In our modern world, where various information is more available than it ever was, sometimes it’s hard to distinguish between real and made-up information. That’s why conspiracy theories nowadays flourish more than ever, too.
It’s likely impossible to find an internet user who hasn’t encountered a crazy conspiracy theory at some point in their life, even if unknowingly. That’s why when someone asked people to share some theories they’ve heard, plenty of them had something to say.
So, perhaps let’s go see what they had to say, shall we? Just beware: The question was about scary theories, and many of them are quite bone-chilling.
More info: Reddit
This post may include affiliate links.
The current social wars were designed to distract us from the trillions of dollars that went from the middle class to the wealthy. It will continue to happen while people fight over body parts and bedroom activities. The people almost broke through with Occupy Wall St. but the PTB continue to divide people to make sure it can't happen again.
I live in the UK and I've long noticed that the upper class has done an amazing job convincing the working class that the middle class is the enemy. In the UK, working class isn't always tied to wage (I've met people who are working class that make as much or more than I do, and I'm middle class), and we often face the same struggles, but the rich need it to be an us vs. them situation so the "them" doesn't become those with all the power and money.
My guess is that the current situation with the ultra-rich screwing all the rest of us won't last more than another generation or two - I might or might not live long enough to find out...
Load More Replies...So grateful this is #1. Although, tbf, this isn't a "conspiracy theory," this is actually true. While we're at it, inflation isn't the reason why everything cost so much more rn. Corporate greed is the reason. They're upping the price, making record profits, while convincing everyone the reason for the price increase is inflation.
Making record profits & then telling employees there is no extra for raises this year but thanks for all the hard work
Load More Replies..."They don't want to see us unite All they want us to do is keep on fussing and fighting They don't want to see us live together All they want us to do is keep on killing one another" Bob Marley, Top Rankin'
That all this doomer "humanity is the REAL virus/monster, we are destroying our planet like a cancer" type of thinking was made up and spread by corporations to make regular people feel equally culpable for climate change. I'm not killing the planet, and you aren't either. Something like 70% of all global emissions are cause by 100 corporations. THEY are killing the planet, but no one will go after them because "humanity was a mistake", and that cynicism is what will actually do us in.
The problem with the climate demonstrators is that they never reach the rich and the ones in power, they just disrupt the life of fellow citizens needing to put some food on the table. Again as I said in the post above: people only attack the ones they can see, the rich looking down and having a blast! The rich know very well how the game works.
Because the rich can afford to deal the the effects…and don’t give a F about anyone else
Load More Replies...The next president of the US wants to deregulate even more, exposing all of us to more toxins in our environment. So long as you can pay the high permit fee your gonna get it. I am truly frightened.
The information I am sharing I got from Sabine Hossenfelder (She is a physicist who makes great educative YouTube videos about these topics) And Kyle Hill a science educator which less credentials than Sabine, but he is trustworthy as sources everything he says! So if orange man is proposing the same deregulations that SABINE is for... I will hear him out and wait to see what he does! Despite his past... Ignorance.
Load More Replies..."Something like 70% of all global emissions are cause by 100 corporations." True, but not what it sounds. I dug into this once and the majority of these companies are oil and gas. Power companies, and fuel for your car. We can and should pass legislation that encourages these companies to move to green energy, but it DOES also come down to how much energy we as consumers are using. We need to come at it both ways until we're fully green and then it won't matter any more.
Yes, it's a crazy argument. The corporations don't exist in a vacuum. They are selling to someone. That someone is me, and you, and all the people commenting on devices that were made by corporations, while blaming the corporations.
Load More Replies...Yes and no. The biggest contributor to climate change is the huge number of people. Overpopulation used to get talked about a lot 20 or so years ago. Climate scientists very consciously stopped talking about it, because it was such a divisive topic and counter-productive. I read an article by a climate scientist maybe 5-8 years ago about this. Along with climate change comes biodiversity loss and plastics pollution, both of which are right up there with climate change as issues. And obviously, this is related to 8 billion people on the planet. But I agree that individual changes are not going to solve climate change. And pushing that onto the people is truly a very explicit strategy for these companies and the people who get rich off of them to take focus off of them.
Yes! But also, those corporations are nothing without their clients. People actually expect/demand all this stuff that is the worst from the environment view (like same day deliveries from Amazon, cheap textiles from Temu, fast fashion, short tends etc.). Nothing will change if people don't vote with their wallets. And for now it's much more affordable to leave the things as they are (for those big corps) because people only say that they want them to change their way of working. This view disappears when people learn how much more they have to pay for environmentally-friendly options produced locally with respect to human rights.
Load More Replies...The rich corporations didn't dream up the "humanity is the problem" hypothesis. People like Paul Erlich did that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Population_Bomb. But the corporations are definitely exploiting these ideas in the way described. I've read so many exposures of how the corporate PR departments are pushing every message they can find to let the big oil firms (etc) carry on making obscene wealth while blaming all the problems on something else. This isn't a conspiracy hypothesis: it's a widely exposed matter of fact that's happening right now.
Yep, this is why I don't feel bad about being wasteful with plastics. Take one look at the amount if plastic wrap one Amazon warehouse trashes in a day. What I use in my lifetime is practically nothing in comparison. You could say I'm partially at fault for shopping at Amazon, but I'm not sure an alternative exists that isn't just as wasteful. Products get shipped all around the world, and that creates a ton of waste because they all do it the same way.
We are all responsible for caring for our planet. Yes corporations are doing most of the polluting but we who use their products and services are also at fault
I remember exactly when this narrative started. In 1970 (the year Earth Day was created) there was a commerical with the Native American Iron Eyes Cody where he's looking at litter & pollution as a person throws garbage out of their car which lands at this feet.Closeup of a single tear rolling down his cheek. A foreboding voice says, "People start pollution, people can stop it." Individuals are to blame. Guilt guilt guilt. So now the smuggies are driving electric cars whose only source for the lithium batteries comes from child slaves in Congo. The commerical:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7OHG7tHrNM
This is why Luigi Mangione strikes terror into the hearts of the corporate masters. Regardless his actions, he's placing the blame correctly.
NASA was behind the moon landings.
The moon landings were faked. NASA hired Stanly Kubrick to film the landings. However, Kubrick is a perfectionist and insisted they be shot on location.
Come on! Everybody knows that the moon DOES NOT exist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 It's made of cheese|!\\
How else are you supposed to geet off of Earth without a space craft? Dreams?
During your lifetime, you have likely heard of some conspiracy theories. After all, there is probably no topic that these theories don’t cover.
A few months ago, one Reddit user asked others what scary conspiracy theories they had heard of. And, oh boy, have they heard plenty. So, we combined a list of the best responses to this question.
In it, you can find theories like the Dark Forest theory, the AI-Bitcoin connection, and many others. Some are scarier than others, some more believable, but the list is undeniably captivating.
Those Facebook memes of posting a current selfie and a photo of you taken 10 years ago, is to program facial recognition software.
They don't have to of you'll just buy this app. And then you can pay them to do it.
Load More Replies...
A small one:
Samsung announced that the Galaxy Watch 4 would include a non-invasive continuous glucose monitor, which would allow you to monitor your blood sugar at any time while you wear it, for as long as you own it.
A months before the 4 was released, that feature quietly disappeared from all of the marketing, without explanation, and now, years later, is nowhere to be found.
I believe Abbott Laboratories, makers of the FreeStyle Light glucometer and the FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitor systems, panicked, fearing that a non-expiring, non-invasive glucose monitor would be hugely popular among diabetics, and devastate their death-grip on the market, paid a huge bribe to Samsung to drop the whole thing.
FDA hasn't cleared any non-invasive methods yet. That includes but isn't limited to smartphone / watch / ring / etc. It's a slow but critical process because people will use it to replace other monitors, so needs to be extremely accurate consistently. They can interface with actual monitors, but can't do the monitoring themselves. https://www.verywellhealth.com/fda-warns-against-unapproved-smartwatches-glucose-levels-8599246
Too bad Abbott can’t seem to master “extremely accurate consistently”. The subreddit for Libre users is full of reports from people who repeatedly have had to send their sensors back to Abbott because they’re faulty.
Load More Replies...Except that Abbott do not have a death-grip on the market - there are other monitors out there.
I was thinking that too. In my T1D bubble, Dexcom is the Kleenex of CGMs. 😁
Load More Replies.......OR they over promised the technology and scrapped it. It happens all the time, CEO demands certain features to be included while having zero understanding of the technology required to include this technology into the product. That's basically Tesla's entire business model.
My partner wanted a smartwatch to show emails, texts and who was calling. Trying to find a watch without the health and fitness features has been a nightmare. He misses his old Pebble.
I too loved my old pebble. I use a Galaxy myself now, but turn off all the health tracking.
Load More Replies...It disappeared from marketing because they couldn't get it approved. No one has figured out reliable, non invasive glucose monitoring. Apple has been talking about it too but the tech isn't good enough yet. I'm sure Abbott, Dexcom and Medtronic are all researching it too. They have to be very careful with this technology because it's a matter of life or death for T1Ds. It either has to be as reliable as a Dexcom G7, or marketed very carefully so T1Ds know not to rely on it.
Yes, the Dexcom system is definitely a good one. Company is great as well if you need help or a replacement. I'm a T2D with Hypogly tendencies dur to malabsorption from stomach surgery.
Load More Replies...
When light bulbs were created, they lasted forever. Producers noticed that would be a limited business and engineered them to go out after a certain period so they could continuously sell them.
Planned Obsolescence, (noun) a policy of producing consumer goods that rapidly become obsolete and so require replacing, achieved by frequent changes in design, termination of the supply of spare parts, and the use of nondurable materials. It's not just about light bulbs.
Apple caught slowing their phones down, 90% of newer appliances. The movie The Man in the White Suit was a great demonstration.
Load More Replies...The lightbulb in the fire station is still burning. It was installed in 1900…. So it can be done
Technologyconnections does an excellent in depth video on this but to summarize as best I can: lightbulbs are a balance between power consumption, light output and longevity. The light bulb in the fire station that lasts forever is not working well as a light bulb it's extremely dim and if you could get near it would be stunningly hot. You don't want forever lightbulbs because they suck. Standardizing the lifetime of a given filament resistance is an easy and reliable way of standardizing the light output because you are measuring the other 2 legs of the balance.
Longer-lasting light bulbs: it was complicated - Technology Connections https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb7Bs98KmnY&t=15s
Load More Replies...This isn't true. That light bulb that's been on for a hundred years is incredibly dim. Not really usable as a light source by itself. Supposedly it's also very hot, meaning it's incredibly inefficient. Engineering a light bulb is about balancing brightness, efficiency and life span. Increasing one too much means reducing the other two.
This isn't weird and wild, it's actually true (ish) - but it doesn't belong on this list.
Light bulb lifespan and power efficiency are directly proportional. Light bulb manufacturers "conspired" to create standards that consumers could understand.
Their plot was so successful, that all manufactured items are now designed to fail within a couple of years.
There are plenty of others you might be aware of besides the ones on this list. For example, the clan of underground billionaires running the world (sometimes it’s also added that they’re lizard people), the Earth being flat, and the moon landing being fake.
Then, some are known in the deep corners of the internet. The reason behind the difference in their popularity usually lies in certain “requirements” they meet. For instance, having the “right” villain, addresses collective anxieties, makes people feel good about their social group, fills certain knowledge gaps, and escalates during uncertain times.
That the public school system sucks because it was deliberately designed to fail the kids, forcing them to shuffle off to the factories once their dreams are crushed at graduation.
Politicians like their constituents all nice and compliant!! (Aka stupid and gullible)
Erm, factory work isnt' really the big market these days. (Customer) service is. So you would want people who can read, write, and do basic maths. Maybe it's because too many continue to vote for parties who funnel tax money rather to their rich friends, while blaming immigrants. But hey, that would make voters responsible, and doesn't feel as satisfying, does it.
I disagree with this. It's not the school system that is trying to get people to fail. Most public school systems just suck because they don't have the funding. There is a correlation with school funding and quality of education.
There's a province in Canada that is introducing oil & gas as a high school elective. It's offered by a company that isn't even in that province, so best-case scenario those kids will be leaving the province when they graduate. Worst case scenario, of course, is that they are unemployed and angry about policies that advance green energy (ie, the other party's policies). We're being real open now about what we actually care about and it's not kids.
I don't think it was deliberate. And I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse 🫤
Dark Forest Theory: we can't find any evidence of extraterrestrial life because the smart ones are hiding, and the dumb ones have been [ended] by... something else.
You also have to look at the cosmic timeline. The lifespan of an entire civilization, from cells to space-faring to extinction is a brief blip in time. The chances of two civilizations both existing at the same time, and being able to communicate/interact, let alone see each other, is extremely minute.
Drake's equation is not exactly a support of the post's theory, but it does support your theory a bit.
Load More Replies...“Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.”
I love this theory. The "Remembrance of Earths Past" book series dives pretty deep into this in the second book. Basically there are very advanced civilizations out in the universe , and it is to their advantage that other civilizations don't make it past a certain point. It could be that there is life and civilizations on almost every planet in the universe that can support life. They constantly monitor things, and when a planet gets to a certain point, they make a judgement call, but generally they just destroy it. So we are never contacted by any other civilization, we are just waiting to be destroyed when one of them finds us. It's really quite terrifying, if you think about it.
"Three Body Problem" and "Remembrance of Earth's Past" are the same book series, fyi.
Load More Replies...It's simple. Suppose you are part of a space faring civilization. To get from star to star you have to have access to near limitless energy and a ship that can overcome that pesky lightspeed. What exactly is on Earth that you would need that you don't have access to? Zilch. They're certainly not going to come here for the riveting conversation of the average human.
If they get here before we get there, it's probably best we don't try shooting at it the second it lands. That is, if they're not already here. :)
Load More Replies...This is the background of the plot in Liu Cixin's sequel to his best-seller book, the three-Body Problem : the Dark Forest. Cool novel, but honestly I don't buy it that much. I find the "struggle over the scarcity of resources" quite a petty, narrow-minded and anthropocentric way to make up laws that would apply to the sheer immensity of the universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Forest
The proof that there is no intelligent alien life is the fact they have not contacted us. The proof that there is intelligent alien life is the fact they have not contacted us.
I believe that we've purposely been placed so far apart that there is no possible way of encountering each other.
Human are nothing more than a virus destroying the larger organism earth. Earth will eventually get a fever in an attempt to rid herself of us.
We are only destroying humanity. Earth will restore itself when we are gone :).
Well, we are also destroying most of the other types of living things. Ultimately though, yeah, Earth is fine. When we are gone, new plants and animals will evolve and life will go on as it has after every mass extinction event
Load More Replies...We were not invasive, but part of nature as long as we remained hunter/gatherers.
Load More Replies...The earth will survive no matter what we do HOWEVER there is no guarantee that the human species will. There is life in volcanic springs, frozen in Antarctica and moulds in Chernobyl. Our mother will outlast us.
Please help!! I know there is a quote from a movie along the same thought but I can't remember which one. ETA: I remembered The Kingsman Samuel L Jackson said it.
Can't tell if this is a joke. Agent Smith said it to Lawerence Fishburne (who always jokes about being confused with Samuel L Jackson) in The Matrix
Load More Replies...This isn’t even the full list. Basically, there are many things that can make a theory more or less successful, and theorists usually attempt to check as many of them as possible.
Even if the theories get disproven, some people still believe in them. In fact, about 50% of Americans believe in at least one debunked conspiracy theory.
Research published by the American Psychological Association (APA) revealed that people are more prone to believing conspiracy theories due to certain motivations and personality traits. For example, those who feel a sense of antagonism and superiority toward others perceive threats in their environment and strongly rely on their intuition.
That governments allow events to take place so they can implement security restrictions. The riots in the UK and protests across the EU are allowed, possibly even encouraged. The citizens will demand order by any means necessary and thats when the restrictions will come in.
Actually, this is the theory of terrorism. Terrorists commit terrorist acts in a country. The government of the country cracks down to the point where the people start to complain. The terrorists then move in to motivate the people to riot and overturn the government and at that point, the terrorists take over the government. If you squint a little, this is how the orange monkey got elected. He just made the illegals the terrorists.
That’s also called scapegoating. It’s how Hitler got Germans to be OK with exterminating the Jews, as well as the gypsies, the homosexuals, the mentally and physically challenged, and the other non-Aryan people. An offshoot of the Social Identity Theory (us vs them).
Load More Replies...I firmly believe that at least some of the terrorist attacks and/or immigrant violence incidents in Europe are either overlooked or deliberately staged so the people are more open to electing fascist-leaning governments, which is good for the capital.
That would require a massive amount of secrecy. It would be impossible for that many people to be able to STFU
Here in the States, people documented random pallets of bricks sitting conveniently where the marches, protests, and looting would be. The government and/or "powers that be" aren't dumb; they know people have cameras in their pockets now to snap pictures, record videos, and live stream, but they know no one will care. They have so deeply conditioned the masses to blindly hate and the only "facts" they'll accept are what suit their cause.
The current President-Elect of the US is planning something like this. His "mass deportation" is nothing more than a way to send troops into cities controlled by the other political party. He'll then declare the other political party as a part of a INSERT CONSPIRACY and they'll all be jailed. Remember my warning.
That there is no such thing as "food safe plastic.".
Nothing's safe. All anyone can do is mitigate risks. Some plastics are made with plasticisers that leach out and have been shown to affect humans. Some plastics do not fall into that category.
Load More Replies...Humans have been transporting stuff in non-plastic containers for millenia, including, but not limited to, paper, cardboard, fabric (think burlap sack), wood, glass, and ceramic. Plastic is favoured because it offers good stability while also being light in weight, which lowers the cost of transport.
Load More Replies...
There's plastic in our blood and every piece of tech listens to us.
And nobody really cares.
This is not a conspiracy theory and lots of people care about plastics and microplastics.
People *say* they care, but the deafening lack of significant amounts of changes in consumer behavior because of it doesn’t support their claims of caring.
Load More Replies...Tech does listen to use though. There have been several times when I am talking to someone about something really random and it pops up as an ad on my phone. Example, was talking about apartments to a friend then suddenly apartment ads were popping up on my facebook and tiktok feed.
Alexa, smartphones, your laptops and tablets, your newer cars, even some of your appliances and cableboxes. They're all listening. I'm sure my car listens to not only what I say, but what music I listen to. This is why I try to swear a lot.
Additionally, the increased accessibility of information due to social media and 24-hour news cycles also helps to reach more people, thus convincing more of them to believe.
If you read something online and wonder whether it is a conspiracy theory or the truth, there are some things you can do to make sure. For example, seek out the evidence for the stated things, as many theories crumble after a lack of it. Then, you can also “test” the idea with logic and critical thinking. So, basically, look for evidence that contradicts and maybe even debunks it.
Plants cultivate humans for the carbon dioxide.
I find the idea that powerful organizations are secretly manipulating global events the scariest. It’s unsettling to think about how much control they might have.
The thing is, they’re not doing it secretly anymore. Their manipulations are now openly flaunted.
Yep, they could shoot someone on 5th avenue and still retain control.
Load More Replies...The UN would love to have any real influence, as would the CIA. Neither has enough money to compete with the genuinely rich and powerful.
Load More Replies...If you want to know who rules over you, look at whom you're forbidden to criticize.
Medical knowledge and technology are more advanced than we think but are kept from the public because they would cut into corporate profits
As a bonus, MK Ultra was not an isolated incident, USA (and other govts) continue secret tests on their own citizens, they just got better at hiding it.
The only problem is that many countries have socialized healthcare and why would they not use more advanced cures.
There are still profits in socialized healthcare. I'm sure you know that, I'm just starting there. The main thing is that it depends on what the advanced cure might do and how much it costs compared to the lesser cure. For example, kidney dialysis machines are very expensive. Somebody makes and sells them. If kidney disease was cured completely, the governments would love that, but the makers of the machines would go bankrupt. I'm not saying that I believe the theory, or at least not in a widespread manner, but it's not wild to suggest that some companies may act to suppress knowledge that would render their product less useful.
Load More Replies...Wouldn't shock me in the slightest, especially here in the US. All about making the bucks here.
This conspiracy is only true in the US. Most of the world's countries have functional medical care.
Looking for the motives or red flags behind the theory, like prejudicial tropes, and seeking the source of the claim (besides other things) are also useful while figuring out the conspiracy theory's validity.
Also, if after some time you realize that you have fallen for some kind of conspiracy theory, don’t feel too bad – as we made it clear, they’re made to convince people. If you realize the fault in your logic related to them, it’s good for you, and bad for them.
Have you ever fallen for any kind of conspiracy theory? Share your experience with us in the comments!
Heres a new one for you:
Spontaneous Life is actually extremely common in the universe.
We talk about the primoridal ooze where the first protiens formed into a cell and all that. But this theory states that life actually spontaneously arises on a microscopic level *constantly*. Well, constantly on a universal time scale, at least. Not all of it is carbon based, and in fact life has formed in many different ways that we don't recognize as true life.
However, there is one critical thing that acts as a gateway: reproduction. Almost all life that is spontaneously created lives a short time and dies without reproducing.
On our world, there have been *two* instances of spontaneous life that were able to reproduce.
1. The precursor that lead to all life as we know it on earth over millions and millions of years
2. Viruses.
I was always taught that reproduction was regarded as a fundamental part of life, i.e. something that doesn't reproduce is not life. The jury is still out as to whether viruses are actually living things as well.
Technically speaking something is not considered to be alive unless it can reproduce.
This is not a conspiracy. It is an actual theory, based on science and many models.
I love/hate the idea that the existence of the uncanny valley implies the existence of something that looks human but wasn't quite human and we needed to fear it.
I mean, several humanoid species lived at the same time, and each was the 'uncanny valley' to the other (and still they mated). Nothing really frightening about that.
I always think that, we know they interacted and we can assume it was not always peaceful.
Load More Replies...Sick people, they are sure still human, but look weird, and in order to avoid infection, you have to avoid them. Bubonic plague for example
Kind of. Theory says people are instinctively afraid of things like insects and spiders as an evolutionary adaptation to keep us safe. If you apply that evolutionary adaptation theory to the uncanny valley phenomenon, you get some really interesting questions raised.
Load More Replies...
It's not particularly scary but go read a bit of Commander David Fravors' statement about his F/18 crew that were called to check on an object they had been tracking on the USS Nimitz for weeks in the early 2000s. It was dropping from 80,000' to 20,000' in mere seconds. When they managed to begin tracking it (the radar had trouble picking it up) there was no infrared heat signature for the propulsion of the craft as it hovered over the ocean and it was pulling G's no pilot could make without a full blackout. It disappeared from view of both planes and popped back onto the radar 60 miles away, in less than a minute. His crew also took a different video years later of a similar object. Really makes you wonder, there's a full statement of the hearing online.
i was a radar operator on the u.s.s. nimitz, 87-91, and this caught my eye when this happened. the pilot said that the object while hovering over the water was causing disturbance on the surface. for the skeptics who say that "pilots are not well trained observers. they were probably chasing a bird", that is bull! when the pilot has visual and the ships in the battle group have the target on radar, that is VERY hard to refute.
No "human" pilot. Unless it's 10,G breakup and you're Pete Mitchell/Maverick (Tom Cruise)
That the stereotypical Alien “encounter”, involving abduction, probing, and other experiments, are not aliens, but rather humans, from the future, coming back to try and figure out why we stopped being able to reproduce. Furthermore, that concludes that whatever brings about the potential fall of man has already begun.
Humanity will go extinct way before it has the capacity to time travel.
Everything changes and is boom and bust cyclical. The fall of man started the second the first one was born.
On that note there is a professor at Montana Tech that pulled many disciplines together to study the above theory. They took how our species has evolved, biologically speaking and extrapolated it out into the "deep future". We would look like a Grey alien. It is in the new alien documentary on Netflix.
And how is that supposed to be determined? His method would have to be able to predict the development of blue whales, okapis and aye-ayes from our mammalian ancestors during the time of the dinosaurs. Evolution has no 'plan' and depends a lot on chance (environmental events, isolated populations, evolution in one of thousands of other species that influence us...)
Load More Replies...
The one about Bitcoin being invented by an AI, which is now accumulating a huge amount of computer power by greedy humans building big bitcoin mining centres to make money, but all they are doing is building an ultra resilient network for the AI to run on. The AI also has a huge amount of wealth to now pay anonymously to humans to do it's dirty work in the physical world.
A superintelligence at some point wants more computation and robot arms - given robot arms aren't all that great, money is the next best thing, as humans will do anything for bigger numbers on their bank account.
For me, it's truely terrifying.
I am very fearful of growing AI and had never heard this one. Great, now I am even more afraid. How long til they use all the robotics and AI driven manufacturing to build better bodies?
I watched ‘Disney’s’ wish movie, I’ve seen their “art” renditions, I’m not worried about AI in my lifetime, it’s like an incompetent drunk uncle.
Load More Replies...
That Lorde is really a 40 y.o. man from Colorado.
This is a fake conspiracy for the masses invented to hide the real truth of "Lorde". I wont tell the real truth because I value my existence.... but if you know you know.
Shrimp is bugs.
I mean, water bugs. That's basically true, it's not really a conspiracy theory. Shrimp and lobster are both in phylum Arthropoda, as are basically all insects, spiders, centipedes, etc - everything that we call "bugs" basically.
Both shrimp and insects are arthropods. But not all arthropods qualify as “bugs” by any standard definition.
No theory here, just facts. Lobsters are a luxury food now, but only a couple centuries ago they were subsistence food for the super-poor. They are literally underwater cockroaches. So let's stop discriminating against eating insects, and start farming them!
The reason we haven't found aliens is because any advanced civilization destroys itself.
I could see them flying by and saying "Huh, roll up the window and lock the door"
Load More Replies...I find it incredibly scary that we might be the most intelligent life out there. Doesn't bode well for the universe.
If any advanced civilization destroys itself, that explains why we're still here.
That some examples of the mandela effect are actually advertisements for a firm that can counter the streisand effect for the ludicrously wealthy .
Funny enough, Terry Pratchett wrote about the Mandela Effect long before it was called that. He threw in a few blurbs in some books but did an entire book around it, Thief of Time, in 2001.
It's when an attempt to cover something up manes it much more well known. Named after Barbara Streisand's attempts nonstop her house appearing on a tiny geographic survey ended up putting it on national news
Load More Replies...That BP (and other sites) that used to load easily now need to reboot every 3 minutes, not because of increased outside links or higher demands, but to 1) increase apparent number of visits, 2) force longer engagement if you actually want to finish the article/video, 3) make your screen jump each reload so you accidentally visit ad sites when just trying to find your spot.
I'm having problems such that if I downvote an article, within a few minutes the downvote disappears so I have to go back several times to make sure the downvote was registered. Has been happening a lot this week.
Load More Replies...This whole site is becoming worthless. Might as well just go to reddit. Seems that's where bp is getting all their stories from anyways.
Load More Replies...We need to start separating "types" of conspiracy theories into reasonable ones that can't be explained and those that insane, dumb, paranoid folks come up with. If it can be easily proven wrong it's not a valid conspiracy theory.
Oxymoron Alert! If it were 'valid' then it wouldn't be a theory any more, but a fact. And even if you mean 'feasible', as in there's no technical reason why it cannot be true, then there's only a couple of those at best.
Load More Replies...fine theory. here's a fact: you're a trolling assphole..
Load More Replies...That BP (and other sites) that used to load easily now need to reboot every 3 minutes, not because of increased outside links or higher demands, but to 1) increase apparent number of visits, 2) force longer engagement if you actually want to finish the article/video, 3) make your screen jump each reload so you accidentally visit ad sites when just trying to find your spot.
I'm having problems such that if I downvote an article, within a few minutes the downvote disappears so I have to go back several times to make sure the downvote was registered. Has been happening a lot this week.
Load More Replies...This whole site is becoming worthless. Might as well just go to reddit. Seems that's where bp is getting all their stories from anyways.
Load More Replies...We need to start separating "types" of conspiracy theories into reasonable ones that can't be explained and those that insane, dumb, paranoid folks come up with. If it can be easily proven wrong it's not a valid conspiracy theory.
Oxymoron Alert! If it were 'valid' then it wouldn't be a theory any more, but a fact. And even if you mean 'feasible', as in there's no technical reason why it cannot be true, then there's only a couple of those at best.
Load More Replies...fine theory. here's a fact: you're a trolling assphole..
Load More Replies...
