I've been doing editorial illustration for 10 years now and, although I draw a wide range of subjects, current events are always present in my work. I especially like the human angle behind all the big, self-important political and ideological words and personalities. I happen to live in a country not far from Ukraine and have been able to witness the huge number of refugees fleeing from the war. We are talking about millions of women, children, pets, displaced, families broken because of the whims of a few. On a broader scale, climate change affects us all and will have an increasingly physical influence on our lives in the next few years. If nothing is done, we will have to live (or die) with its consequences.

War is always a very complex subject and no matter how many pretty words and selected facts you use to justify it, there is always the human suffering of innocent victims caught in the middle from both sides. Like many things in life, it's a battle between those in power at the expense of the powerless. I prefer to take the side of the powerless. On the other hand, no matter how hard you try to be neutral, people will still criticize or insult you for it. We always like satire until it affects us personally; then it's not funny anymore. It's just a matter of perspective.

I have done several illustrations on environmental issues. The climate crisis grows more urgent every year, but governments and businesses don't seem much interested in solving the issue. With July 2023 being the hottest recorded month ever, I did an illustration of humankind being rowed to the realm of the dead by Charon, leaving Earth behind. That's what will happen to us if we keep on the path of greed. In my opinion, our only option is to take economic action and boycott polluting companies, as I'm afraid simple protesting won't do.

New developments in AI technology have increased the discussion of its economic and ethical ramifications. Although AI can be used as a tool for artists, I fear it will mostly be used by greedy corporations and clients willing to sacrifice creative solutions for bland, soulless content, as long as it saves them a few bucks. Personally, I don't use AI. Political and social illustration is very conceptual and you at least need a human to come up with a clever idea... or you rip off other people's concepts. I'm for regulating this new technology and protecting artists' works from being used to train the algorithm without their permission, but since everything is still in the beginning, it's difficult to know how all of this will unfold.

Art can be used for many things, and raising awareness of problems and injustices in the world is one of them. Think of it as good journalism: without information and public scrutiny to hold them back, people in power would have free rein to do the worst things imaginable and cover them up with propaganda and nice PR.

It's arrogant to think art can solve world problems, but it can reflect and ignite what people already have in their hearts and point them in the direction of action and change.