40 Indicators That The Person You’re Talking To Is Super Smart And Hides It Well
Interview With ExpertHow can you tell that someone is intelligent? At first glance, it sounds like a trick question with an easy answer, but the more you think about it, the more unclear things seem. Is it the person who can recite all the works of Shakespeare from memory? Perhaps it’s someone you know who runs a successful business or is an actual inventor? Or is it someone in your life who prioritizes their mental health and social relationships above everything else?
Not everyone lets on that they’re as smart as they are. The r/AskReddit community shared their personal thoughts about the signs that someone is far more intelligent than others might think. Scroll down to read their thoughts.
This post may include affiliate links.
They are able to change their opinion given new information.
THIS is such an underrated quality in someone! I love people who can do this. (I showed a flat earther that experiment where they used lasers to try to prove the earth was flat, but it only proved that it is in fact curved, but the flat earther was basically plugging his ears and going LALALA I CANT HEAR YOU LALALA”)
Bored Panda reached out to Melissa Church of Bad Science Jokes to hear her thoughts on intelligence and why it's valued so much in our society. She was kind enough to share her perspective with us.
Church told us in an email that, for her, what lies at the core of being truly smart is waiting to respond. "The most intelligent people I've met seem to really take their time with a reply during a conversation," she said.
"They are not quick to anger, or excite, they look at all the facts and then come to a decision."
They are comfortable and confident enough to admit when they don't know something but will look it up.
They don't argue when it is obvious that someone they are talking to cannot be convinced of alternative thinking or different viewpoint to their own.
“Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference “ –Mark Twain
“You cannot reason a person out of a position he did not reason himself into in the first place.” - Jonathan Swift
I don't know about this one. I get it, but if you refuse to calmly refute the other persons points and don't give them the time of day it tends to reinforce in them that they are correct. Not saying to argue and get heated, but ask questions and calmly state your point, then agree to disagree seems to work imo
I'm very bad at this. And not arguing in general. Listen, I was raised by a philosopher and a lawyer, both Jews. I'm the kid of several stereotypically argumentative people. It would be a miracle if I wasn't argumentative.
Why does politics so easily get injected into everything?
Load More Replies...My neighbour, she knew that I've had Covid, was seriously ill and almost died. I talked to her about the vaccines because she started the conversation and told her how I was one of the first people in our city to have the AstraZeneca. Do I know everything about Covid? Nope. But I do know a lot. Especially as the hospital I was in is a teaching hospital, we had some of the top specialists in the UK there. I wrote things down, kept notes so I could learn. But she said that she's refused the vaccines and got really verbally aggressive. I asked her to leave because she was getting too verbally aggressive. Starting to scare me. She refused at first but eventually did leave. She is no longer welcome in my home. Mainly because she is not vaccinated, I'm not going to put myself in danger for anyone elses beliefs and if I'm put in a situation where I might have to call the police after I've asked you politely repeatedly to leave? What am I supposed to do?
You could try the top arguments of this list. Try to understand what drives her...maybe come to some agreements and try to find middle ground. For ex, in our country they started off by guaranteeing 90% immunity rate...it dropped to below 50% over time. So we simply have to agree governments were wrong. But is less than 50 better than no vaccination? Absolutely!... does every person agree they rather not be vaccinated if it wasn't for their own good? Of course.. we have much more in common with anti vaccers than we may think...but everything is so polarised its as if we change religion even by trying to understand others
Load More Replies...You can't convince an idiot that they're wrong. You can only reinforce the fact he's an idiot!
I worked with a guy who refused to accept that folks could be "brought around" to his way of thinking, no matter how absurd the idea was. He was/is the guy who thinks he is the smartest one in the room and his view is the only correct one. I'd just shake my head and walk away.
But dont gatekeep information because you are too fragile or superior to share the correct information.
You missed the point of this post. They aren't "gatekeeping info." They would provide the info IF the person could be convinced of alternative thinking or a different viewpoint from their own. They simply do not argue with these resolutely ignorant people. *edited a spelling error.
Load More Replies...Meanwhile, Church shed some light on the role that intelligence plays in society as a whole in this day and age. "I feel the tech industry, in general, has helped to change the definition of 'nerd' from the stereotypical caricature we see on television to some of today's wealthiest, most successful, people," she told Bored Panda.
"When we look at who is behind all of our favorite products, we see these extremely intelligent people who had a crazy idea and made it work. Things we cannot live without! The device you're reading this on was developed by some extremely smart people and made easy to understand for those folks like me. Ha!"
Church continued: "Society sees that it takes some exceptionally intelligent people to make our day-to-day lives what they are. Just a couple generations ago technology wasn't anywhere near what it is today, and having parents, grandparents, and ourselves, see just how far we've come in that regard, reminds us just how important the 'nerds' are!"
They gather information before making a judgement.
They can explain very complex things in very simple terms and analogies.
I really like to do this and wish math and science teachers would do the same. God the amount of complex sentences and equations they have to use nearly fried my brain but when I finally got a tutor he explained everything complex in such a simple matter I went from "the most incompetent, underserving of success of a student (words spoken to me by principal and teachers) to one who ranked 1st in biology, Language, Computer out of all the students in my school while improving in maths, chemistry, physics, business studies better than before.
They argue against your points, not you personally. I can’t stand when people can’t argue without taking offence or just giving up because their views are being challenged. An argument should be about the idea being discussed not a personal attack.
I understand why some people take it personally though. If you say “I believe X” and someone says “X is a stupid idea to believe in for these reasons,” I might feel like they’re calling me stupid. Intelligent people can disagree with your points without making you feel like they’re attacking you, ignorant people can’t
If you talk to a whole bunch of people, they’ll likely have different interpretations of what intelligence really is. For some, it’s all about high IQ scores, book smarts, reasoning skills, fancy words, and a great memory. For others, it’s akin to wisdom, empathy, and living a good life. Still others associate smartness with results, e.g., financial success, a stellar career in academia, a global network of corporate contacts, etc.
Fundamentally, intelligence is the ability to acquire and apply your knowledge and skills. So, somebody who is incredibly curious and quickly devours new information is likely smart. However, the other half of that equation is to actually use all of that knowledge and your newfound skills for some goal.
Or getting lucky, as MIT Technology Review notes in its wittily titled article 'If you’re so smart, why aren’t you rich?'
They hold their cards and quietly observe, analyze and study everything and everybody.
They question everything including themselves. They are Usually full of self-doubt because they’re smart enough to know there’s so much more to know.
I do this when i am in a new situation like a job or even a social gathering. I don't stay absolutely silent but I choose what I say carefully and observe how others are in the environment until i feel comfortable with what i can say to who.
They let you do most of the talking but they are actually listening and learning from what you say.
They read. Reading constantly expands the minds. It grows intelligence that wasn't asked for in the beginning, just entertainment. It expands one's thinking, in many directions. Empathy, compassion, a sense of the world as community, a sense of belonging. All these things, and more, come from reading!
And read a wide variety. Even when I was reading almost nothing but romance novels, i read a wide variety of the subgenres. As well as the newspaper, and 4 science-based and 2 arts based magazines that I subscribed to. I do the same now online, except I'm into sci-fi
Learning thousands of trivia facts might be proof that you’ve got a good memory and are fairly disciplined, but if you don’t end up using any of it, it’s fairly useless fluff. On the flip side, someone who learns a few new bits of information, instantly applies them, and iterates past failure to improve their workflow, studying habits, or health is clearly getting actionable results.
Knowing information is good and all, but the true test is in how you use it… and whether you use it at all. The world is full of incredibly creative people with amazing ideas, but far from everyone will have the courage, patience, and willpower to test them out in the real world.
They'll always add counterpoints ie 'arguments against' whatever they're saying. eg "...but I need to add that there are people who say this blah blah..."
Most ignorant people I know always speak like their opinions are established facts that are infallible.
I like to play devils advocate a lot. Doesn't necessarily mean i believe in the point I'm trying to make but I believe it helps enrich the conversation and maybe help the other person see things differently.
They pick up quickly on things and are observant of their surroundings.
Well I fail that one...I semifrequently walk into walls or chairs or whatever because I'm not paying attention.
They're funny. Fast thinkers come up with great jokes on the spot.
It’s very likely that you know some people who probably have an above-average IQ who seem to struggle with a lot of things, whether it’s their physical and mental health, their work, or their relationships. It’s also likely that back in school they were lauded as gifted and got good grades.
However, success as a grown-up requires far more than an agile mind. You need to know how to work in a team and navigate complex relationships. You have to know how to communicate with people clearly, not just boast about how you’re the best. You have to be willing to set your ego aside and be willing to learn something new from someone who has more experience than you. You need empathy. And you need to realize that working hard and burning out isn’t always the same as being efficient.
They choose their battles.
It's not so much that they ask questions but the type of question. They use alot' of comparisons and analogies when expressing ideas or explaining things.
As for the quiet thing....i know plenty of stupid quiet people.
They don't claim to have firm answers to soft questions - they shrug and say "I dunno" a lot because they have never really finished thinking the matter through.
When they argue with you, they don't care who wins the argument. They are searching for the correct answer even if it is yours.
Also when their conclusions are challenged, they happily expose their thought process for you, laying their decision making process out in plain terms and inviting you to pick it apart.
One way I figured out a long time ago with a friend if mine that helped prevent arguments was presenting something as "I feel that" instead of saying something "IS" a certain way. Like saying "I feel like you've been a little grumpy with me lately. Have I done something to upset you?" Vs "You've been really grumpy with me lately." Because the latter is being presented as a fact, whereas the former is taking responsibility for the fact that the speaker could be wrong, and that they could have a perception of something that may or may not be there. When it's presented as fact, people tend to bristle and feel offended more because it feels more like someone's TELLING them how they feel or how they are instead of asking.
Who’s the smartest person that you personally know, dear readers? What are some (not so) subtle signs that someone is way, way more intelligent than they initially seem? What qualities, skills, and attitudes do you associate intelligence with the most? Do you know anyone who has book smarts in spades but isn’t all that great at applying them?
For all the Dungeons & Dragons nerds out there, would you rather have a high Wisdom or Intelligence score? Tell us all about what you think in the comments, at the bottom of this post.
They listen more than talk. And don't get angry or defensive when someone says something they don't agree with.
The precision in their word choice. I’m not talking about advanced vocabulary or jargon I’m highlighting the ability to communicate ideas effectively. I’ve never met a dumb person that was very precise in their speech
I am disagreeing with this one. I have taught students how to give presentations about their research. Saying one thing wrong and then correcting yourself is not a sign of low intelligence. No one will remember that you misspoke. They will remember that you explained things clearly so that the audience could understand.
They catch on quickly without you having to explain every little detail.
They’re quiet and analytic and they argue differently.
this would be the social type, which is more specialized and suffers from some of the usual social diseases. the slightly off type socially, but more generalized/flexible in skills would need context at least the first time, or a bit after. and their enemies know, hence the non-touch approach.
They can deal with the absence of data, incomplete data, conflicting data and generally can zero in to the important thing in a confusing situation.
They remember small details about things and people and are able to use that information in a productive way to further their goal. Memory is important but knowing how and when to use facts that people have only said maybe once shows flexibility and adaptive intelligence.
Sometimes I can feel a fact evaporate the second I share it. Thst is because they have been stored in" not relevant for me but cool info to be able to share with someone else". When my brain feels this purpose is accomplished it shreds my fact, without even asking or discussing it with me first. Not cool, dude.
They smile when they overhear a stupid conversation rather than getting upset by it.
only when it doesn't affect them directly; sometimes, these are a mere subversive act, and their high degree of "stupidity" is simply the measure of them despising you enough to not struggle more. 90% of the press releases, or that nice lady and respectable gent in the comments...
For one reason or another, some may underperform in school when they know they could very well be a top student.
Mental acuity is not the same as emotional intelligence. Many young smart people has been smart long enough that they are used that intelectual things are easy for them, so when they face a challenge they opt for the easy exit. Why make effort and keep being a straight A kid when you can be a C+ kid without any effort with what you already know? They are also smart enough to know that no inmediatte reward comes from being a top student and could lead to ostracism from your peer, so they dont see a reason without some guidance.
Their ability to adapt to a wide range of conversations.
Downplaying their intelligence.
I don't downplay my intelligence so much as I'm realistic about its usefulness. Hard work and opportunity, among other things, play a much larger role when it comes to being successful in many areas of life. I know a lot of people who aren't as smart as me, but are more successful. Largely due to the aforementioned other things. I also know people much smarter than me who are way less successful
Their humor. Being able to emotionally distance yourself enough to find something funny, even if it hits close to home.
When they hear something, be it gossip or news or whatever, they ask about sources. Similarly, when *they* are sharing something, their source is always credible *or* they're specifically saying it as speculation like "I have heard but not confirmed...".
I, like many in the US right now, are trying to find facts behind BS being spewed to make a decision. One of the best programs that delve into issues, should they cover it, is called Left, Right, and Center. I am absolutely addicted to hearing both sides, and using nuance and details to make up my mind.
They don’t brag about their achievements or even bring it up unless they’re asked. My gf is super smart and knows more than like 80% of the ppl she talks to but she has NEVER bragged or brought up the insane amount of stuff she knows. I sometimes bring it up when I’m with her and friends just cus I feel like she deserves some credit.
They speak up in a meeting.
Once.
And what they have to say is usually pretty close to the optimal solution.
Thats because they have listened and learned from all the arguments presented, weighted them with the true pros and cons with a solo fokus ln solving the Task instead of being the only voice to win. If they are truly intelligent and emotionally aware, they also correctly place the ideahavers of the contributions that are part of the ultimate solution if they want to gamble, they aslo add a few counterpoints that where valid, but counter them with a way to get around it with said ultimate solution.
They live in reality by using logic and objective fact over subjective feelings/emotion when proving a point.
I’m not too sure about this one, at least for myself. I’m not by any means trying to boast, but people say I’m intelligent/academic, and I still lead with my heart. Yes facts and logic play a big role, but I feel like this post confuses being intelligent with analytical. Intelligence isn’t usually an absence of emotion, it’s just using that emotion in a constructive way alongside logic. The two sides of the brain don’t have to be mutually exclusive
They nod their head before you end your sentences. They know exactly everything you are going to say. Like they’re two or three sentences ahead. Worked with a bond trader, off the charts brilliant, very analytical. When I talked to him I felt like my talking was slowing the conversation down. I’ve only had that feeling with a couple of people in my life.
This is a bit of a hit and miss one... Assumptions aren't intelligence, so someone assuming they know what you're going to say isn't necessarily a sign they're intelligent. I'd say that being able to follow a speaker and come up with relevant responses that genuinely add to the topic is a better sign
I think if we define "smart" as a vast knowledge base we ignore the decision making factor. I like to think of "smart" people as those who seem able to use the tools around them to solve the problems they are facing.
A dead giveaway someone is smarter than they let on?
- They say "no" often in the interest of their goals.
- They have large tool box, both figuratively and literally, as having the right tool makes all the difference, in terms of time to resolution.
- They tend to read often, not one thing but several things, or have some experience doing many different things, this gives a really well rounded perspective.
I believe "smart" people are good problem solvers.
They stay quiet in arguments, relaxed during quizzes, don't boast.
I loved quizzes and tests. They were like games to me. BTW, for anyone with test anxiety, if you can make yourself approach it as if it's a word or math game, instead of a test, they can actually become enjoyable, or at least less stressful. I had awful anxiety before I learned to do this
When they want to avoid an argument in which they know they have superior knowledge by saying things like "I´m not sure, you may be right".
Because I refuse to lie, my other go to is "Hmm. You've given me something to think about"
One I don't think has been mentioned is sarcasm. Manipulating information on the fly is surprisingly difficult (your average comedian / stand up artist / freestyler etc is smarter than your average person). Sarcasm is like manipulating information in sepia mode - you're making a point while throwing a negative filter over it, a bit like writing on a mirror with rotated handwriting. That takes more smarts to get the same point across and not miss the beat.
Consequently lying through your teeth is like negative sarcasm, you're throwing a negative filter over your incorrect information to try to get a positive outcome. It's more complicated than expressing the equivalent truth so yeah keep an eye out for (good) liars, that s**t takes a lot smarts to not come across as incompetent.
Yes those are massive generalisations but I do find that folks with a great sense of sarcasm lean nearer the intelligent end of the spectrum.
Someone more clever than I pointed out that it must have been really hard for the first person to use sarcasm to explain it.
I have a friend to likes to jokingly proclaim he is never wrong.
It's all fun and bluster until you think about it and he is actually never wrong. Everything he has said, every small factoid, offhanded comment, even advice he has given has been right.
He says it as a joke, but honestly he is right. Dude has a big old brain hiding behind the fun and bluster.
My son was this person. Then my youngest daughter grew up. They had a disagreement to the correct usage of bovine or bovid. I looked it up and she was right. It was the first time (of which I knew) that he was wrong since about age 10. Was nice to point out to him that he was human and was a very good experience for all involved.
When they are quiet enough to observe and understand but talkative enough that they aren’t just some weirdo.
I tend to do the quiet observation when I am in a new environment like just starting a new job. I like to get the vibe of the place and the people who are in it. I'll be talkative but only to a limit until I know who I can talk to and what I can say.
Philosophy/History nerd, it also probably means they are cool af too.
As someone who worked as a volunteer with kids: they cheat in games. We had a girl that was (we believed) the kid of a Thai import bride who a fellow of our town married. She always acted pretty dumb, but when we played outside games with a group, she always cheated by exploiting loopholes or parts that weren't explained properly, because they were kids of age 7-10 and we didn't want to make the game too difficult.
She always abused the game to gain an advantage and when we told her she couldn't do that she went 'Oh sorry, I didn't understand the game!' in a broken accent.
You understood the game perfectly little girl, otherwise you wouldn't play it like this. She was way smarter than she let on, it almost seemed like an act.
They don't complain about how stupid so many people are, or complain that "these people vote", or take pleasure and feelings of superiority from seeing people do or say highly uninformed things.
Most of the first many are indicators of wisdom, not intelligence. Alas, I know many scientists and programmers who are extremely smart and have not a lick of wisdom.
How do you define these terms? English is not my first language. For me, wisdom would be linked to spiritual knowledge, not behavioral or technical acumen. Like the Magi are wise men. They aren't necessarily learned though. But this may be my lack in understanding the nuance of the language.
Load More Replies...I can't recall where I heard it, but one of my favourite replies to a difficult job situation is, 'I know enough to know that I don't know enough'
I tell potential new customers that a lot. And I experiment on my mom’s house where I’m not dealing with how much to charge when I’m figuring out how to do something while I’m doing it. And I can finish tomorrow if it takes too long.
Load More Replies...#41 I write clever comments on Bored Panda and other websites.
I was part of the leadership of an advocacy group for gifted and profoundly gifted children. I can say, categorically, that most of the things that people here believe are "signs that a person is very smart" are false. Many of them are ways to demonize others "my own logic is impeccable, may facts are always true, so therefore anybody smart will be convinced by this". Another fallacy is "smart people aren't emotional, and therefore only argue logically". People should stop thinking that "the Big Bang Theory" is a documentary.
Have you watched Big Bang Theory? If there’s one thing those smart guys didn’t do, it was make reason-driven decisions. If fact, that was a big part of the joke. They had high IQs, but they weren’t nearly as smart as they thought. Even Sheldon, who saw himself as a current day Spock made emotion driven decisions far more often than he was willing to admit to himself.
Load More Replies...I have read these and come to the conclusion that I am an idiot. Sadly, I am not the first to reach this conclusion, thus further proving the point.
There are several posts here stating that a good teacher should use analogies. I have found that there are many students who do not understand analogies, so I have to explain things first without, then with the analogies. Further, I have had complaints that I do not know all the answers to student questions in class. Many students are quite happy that I will research something and use visuals to answer a question later. But some will state that I am not qualified to teach the class if I do not know the answers to every question asked immediately.
Dang. My score on this scale is the one I wanted on the ADHD scale and vice versa.
Most of these were spot on. Of course this post is not talking specifically about "book smarts," but innate intelligence. My grandma only had a third grade education, tested at a 12th grade level at an employment agency and was one of the smartest people I knew. Many uneducated people have greater actual intelligence than some Ivy League graduates
and that's why some of them are kept uneducated. it's easier than to pretend they are stupid all the time to shut their mouth, especially when they bring arguments. plus, the uncontrolled intellect can sometimes grow other weeds, like morality... so, first you assess their bad character and loyalty, and only then you send them to school.
Load More Replies...Reading these, I am either the most intelligent person in the world or I believe that brown crayons taste of chocolate.
Did you know that brown cows give chocolate milk? White cows give white milk and cows that are two toned give half and half?
Load More Replies...Most of the first many are indicators of wisdom, not intelligence. Alas, I know many scientists and programmers who are extremely smart and have not a lick of wisdom.
How do you define these terms? English is not my first language. For me, wisdom would be linked to spiritual knowledge, not behavioral or technical acumen. Like the Magi are wise men. They aren't necessarily learned though. But this may be my lack in understanding the nuance of the language.
Load More Replies...I can't recall where I heard it, but one of my favourite replies to a difficult job situation is, 'I know enough to know that I don't know enough'
I tell potential new customers that a lot. And I experiment on my mom’s house where I’m not dealing with how much to charge when I’m figuring out how to do something while I’m doing it. And I can finish tomorrow if it takes too long.
Load More Replies...#41 I write clever comments on Bored Panda and other websites.
I was part of the leadership of an advocacy group for gifted and profoundly gifted children. I can say, categorically, that most of the things that people here believe are "signs that a person is very smart" are false. Many of them are ways to demonize others "my own logic is impeccable, may facts are always true, so therefore anybody smart will be convinced by this". Another fallacy is "smart people aren't emotional, and therefore only argue logically". People should stop thinking that "the Big Bang Theory" is a documentary.
Have you watched Big Bang Theory? If there’s one thing those smart guys didn’t do, it was make reason-driven decisions. If fact, that was a big part of the joke. They had high IQs, but they weren’t nearly as smart as they thought. Even Sheldon, who saw himself as a current day Spock made emotion driven decisions far more often than he was willing to admit to himself.
Load More Replies...I have read these and come to the conclusion that I am an idiot. Sadly, I am not the first to reach this conclusion, thus further proving the point.
There are several posts here stating that a good teacher should use analogies. I have found that there are many students who do not understand analogies, so I have to explain things first without, then with the analogies. Further, I have had complaints that I do not know all the answers to student questions in class. Many students are quite happy that I will research something and use visuals to answer a question later. But some will state that I am not qualified to teach the class if I do not know the answers to every question asked immediately.
Dang. My score on this scale is the one I wanted on the ADHD scale and vice versa.
Most of these were spot on. Of course this post is not talking specifically about "book smarts," but innate intelligence. My grandma only had a third grade education, tested at a 12th grade level at an employment agency and was one of the smartest people I knew. Many uneducated people have greater actual intelligence than some Ivy League graduates
and that's why some of them are kept uneducated. it's easier than to pretend they are stupid all the time to shut their mouth, especially when they bring arguments. plus, the uncontrolled intellect can sometimes grow other weeds, like morality... so, first you assess their bad character and loyalty, and only then you send them to school.
Load More Replies...Reading these, I am either the most intelligent person in the world or I believe that brown crayons taste of chocolate.
Did you know that brown cows give chocolate milk? White cows give white milk and cows that are two toned give half and half?
Load More Replies...