Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

Share this article:

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Woman Thinks It’s Not Fair To Split The Bill For Meal She Didn’t Eat, Gets A Reality Check
95

Woman Thinks It’s Not Fair To Split The Bill For Meal She Didn’t Eat, Gets A Reality Check

Interview With Expert
ADVERTISEMENT

If there’s one thing that can break friendships, it’s probably splitting the bill. Never has there been an issue where people’s opinions get so heated they might be ready to end a years-long friendship over it. Do you split everything in half? Does everyone pay for their meal?

More importantly, does a person still need to pay even if they don’t eat the food and someone else takes it home? The latter dilemma is exactly what happened to one woman. She refused to cover the meal she ordered but her friends ended up eating, so, she didn’t think it would be fair for her to pay. But when she posted her story on the internet, netizens gave her a reality check.

To find out what’s the etiquette in such a situation, Bored Panda reached out to the author and etiquette expert at The Swann School of Protocol Nikesha Tannehill Tyson. She kindly agreed to tell us who should pay for the dinner in this instance and how friends can generally avoid the split bill drama. Read her expert insights below!

More info: The Swann School of Protocol | Gracious Living

RELATED:

    A woman refused to pay for her meal after she did not eat it and gave to friends to bring home

    Image credits: unsplash (not the actual photo)

    After her friends started giving her the could shoulder, she started wondering if she was the jerk in this situation

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: freepik (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits:

    Image credits: Getty Images / Unsplash (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    According to an etiquette expert, the person who orders the food should pay for it, regardless of who eats it

    Bored Panda wanted to get an etiquette expert’s opinion on the issue, so, we reached out to Nikesha Tannehill Tyson from the Swann School of Protocol. According to her, the person who ordered the meal is responsible for paying for it, regardless of whether they ate it or not.

    “Communication aids in clearing up misunderstandings and awkward situations,” Tannehill Tyson adds. “The person who wants the meal can contribute towards the meal ticket but should not feel obligated to do so.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    When you’re having dinner with friends, it’s better to discuss who’s paying for what up front. While it might be awkward to start the conversation, it will benefit everyone in the long run and clear up any potential misunderstandings.

    Tannehill Tyson says that discussing bill-splitting expectations before dining out clears the air and makes for a more enjoyable experience. “When arrangements have not been communicated, it is acceptable to just ask, ‘How will the bill be split?’ That way the arrangements can also be communicated with the server in advance,” she offers an alternative.

    In the end, it’s all about fairness and social grace, the etiquette expert emphasizes. “Etiquette is about putting others at ease. A little grace is needed [in] tricky situations.” She suggests something to consider: is a meal worth ruining a friendship?

    Image credits: Wavebreak Media / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    Cultural differences sometimes play a role in how people decide to split the dinner bill

    Splitting the bill among friends is quite a complex issue in general. People decide amongst themselves which way of splitting suits them the best, but most folks still lean towards everyone paying for themselves.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One survey found that 33% of Americans say they won’t split the bill equally, especially if the meals vary in cost. That’s not surprising, given that some friends take advantage of that. Research has shown that individuals tend to order more expensive meals when they know that the cost will be split evenly among the group.

    Other people, however, suggest that splitting the bill evenly is just a natural part of the group dining experience. Humorist and cultural observer Joel Stein told Today that people shouldn’t be so individualist when dining with friends.

    “I think if you go out to dinner, you just have to throw capitalism out of your head,” he quipped. “It doesn’t matter if you just felt like a drink or a salad. The idea of some kind of financial fairness in a group-dining situation is nonexistent. Once you’ve accepted an invitation to go out with a large group, you just have to know that you’ve entered a socialist space.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    He considers this a mostly American problem and that conflicts about the dinner bill arise because we’re so individualistic. And there might be some truth to that, as in France, or Greece, for example, it’s impolite not to take turns treating your friends and covering the whole bill, while in Germany, Canada, or the Philippines, people prefer to cover their meals separately.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One Yelp study found that there are even differences in the regions of the U.S. 65% of diners from the South would like to pay according to individual diners’ orders. And in the Northeast, 39% split the bill evenly and 35% let one person cover the entire meal and then pay them back at a later date.

    The majority of commenters believed the woman had to pay for her food even if she didn’t eat it, too

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Others, however, thought this would be unfair: “It takes some real audacity to ask for payment”

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Even after the consensus was that she was the jerk, the woman still stood her ground

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Ic_polls

    Poll Question

    Who do you think should pay for a meal if the person who ordered it can't eat it and someone else takes it home?

    The person who ordered it

    The person who takes it home

    Split evenly among all diners

    Discuss and decide on the spot

    Share on Facebook
    Kornelija Viečaitė

    Kornelija Viečaitė

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Hi there, fellow pandas! As a person (over)educated both in social sciences and literature, I'm most interested in how we connect and behave online (and sometimes in real life too.) The human experience is weird, so I try my best to put its peculiarities in writing. As a person who grew up chronically online, I now try to marry two sides of myself: the one who knows too much about MySpace, and the one who can't settle and needs to see every corner of the world.

    Read less »
    Kornelija Viečaitė

    Kornelija Viečaitė

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Hi there, fellow pandas! As a person (over)educated both in social sciences and literature, I'm most interested in how we connect and behave online (and sometimes in real life too.) The human experience is weird, so I try my best to put its peculiarities in writing. As a person who grew up chronically online, I now try to marry two sides of myself: the one who knows too much about MySpace, and the one who can't settle and needs to see every corner of the world.

    Rugile Baltrunaite

    Rugile Baltrunaite

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less »

    Rugile Baltrunaite

    Rugile Baltrunaite

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    What do you think ?
    Add photo comments
    POST
    Emilu
    Community Member
    1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Lol, "it's not a black and white situation". Yeah, it is. You order - whether you want it or not - you pay. First time in memory I've agreed with the YTAs.

    marcelo D.
    Community Member
    4 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    this, and the gall to say "they chose to eat it so they have to be responsible for their actions" while completely disregarding that she chose to buy food she couldn't eat, and yet expect that choise to have no responsability

    Load More Replies...
    Pink kitty
    Community Member
    1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    She actually says "I would just have to find someone to give it to otherwise. No I would not have then made that person then pay it would have just been a kind gesture if they wanted the food". She says she"wouldn't make [the person she might give the food to] pay" but she thinks her friend and the friends bf should pay!! Does she hear herself and what she is saying?! I agree with the reddit commenter who says the op has a low social IQ

    Nikole
    Community Member
    1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You ordered it. If they hadn’t taken it home you would have left it at the restaurant and it’d be thrown away.

    Ms.GB
    Community Member
    1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I wonder what she thinks they would have done if she had said "You can take it home as long as you pay for it." They obviously wouldn't have wanted to pay full price for someone's old food they took a bite out of. If they wanted it as badly as she thinks they did wasn't she wondering why they didn't just order a fresh one to go? If they had to pay for it either way they would have ordered a fresh one obviously. They only asked to take it because they thought it would be trashed.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Emilu
    Community Member
    1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Lol, "it's not a black and white situation". Yeah, it is. You order - whether you want it or not - you pay. First time in memory I've agreed with the YTAs.

    marcelo D.
    Community Member
    4 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    this, and the gall to say "they chose to eat it so they have to be responsible for their actions" while completely disregarding that she chose to buy food she couldn't eat, and yet expect that choise to have no responsability

    Load More Replies...
    Pink kitty
    Community Member
    1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    She actually says "I would just have to find someone to give it to otherwise. No I would not have then made that person then pay it would have just been a kind gesture if they wanted the food". She says she"wouldn't make [the person she might give the food to] pay" but she thinks her friend and the friends bf should pay!! Does she hear herself and what she is saying?! I agree with the reddit commenter who says the op has a low social IQ

    Nikole
    Community Member
    1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You ordered it. If they hadn’t taken it home you would have left it at the restaurant and it’d be thrown away.

    Ms.GB
    Community Member
    1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I wonder what she thinks they would have done if she had said "You can take it home as long as you pay for it." They obviously wouldn't have wanted to pay full price for someone's old food they took a bite out of. If they wanted it as badly as she thinks they did wasn't she wondering why they didn't just order a fresh one to go? If they had to pay for it either way they would have ordered a fresh one obviously. They only asked to take it because they thought it would be trashed.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda