14-Year-Old Girl Wins $25K For Finding A Possible COVID Cure
Authorities in 215 countries and territories have reported about 40.8 million Covid‑19 cases and 1.1 million deaths since China informed the World Health Organization (WHO) about its outbreak in December. And while scientists around the world are racing to find a treatment for the disease, one 14-year-old girl’s efforts stand out among them.
Anika Chebrolu, who is Indian American, submitted her project to the 2020 3M Young Scientist Challenge when she was in 8th grade. Initially, she tried to use in-silico methods to identify a lead compound that could bind to a protein of the influenza virus.
But “because of the immense severity of the Covid-19 pandemic and the drastic impact it had made on the world in such a short time”, Anika — with the help of my mentor — changed directions to target the SARS-CoV-2 virus. And it worked.
Anika Chebrolu from Frisco, Texas, has just won the 2020 3M Young Scientist Challenge — and $25,000
Image credits: CBSDFW
Her invention uses in-silico methodology to discover a lead molecule that can selectively bind to the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
Image credits: CBSDFW
You can watch her explain it in the video below
Image credits: CBSDFW
Anika said her journey’s really exciting and she’s trying to process it
Image credits: CBSDFW
“The last two days, I saw that there is a lot of media hype about my project since it involves the SARS-CoV-2 virus and it reflects our collective hopes to end this pandemic as I, like everyone else, wish that we go back to our normal lives soon,” Anika told CNN.
But she’s already being called America’s top young scientist
Image credits: CBSDFW
Anika said she got inspired to start searching for potential cures to viruses after learning about the 1918 flu pandemic and finding out how many people die every year in the US despite annual vaccinations and anti-influenza drugs on the market.
“Anika has an inquisitive mind and used her curiosity to ask questions about a vaccine for Covid-19,” Dr. Cindy Moss, a judge for the 3M Young Scientist Challenge, said. “Her work was comprehensive and examined numerous databases. She also developed an understanding of the innovation process and is a masterful communicator. Her willingness to use her time and talent to help make the world a better place gives us all hope.”
Image credits: 3M Young Scientist Challenge
The media is celebrating together with the 14-year-old
Image credits: Goodable
Image credits: 3M
Image credits: USAndIndia
And people really appreciate her work
Image credits: KennyRS
Image credits: AsIWas_Saying
Image credits: SOAlumniNetwork
Image credits: louietwostep
Image credits: AlyssaVenice
Image credits: GooseGrinder
24Kviews
Share on FacebookSo many people talking...pro COVID measurements, contra COVID measurements. But some are really doing something. If you see a 14-year old advancing scientific research, those people who spread opinions without a factual base should realize it is time to shut up.
If you see a 14 year old advancing science this much, doesn't it mean the entire science field has been slacking off? Call me cynical, but if it truly is a cure for Covid, there would be no need to mention her age. At least more than once.
Load More Replies...Bravo and congratulations! I too find the 25.000 a very small sum for what she accomplished, but that was the sum of the prize money. This was surely only the first acknowledgment of her brilliant scientific career.
This is amazing! But where did she find all the resources to do this?? My school district barely has enough funds for functioning microscopes, and there's no way my parents would be willing to fork over the money to buy all the lab equipment needed lol
"In-silico docking study" - means everything was done on the computer. The data of the molecular structures are freely available, and an overwhelming amount of programs to analyze these biological data is free, too. No funds needed except for a good computer. Of course, since the analysis was done on a computer, the question is if the molecule will truly work as intended - the programs are good but far from perfect, it is entirely possible that the molecule won't bind quite as intended. And even if it does, there's the possibility that the designed molecule interacts with other proteins as well and is therefore harmful for humans... It 's amazing that a 14-year old did such an analysis, kudos for that, but it's just one step in pharmaceutical research.
Load More Replies...Good work by this young lady, BUT why don't we wait and see if this actually is or leads to a 'cure' for COVID before we let our imaginations run wild. Remember Theranos? People were so eager to say: "This young woman solved a huge problem!!!!" - that they didn't stop to ask if that person, Elizabeth Holmes, actually had done anything. I'm assuming this teenage girl doesn't have the con-artist-intentions and egomaniacal delusions that Elizabeth Holmes had. It could turn out that she's really onto something. But remember what the WSJ journalist, John Carreyrou, said, about what led to his reporting that exposed Elizabeth Holmes: that he read The New Yorker's breathless coverage of Elizabeth Holmes' supposed scientific breakthrough, and that he found it doubtful that a very young person had turned out to know some aspect of science so much better than all of the deeply experienced scientists who had studied it. The same point applies here. Is it likely the COVID cure will come from a middle school student? Have other major scientific discoveries ever come from someone that young? Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, Van Leeuwenhoek, Kepler, Faraday, Einstein, Rosalind Franklin and Watson and Crick, Marie Curie, Jennifer Doudna and Emanuelle Charpentier - none of them made their major discoveries and insights at 14. All were well into adulthood with years, in some cases decades, of diligent scientific higher learning under their belts when they found breakthroughs that changed the world. Still, it's nonetheless a possibility that this girl has discovered something major, but don't jump to sweeping conclusions just b/c you have some yearning to see 'girls in science!!!!'
I'm a bit puzzled that the work speaks about "influenza" and "flu", while the commentary is about "SARS/Cov" and "Covid-19". Which are two unrelated diseases, the viruses causing them don't even remotely belong to the same families. Checking: They're in the same Kingdom, but different Phylum (and hence different Class, Order, Family and Genus).
Stop asking questions!!! This girl cured COVID!!! She's a female in science!!! A female in science!!! And that means that she's now cured COVID!!!!
Load More Replies...This girl's discovery led to that Pfirzer vaccine right? Everyone better answer yes, or you're against girls being in science!!!!!!
To all those saying that the companies should be paying her way more, maybe switch it around and say "3m only paid 25,000 for this so they should be held responsible for giving it away for free"? Maybe stop this mindset of making people go bankrupt for healthcare
All you need now is a president who has respect for scientists, women, coloured people and, well, anyone else at all.
Yes, there are too many of us for the planet. No, people do not need to die off en masse. Your comment is plain nasty.
Load More Replies...So many people talking...pro COVID measurements, contra COVID measurements. But some are really doing something. If you see a 14-year old advancing scientific research, those people who spread opinions without a factual base should realize it is time to shut up.
If you see a 14 year old advancing science this much, doesn't it mean the entire science field has been slacking off? Call me cynical, but if it truly is a cure for Covid, there would be no need to mention her age. At least more than once.
Load More Replies...Bravo and congratulations! I too find the 25.000 a very small sum for what she accomplished, but that was the sum of the prize money. This was surely only the first acknowledgment of her brilliant scientific career.
This is amazing! But where did she find all the resources to do this?? My school district barely has enough funds for functioning microscopes, and there's no way my parents would be willing to fork over the money to buy all the lab equipment needed lol
"In-silico docking study" - means everything was done on the computer. The data of the molecular structures are freely available, and an overwhelming amount of programs to analyze these biological data is free, too. No funds needed except for a good computer. Of course, since the analysis was done on a computer, the question is if the molecule will truly work as intended - the programs are good but far from perfect, it is entirely possible that the molecule won't bind quite as intended. And even if it does, there's the possibility that the designed molecule interacts with other proteins as well and is therefore harmful for humans... It 's amazing that a 14-year old did such an analysis, kudos for that, but it's just one step in pharmaceutical research.
Load More Replies...Good work by this young lady, BUT why don't we wait and see if this actually is or leads to a 'cure' for COVID before we let our imaginations run wild. Remember Theranos? People were so eager to say: "This young woman solved a huge problem!!!!" - that they didn't stop to ask if that person, Elizabeth Holmes, actually had done anything. I'm assuming this teenage girl doesn't have the con-artist-intentions and egomaniacal delusions that Elizabeth Holmes had. It could turn out that she's really onto something. But remember what the WSJ journalist, John Carreyrou, said, about what led to his reporting that exposed Elizabeth Holmes: that he read The New Yorker's breathless coverage of Elizabeth Holmes' supposed scientific breakthrough, and that he found it doubtful that a very young person had turned out to know some aspect of science so much better than all of the deeply experienced scientists who had studied it. The same point applies here. Is it likely the COVID cure will come from a middle school student? Have other major scientific discoveries ever come from someone that young? Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, Van Leeuwenhoek, Kepler, Faraday, Einstein, Rosalind Franklin and Watson and Crick, Marie Curie, Jennifer Doudna and Emanuelle Charpentier - none of them made their major discoveries and insights at 14. All were well into adulthood with years, in some cases decades, of diligent scientific higher learning under their belts when they found breakthroughs that changed the world. Still, it's nonetheless a possibility that this girl has discovered something major, but don't jump to sweeping conclusions just b/c you have some yearning to see 'girls in science!!!!'
I'm a bit puzzled that the work speaks about "influenza" and "flu", while the commentary is about "SARS/Cov" and "Covid-19". Which are two unrelated diseases, the viruses causing them don't even remotely belong to the same families. Checking: They're in the same Kingdom, but different Phylum (and hence different Class, Order, Family and Genus).
Stop asking questions!!! This girl cured COVID!!! She's a female in science!!! A female in science!!! And that means that she's now cured COVID!!!!
Load More Replies...This girl's discovery led to that Pfirzer vaccine right? Everyone better answer yes, or you're against girls being in science!!!!!!
To all those saying that the companies should be paying her way more, maybe switch it around and say "3m only paid 25,000 for this so they should be held responsible for giving it away for free"? Maybe stop this mindset of making people go bankrupt for healthcare
All you need now is a president who has respect for scientists, women, coloured people and, well, anyone else at all.
Yes, there are too many of us for the planet. No, people do not need to die off en masse. Your comment is plain nasty.
Load More Replies...
179
39