Sometimes it feels like modern technology is advancing at such a rapid pace, it can be hard to keep up. It seems that not that long ago, we were amazed by cell phones with colored screens and mp3 players that fit in our pockets and now those things appear almost comically dated. Some of those pieces of technology seemed like important parts of our childhood, but, sadly, have slowly faded into obsolescence with a great part of the current generation having no idea how they work.
This was recently the case when one Stranger Things fan asked what the “red room” shown in some episodes was used for
Image credits: Netflix
The fan wanted to know why Jonathan is frequently shown dunking pictures into some liquid in the “red room”. Now, if you’re a fan of film photography, you probably know what the purpose of the room is. But just in case you’re not, the room is actually called a darkroom and serves as a workplace for photographers who are developing film.
Image credits: Netflix
Image credits: Netflix
Since photographic film is extremely sensitive to light (meaning all of its contents can be destroyed if it’s exposed to light), it has to be developed in complete darkness. The red light seen in the show is used when making black-and-white prints from the developed film and since the majority of photo paper used for prints is only sensitive to green and blue light, a red or amber-colored light is a safe choice to use in darkrooms, allowing the photographer to see what he is doing.
Someone posted the fan’s question to Twitter, making people realize how old they were getting
Image credits: soapachu
Image credits: johntonta
Image credits: GayUnclePhil
Image credits: Djinnkitty
Image credits: mulderist
While it’s true that film has become quite obsolete in the 21st century, some photographers still prefer to use film cameras instead of conventional DSLR ones. Perhaps it’s the vibrant colors, the process of loading the film, or the suspense of getting it developed that makes them stick by it.
Image credits: HoldThatGhost
Image credits: genderpunksap
Image credits: DCcosplayMedic
Image credits: IkeVolpe
Image credits: anneramsey740
Some users fondly remembered the days they used darkrooms themselves
Image credits: severuduw
Image credits: FranSipsWhiskey
And while some couldn’t believe it was a real question
Image credits: jholleyga
Others defended the fan, commending them on being curious and not being afraid to ask
Image credits: Den_Matrix
Image credits: CPK_Schilling
Image credits: LiamKav
Image credits: Gracelove47
Image credits: UncleAli4
Image credits: sslepard
When someone asks for information, and intelligently cites instances that they want clarified, don't mock them. Give them the information and be glad someone didn't just start complaining that the stupid director shouldn't have used stupid red lights for no reason because it made it hard to see.
Sure. But this guy could have checked it himself through the magical power of Wikipedia.
Load More Replies...I agree with ppl who defend the fan, how is he supposed to know what that room is for when everything today is digital. He was curious and tried to learn the purpose, what is wrong with that. On my case I've never seen a darkroom and I love photography as an amateur. My reflex is digital, my phone is digital, getting physical photos is made with a printer... I know about that room because films and questions to my brothers. Sorry for the rage, when people critize like this, something inside me burns.
This is the problem. Not everything is digital. You just think it is because you are not paying attention. Most of the great pieces of photographic art in museums all over the world are made using film not digital. It doesn't matter if they were made 100 years ago or yesterday. I don;t blame you, this is the state of education these days. Nothing wrong with digital imagery, I use a digital camera daily, along side my film cameras and my darkroom for print making.
Load More Replies...When someone asks for information, and intelligently cites instances that they want clarified, don't mock them. Give them the information and be glad someone didn't just start complaining that the stupid director shouldn't have used stupid red lights for no reason because it made it hard to see.
Sure. But this guy could have checked it himself through the magical power of Wikipedia.
Load More Replies...I agree with ppl who defend the fan, how is he supposed to know what that room is for when everything today is digital. He was curious and tried to learn the purpose, what is wrong with that. On my case I've never seen a darkroom and I love photography as an amateur. My reflex is digital, my phone is digital, getting physical photos is made with a printer... I know about that room because films and questions to my brothers. Sorry for the rage, when people critize like this, something inside me burns.
This is the problem. Not everything is digital. You just think it is because you are not paying attention. Most of the great pieces of photographic art in museums all over the world are made using film not digital. It doesn't matter if they were made 100 years ago or yesterday. I don;t blame you, this is the state of education these days. Nothing wrong with digital imagery, I use a digital camera daily, along side my film cameras and my darkroom for print making.
Load More Replies...
70
51