we?

They are some really coldhearted self righteous people in this comments section who will never get what you’re saying about three need for human intervention to save species that are in danger because they just want to preach and feel like they’re right. You’re taking to the facts don’t matter club.

What natural habitat!? Most of the species they have are endangered because of humans interfering with their habitats. Almost every animal they have captive were either born in captivity as a conservation effort to quit least preserve the species from going extinct or they were injured, rescued and not fit to be released back to wild. And the animals they do encounter in the wild they are able to get a lot of information by getting hands on and that research has given priceless information on how to better preserve their entire species. Less than 5 minutes of interaction with a human that will not kill them can potentially end up saving hundreds more like them. I wish people would do more research before forming such strong opinions on things because they also fail to realize that this family still lives in a normal kinda run down house despite the game because their profits all go right back into conservation. Sometimes it takes a very small amount of discomfort for a much larger pay

Tosha Monty... Sir David Attenborough brought the natural world to us without manhanding animals. The ones that are endangered can be helped by conservation programmes and breeding programmes (there is a difference). They do not need human interaction which, ultimately, hasn't helped a thing - ooh, a few humans now know a bit more about how an animal behaves in a false environnment. Big deal. Watching them on TV and seeing how they behave in their natural habitat is how people learn. I have done A LOT of research on this, thank you very much.