I both love and hate how accurate this is, oh my gosh. I swear, 95% of the conservative arguments I see on social media look exactly like this, and generally rely on logical fallacies instead of hard evidence.

Watch the brain dead start circulating this sarcasm as fact.

Did people not read the title? The whole point is getting seeing the absurdity of conservative logic. You don't need metal gymnastics to understand, just read the title, lol.

I had to quit. B/c it started to read more like my neighbor who spouts Newsmax/etc.

This is hilarious, but per seeing some of the comments, I think one has to have a acute sense of sarcasm to actually get these.

Trump: After he failed to destroy our republic, he didn't randomly nuke anyone out of frustration.

Spot-on.

If only he did Comrade Napoleon (Animal Farm).

I wish i knew who most of these characters are

Leave it to Bored Panda users to ruin a thread with their complete lack of understanding of the premise. This one is better for reddit.

The Radiance.

Can we agree that by adding in or leaving out context on purpose, things can be skewed to manipulate the audience. If you want these things to not exist, start demanding that people in arguments/debates give all information, not just whatever suits their side of the story. If they don't do so, instantly agree with the other side. It's simple, people either want the unbiased truth to prevail, or to win for their own benefit only. Learn to spot the difference.

These are funny and there are plenty of conservatives that argue like this, but not all conservatives argue like this and there are plenty of progressives that do too. What someone thinks and how they think are two different things.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Excellent approach, hits the nail on the head 👍🏻. I think the implied questions on Wile .E. Coyote and Joffrey are valid though. We know the intentions of Wile and his actions, that's not the case in possible edited videos. And the mentality of getting rid of anything deemed as bad at all costs sparked a lot of violence (from left and right). Questioning sources and actions of groups doesn't seem "conservative" to me, just a sensible thing to do