on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda