ADVERTISEMENT

If there’s one thing the world will never run short of, it’s human stupidity. Spend just a few minutes online and you’ll find plenty of evidence, but this recent Reddit thread might be the best example yet.

Here, people gathered to share the most ridiculous rules they’ve encountered, all of which exist because someone once made a shockingly dumb decision. Scroll down to enjoy these hilarious precedents, and don’t forget to upvote your favorites—they deserve some credit for making us all feel a little smarter!

#1

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Taking your shoes off going through airport security because one guy had a sneaker that contained a small explosive. Thank god he didn’t hide a bomb up his a*s.

Known-Ad9610 , wavebreakmedia_micro / freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kira Okah
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Wasn't a small explosive. He was trained at an Al-Qaeda camp, and both of his shoes were adapted to properly fit the bottom full of plastic explosives. Just lucky he was discovered trying to light them and was subdued.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#2

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created On almost every clothes iron in the United States there is a warning label to “not iron your clothes while wearing them.” I assume there’s a few stories behind that warning.

zeebious , Racool_studio / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kira Okah
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I have heard of a few stories online of people thinking that the warning is stupid, doing just that, and getting a nice burn.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

The replies in this Reddit thread might have you doubting the existence of common sense, but they’re nothing short of entertaining. Bored Panda connected with the post’s creator, u/seequelbeepwell, to find out what inspired them to ask the question.

“I was watching YouTube videos about life in Japan and noticed how much trust they place in people to do the right thing,” they told us. “It got me thinking that maybe Western culture is different because we seem to have a few bad apples that end up creating most of the rules.”

ADVERTISEMENT

To their surprise, the responses didn’t quite match their expectations. “I would’ve thought Florida would come up more, but Alabama seemed to take the crown,” they said. “A lot of people were venting about work-related rules. Reddit is on the side of the lady who spilled McDonald’s coffee on herself.”

#3

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created I worked in an office where one numb nut decided to take his lunch break at 4pm everyday so he could leave early. Manager said to stop doing that. So he quit taking a lunch break Monday-Thursday. On Friday, he took all 5 lunch breaks at once and went home at noon. After that the manager assigned everyone a lunch break time. If you didn’t take it during your assigned hour you did not get a lunch break. It felt like the most Mickey Mouse middle school rule ever. Magically, that rule went away after numb nut was fired a couple of months later.

ETA: We were a customer-facing department. We had to ensure coverage for walk ins, appointments, phone calls, etc. if this wasn’t the case I doubt manager would have cared when we took lunch.

RhondaTheHonda , wayhomestudio / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Bookworm
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The last part makes everything completely reasonable. I take my break whenever at work, because I'm not front-of-house staff, so whatever mayhem is going down on the sales floor, I can't come out and deal with it anyway. As long as I take my allowed time and come back, no one cares. If the person running the registers did that, there would be a problem.

BeesEelsAndPups
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My last company required all employees to work 8 hours + a 1 hour lunch break. Except you were heavily encouraged to take your lunch at your desk while working. So really, it was a 9 hour work day. One exception was that employees were allowed to go for a stroll after eating their lunch. This really meant a walk around the building (takes 10 minutes is you walk real slow). Not me, I took my 1 hour walk, every day. Found a 19th century cemetery nearby, and explored, listened to music. Lost 40 lbs in one year, found some really cool nooks in that graveyard, and enjoyed my break.

Sergio Bicerra
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We had a similar rule and encouragement to est in your desk and keep working to meet endlines, but then a coworker spilled his coffee in his keyboard (wireless apple keyboard, expensive) and a new rule was set to not eat in your desk, so productivity took a down. Several week after, that rule was turned down but few resumed eating on their desks.

Load More Replies...
arthbach
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

In many countries there are laws regarding how long a person is allowed to work without a break. Typically, employees must take a break after about 4 hours. It's not about employers trying to be mean, but rather abiding by the law.

Bat cat in a hat
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Most offices I worked at had guidelines that lunch breaks must be taken by 2:30 (unless special circumstances) to avoid those kind of smart arses. In one job I did have a shorter lunch break to be able to leave 30 min earlier to make it for the last off-peak train (cheaper) but it was agreed with the boss from day 1

Hans Georg
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This would not work in Germany as you would need to have worked after your break to get it count as a break.

Apatheist Account2
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We now have the utter stupidity on the rail unions that if a manager says hello to someone in the 59th minute of their break, they get to have another hour off because they "must have an hour free from work". Unions can do a lot of good, but this is hardly great for business.

BeesEelsAndPups
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Better some silliness, than the alternative without unions I suppose. And this nonsense only gets into policy because management agreed to it. Unions aren't all-powerful

Load More Replies...
Did I say that out loud? (he/him)cis/het
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'd be interested to know which country this is? In the UK, this would be illegal as you're not allowed to take your break at the beginning or end of your shift. It must literally *break up * your working day.

Tams21
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think it's actually pretty rare to be free to choose your break in customer service positions. It's a shame one person ruined it in one of the few places where you could.

Upstaged75
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I was an office manager when I was younger and I supervised all the admin assistants. And after listening to them argue about who was going to lunch at what time, then coming to me to complain I had to make a set schedule. I was in my 20's and these women were mostly old enough to be my mother! It was like running a daycare.

Riley Quinn
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

There's always that self-centered jerk of a person who will game the system and make everyone else's life hell.

Schmebulock
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That sounds like a very smart employee! If you are paid to work 8 hours and don't want to be there for 9, they should allow you to come in later or leave earlier. No matter what time you take a lunch hour you are not available for customers and it's not rocket surgery for mgmt to adjust coverage accordingly. STOP being a slave to corporate BS.

Roland Nijveld
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Proper labour laws would prevent this. Here you have to take atleast 30 mins break after 4 hours of work. For both parties it's also the best.

Kerry Fletcher
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Our place is simple, you can take your lunch when you want except in the last hour of your day. That's pretty reasonable

Rizzo
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My 8 hour workday ends after 8,5 hours because we have to take a half hour break minimum. If one doesn't take a break it's their own fault. International Company.

Kit Black
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think it would have been easy to just let the guy do what he was doing all along - if everyone else is taking lunch at a normal hour, why does it matter if he takes his at the end of the day? Coverage should be fine.Because everyone else already took their lunch

Wendy Neumeyer
Community Member
3 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

In the US there exist no federal laws governing break periods at work. The state I grew up in, however, had its own regulatory body to determine laws for occupational safety and health. An 8 hour shift would involve 2 10-15 minute paid breaks with a minimum half hour unpaid break for lunch. If one had to punch a time clock, the breaks were quite regulated. If you worked more than 4.5 hours the employer was required to give you a lunch break, as well as a short paid break.

Gingergirl
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Where I live, employees must take a minimum half hour break after 4 hours. I guess that stops employers working people too hard and employees doing what old mate did.

Emma London
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a common rule that you can't start or your shift with a break or luch time. Breaks are for employee's health and safety, not for an automatic paid freetime.

deletemyaccount
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Where I work you have to take your meal between the 4th and 5th hour of work. There is only one exception where you can skip your lunch and on the rare occasion you get paid time and a half for skipping your lunch but you better be certain its validated because you will get fired for time fraud if you are wrong.

TheBlueBitterfly
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The only "office" job I ever worked (transcribing workers comp hearings from recordings/stenographer notes) the entire office shut down from 12-12:30. If you were working through your lunch, you got written up.

keyboardtek
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

But if four of the days he covered those customer during what would have been his lunch hour, he still put in 40 hours a week doing his job.

Bored Sailor
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My first job after the military my direct supervisor had set work hours very specific, 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and lunch had to be taking daily for exactly one hour between 11:00 and 1:00. I hated that place for more reasons then this. But have been happy at my current flexible job for almost eight years now, hopefully contracts go good and all stays the same.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#4

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created There was a rule against hanging off pipes at an old job because someone tried doing chin-ups on them. Pulled the pipes out of their bracketing and flooded the entire building.

No-Bad5781 , freepik Report

#5

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Warning tags on Halloween costumes “this cape does not give the wearer the ability to fly”.

austintrotter , Felipe Sodré / Pexels Report

Add photo comments
POST
Pandemonium
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I have a scar over my eye proving that I was once 100% certain that a cape would give me the ability to fly. I think I was four years old.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

One Redditor, u/ribbediguana, shared a particularly funny story about her office banning post-its after someone missed an important message. She gave us the full scoop on what led to the unexpected rule change.

“It was a very small recruitment company,” she explained. “Honestly, the person who wrote the note could’ve just delivered the information directly. A client called in on a Friday, right before lunch, needing a temp for Monday. The person who was supposed to handle it—the one who received the post-it—was out at a client lunch. Back then, if you weren’t out drinking with clients on a Friday, you weren’t working hard enough!”

ADVERTISEMENT

“The person who took the message left the post-it on her co-worker’s desk,” she continued. “But it wasn’t seen, the role didn’t get filled, and it made the company look bad. The business owner was furious on Monday, and a lot of passive aggression filled our tiny office of just five people.”

The fallout was intense. “The person who lost the message was demoted for a month, losing out on commission. The co-worker who missed the note quit shortly after. I didn’t last long either—the whole thing was a neon red flag for the emotional state of the business owner.”

#6

Decades ago, I was shopping at a toy store, looking for a Lego table. I found a flat Lego table box, picture of two kids sitting at the table (fully constructed). The label read, I s**t you not, “children not included” .

sweet_neighbor9 Report

#7

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Employees must wear appropriate undergarments. As the manager at the time, I was involved in too many conversations that were part of what eventually led to this policy. No underwear with see through pants, bras showing, visibly lacking bras, underwear visible through clothes, strings pretending to be underwear that were visible above pants. I feel like I’ve seen it all. I counseled many employees on professional attire.

HotMess1909 , freepik Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#8

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created My Alma mater now has a line in the student handbook that charcoal grills are not permitted in the dorm rooms.

xeryon3772 , Håkan Dahlström / flickr Report

Add photo comments
POST
Passerby
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Understandable. It's actually dangerous if you use charcoal grills in a closed room. You can die from lack of oxygen. People have actually died from it.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT

After the post-it ban, the company’s solution was to use a carbon copy phone message pad and still leave the note on the desk, but follow it up with an email. “Yet, there were no changes to the rule about getting tipsy with clients on a Friday!” u/ribbediguana said.

“And that was only the beginning,” she added. “The business owner also told us we needed to ‘look more expensive’—this coming from someone who constantly had food on her shirt and stockings around her ankles.”

This rule was put in place thanks to a recruiter who dared to wear flat shoes to a client visit. “We were told we had to wear stilettos, suits, cufflinks, and jackets—even in 104-degree weather,” u/ribbediguana said.

In the end, it seemed the boss was the common problem. “She was a mess,” u/ribbediguana summarized. “I’ve worked at three recruitment firms, and they all had the same type of women running the show. Let’s just say, I’m not a fan of recruitment anymore!”

ADVERTISEMENT
#9

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created The "no drinking allowed at work" rule at my job is because of me back when I was an alcoholic.

Before that it wasn't an official rule because they just assumed everyone would realize it wasn't allowed.

Got it written in the handbook and everything! I'm a bringer of change.

SomethingClever42068 , pxhere Report

Add photo comments
POST
sbj
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Where I live it's against the law to drink out on the street and nobody seems to pay attention to this

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#10

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Man it makes my stomach hurt thinking about this - but all those signs at the Hoover Dam that tell you not to put your dog on the railing… How many puppies fell in the Hoover Damn for this sign to exist?!

TheLadyLeanneREAL , Bureau of Reclamation Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kristal
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This made me cry about the terror the little puppy felt falling down after trusting it's owner and then dying T.T

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#11

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created I worked in a place where post it notes were banned. Because a person once wrote something important, and stuck it on another persons desk but it fell off.

ribbediguana , freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Passerby
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Unfortunate, but I can understand why it was changed. A post-it note doesn't seem like a good way to convey something important anyway.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT

As for u/seequelbeepwell, they don’t think it’s the rules themselves that are ridiculous, but rather when people knowingly dismiss them. “For example, I ate expired salad dressing the other day,” they confessed. “I saw the expiration date and still went ahead with it. Let’s just say it was one of those bathroom moments that required a shower afterward.”

“On that note, I think my next post will be the opposite,” said u/seequelbeepwell. “What are some everyday goods and services that seem like they were created specifically for idiots?”

And we at Bored Panda can’t wait to see that one—stay tuned!

#12

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Label on engine oil: “not safe for human consumption.” Thanks, Fast and the Furious.

Wal-Mart_Toilet , peoplecreations / Freepik Report

#13

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Horses are forbidden to eat fire hydrants in Marshalltown, Iowa. I love to know WHY IN THE HELL IS THAT A LAW.

Queen_Queenn , freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kira Okah
Community Member
1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That is a very wacky-minded way of reading it. It's about where to not hitch animals so they don't damage any posts by gnawing on the wood - hydrants would have had wooden posts supporting the line - or by pulling against its hitch. The law: "Do not: Fasten, hitch, or tie any horse or other animal to any fire hydrant, telegraph, telephone, electric light or other pole or to any fence, tree, shrub or other property. Drive, stop, tie or place any horse, or other animal where it may bite, eat or in any way damage any fire hydrant, telegraph, telephone, electric light or other pole or any fence, tree, shrub or other property."

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#14

Where I used to work they sent round a company wide email (50 odd stores) banning carrier bags from the warehouse because someone slipped on one and broke their leg. She actually broke it because we were roller skating in the warehouse and put slipped on a bag in the accident book because we didn't know what else to say.

marvellcg Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#15

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created We have to keep the loading dock doors closed at work because somebody decided it was a short cut. We have a long loading bay where the trucks back all the way inside by a couple truck lengths and some lady tried to drive all the way through. She hit the dock and destroyed her car and the dock plate, which was impressive because its a huge steel plate. So now we have to keep the doors closed no matter how hot it gets.

One-Permission-1811 , freepik Report

#16

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created You can't take pictures in the ossuary at Kutna Hora anymore because someone took pictures of themselves kissing and whatever else to the bones.

JojenCopyPaste , Shawn Harquail / Flickr Report

Add photo comments
POST
Rachel Pelz
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ossuary are such a weid concept. "Come in, we used to be what you are and you will be what we are"

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#17

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created In our theater, we had to make the “no throwing tools” rule. Which you would think that’d be OBVIOUS, but no. Apparently common sense isn’t that common anymore

TheGummyCandyStars , freepik Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#18

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Climbing on the rail on a cruise ship can get you banned for life.

LeoMarius , cookie_studio / freepik Report

#19

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created An operator in the control room of a power plant was caught sleeping during his shift. The resulting rule was outlawing any napping/sleeping anywhere on site at any time. Not at breaks or lunchtime, at your desk, in your office or in your car in the parking lot at lunch. And to top it off, keep your office door open at all times to show that you’re working at your desk. They could have just said not to sleep in the control room, but that would be singling a person out.

tatorpop , pvproductions / freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They cannot mandate what you do on your lunch break, nor force you to stay on company premises without a good reason.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#20

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created One rule that stands out is the "no food in the computer lab" policy—thankfully, I wasn’t the one who spilled a soda all over the equipment! Sometimes, one person’s mistake leads to valuable lessons for everyone.

AffiliateJourney101 , DC Studio / freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Robert T
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

A very sensible policy. I was once presenting a training course and knocked a glass of coke all over my laptop. It didn't like it. I did eventually get it dried out and working again, but it had sticky keys permanently enabled!!

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
#21

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created The abolishment of last meal requests in Texas because one guy had such a massive meal request.

Oyster_- , freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Abolished because Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a large and expensive last meal, but did not eat any of it, stating that he was not hungry. Concurrent but significant reason is that at the time the Governor of Texas was Republican Rick Perry, an all-around as**ole, religious nutjob and opponent to basic human rights. He actively fought battles against LGBT rights, freedom of religion, light dr*gs recreational and medical use, human treatment of prisoners, any basic regulations of firearms etc. He is the guy who greenlighted executions for mentally incapable inmates and refused to hold executions for prisoners whose guilt had became dubious from new evidence after the trial, at the same time favoring moving more money to private prisons while lowering living standards for inmates.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#22

I used to work for a school district in the cafeteria. We got 10 days of PTO per year.

One year, a coworker decided that she was going to take an 8 day cruise the second to last week of the school year.

The following year? No taking time off except in medical emergencies the last month of school.

KnockMeYourLobes Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

American workplace rules are insane, btw. 10 days PTO as a concession they can take away? No buddy, you deserve to have three times that, and PTO use should be mandatory to warrant employees' wellbeing.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#23

I am a photographer. One of my new event photography clients gave me a list of instructions that included “Do not photograph close-ups of our employees’s low cut shirts” and I wondered which photographer had done this previously. Yikes.

Zealousideal1999 Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jane Jayne Jain Jeign Jein
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Reminds me of the UK tory MP Christopher Chope who objected to, and delayed, legislation to make upskirting a criminal offence. He then did the same thing with legislation to tackle female genital mutilation. Didn't stop him from being re-elected though.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#24

You know those warnings on hand sanitizer that say “do not drink”?

Dreamy_Sugar Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kira Okah
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That is because alcoholic people would drink it or put it in other things for the alcohol content, due to cost.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#25

We just had a mandate come down about our dress policy, we wear badge reels and because some idiot at one of the other hospitals had one that was inappropriate- instead of telling them to change it, they changed the policy that we can ONLY wear badges with the system name on it. Never mind that 99.9% of us wear cute, fun, and appropriate ones, we’re all punished because one dips**t displayed their dark humor where patients can see it. They should know the dark humor is for lockers outside of the public view LOL

crazygranny Report

#26

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created The 'Do Not Put Your Hand Underneath The Lawn Mower When Running'. Some knucklehead back in the 90's wanted to trim his hedges and thought that his lawn mower would do the trick. So he fired it up and was going to lift it up by the deck and lost all of his fingers from the middle knuckle up. He successfully sued Toro Co. for not warning people not to put there body parts by a sharp metal blade spinning at 100's of rpm.

76yankee20 , prostooleh / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

OP is confusing two separate cases. The lawnmower ones dates back to 1986 Mele vs. Turner, when 18 years old Charles Turner was injured while mowing a neighbor's lawn with a Sears Roebuck lawnmower. The mower did not evacuate grass properly and it kept accumulating, at which point Turner started cleaning the edge of the lawnmower with his hands without stopping it. After multiple times, he was injured. The plaintiff was definitely not the smartest tool in the shed (contrary to the mower's blade), but the mower design was effectively dangerous. The case was dismissed because the danger was evident to the plaintiff. Funnily enough, Sears&Roebuck already had a voluntary danger notice on not touching the blade while spinning, but this case made it a common occurrence on such products. .

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#27

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created I know a country that had full face covering bike helmets banned because shop breakers created a trend of using them to mask their face.

Just-a-naughty_boy01 , azerbaijan_stockers / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Cee Cee
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Lots of shops and petrol stations here won't let you in if you keep your helmet on.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#28

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created Doritos have rounded edges due to some peoples’ insufficient chewing habits.

DopeCharma , azerbaijan_stockers /freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Passerby
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Even without that, I think they should be round anyway. Putting something with sharp edges inside your mouth is just asking for trouble, really. Accidents do happen.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#29

How overtime was bid for.

A coworker figured out a way to game the system so he could maximize the available overtime, leading to complaints that there was very little left over for others to sign up for. The rules were changed 4 or 5 times and each time he found a way around the rules. Eventually they just started skipping over every other of his OT requests and put in a maximum number of OT hours someone could work in a calendar month and boy did he cry about that for months that he wasn't getting 20 hours a week of OT.

wetwater Report

Add photo comments
POST
Cee Cee
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Should be paying decent wages so workers didn't have to depend on overtime. Hire enough staff too.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#30

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created At my local KPOT place, you have to verbally order your broth instead of on the tablet because someone managed to order 10 soups at once.

knockoutcharlie , jcomp / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Panda Kicki
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So if someone accidentally order 10 rice that is off the tablet as well? And so on until you scrap the tablet?

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
Continue reading with Bored Panda Premium
Unlimited content
Ad-free browsing
Dark mode
#31

There are a ton of state and federal regulations in the senior living facility business (and it is very much a business, but that's a whole 'nother topic) that are in place and enforced because of "one bad apple." SNFs are scared to use bladder catheters because it may look like they are used for the convenience of staff. Assisted living facilities ban side rails because 2 people out of several million have gotten their heads stuck in them. Psychotropic medications often cannot be used because it may seem like a chemical restraint. There are many other examples. All of these things can be very useful for enhancing quality of life for the residents, but a few "bad apples" have ruined it for everyone.

DesignerChe Report

Add photo comments
POST
Rachel Pelz
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

No side rails? Making people less independent and dependent on walkers and wheelchairs sooner than necessary...that's just sad.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#32

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created The place I worked at posted instructions on how to go number 2. Because people were squatting on the toilet rim breaking the porcelain and injuring themselves.

Scared_Crazy_6842 , freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jane Jayne Jain Jeign Jein
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Some of the factories I deliver to have high proportion of immigrant workers coming from countries where squat toilets are the norm. These companies do the same thing, whinging that they have to keep replacing the western toilets, but never thinking they could just install some squat toilets to keep everyone happy. Squatting is better for your health, opens your bowels better, but since it's a weird 'foreign' habit it just gets dismissed and the foreign workers are seen as trouble makers or as stupid for not adjusting to western ways.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#33

I stayed at a hotel where the ‘house rules’ included ‘No ATVs in Lobby’!

kikiveesfo Report

#34

Remote jobs requiring clocking out for every single step away from the keyboard. Even if it's 1 min to refill coffee or grab water. Takes longer to log out and back in than I would have been gone.

Thin_Ganache5733 Report

Add photo comments
POST
C B Jones
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Is this because of previous cases of lazy employees, or is this the consequence of neurotic and paranoid micromanagers getting their way, though?

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#35

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created My old job banned headphones/earbuds for anyone who worked on the warehouse floor, because some moron had both earbuds in and walked in front of a forklift without looking.

I had a cubicle job inside the warehouse and the ban still applied to us. A few of us argued with management and they said they had to make it "fair" for everyone. It was the last straw after lots of s****y treatment (like remodeling the building and removing the windows for weeks in the dead of winter) so I peaced out.

undercover_ravioli , DC Studio / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Not using earbuds and headphones on the shop floor is the basic minimum in mandatory workplace safety. You need to hear alarms, machinery malfunctions and other people calls. The fact it was not banned BEFORE an accident is mind boggling. And yes, it applies to cubicle jobs too because warehouses are considered a high risk environment -especially for fires- so you must be in a condition to hear an evacuation order or fire alarm.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#36

We nearly have to dynamite our way into a bottle of Motrin. All because some m**********r thought it would be a good idea to poison a few Tylenol bottles in 1982.

Mandelliib Report

Add photo comments
POST
Sand Ers
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

And to this day they don’t know who did it. They also don’t know if it was truly random mayhem, or cover for a specific murder.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#37

One guy poisons his kids Halloween candy, now every parent has to confiscate their kids Halloween candy and go through it for razor blades that aren’t there .

NuclearFamilyReactor Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kira Okah
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

and for the purposes of half-inching a chunk of the goodies.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#38

The "Not suitable for flying" label on Halloween Superman costumes.

TheyCallHimBabaYagaa Report

#39

Work: don't wear ragged jeans and a boob tube to a board meeting.

Timely_Egg_6827 Report

#40

Flash photography in museums because someone damaged artwork with their camera flash.

annawhittee Report

Add photo comments
POST
flowingcomplexity
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I really think it should be completely banned. I want to appreciate the artwork. This is sad

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#41

Oh I have a good one. Worked at an aircraft manufacturer that's well known in the pacific Northwest part of USA. there is a sealant used that is flash frozen, so needs to be thawed at room temperature. In the specs it literally says you cant microwave the sealant because a guy absolutely destroyed a microwave AND sealant by doing just that. This stuff stains and is incredibly hard to remove from hair/skin. .

Sigbac Report

#42

30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created When you buy a car most dealers have a tire chain disclosure informing you to check your owners manual to see what kind of chains or traction devices your vehicle takes. This is due to someone in the 90’s putting the wrong kind on their car and suing the dealer into the oblivion. Literally 1000’s of forms from one lawsuit.

silversum1 , senivpetro / Freepik Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They ask you to sign the waiver because it's a requirement from a poorly worded California Vehicle Code article (§ 11713.6). The law requires the seller to openly disclose if a vehicle is prohibited to safely operate while using snow chains, and is required to use different equipment to avoid damage to the road or the vehicle itself. The "suing the dealer into the oblivion" is b******t.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#43

At my work we can't take a powered pallet jack out on the sales floor without an escort because somebody somewhere else in the company hit someone. Certainly lugging around a one+ ton pallet with a manual jack that needs at least a few feet to stop with people who don't look where they're going because they're glued to their phones at all times is so much safer.

DarthWoo Report

Add photo comments
POST
Jrog
Community Member
1 month ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is one instance of someone attributing sensibly designed safety procedures to "somebody somewhere hitting someone". No buddy, there are people whose job is PREVENTING accidents and if you move heavy loads in public cordoning off the area and having a spotter are an obvious advice (if not mandatory, depending on where you are)

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#44

In the UK there aren’t power outlets in bathrooms.

Which means you have to dry your hair with your dryer plugged in the corridor or something. Because of some idiot.

alsotheabyss Report

Add photo comments
POST
Tevye
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

A higher level of safety standards - electricity and water together are highly dangerous. Walking a few feet from the bathroom to the bedroom is easily achieved by Brits. We also don't have light switches (apart from pull cords) inside the bathroom for the same reason.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#45

Don't put Animals in microwaves after a lady gave her cat a bath and then tried to dry him in the microwave. She sued and won because there was no warning then.

ai-ui Report

Add photo comments
POST
Kira Okah
Community Member
1 month ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is an urban legend that pre-dates microwaves to being about drying the cat on a wood stove. The nearest thing that I can find that actually happened irl is someone who purposely murdered a kitten this way, she was imprisoned for the crime.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu