ADVERTISEMENT

Ever wondered why Greenland looks as big as Africa on the map? It’s because of something called the Mercator projection. Putting a 3-D planet on a two-dimensional world map was a challenge for early cartographers. So, a Flemish geographer and cartographer named Gerardus Mercator came up with a solution for the most accurate world map. 

In 1569, he designed an atlas that could be accurately used for navigation purposes. Still, the downside was that his system distorted the size of objects depending on their position relative to the equator. 

Because of this, landmasses like Antarctica and Greenland appear much bigger than they actually are. Though there are around 40 types of map projections, from conical to polyhedral and retroazimuthal, depicting the true size of the world, this one is still used the most because of its convenience and simplicity, even by Google Maps. None of these projections can be titled the real world map because they all depict the same Earth through a different lens.

So, what does the real-world map look like? To show how incorrect our understanding of countries by size is, a website called thetruesize.com lets you move land masses into different locations. This helps you understand the true size of countries. 

We at Bored Panda played a bit with this tool, and what we found will change your perspective on our planet’s geography. The website lets you juxtapose two countries together to compare their relative size.

Here’s what the real size of countries looks like.

#1

US Moved Down Next To Australia Looks Unbelievably Small

Map comparing the true size of the United States and Australia.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Yvonne Bernal
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Size of contiguous United States Not counting Alaska & Hawaii, the 48 contiguous states occupy a combined area of 3.12 million sq. mi. While Australia is 2.99 million sq miles - I never realized they were so close in size!

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#2

Russia On The Equator Is Not A Giant Bear Anymore

Map illustrating the true size of Russia compared to the equator, showing positional distortion.

the true size Report

#3

If Romania Was An Island In The Arctic Ocean

Map illustrating the true size of Romania compared to the Arctic Ocean.

The True Size Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#4

Australia Is Way Bigger Than You May Think - It Covers Almost The Whole Of Europe

Map comparing Australia's true size in different global positions.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Hans
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We do not have kangaroos and koala beers over here, though. :( (And, well, also no giant spiders.)

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Is Africa Bigger Than it Appears on the Map?

Yes, Africa is significantly larger than it appears on many traditional maps. An interesting fact about the Mercator projection is that it distorts the sizes of landmasses as they get farther from the equator. This distortion disproportionately enlarges countries near the poles while diminishing the size of equatorial regions. As a result, Africa, which straddles the equator, is typically misrepresented as much smaller than it is in reality.

In reality, Africa covers an expansive area of about 11.7 million square miles. Its vastness is often underestimated on conventional maps, leading to misconceptions about its size and significance. On an accurate world map, Africa would appear three times the size of US.

ADVERTISEMENT
#5

If Brazil Was In Asia It Would Be Massive

Map showing the true size of Brazil compared to Russia, with Brazil's actual position in pink and overlaid on Asia in blue.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Brian Hermann
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The map of the earth is a 2 d representation of a 3 d object, that's why the size is different, because the map is distorted.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#7

Greenland Is Not So Big When Compared To USA And Brazil

Map showing the true size of Greenland compared to the USA and the equator.

The True Size Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#8

When You Move Canada To South America

Map showing Canada's actual size overlay on South America, illustrating the true size of countries.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Laura Mackenzie-Callow
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Nope. The width of South America at its widest point is 2,705 miles (4,353 km), The width of Canada at its widest point is 5,780 miles (9,306 km).

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT

What is the Most Realistic World Map?

The AuthaGraph is considered to be the real world map that shows the true size of countries.

Unlike the Mercator projection, which distorts the sizes of landmasses, the AuthaGraph projection aims to maintain equal area property. This means that the relative size of continents and countries is preserved accurately. This is essential for understanding the true proportions of different regions of the world.

The AuthaGraph projection minimizes distortion by dividing the Earth’s surface into 96 regions, which are then transferred to a tetrahedron. This tetrahedron is unfolded and flattened to create a two-dimensional map.

While no projection can be perfect in preserving both area and shape, the AuthaGraph projection comes really close to showing the real size of countries.

ADVERTISEMENT
#9

California Moved Onto The UK Shows They're Quite Similar In Size

Map overlay showing true size comparison of California and the United Kingdom.

The True Size Report

#11

Australia Moved Onto North America Becomes REALLY Big

Map illustrating the true size of Australia compared to North America, with overlays for size comparison.

