“Disgusting Human”: Stepmother Explains Her “Simple” Side Of Story After Locking Boy Up For 20 Years
The woman at the center of what some have described as a real-life horror story in Connecticut has finally broken her silence through her attorney.
Kimberly Sullivan, the 70-year-old stepmother accused of holding her now 32-year-old stepson captive for two decades, has sparked outrage after denying all allegations of abuse. Her legal team are calling the charges an “extreme shock” to a woman who led a “relatively quiet life.”
- Woman accused of holding stepson captive for 20 years denies abuse allegations.
- Stepson found emaciated after house fire claimed he was confined in closet for decades.
- Defense claims woman is victim of disinformation with charges being an extreme shock.
- Judge orders GPS monitoring due to substantial risk of flight; legal team appeals.
“Her life has been turned upside down,” said her defense attorney, Ioannis Kaloidis, painting Sullivan as the innocent victim of a disinformation campaign with a “giant target on her back.”
“Her side of the story is quite simple,” Kaloidis told local media. “She did not harm him. She did not restrain him. She did not imprison him.”
Woman accused of trapping her stepson in a closet for two decades is declaring herself innocent
Image credits: Hartford Courant / Getty
After her arrest on March 12, Sullivan is facing charges that include first-degree assault, second-degree kidnapping, and cruelty. Authorities discovered her stepson in an emaciated state following a fire in the family’s home on February 17.
According to police, it was the stepson himself who set the house ablaze in a desperate attempt to escape what has been described as a two-decade-long nightmare.
Image credits: Fox 61
Inside the house, officers found a 8-by-9-foot storage closet where the man said he had been confined for most of his life. The space, windowless and without heat or ventilation, was described as filthy and unsanitary, and was reinforced with plywood and a slide lock.
Image credits: Inside Edition
As Bored Pandapreviously reported, official documents detailed how the man was kept in that closet for close to 24 hours a day, subsisting on only two sandwiches and two bottles of water daily—one for drinking, the other for bathing.
When rescued, the man weighed under 70 pounds.
Adding to his torture, the victim was refused access to a bathroom and had to relieve himself using newspapers and the aforementioned water bottle, the result of which was apparent when police searched the area.
Sullivan’s lawyer argued that the case has been misrepresented in an attempt to paint his client in the worse possible light
Image credits: Waterbury Police Department
Giving credence to the police reports were images of the house, showing cluttered, dirty rooms and a rundown staircase, which flooded the internet shortly after Sullivan’s arrest, shocking the public.
Despite the gruesome allegations and outrage, Sullivan’s attorney insisted that there’s more to the story, and that the photos and videos have been misrepresented in an attempt to exaggerate Sullivan’s role in the case
Image credits: Waterbury Police Department
“I have seen the photos, I have seen the videos,” Kalodis said. “I disagree with the characterization of those photos and videos. They’ve been made out to be the worst that anyone has seen in 20 years. I do not see that as the case.”
For Kaloidis, said mischaracterization has endangered his client’s life, turning her into “public enemy number one.”
“Her face has been plastered all over the TV, the news, the internet, and social media. Her life has been turned upside down,” he added. “It is a tremendous weight that she is carrying. It is a tremendous upheaval to her entire life.”
Prosecutors argue Sullivan should carry a GPS ankle monitor due to “substantial risk of flight”
Image credits: Waterbury Police Department
After posting a $300,000 bond the day after her March 12 arrest, Sullivan was released under intensive pretrial supervision.
At the time, Judge Corinne Klatt denied prosecutors’ request to place her under house arrest or GPS monitoring. However, that decision was reversed on March 28 by Judge Joseph Schwartz, who ordered Sullivan to wear a GPS monitor, citing concerns about public safety.
Sullivan’s legal team quickly fired back, filing an appeal. In the petition, they argued that the judge’s decision was not supported by any new evidence.
Image credits: Waterbury Police Department
“There was no new material information that demonstrated the inadequacy of the original conditions,” the document read. “The defendant was not arrested or even charged with any new offenses.”
Image credits: Waterbury Police Department
Prosecutors, on the other hand, remain adamant that GPS monitoring is necessary, with Supervisory Assistant State’s Attorney Don Therkildsen Jr. arguing that Sullivan is a “substantial risk of flight.”
He also referenced his initial conversation with the victim.
“Why is she out walking around when I was locked up in a room for 20 years?” he reportedly said.
“Lock her up.” Netizens took to social media to call for the woman’s immediate incarceration
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
I'm still waiting for "her side of the story" to be shared as per the article title. All I see is a lawyer suggesting that there might be another side to it.
I will wait to hear her side of the story until she's in court. This "boy/child" had a horrific life at her hands, regardless of her "side". He is now an emaciated man who will never physically recover from what he endured. This "woman" gets none of my time.
She can wipe that fake innocent look off her overly made up face, or I’ll do it for her. She threw a 12 year old boy into a closet and kept him locked in there for twenty years. WTF kind of defense can she have for that? There. Is. NONE. Even if he was being an obnoxious and trying tween, or had a physical or emotional issue that made him difficult to care for or be around, it still doesn’t mean he deserved such misery. Twenty years ago was 2005, and there were plenty of programs and assistance she could have sought to help her. She could also have sent him to live with his father’s family, thereby passing the buck for taking care of him to them, and moved on with her life. She had so many other options to choose from, yet she decided locking him away was the best of them. Rotten evil b***h. Did the boy’s other family, friends, and school ever contact her? What did she tell them that they just accepted, moved on, and let the boy’s nightmare continue, and how many times did she fend them off with lies to chase them away? They must be feeling such guilt for not pressing her further all those years she was obviously lying about the boy, especially since those were all chances to free him from this monster? Imagine if he was able to hear her lying to them, but couldn’t get them to hear him to prove he was there. I shudder at the thought. Or was no one looking for him these past twenty years? Did no one try to investigate what may have happened to him? Why did the poor man have to set fire to his own home to be free, especially since he could have died in that fire? Maybe it was a chance he took, since either freedom or death would be preferable to captivity. This piece of s**t woman deserves to burn for the rest of her life, then be shoved onto the express elevator to the burning basement when she dies.
Nah, anyone who locks a human being up for 20 years instead on seeking help for them from the authorities or whoever is a psychopath. Full stop.
Look at the make-up, and her face - can totally tell she is not in her right mind, obviously mentally ill, trying to look young and is a hoarder- you never know what is hiding behind doors of your neighbors- be more observant, and nosy if you have to. If something doesn't seem right - it probably isn't.
Don't start with the armchair diagnosis. Ffs.
Load More Replies...Let's subject the lawyer to 20 days of what the victim went through and see what he says then.
This poor child was failed by so many people. If you see something, say something!!
Load More Replies...I'm still waiting for "her side of the story" to be shared as per the article title. All I see is a lawyer suggesting that there might be another side to it.
I will wait to hear her side of the story until she's in court. This "boy/child" had a horrific life at her hands, regardless of her "side". He is now an emaciated man who will never physically recover from what he endured. This "woman" gets none of my time.
She can wipe that fake innocent look off her overly made up face, or I’ll do it for her. She threw a 12 year old boy into a closet and kept him locked in there for twenty years. WTF kind of defense can she have for that? There. Is. NONE. Even if he was being an obnoxious and trying tween, or had a physical or emotional issue that made him difficult to care for or be around, it still doesn’t mean he deserved such misery. Twenty years ago was 2005, and there were plenty of programs and assistance she could have sought to help her. She could also have sent him to live with his father’s family, thereby passing the buck for taking care of him to them, and moved on with her life. She had so many other options to choose from, yet she decided locking him away was the best of them. Rotten evil b***h. Did the boy’s other family, friends, and school ever contact her? What did she tell them that they just accepted, moved on, and let the boy’s nightmare continue, and how many times did she fend them off with lies to chase them away? They must be feeling such guilt for not pressing her further all those years she was obviously lying about the boy, especially since those were all chances to free him from this monster? Imagine if he was able to hear her lying to them, but couldn’t get them to hear him to prove he was there. I shudder at the thought. Or was no one looking for him these past twenty years? Did no one try to investigate what may have happened to him? Why did the poor man have to set fire to his own home to be free, especially since he could have died in that fire? Maybe it was a chance he took, since either freedom or death would be preferable to captivity. This piece of s**t woman deserves to burn for the rest of her life, then be shoved onto the express elevator to the burning basement when she dies.
Nah, anyone who locks a human being up for 20 years instead on seeking help for them from the authorities or whoever is a psychopath. Full stop.
Look at the make-up, and her face - can totally tell she is not in her right mind, obviously mentally ill, trying to look young and is a hoarder- you never know what is hiding behind doors of your neighbors- be more observant, and nosy if you have to. If something doesn't seem right - it probably isn't.
Don't start with the armchair diagnosis. Ffs.
Load More Replies...Let's subject the lawyer to 20 days of what the victim went through and see what he says then.
This poor child was failed by so many people. If you see something, say something!!
Load More Replies...





















21
18