Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“Feels So Unjust”: Fans Devastated After Famous Squirrel Is Seized And Euthanized By Authorities
48

“Feels So Unjust”: Fans Devastated After Famous Squirrel Is Seized And Euthanized By Authorities

ADVERTISEMENT

Peanut the Squirrel, a social media sensation who captured the hearts of thousands of fans on social media, was euthanized earlier today (November 1).

“It has been a terrible nightmare for me,” said Mark Longo, Peanut’s owner, after uploading an update video on Instagram, where more than 534,000 fans of the squirrel joined him in expressing their sorrow over the pet’s untimely passing.

Highlights
  • Peanut the Squirrel, loved by thousands, euthanized due to rabies diagnosis.
  • Fans raised over $12,500 on GoFundMe for Peanut's return and DEC reform.
  • Mark Longo found Peanut as a baby, turning him into a social media star.
  • DEC justified actions citing rabies risk and illegal wildlife ownership.

Peanut was taken from Longo’s house in Pine City, New York, on Wednesday (October 30), alongside another one of his pets, a raccoon, after a rabies diagnosis forced the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to confiscate them for testing.

According to a statement released by the Chemung County Department of Health, the decision to put both pets down was made after a person involved in the operation was bitten by Peanut.

Peanut, the squirrel who became a social media sensation, was forcibly euthanized after being diagnosed with rabies by New York authorities

Image credits: Peanut The Squirrel

The squirrel had become a beloved figure online, delighting its fans by appearing in videos enjoying waffles, playing with hula hoops, and greeting Longo after a long day of work. 

Mark and Peanut’s story began seven years ago when the former had found out that the latter’s mother had been struck by a car, unable to leave the baby squirrel to fend for himself. Mark took him home and gave him his now-famous name. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite Mark’s attempts to release the squirrel back into the wilderness, Peanut returned home every time, eventually becoming part of the family.

Image credits: Peanut The Squirrel

Upon Peanut’s seizure, his supporters launched a GoFundMe campaign petitioning for the squirrel to be brought home, and for the DEC to be reformed. As of today, the website has accumulated over 28,000 signatures and raised over $12,500 in funds.

Image credits: Peanut The Squirrel

Before the squirrel’s fate was confirmed, Mark expressed his concern and uncertainty on social media, hoping that his pet would be returned to him safely. After the news broke, he uploaded a tearful video holding a hand-drawn portrait of his pet, whom he referred to as his “best friend.”

“Thank you for the best 7 years of my life. Thank you for bringing so much joy to us and the world,” he wrote, confessing to feeling guilty about not being able to protect Peanut. “I’m sorry I failed you but thank you for everything.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Both his owner and fans of the pet were left angry by the DEC’s decision, believing it to be unjust. The organization replied, stating it was acting in accordance with the law

Image credits: Peanut The Squirrel

Peanut’s followers reacted with a mix of rage and frustration, feeling that the squirrel’s life had been taken unjustly and shaming those responsible for reporting the pet’s illness to the authorities.

“I’m shell shocked by this. I hope those behind the reports don’t sleep at night,” one viewer stated. “I hope time heals as much of this pain as it can for you both, Peanut was wonderful, I loved watching his videos all the way from the UK.”

“This sweet squirrel was living his best life. What the f–k is wrong with people!?” another asked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Peanut The Squirrel

As Mark announced through his non-profit, P’nuts Freedom Farm is going to demand accountability from the DEC but gave no specifics as to which measures they intend to take. 

“Despite our passionate outcry for compassion, the agency chose to ignore our pleas, leaving us in deep shock and grief,” Mark wrote. “To add to our anguish, they informed the media of their decision before even notifying P’nuts Freedom Farm, his loving home.”

For the DEC, the decision was justified due to the prevalence of rabies in raccoons across New York’s Southern Tier. Due to the high risk of contagion, animals displaying symptoms are euthanized to collect their brain tissue samples for testing.

The department also stressed that keeping wild animals as pets is illegal in New York and that they were acting in compliance with guidelines established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Bored Panda has reached out to Mark Longo and the P’nut Farm for comment.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Ic_polls

Poll Question

Thanks! Check out the results:

Share on Facebook
Abel Musa Miño

Abel Musa Miño

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Abel is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Santiago, Chile, he holds a Bachelor's degree in Communication and a diploma in International Relations. In his spare time, you can find him tinkering with his motorbike, playing with his dog, or reading a good novel.