The True size Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#12

Japan Can Stretch Almost Across Canada

Map showing Japan's true size, with overlays comparing its size and position over Canada.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Gordon Weir
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It all has to do with putting a round object onto a flat, rectangular presentation. Locations near the poles get stretched and distorted, appearing much larger. The point of the map is that IF Japan was in that particular geographic location (closer to the North Pole), it would look much larger when transcribed onto a flat map.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Why is Greenland So Big on the Map?

Greenland appears disproportionately large on the maps due to an inherent distortion in translating the Earth’s three-dimensional, spherical surface onto a two-dimensional map.

The Mercator projection is widely used for navigational purposes because it preserves angles and, therefore, helps sailors navigate straight lines or constant compass headings. However, it doesn’t preserve area or size accurately, particularly as you move away from the equator. 

It exaggerates the sizes of landmasses as they approach the poles, causing polar regions to appear much larger than they are in reality.

ADVERTISEMENT

Greenland is situated near the North Pole, and as a result, it is significantly distorted on Mercator maps. In reality, Greenland is much smaller than it appears on traditional maps. It covers an area of approximately 850,000 square miles, making it only slightly larger than Saudi Arabia (830,000 square miles).

#13

Antarctica Is Not So Much Larger Than Brazil

Map comparing the true size of Antarctica to other countries on a world map background.

The True Size Report

#14

This Is How India Changes As You Move It North

Map showing the true size of India compared to Russia, highlighting India's actual position and size overlay.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Yvonne Bernal
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Wholly Molley! No wonder I get so many customer service agents in India.... that is one HUGE country.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#15

Canada Moved Down Onto The US Reveals That Both Countries Are Pretty Much The Same Size

Map showing the true size of Canada compared to the United States, highlighting Canada's larger geographical area.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Katherine Dagold
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

but 2/3rds of Canada is uninhabitable because it's in the f-ing article circle.

Stephen Esdaile
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

But almost all of the USA is unihabitable because of the f-ing Americans...

Load More Replies...
Barry Keleher
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This one is actually accurate when backed up by figures. Canada being 9,984,670 sq km and the U.S. being 9,826,630 sq km.

Jack Smith
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Except without Alaska, the contiguous 48 are only 8,080,464 sq km. So Alaska makes up almost 20% of the USA's area

Load More Replies...
Tracy Cormier
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Except Quebec is not covered in ocean and you have the upper half of Canada transposed over Canada.

Mário Silva Tango
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

the true way to compare the size diferences of countries is look them at a globe map. There, in a globe, you don´t have mercator projection.

Martin Errington
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Funny this should be mentioned; Look at the actual map of the world: https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/search/commonwealth:7h149v85z Look at the size of Australia in comparison to other land masses. Look at where *Antarctica* is because it's not where we are generally told it is. This also happens to be the same map the U.N uses. This is the actual earth map, and surprise surprise, there is no globe. You live on a flat plane. Even the guy who creates the pictures of earth at NASA admits that beautiful ball we see in pictures, is nothing more than a picture https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html His very words on the NASA website: "Then we wrapped the flat map around a ball. My part was integrating the surface, clouds, and oceans to match people’s expectations of how Earth looks from space" There you go folks

Eugene
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

You ignore what he mentions earlier in the same paragraph - "a photograph from above low Earth orbit that showed an entire hemisphere (one side of a globe)"

Load More Replies...
Mike Robinson
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Wow people get so much at arms with each other over a simple debate. If we are all in Soo much disagreement with each other as we are over simple problems like this it's no wonder we aren't solving bigger problems like hunger and war, or world industrial take over. We are doomed at this rate. If we all have such a vague understanding of these things, the questions we should REALLY start asking is what are we letting our governments teach in our schools, and why are we Soo willing to be mislead and I'll- informed Some of this stuff about maps is interesting. I learned about the proportional indifferences of the mapped lands masses only a few years ago and went..." Huh I didn't know that" , then carried on with my day. We as a people need to realize that no matter how impartial one wants to remain, the history books will all ways be written with some bias. We need to beware that with said biases, comes perspective. That perspective is usually from that of the winning side.

Mike Robinson
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Because of this one sided perspective It would be nearly impossible to write the history books without the facts becoming propagandized and skewed. I have also read that the currently accepted maps we use are also a slight representation of the current geo-political paradigm, giving greater/ lesser importance to countries by misrepresenting land masses. The source I read from noted that the G8 countries were of the greater mis proportion. Of coarse that part could be coincidental. until I hear otherwise I remain open to the truth, even in the event that it contradicts what I thought I once knew. That's means also, being prepared to learn I could be wrong in my beliefs. Be nice to each other guys. And know that if you find out one day you were wrong, be okay with that we are not perfect. Also, if you find out one day your right, go easy on your fellow man, we're not perfect.

Load More Replies...
Jamie Laurence
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ok, so I no longer trust a single picture in this article after this one. Now Canada is similar to the USA, when the first picture shows the USA being about the same as Australia, and another picture shows Australia as quite a bit smaller than Canada. Calling BS on this whole thing. Too much contradiction.

J S
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Its because Alaska represents almost 20% of the area of USA but it isn't factored into the visual comparison with Australia.

Load More Replies...
Sam Macdonald
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Man...this is confusing. How does 4400 miles become smaller than 3300 miles? No matter how hard I try... I can't figure out how Canada becomes smaller than the USA.

Trent Nelson
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Statistics that indicate that China and the USA are bigger than Canada are based on land area excluding the surface area of freshwater lakes. When calculated that way, Canada becomes fourth. When freshwater surface area is included, Canada is second.

Load More Replies...
Alex Preston
Community Member
4 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yeah, except for Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, which on their own are three times the size of Continental Europe.

Brandon Roach
Community Member
5 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Wow!! I didn't know that! It's totally not like Canada and America are completely lined up with each other! Oh gosh oh gish, i didn't know that!!

Johan Strydom
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Confusing maps. I want to see all the countries on the same scale.

Amber Burns Johnson
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Really :.. nothing on African???? You can fit half the world in Africa and you guys covered nothing on Africa. Makes me sick. I was just thinking how racist it is to make Africa so small and now I'm seeing completely missing from your article

Mark Harrison
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We are so f*****g annoying as a species. We'll argue about anything. I'm bigger! NO! I'm WAAY bigger than you...most of you is uninhabita...shut up you! You're teeny! Blahblahblahfuckingblah Lmao

Marcel Luitze
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

#15 Canada Moved Down Onto The US Reveals That Both Countries Are Pretty Much The Same Size - Yes, but only if you leave Alaska out from the comparison

keith Reed
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

this is a big eye opener, i now know that Russia is not so big as it appears on the map!

J S
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Chad Boomershine But you don't have to cross a border to get into Nunavut. It's within the contiguous area of Canada. They didn't buy it from another nation. Canada, Australia, China, Brazil and Russia could all decide to form one country. But they'd be a bunch of disjointed pieces of land, like America.

Debashrita Sarkar
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Great compilation, Just one question, where did you get this map of India from in #14? I think the political map of India is a bit different in the regions of Kashmir?

Christy Linn
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

How are they pretty much the same size when Quebec and all of Atlantic Canada are in the Ocean and the Territories are overlapping ON, SK, and MB?

Matthew Basala
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

russia is the biggest followed by canada. Then the us is either 3rd or 4thdepending on how you meausre the water in the country with china taking the other. And canada is not largest un ified country. Russia is. You contradict yourself

Dianne McIntyre (Dee)
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We as Canadians are taught in grade 4 Geography that our country is the second largest in the world. And we are okay with that!

Hannah Stella Australis
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Because the map is a projection, the size of a country depends on its location. If you want real proportions you need to look at a sphere. The proportions on a 2d map are only accurate at the equator. There are several different ways of projecting the round earth onto a piece of paper and each looks different. The one you are familiar with is the one that has proven most useful, because places like Antarctica are very distorted but also to a lot of people not very necessary to depict.

Liberty Dankmeme
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

the problem with canada is that it's full of liberals - i can deal with snow - just not stupid liberals who want to import sharia terrorists

Mark Hyde
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Don't worry about it. If Trump get's in, there'll be nothing left to argue about anyway.

J S
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

On the plus side, plenty of room for all the Americans to move to Canada to escape Trump

Load More Replies...
Edz Singson
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is shown that our country is differ from others . Philippines <3

J S
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yes, as an island nation, you are at risk of land being under sea level due to melting polar ice from global warming. That makes you different from USA or Canada

Load More Replies...
Ben Lunsford
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Canada, the US, and Australia are all basically the same size. All within a few percent of each other.

J S
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Canada, USA and China are roughly the same size. Australia is quite a bit smaller, Canada is 2.3 million square kilometers larger than Australia. USA is 2.2 million square kilometers larger than Australia. Australia doesn't make the top 5 for largest countries.

Load More Replies...
zarmextin
Community Member
8 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

How stupid are you, really? Areas of a country is constant, it does not change when you move it to other continents. What you are trying to show, I believe, that, google maps show it disproportionately.

Michael Goble
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Who are you calling stupid? Nothing to do with Google. All paper maps distort country sizes as you move further north or south of the equator. What these images illustrate is that flat maps seriously distort the sizes so, looking at a map, you get entirely the wrong idea about how countries actually compare with others in size. A normal map shows Australia as being smaller than the US. The illustration here shows that in reality they are almost identical in size.

Load More Replies...
View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#16

How This All Works

Diagram showing 3D model, UV map, and texture illustrating the true size of countries on a world map.

Report

Add photo comments
POST
Tom Watson
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

You should move this to the top for the dimwits. This is a great series of posts. Thanks for sharing - fun stuff :D

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Is the True Size Map Accurate?

The True Size Of… is an interactive tool that lets you visually compare landmass. It provides a more accurate representation of landmass sizes and minimizes distortion.

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#18

If Poland Was An Island In The Norwegian Sea

Map showing Poland's actual size and position, with a comparison to its location in the Norwegian Sea for perspective.

The True Size Report

#19

The US Could Easily Cover The Whole Of Canada But It Becomes Much Smaller When It's Moved South

Map depicting the true size of the U.S. compared in positions over Canada, its actual site, and on the equator.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
Hans
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ask 100 people in a shopping male whether they believe this is the work of rogue regimes...90 will say "yes".

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#20

When You Move Mexico Onto Greenland Its Size Increases Dramatically

Map showing the true size of Mexico compared to Greenland, highlighting distortion in size perception.

The True Size Report

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#21

If Lithuania Was An Island In The Barents Sea And Artic Ocean

Map illustrating the true size and position of a country compared to its displacement in the Arctic and Barents Sea.

The True Size Report

#22

Moving UK North And South Reveals How It Actually Compares To Other Countries

Map showing the true size of the UK compared to Greenland and the Equator, highlighting the distortion in world maps.

Report

#23

Democratic Republic Of The Congo When You Move It North

Map comparing true country sizes: Congo overlay on Greenland.

The True Size Report

ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#24

How The Size Of Russia Changes As You Move It South

Map illustrating the true size of Russia compared to Australia.

The True Size Report

#25

#27 Tiny Iceland Compared To New York

Comparison map showing the true size of New York in orange and Iceland in blue.

Report

#26

Tiny Iceland Compared To Its Giant Neighbor Greenland

Map showing true size of Iceland compared to Greenland, highlighting size discrepancies on world maps.

The True Size Report

Add photo comments
POST
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#27

Let Me Just Make This Easy; The Issue Is Peters (accurate) Vs Mercator (inaccurate).

Comparison of Peters and Mercator projections showing the true size of countries.

Report

Add photo comments
POST
Thorfinn Tait
Community Member
8 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

"Peters" (actually Gall-Peters, as Gall came up with the projection long before) is no truer than Mercator overall. The key phrase here is area: Gall-Peters is designed to preserve relative areas, while Mercator preserves direction and shape. "True representation of land area" and "Incorrect/false representation of land area" are not entirely false statements, but they are too easily read as "Gall-Peters good, Mercator bad!" Which is simply not the case. But despite the famous West Wing scene, in fact there are many better projections than Gall-Peters for showing the whole world — and they have been and continue to be in use in most major publications related to maps and geography for many, many years. There's no single most popular projection, but Mollweide, Winkel Tripel, and perhaps Robinson remain some of the most common. In short: each projection has its own uses, and its own shortcomings. Mercator was never meant to be the only projection ever used.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#28

Alaska Doesn't Seem So Big When Compared To 48 Contiguous States

Map showing true size of Alaska in orange at its actual position and in blue next to the contiguous United States.

The True Size Report

#29

Texas Moved On Top Of Alaska Shows That They're Almost The Same Size

Map illustrating the true size of Texas overlaid on Alaska.

The True Size Report

#30

You Cannot Make Legitimate Size Comparison Unless You Are Doing So On An Equal Area Map

World map using Hobo-Dyer projection, showing true size of countries with colorful borders and labels.

Report

Add photo comments
POST
Ryan Cove
Community Member
7 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

At least this time, you used the Hobo Dyer Map instead of the atrocious Gall-Peters Map.

View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda