That's a 4th degree burn right there

I think it should be mandatory for every unwanted child born be adopted buy a Texan so that truly there will be no unwanted children.

Proof bigger doesn't mean better.

Not one star, Lone star. Like, the star that guided people to Christ’s birth. One star is very powerful, unlike a star in this fallen world.

Dayummmmn

A r t

The best one.

Funny.

Spot on!

Every Republican: "Well it's my freedom to dictate what happens in women's bodies. And I'm prepared to invalidate the constitution and every amendment which could keep me from doing that. By the way, that's how I also think about voters rights for minorities. "

Pass it.

That's fackin sick. Whoever voted this in should have to stand in front of a firing squad of rape victims. See how much they agree with it then.

As soon as possible. I'll cover the expenses.

Extremists are discussing the possibilities of applying Taliban tactics to the USA. Would be a good thing for Texas, Sharia law doesn't ban abortions.

and it would be even worse if they had to shut down the program due to no longer being able to filter what's real and what isn't, wouldn't it be? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The new Texas Anti-Abortion law authorizes anyone in the country to file a lawsuit against any abortion provider, or anyone who helps someone get an abortion, and seek a penalty of that person of at least $10,000 per abortion. Which does sound like the start of Nazi Germany when people were encouraged to snitch on family, friends and neighbors if they dared to doubt the Führer.

This is great! It's foetus logic I believe so "we must fight for foetuses!" but when comes to helping children they are "not my child not my problem"...

I think women in Texas should just demand a law that all men be required to have a vasectomy. When they are mature and ready to have children, their vasectomy can be reversed.

makes pictures from the anti-mask protests look almost funny texas-6131...e181e6.jpg

Perhaps Texan women should go on strike and deny men sex until this law is from the table.

It's not about sanctity of life, it never was. It's about controlling women and returning to them good ol' days when women knew their place and slaves were cheap.

Oh this is so true

And an open invitation for raping.

Error, Sharia law is much more humane in matters of abortion. With a strong and clear reason, permissibility becomes more lenient. Such cases include forced pregnancy (caused by rape), reasons of health and other pressing reasons.

Most countries go forward in time, some countries go backwards.

Yes, why the f*ck not!

You can sue them for assisting in transporting women out of state. None of the legislators are poor

Marvellous idea. Castrate every guy who supported this bill, so they can't procreate.

RIGHT. I finally understand. Thank you ImSpeaking13. I get it now! Texas needs more babies to make up for all the people they are killing from the Delta Veriant! That's why women have bounties on their heads for not want ing a kid!

Trying? I think they've pretty much succeeded. Still at the rate they also seem to be trying to kill off their voters thanks to the anti vaxx, anti mask rhetoric, pretty soon they'll be unelectable (not soon enough I realise)

This is ridiculous, most women don't have regular periods so going a month or so without a period how the actual f**k are they supposed to know if pregnancy is not suspected?

Yep. And these legislators doing their best to ban it know full well that the law will never apply to their families. They need to curry favor with the religious conservative wing of the party. If they have to sell out poor people to do it, oh well.

Don't forget spurs and fancy belt buckles...

trump is a pitiful human

mandatory vasectomies than can only be reversed when they prove themselves of being sufficiently capable and responsible to support another life

F*** Ben “Hysterical” Sasse: https://www.bustle.com/p/ben-sasses-hysteria-comment-at-brett-kavanaughs-hearing-is-being-ripped-apart-on-twitter-11495038

Biden doesn't want to expand the SCOTUS because he understands it would set a dangerous precedent. If the Democrats can do it, so can the Republicans.