Read less »
Abel Musa Miño

Abel Musa Miño

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Abel is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Santiago, Chile, he holds a Bachelor's degree in Communication and a diploma in International Relations. In his spare time, you can find him tinkering with his motorbike, playing with his dog, or reading a good novel.

Renan Duarte

Renan Duarte

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

Read less »

Renan Duarte

Renan Duarte

Author, BoredPanda staff

This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
Angrykitten
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If the animal had rabies what else could be done but euthanize? I think I'm missing something because I don't understand

Sunny Day
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The squirrel was not showing any signs of being sick. Normal procedure is "quarantine & observe" to see if it is getting sick. They euthanized immediately to avoid the inevitable "return the squirrel" court order after public outcry. No way to return = no egg on their faces.

Load More Replies...
LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So... an animal that is illegal to keep as a pet and BIT A PERSON was seized and euthanized due to it displaying symptoms of rabies? Why is that creating a frigging lynch mob mentality? The squirrel BIT someone. And it is NOT legal to keep them as pets in New York. I absolutely feel for the Longo family, as I understand loving a pet (even one that is a wild animal - I used to catch lizards in my backyard and keep them as pets when I was a kid) but he has no leg to stand on, in my opinion, when the animal was illegal to keep as a pet in the first place. Raccoons are also illegal to keep as pets in NY. It sucks that Longo's animals were seized and euthanized, but he wasn't allowed to even have them in the first place. And, again, the squirrel bit a human. Since it was displaying rabies symptoms, that person now has to have expensive and painful anti-rabies treatment. I love animals more than I love people, but an animal that bites/attacks humans is a risk to human life.

BoredPangolin
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with you but for one point: there is literally no way to manipulate a roden (rats, squirrels, even rabits) that don't know you without risking a bite. When scared and stressed, rodents bite. It's hardly a cause for concern in itself, I'm hoping the bite wasn't the one reason for euthanasia and that they actually tested him. It's not like dogs.

Load More Replies...
Ryan-James O'Driscoll
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Rabies is a horrific disease that is universally fatal once symptoms develop. People rallying behind this squirrel need to rethink their priorities.

ALonelyHeart
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Neither animal was exhibiting any symptoms of rabies and they were kept inside. A squirrel outside is highly unlikely to contract rabies anyway. The typical procedure is to quarantine an anima, such as a dog when they bite someone - even if there is evidence of a rabies shot. This agency acted over and above what they say is the law and did wrong on every level, all because someone complained from hundreds of miles away about the dangers that did not exist.

Load More Replies...
BoredPangolin
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I do absolutely love animals but I find it hard to sympathize for the owner. He took in two animals who are illegal to own in his place, rather than bringing them to rescues. He then made money out of videos of said illegal pets. It's tragic the squirrel had to pass away.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's also baffling to me that Longo is saying (now that Peanut is dead) that he was "in the process" of applying for a permit for Peanut to be an "educational" animal. He's had Peanut for 7 years. In those 7 years he apparently didn't bother initiating the permit process, or any sort of permit for him to be an actual wildlife rehabilitator (he is not one.) He had 7 years to do so. Even with bureaucratic red tape, it doesn't take 7 years to register a squirrel to be an "educational" specimen so that Longo would have legally been able to keep him in captivity in New York. It's horrible that Peanut and Fred had to be euthanized; I have no doubt Longo loved them deeply and is devastated. But they were illegal pets and he had to know that there was a risk every single day that they could be seized and removed from his possession, especially since he made tons of posts on social media that he was clearly keeping an illegal animal as a pet.

Load More Replies...
Grenelda Thurber
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

What exactly is the GoFundMe for? Rabies vaccinations for everyone who's been exposed? It's illegal to keep squirrels as pets. Keeping animals that display symptoms of rabies as pets is also stupid.

ALonelyHeart
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Neither animal was exhibiting any symptoms of rabies and had been contained inside and not exposed to any other animals where they could have contracted rabies! Even squirrels in the wild do not contract rabies!

Load More Replies...
similarly
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

You can save a squirrel. You can feed a squirrel. If you like, you can pet a squirrel. What you can't do is keep it as a pet. Let it stay outside. Build it a squirrel hut to live in, if you like. Film it if you like. But always keep a degree of deniability. "Nah. Not mine. It lives in that tree over there."

ChugChug
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For those who don't understand, they were only suspecting rabies because it bit a person who the animal didn't know (it was probably stressed). So based on this they had to put it down. The only way to test rabies is to cut out a piece from their brain, so testing before euthanasia is not an option. Quarantine is also difficult because incubation period for rabies can be as long as 1 year... so very sad situation. It should have been vaccinated really, but since its illegal to keep wild animals, I guess they couldn't do that either..

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think there was likely also a lot of concern because Fred the raccoon was a fairly recent acquisition at their "sanctuary", and raccoons are a common vector for rabies. There was probably fear that Fred could have exposed the Longos (and, in theory, Peanut) to the rabies virus, if Fred himself was infected. I don't think Peanut was necessarily exhibiting "signs" of rabies - I doubt the necropsy will even show he had the virus - but the DEC was being cautious, as rabies is invariably fatal without costly post-exposure treatment (HRIG can cost several thousands of dollars.) There is a vaccine for raccoons (it is used in bait-drops to vaccinate large groups of wild raccoons) but I'm not sure there's a "safe", effective vaccine for squirrels, as there's likely been zero research into creating one. But you're correct, even if the Longos had taken Fred to a vet, the vet wouldn't have vaccinated him, as they are illegal to keep as pets.

Load More Replies...
Deborah B
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Accountable for what? Following the law? Confiscating an illegal pet with rabies symptoms, and euthanising it for testing after it bit someone? Yes, it completely sucks for the squirrel, and everyone who loves the squirrel but point your outrage somewhere productive. Instead of attacking DEC for following the rules, advocate for changes to legislation.

StarCrossedFriday
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Did it have rabies symptoms? Biting a stranger isn’t in itself a sure fire way of diagnosing rabies. If the only issue was that it was illegal and might have rabies, instantly putting it down seems extreme. We need more info.

Load More Replies...
Nimitz
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The people calling for lawsuits are the finest examples of toxic positivity... Someone adopted a squirrel and racoon and it didn't work out? You don't say! This guy fully clowned himself, but managed to make literally thousands of dollars off of putting other people in danger... *table flip*

Surly Scot
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Need more information. Was the raccon vaccinated for rabies? Squirrels can't be vaccinated for it and they rarely get rabies or transmit it. Perhaps he never had the raccoon vaccinated, it caught rabies and started displaying symptoms, so they had to remove the squirrel as well for everyone's safety. It states there was a confirmed rabies diagnosis, so maybe he took the raccoon to the vet for its odd rabies behavior, vet confirmed and reported it to the authorities, guy took raccoon back home ignoring the problem, authorities acted on the report and came for both animals.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It is rare for a squirrel to get rabies ONLY because rabies is transmitted via saliva - and that means that a squirrel could, in normal wild circumstances, only acquire rabies infection if it was bitten by a rabid animal. Squirrels and small and are typically killed if bitten by a larger, rabid animal, so rabies infection in squirrels is rarely seen because of this, NOT because they are resistant or "immune" to rabies. Since Fred the raccoon was a recent acquisition, I doubt he was vaccinated. Speaking hypothetically, if Fred DID carry the rabies virus, he could transmit it to Peanut via a bite/nip, a scratch, or even if he simply licked/groomed Peanut. It is still unlikely that Peanut was infected even if Fred IS found to have had been infected, but Peanut still would have been seized anyway because it is illegal to keep squirrels as pets. He may not have been euthanized at all if Fred had never been rescued/present - and Longo could have applied for a permit to keep Peanut.

Load More Replies...
Panda Bear
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Maybe don’t keep a wild animal as a pet. The poor squirrel had to pay the ultimate price because someone bozo wanted to be famous on the internet.

