ADVERTISEMENT

There are nearly 8 billion people on this planet, and everybody constantly wants to know things. Whether you're into astronomy and the whole chicken or egg thing, or you're simply a curious person – all the answers that humankind can give you would probably be not enough, and it's absolutely understandable. We're floating God-knows-where around a bunch of fairly similar and large astronomical bodies while having to get up and go to work every single day – how could you not wonder about things? 

However, sometimes looking for answers can do no good. An existential crisis can seriously mess up your whole nervous system, which is we have multiple options that can help us get away from reality whenever we need to. But from time to time, it gets rather samey and watching a show or scrolling through your feed doesn't keep you entertained anymore:

This is when a Twitter page with over 1.3M followers dedicated to "quite interesting" facts comes to the rescue: nearly 50K tweets worth of lightweight and educational posts that'll keep you occupied for hours. We've gathered a few of the best ones, but don't hesitate to use the comment section to add your "quite interesting" fact.

More info: Twitter | Instagram | BBC

Image source: Ben+Sam (not the actual photo)

Besides, the “Quite Interesting” Twitter page is actually a game show that currently broadcasts on the BBC Two channel. It started out in 2003 and already has 19 seasons. However, the quiz show has more of a comedic twist where well-known British personalities compete and score points not necessarily based on the correctness of their answers but the funniness. And as for the plot of the show, it focuses on the participants answering obscure questions, making it almost impossible to give a correct answer, which is why humor remains the main focus.

ADVERTISEMENT
#6

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
third molar
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This needs to be popularized so people will stop spending on rings!!

Devil's Advocate
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If you need an expensive ring, chances are you're making up for a lack of other, more important things in the relationship

Marnie
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I need a source or it is meaningless to me. I don't believe just random tweets by people. I suspect that will be the case for most of these.

Stein-Inge Kummeneje
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's not a random tweet though. It's from QI, a huge British television show focusing on weird trivia. It is fact checked.

Load More Replies...
𝖊𝖆
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think this is relative to your pay. You could spend £1000 on a ring, and that be one months wage. Or £10000 and that be two and a half months wages. The second is more likely to divorce. As the emphasis is on appearance and wanting things for how much it costs rather than being focused on the actual marriage. Same goes with the cost of weddings. The more expensive a wedding compared to your earnings, the more chance you have or divorcing.

80 Van
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Important to remember that correlation does not equal causation. It’s likely that higher-wealth people have a higher likelihood of divorce due to a number of factors that have nothing to do with the engagement ring itself.

AxleMunshine001
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My wife bought her own engagement ring, because I couldn't afford any. My wedding ring is made of titanium and cost me just a few bob. It's the sentiment that counts, not the amount carats.

Debrina Blackmoon
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yet I'm actually glad mine were lost to p**n(he possibly sold the second set and 3rd single)as they were just part of the joke.

Load More Replies...
Groundcontroltomajortom
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'd rather an expensive ring than an expensive wedding or wedding dress, the ring at least you'll wear and treasure for the rest of your life??

Slick
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, my husband and i got married almost 10 years ago. We never bought rings for the occasion. And honestly, we never needed it. It's mostly people who can't understand why and are bugged by it.

Mark Karol-Chik
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Purchase vintage rings instead! At local small stores, or antique stores.

Terry Fergusson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

citation https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/wedding-spending-432/

Paddling Panda
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My mum bought their wedding bands for @ $100 in 1964. They've had lots of problems but are still married 57 years later.

Zuila
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We had no engagement rings, only wedding bands. Does this mean we likely never get divorced?

LadyHardanger
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We were pretty much still students when we got engaged, and my now husband bought us matching gold bands, mine has a tiny diamond. They served as our engagement rings and then magically became wedding rings after the ceremony. We are both very low maintenance. And have been happily married for nearly 14 years.

Nazda Pokmov
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Look at the celebs and their multimillion dollar rings....this is quite true.

Mazer
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don’t doubt it, finding out your partner’s personality is not as rich as his bank account.

Denise Taylor
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is almost certainly a case where correlation is not causation.

Cayna Warrick
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Because if it's about love, you wouldn't care if it's a cracker jack ring provided they gave their heart with it. When it's a monetary value of the ring that matters to you then you have no love.

Daria B
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yasss! My husband I never bought one in the first place ♡

Ola Pe
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It makes sense to me- paying special attention to convenances, trying to show off in front of your future wife and other people, reassurribg your status with money and generally making a show out if engagement are in my opinion not the best indicators if true engagement and caring about the other person. Same if it’s the future bride who demands an expensive ring

Tenacious Squirrel
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It’s just generally odd that people need a ring (and contract) to prove/evidence an emotion. If you love someone and want to be with them there is absolutely no need for either of those things, in fact the opposite.

I'mNotARoboat
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Engagement ring = 2 pipe cleaners/pennies Weddings rings = two O rings in our respective sizes/less than a dollar each

Kellie Whyte
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Awesome, because my ring is plain and not expensive AT ALL!!! But I LOVE IT!!!

Robecca
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I would say it’s because people with money can afford to get divorced

Celtic Pirate Queen
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Right? My sister & her ex spent over $40k on their wedding and honeymoon (the ring was an additional $12k and she cheated on him ON THEIR HONEYMOON). She got so caught up in the planning of the wedding, she forgot to think about the MARRIAGE. That money would have been much better spent on premarital counseling/therapy. They were separated within 3 years, but are still legally married 20 years later.

backatya
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

true because the bride only is interested in materialistic things. Ture love she would accept anything or no ring at all

Riley Quinn
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I truly believe the more the wedding costs, the quicker the divorce. Never did understand this foolishness. Instead of a lavish wedding, I invested, and now enjoy my personal freedom from financial insecurity.

Edward Griggs
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I spent 35 dollars on my engagement ring and we still got divorced, 10 yrs later and 3 kids I'll add.. I'm calling bunk on this one

Two_rolling_black_eyes
Community Member
2 years ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is factually inaccurate because the correlation is not linear. TL:DR - There are sweet spots and sour spots and they usually correspond to people reaching either beyond their income or having unreasonable expectations. On the bottom end - someone spending between $2000 and $4000 is 30% more likely to get divorced than someone spending between $500 and $2000 (the first sweet spot). Someone who spends less than $500 is twice as likely to get divorced than a ring in the first sweet spot. The second sweet spot is $4-5k. That first sweet spot is there because it strongly correlates to couples who say they have planned for their future prior to marriage. People who bought the ring in the sour spot right above it had the highest proportion of people said more money = more commitment. $2k-$4k is also the highest proportion of people who borrowed to buy in all groups under $50k. Less than $500 had the highest proportion of impulse weddings (engaged less than 30 days).

KT
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Lol odd. My ring was $10,000 and we are still married 16 years later :)

Brian Bennett
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I wish I had a bigger one - we could have got more money when we had to p**n it to eat!

Bobby
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I didn't bought any engagement ring. 15 years of Married life.

Kanuli
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We didn’t have any engagement rings? Means 0? We spent quite a bit on our wedding rings though.

Sleepyhead
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Hey. *tosses a Ring Pop to the love of my life* It's you and me, buddy.

athornedrose
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That feels like correlation and the actual issue is people who can afford expensive rings tend to attract people after their money

Brandy Dor
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yeah, because you're more likely to be able to afford a divorce

WildHoneyPie
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Mine's a ruby (husband was shocked it didn't actually have to be a diamond, lol). It was $175.00 26 years ago. I cherish my ring.

ZAPanda
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I look forward to the day when either engagement rings are a thing of the past OR both partners get them OR the men get them. It's rather tedious that men mark their territory before marriage in this way.

matilda
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I would believe in this more if it said "the more effort you put in creative a social media video from it..."

Anonymous User
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Completely written by someone who is trying to cover up the fact that they didn't want to or couldn't spend a decent amount of money on a ring.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#8

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
funkybluegirl
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Definition of imposter syndrome: "Imposter syndrome is loosely defined as doubting your abilities and feeling like a fraud. It disproportionately affects high-achieving people, who find it difficult to accept their accomplishments. Many question whether they're deserving of accolades."

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
#19

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Ozacoter
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Luckily if they even taller it would be very uncomfortable for them

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#20

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

ADVERTISEMENT
#22

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Robert T
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It takes 10 times longer when there is a BP tab open in your browser...

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#27

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Julia Atkinson
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Absolute nonsense, and when I tell my cats about this they'll come and beat you up

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#28

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Ozacoter
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I guess that this decade the skirts will be as long as a wedding dress

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#34

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Troux
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ooooh you're having an anxiety attack, too? This is going great!! 🥰🥰🥰

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#38

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Olga Dremina
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'm pretty sure plumbers installed less known saxopipes in our house.

View more commentsArrow down menu
#40

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Nikki Sevven
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

System of a Down's album entitled "Toxicity" was released two years before Britney Spears' song "Toxic." Just saying.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#45

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
May
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So much of that is during December - so many traditions involving candles!

View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda
#46

Quite-Interesting-Facts-Twitter

qikipedia Report

Add photo comments
POST
Luther von Wolfen
Community Member
2 years ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

"Only"? Human beings have been around for 150,000 years and 1/15 of the total are alive now.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu