Photographer Challenges Herself To Shoot In ‘Ugly’ Location, And Results Prove That It’s All About The Skill
Pro and amateur photographers see different things when they look at the same place, and this story proves that professionals can work wonders even with minimal resources. To challenge herself, Jenna Martin took her camera and her portrait photography model to Lowe’s: “Instead of searching out the usual beautiful locations around where we live, I had the idea to do just the opposite,” she wrote on PetaPixel. “I wanted to go somewhere ‘ugly’ by all conventional photography standards and then see what we could do with it. Lowe’s seemed like the perfect option.”
“For this ugly location challenge, I wanted somewhere with horrible lighting and limited backdrops. Somewhere that made absolutely no sense for a photoshoot idea.” Before she started shooting, Martin set herself some rules:
1) They had to work with whatever was already there. The photographer brought just her camera, without any artificial lighting or props;
2) They couldn’t rearrange the displays or make any big changes to photo backgrounds;
3) They’d stop shooting if anyone else was in the background.
“As soon as we walked in an employee asked if they could help us and I asked, “We were just going to take a few photos, is that okay?” He replied, “Of course! I was just wondering why she was so overdressed for a trip to the hardware store!” Martin and her model had about an hour before the store closed, so they began their photoshoot in narrow and wide aisles, against paint samples and trees.
“Overall, this was a really fun challenge! Not that I’d invite an actual client to ever do a Lowe’s photoshoot (I mean, never say never), but I was pretty happy with these cool photos! Horrible location for the win! Next time you see an awful spot, maybe give it a chance, you never know what you might end up with.”
More info: jennamartinphotography.com | Instagram | Model’s Instagram (h/t petapixel)
“Instead of searching out the usual beautiful locations around where we live, I had the idea to do just the opposite”
Image credits: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
“Lowe’s seemed like the perfect option” Location 1: The Paint Samples
Not edited
Edited
Lowe’s Location 2: The Lighting Section
Not edited
Edited
Lowe’s Location 3: The Aisles
Not edited
Edited
Location Shot: Aisle 2
Lowe’s Location 4: The Garden Section
Not edited
Edited
Lowe’s Location 5: Pillows Section
“Horrible location for the win!”
The locations are beautiful ? And also, I liked some of the unedited versions more than the edited ones.
yeah... don't forget the beautiful girl are big part of beautiful portrait. even at a ugly place a beautiful girl do the trick
So all you need is a gorgeous girl to take professional good-looking pictures? If that's you're trying to say, you clearly haven't seen enough pictures. Besides, she's not even that pretty (sorry, but beauty is subjective). She's definitely photogenic and she has nice poses, but her beauty is not universal. There is much more to be said about the photographer's skill in a "dull location" (and if it doesn't look like it it's because of his experience on picking spots and angles), the editing and the camera itself than the girl/model.
Load More Replies...The locations are beautiful ? And also, I liked some of the unedited versions more than the edited ones.
yeah... don't forget the beautiful girl are big part of beautiful portrait. even at a ugly place a beautiful girl do the trick
So all you need is a gorgeous girl to take professional good-looking pictures? If that's you're trying to say, you clearly haven't seen enough pictures. Besides, she's not even that pretty (sorry, but beauty is subjective). She's definitely photogenic and she has nice poses, but her beauty is not universal. There is much more to be said about the photographer's skill in a "dull location" (and if it doesn't look like it it's because of his experience on picking spots and angles), the editing and the camera itself than the girl/model.
Load More Replies...
693
158