Andrewsarchus42
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He didn’t just keep a wild animal as a pet. He ILLEGALLY kept a wild animal as a pet 🤦‍♀️

Load More Replies...
Okiedokie
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Only a DFA can confirm rabies in animals. And the animal has to be dead. I hope he demands a DFA.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It states right in the article that the squirrel's brain tissue will be tested.

Load More Replies...
Philly Bob
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

While it's possible for squirrels to get rabies, it's exceedingly rare. This is due to several factors related to their biology and behavior as squirrels possess a robust immune system that can often fight off infections, including the rabies virus. Additionally, their behavior typically doesn't put them at high risk of encountering rabid animals. They tend to avoid confrontation with potential carriers of the virus, such as raccoons or bats, which reduces their exposure. However, they (NY) still win on the fact that it's illegal to posess a wild animal.

Ece Cenker
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

One question: Where had DEC been in the last 6+ years when this animal had been kept illegally and had been a health threat? By their argument points, they have been failing both the animal and the people around it. Coming in years later only to kill the animal and leave people around it in misery is a job shittily done. They are definitely accountable.

pebs
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Rabies is a very serious disease and the animal bit a person. It's sad, but there was nothing else to do.

Deedee
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don't get it, what symptoms? Did Peanut go on a rampage with froth in his mouth, or was the only symptom that he bit someone? Plenty of animals bite, that doesn't mean they are rabid. Why not hold Peanut in quarentine for a few weeks to see? Forcibly removing someone's (albeit illegal) pet without any warning is cruel. I think the very least DEC could have done is let the owner take Peanut to a trusted vet to be put down. That way Peanut wouldn't be so scared and the family could have some closure.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not all animals froth at the mouth when rabid. That's just what Westerns and Cujo have made us think. In many small mammals, the only signs might be confusion, weakness, difficulty walking, lethargy, and inappetence. In 1972, a study on rabid squirrels showed that half of the infected animals that died of rabies showed NO clinical signs of the disease. And what would the point be of holding an illegal animal in quarantine for "a few weeks"? If it was rabid, it would die slowly and horribly within a few days. If it wasn't rabid, it's not like they could hand it back to Longo, as it is illegal to keep a squirrel as a pet.

Load More Replies...
Atom Bohr
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'm so confused... Did PNUT have rabies or not? That seems to be the reason for him and the racoon being taken and euthanised, but the family is completely glossing over that fact as if it's not true? If he was a "beloved pet", why wasn't he vaccinated? This could have been prevented? Surely? I'm not a vet or anything of the sort, but rabies vaccines exist for lots of species, so surely one of them would have been suitable for a squirrel?

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He couldn't be vaccinated, nor could Fred the racoon be vaccinated, because squirrels and racoons are illegal to keep as pets in New York. Any normal veterinarian Longo took his illegal animals to would refuse to vaccinate them (I am not sure there is even a "safe" vaccine for squirrels; there is one for raccoons) and might even have turned Longo in to the authorities for keeping illegal animals as pets. It's sad, because at least Fred could have been vaccinated if Longo had actually bothered getting his license as a wildlife rehabilitator, but he didn't, so now two animals have needlessly died for this man's hubris and folly.

Load More Replies...
Carl Roberts
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The squirrel had RABIES. Euthanasia is the ONLY option. The peopel being "outraged' that it was put down are , to put it bluntly...morons.

frey
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

we dont know that they had rabies, they were playful and docile, the dec used that excuse to justify killing innocent animals.

Load More Replies...
Andrewsarchus42
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It is illegal to keep squirrels and raccoons as pets in NY. They could have applied for the proper permits to keep them at any time they were alive. But they didn’t. Should the government have killed the squirrel? That’s debatable. What isn’t debatable is that the raid was legal and justified. Are we going to allow people to get away with crimes just because they’re famous on the internet? Isn’t that a pretty slippery slope? Would people feel the same if they were illegally keeping a bear as a pet?

G Bono
Community Member
2 weeks ago

This comment has been deleted.

frey
Community Member
2 weeks ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

B******T I dont think those animals had rabies. I think the evil dec just used that as an excuse to take and kill them. For the pathetic losers who have no life and complained, karma is coming for you. For the DEC, you are a piece of s**t. IF they had rabies, wouldnt they would have attacked the owners? come on people, get a brain!! The internet is the worst thing to ever happen to society. the earth would be better is people died off an animals took over. humans are evil!!!

Gabby M
Community Member
2 weeks ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

DISGUSTING .... I would so support a lawsuit!!! Amazed they don't do MORE for abused animals!!!!!!!

Angrykitten
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If the animal had rabies what else could be done but euthanize? I think I'm missing something because I don't understand

Sunny Day
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The squirrel was not showing any signs of being sick. Normal procedure is "quarantine & observe" to see if it is getting sick. They euthanized immediately to avoid the inevitable "return the squirrel" court order after public outcry. No way to return = no egg on their faces.

Load More Replies...
LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So... an animal that is illegal to keep as a pet and BIT A PERSON was seized and euthanized due to it displaying symptoms of rabies? Why is that creating a frigging lynch mob mentality? The squirrel BIT someone. And it is NOT legal to keep them as pets in New York. I absolutely feel for the Longo family, as I understand loving a pet (even one that is a wild animal - I used to catch lizards in my backyard and keep them as pets when I was a kid) but he has no leg to stand on, in my opinion, when the animal was illegal to keep as a pet in the first place. Raccoons are also illegal to keep as pets in NY. It sucks that Longo's animals were seized and euthanized, but he wasn't allowed to even have them in the first place. And, again, the squirrel bit a human. Since it was displaying rabies symptoms, that person now has to have expensive and painful anti-rabies treatment. I love animals more than I love people, but an animal that bites/attacks humans is a risk to human life.

BoredPangolin
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with you but for one point: there is literally no way to manipulate a roden (rats, squirrels, even rabits) that don't know you without risking a bite. When scared and stressed, rodents bite. It's hardly a cause for concern in itself, I'm hoping the bite wasn't the one reason for euthanasia and that they actually tested him. It's not like dogs.

Load More Replies...
Ryan-James O'Driscoll
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Rabies is a horrific disease that is universally fatal once symptoms develop. People rallying behind this squirrel need to rethink their priorities.

ALonelyHeart
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Neither animal was exhibiting any symptoms of rabies and they were kept inside. A squirrel outside is highly unlikely to contract rabies anyway. The typical procedure is to quarantine an anima, such as a dog when they bite someone - even if there is evidence of a rabies shot. This agency acted over and above what they say is the law and did wrong on every level, all because someone complained from hundreds of miles away about the dangers that did not exist.

Load More Replies...
BoredPangolin
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I do absolutely love animals but I find it hard to sympathize for the owner. He took in two animals who are illegal to own in his place, rather than bringing them to rescues. He then made money out of videos of said illegal pets. It's tragic the squirrel had to pass away.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's also baffling to me that Longo is saying (now that Peanut is dead) that he was "in the process" of applying for a permit for Peanut to be an "educational" animal. He's had Peanut for 7 years. In those 7 years he apparently didn't bother initiating the permit process, or any sort of permit for him to be an actual wildlife rehabilitator (he is not one.) He had 7 years to do so. Even with bureaucratic red tape, it doesn't take 7 years to register a squirrel to be an "educational" specimen so that Longo would have legally been able to keep him in captivity in New York. It's horrible that Peanut and Fred had to be euthanized; I have no doubt Longo loved them deeply and is devastated. But they were illegal pets and he had to know that there was a risk every single day that they could be seized and removed from his possession, especially since he made tons of posts on social media that he was clearly keeping an illegal animal as a pet.

Load More Replies...
Grenelda Thurber
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

What exactly is the GoFundMe for? Rabies vaccinations for everyone who's been exposed? It's illegal to keep squirrels as pets. Keeping animals that display symptoms of rabies as pets is also stupid.

ALonelyHeart
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Neither animal was exhibiting any symptoms of rabies and had been contained inside and not exposed to any other animals where they could have contracted rabies! Even squirrels in the wild do not contract rabies!

Load More Replies...
similarly
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

You can save a squirrel. You can feed a squirrel. If you like, you can pet a squirrel. What you can't do is keep it as a pet. Let it stay outside. Build it a squirrel hut to live in, if you like. Film it if you like. But always keep a degree of deniability. "Nah. Not mine. It lives in that tree over there."

ChugChug
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For those who don't understand, they were only suspecting rabies because it bit a person who the animal didn't know (it was probably stressed). So based on this they had to put it down. The only way to test rabies is to cut out a piece from their brain, so testing before euthanasia is not an option. Quarantine is also difficult because incubation period for rabies can be as long as 1 year... so very sad situation. It should have been vaccinated really, but since its illegal to keep wild animals, I guess they couldn't do that either..

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think there was likely also a lot of concern because Fred the raccoon was a fairly recent acquisition at their "sanctuary", and raccoons are a common vector for rabies. There was probably fear that Fred could have exposed the Longos (and, in theory, Peanut) to the rabies virus, if Fred himself was infected. I don't think Peanut was necessarily exhibiting "signs" of rabies - I doubt the necropsy will even show he had the virus - but the DEC was being cautious, as rabies is invariably fatal without costly post-exposure treatment (HRIG can cost several thousands of dollars.) There is a vaccine for raccoons (it is used in bait-drops to vaccinate large groups of wild raccoons) but I'm not sure there's a "safe", effective vaccine for squirrels, as there's likely been zero research into creating one. But you're correct, even if the Longos had taken Fred to a vet, the vet wouldn't have vaccinated him, as they are illegal to keep as pets.

Load More Replies...
Deborah B
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Accountable for what? Following the law? Confiscating an illegal pet with rabies symptoms, and euthanising it for testing after it bit someone? Yes, it completely sucks for the squirrel, and everyone who loves the squirrel but point your outrage somewhere productive. Instead of attacking DEC for following the rules, advocate for changes to legislation.

StarCrossedFriday
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Did it have rabies symptoms? Biting a stranger isn’t in itself a sure fire way of diagnosing rabies. If the only issue was that it was illegal and might have rabies, instantly putting it down seems extreme. We need more info.

Load More Replies...
Nimitz
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The people calling for lawsuits are the finest examples of toxic positivity... Someone adopted a squirrel and racoon and it didn't work out? You don't say! This guy fully clowned himself, but managed to make literally thousands of dollars off of putting other people in danger... *table flip*

Surly Scot
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Need more information. Was the raccon vaccinated for rabies? Squirrels can't be vaccinated for it and they rarely get rabies or transmit it. Perhaps he never had the raccoon vaccinated, it caught rabies and started displaying symptoms, so they had to remove the squirrel as well for everyone's safety. It states there was a confirmed rabies diagnosis, so maybe he took the raccoon to the vet for its odd rabies behavior, vet confirmed and reported it to the authorities, guy took raccoon back home ignoring the problem, authorities acted on the report and came for both animals.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It is rare for a squirrel to get rabies ONLY because rabies is transmitted via saliva - and that means that a squirrel could, in normal wild circumstances, only acquire rabies infection if it was bitten by a rabid animal. Squirrels and small and are typically killed if bitten by a larger, rabid animal, so rabies infection in squirrels is rarely seen because of this, NOT because they are resistant or "immune" to rabies. Since Fred the raccoon was a recent acquisition, I doubt he was vaccinated. Speaking hypothetically, if Fred DID carry the rabies virus, he could transmit it to Peanut via a bite/nip, a scratch, or even if he simply licked/groomed Peanut. It is still unlikely that Peanut was infected even if Fred IS found to have had been infected, but Peanut still would have been seized anyway because it is illegal to keep squirrels as pets. He may not have been euthanized at all if Fred had never been rescued/present - and Longo could have applied for a permit to keep Peanut.

Load More Replies...
Panda Bear
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Maybe don’t keep a wild animal as a pet. The poor squirrel had to pay the ultimate price because someone bozo wanted to be famous on the internet.

Andrewsarchus42
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He didn’t just keep a wild animal as a pet. He ILLEGALLY kept a wild animal as a pet 🤦‍♀️

Load More Replies...
Okiedokie
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Only a DFA can confirm rabies in animals. And the animal has to be dead. I hope he demands a DFA.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It states right in the article that the squirrel's brain tissue will be tested.

Load More Replies...
Philly Bob
Community Member
2 weeks ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

While it's possible for squirrels to get rabies, it's exceedingly rare. This is due to several factors related to their biology and behavior as squirrels possess a robust immune system that can often fight off infections, including the rabies virus. Additionally, their behavior typically doesn't put them at high risk of encountering rabid animals. They tend to avoid confrontation with potential carriers of the virus, such as raccoons or bats, which reduces their exposure. However, they (NY) still win on the fact that it's illegal to posess a wild animal.

Ece Cenker
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

One question: Where had DEC been in the last 6+ years when this animal had been kept illegally and had been a health threat? By their argument points, they have been failing both the animal and the people around it. Coming in years later only to kill the animal and leave people around it in misery is a job shittily done. They are definitely accountable.

pebs
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Rabies is a very serious disease and the animal bit a person. It's sad, but there was nothing else to do.

Deedee
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don't get it, what symptoms? Did Peanut go on a rampage with froth in his mouth, or was the only symptom that he bit someone? Plenty of animals bite, that doesn't mean they are rabid. Why not hold Peanut in quarentine for a few weeks to see? Forcibly removing someone's (albeit illegal) pet without any warning is cruel. I think the very least DEC could have done is let the owner take Peanut to a trusted vet to be put down. That way Peanut wouldn't be so scared and the family could have some closure.

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not all animals froth at the mouth when rabid. That's just what Westerns and Cujo have made us think. In many small mammals, the only signs might be confusion, weakness, difficulty walking, lethargy, and inappetence. In 1972, a study on rabid squirrels showed that half of the infected animals that died of rabies showed NO clinical signs of the disease. And what would the point be of holding an illegal animal in quarantine for "a few weeks"? If it was rabid, it would die slowly and horribly within a few days. If it wasn't rabid, it's not like they could hand it back to Longo, as it is illegal to keep a squirrel as a pet.

Load More Replies...
Atom Bohr
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'm so confused... Did PNUT have rabies or not? That seems to be the reason for him and the racoon being taken and euthanised, but the family is completely glossing over that fact as if it's not true? If he was a "beloved pet", why wasn't he vaccinated? This could have been prevented? Surely? I'm not a vet or anything of the sort, but rabies vaccines exist for lots of species, so surely one of them would have been suitable for a squirrel?

LakotaWolf (she/her)
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He couldn't be vaccinated, nor could Fred the racoon be vaccinated, because squirrels and racoons are illegal to keep as pets in New York. Any normal veterinarian Longo took his illegal animals to would refuse to vaccinate them (I am not sure there is even a "safe" vaccine for squirrels; there is one for raccoons) and might even have turned Longo in to the authorities for keeping illegal animals as pets. It's sad, because at least Fred could have been vaccinated if Longo had actually bothered getting his license as a wildlife rehabilitator, but he didn't, so now two animals have needlessly died for this man's hubris and folly.

Load More Replies...
Carl Roberts
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The squirrel had RABIES. Euthanasia is the ONLY option. The peopel being "outraged' that it was put down are , to put it bluntly...morons.

frey
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

we dont know that they had rabies, they were playful and docile, the dec used that excuse to justify killing innocent animals.

Load More Replies...
Andrewsarchus42
Community Member
1 week ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It is illegal to keep squirrels and raccoons as pets in NY. They could have applied for the proper permits to keep them at any time they were alive. But they didn’t. Should the government have killed the squirrel? That’s debatable. What isn’t debatable is that the raid was legal and justified. Are we going to allow people to get away with crimes just because they’re famous on the internet? Isn’t that a pretty slippery slope? Would people feel the same if they were illegally keeping a bear as a pet?

G Bono
Community Member
2 weeks ago

This comment has been deleted.

frey
Community Member
2 weeks ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

B******T I dont think those animals had rabies. I think the evil dec just used that as an excuse to take and kill them. For the pathetic losers who have no life and complained, karma is coming for you. For the DEC, you are a piece of s**t. IF they had rabies, wouldnt they would have attacked the owners? come on people, get a brain!! The internet is the worst thing to ever happen to society. the earth would be better is people died off an animals took over. humans are evil!!!

Gabby M
Community Member
2 weeks ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

DISGUSTING .... I would so support a lawsuit!!! Amazed they don't do MORE for abused animals!!!!!!!

You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda