Some film and television series franchises have been around for such a long time that changes were bound to happen. Not just the technical side of things, like picture quality, visual and sound effects, or props, but also things like the cast.
It may have been the case that some stars refused to continue working with a given franchise, or vice versa—the suits behind the franchise decided not to cast them any more. Or perhaps they simply grew old and it was only natural a new actor would step in.
Regardless, change is inevitable. Today, Bored Panda takes a look at how popular female characters have changed over the course of a franchise. Check them out in the list below, and while you’re at it, vote and comment on the ones you like the most. And, no doubt there’s a lot more that could have made the list, so why not share those in the comment section!
This post may include affiliate links.
Sarah Connor
Linda Hamilton as Sarah Connor is seen throughout much of the Terminator series. And though the likes of Emilia Clarke and Lena Headey have also played the same role in some of the entries of the franchise, Hamilton has ultimately remained the face of Sarah Connor, starting from the original movie in 1984 up until the sequel Terminator: Dark Fate in 2019.
I'll never forget watchting Terminato II in the movies when it came out. the first time EVER I saw a woman on screen who was seriously tough and kicked ass. (I saw Alien on the small screen a bit later) God, how I cheered. Growing up as a girl who was interested in fighting and action seriously sucked, back then.
Even without having watched the last Terminator, I am so damn grateful that Linda Hamilton got her screentime. She looks so tough and gnarly and perfect.
Never seen Terminator, but I definitely think the picture on the right looks WAY cooler.
I found her much better in Dark Fate than in Terminator 2. T2 remains my favorite though. Dark Fate was Arnold his goodbye to the series in a gracious way.
I love the fact that Linda has not had any plastic surgery, fillers or even a facelift. And she still looks great - and natural! Much better than those plastic women you often see in Hollywood.
Wonder Woman
Technically speaking, the first live-action appearance of Wonder Woman was the 5-minute-long 1967 TV pilot short film titled Wonder Woman: Who's Afraid of Diana Prince? starring Ellie Wood Walker. Then there was the 1974 full-length live-action movie starring Cathy Lee Crosby. Neither of the two were deemed comic-book-accurate, leading to a bad reception by the public.
However, then came the 1975–1979 Wonder Woman TV series starring Lynda Carter as Wonder Woman, who many of us remember fondly as the face of the iconic superwoman.
Today, the most recent incarnation of Wonder Woman is Gal Gadot, having starred in the 2020 movie titled Wonder Woman 1984. However, there’s a 2021 movie already complete—Justice Society: World War II—where the role of Wonder Woman is played by Stana Katic, but Gal Gadot is set to appear in three other movies in the next 3 years, one of which is currently complete, so it’s quite likely that she’ll keep the title of Wonder Woman for now.
I might be biased but Gal Gadot is (in my opinion) the best actress to play wonder woman
She had a much more serious script to follow, too. I loved Lynda Carter, but it was a very fluffy show :)
Load More Replies...I remember the 70s version. Tube tops were in and I could never figure out how she kept from popping out of that bustier when she ran, when I could barely take a step without flashing people. The new costume looks way better and is much more realistic to the physicality of the role
Load More Replies...It's interesting to see how in the early versions her costume just looks like, well, a costume, but in the most recent version it actually looks like armour rather than a flimsy Lycra top.
I would like to know why the male heroes are covered head to toe, including masks, yet Wonder Woman is still in a ridiculously tiny uncomfortable skirt with a rope as her “weapon”. Come on Hollywood, get a clue.
Here's an amusing skit on that https://youtu.be/-vI5tdORhC0
Load More Replies...I think Gal Gadot starred in two Wonder Woman films, am I wrong? The one set in 1984 is the second film.
I don't like superhero films, but my misses was a fan of Lynda Carter's Wonder Woman, so we saw Wonder Woman (2017) with Gal Gadot. I have to say I though it was a great movie and the costume update done extremely well. To quote my partner 'Lynda Carter will always be my Wonder Woman, but this lady is my super hero'.
Does anyone remember the Lynda Carter episode where all the people melted? I didn’t sleep for weeks.
Mary Poppins
Mary Poppins is probably the world’s most famous nanny, right there with Mrs. Doubtfire and Vin Diesel in that one movie.
Anyway, the first Mary Poppins movie (musical, in fact) was released in 1964 and it took the world by storm. This Walt Disney classic is based on P. L. Travers's book series of the same name.
Now, there are only two movies out there, but there have been loads of plays and musicals based on it as well. So, the 1964 iteration, starring Julie Andrews as Mary Poppins, was the only movie out there for quite a while until 2018, when Disney released an official sequel titled Mary Poppins Returns. There was a plan to reprise Andrews in this movie as well, but it didn’t work out, so Emily Blunt took on the role.
Also, supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
I LOVE Mary Poppins Returns. One of my favorite movies! Emily Blunt and Lin Manuel Miranda are phenomenal!
One of them is emily blunt and one is Julie Andrew's there not the same people
Laurie Strode
Halloween is one of the most iconic horror movie franchises in film history, right there alongside its ‘little brother’ Friday The 13th, Nightmare On Elm Street, and Hellraiser.
But, did you know that ever since the first movie in 1978, Jamie Lee Curtis has always played the film’s protagonist Laurie Strode? With the exception of 2007’s Halloween, which is dubbed Rob Zombie’s Halloween where Laurie is played by Scout Taylor-Compton, she has been and continues to be Laurie Strode right up until the recently announced Halloween Ends due 2022.
Michael Myers, on the other hand, had different stunt doubles, different young and adult actors, and even different actors play him depending whether he’s masked or not.
She said in an interview that the only reason she got the part is that she screamed louder than any of the other actors trying for the part. At the time, no one knew that her parents were Janet Leigh and Tony Curtis.
Load More Replies...That's a really unfortunate photo of her as I think she looks amazing for her age now
Jeanne d'Arc
Also known as Joan of Arc, the historical female figure has been imagined and reimagined on the screen multiple times by multiple actresses throughout the years.
Jeanne d'Arc films have been gracing the world as early as 1898 with the release of the short film Execution of Joan of Arc, where it’s unknown who played the role of Jeanne, followed by another short film, Joan of Arc from 1900, where she’s played by French film actress Jehanne D'Alcy. Others, like Maria Falconetti (1928), Ingrid Bergman (1948), and Milla Jovovich (1999) have also taken on the role, with the most recent being Lise Leplat Prudhomme in 2019’s Joan of Arc. Yeah, she does look super young, but remember that Jeanne herself is estimated to have been around 17 when she took part in battles and around 19 when she died.
She was executed when she was either 13 or 14 years old, depending on which historian you believe.
Load More Replies...Oh no! Knitted mail on otherwise bare head... When will movie people learn.
The last one looks 7, not 17. That's just wrong. 17 year old of those times already were married and had given birth like 3 times.
Selene
Depending on who you ask, the average lifespan of a vampire can vary from hundreds to thousands to infinity years. Well, when it comes to the Underworld franchise, the same applies to Kate Beckinsale, the face of the series’ protagonist Selena.
Sure, 13 years between the first and fifth films do show a minimal difference in what Beckinsale looks like—it’s only natural—but otherwise, she’s the only immortal face of Selena in the live-action films.
There are talks of a 6th movie coming out. Back in 2017, the creator of the franchise Len Wiseman said Beckinsale will be coming back as Selena for this one too, but a year later, Beckinsale herself said she won’t as she has done so many already, so it is yet to be determined.
She still looks fantastic. Even when she wears the horse costumes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mQe7_l9iJI
As a vampire herself, Beckinsale is the only person fit for the role of Selene
I have yet to watch any of these films. Always meant to, just never got around to it.
Cruella De Vil
Cruella is one of the most well-known Disney villains out there. But before she became a Disney villain, she was an antagonist in Dodie Smith's 1956 novel The Hundred and One Dalmatians. It was five years later that she became a key figure in the Disney Universe.
Even though her first visual appearance was the animated adaptation of the novel back in 1961, the first live-action actress to take on the role was Glenn Close in 1996. Since then, the likes of Wendy Raquel Robinson and Victoria Smurfit been chosen to portray Cruella in the movie Descendants (2015) and the fourth and fifth seasons of Once Upon a Time (2011-2018) respectively, it seems that Close will not return to play the role any time soon as the upcoming (currently due 2021) live-action film Cruella, which will be detailing Cruella’s backstory, has will have Emma Stone take the lead as the antagonist.
The new movie is detailing her backstory, so she would be younger in the new movie.
Load More Replies...I don't know why you got downvoted, I was thinking the same thing. It's the makeup.
Load More Replies...Glen Close is the best Cruella De Vil. The other one? Eh, not so much,
Glenn Close was amazing as Cruella, I really hope Emma Stone will be as good :)
Eva Ernst, The Grand High Witch
Eva Ernst, better known as the Grand High Witch, from Roald Dahl’s famous 1983 fantasy novel The Witches, is the main antagonist in the book, and was portrayed by two people across two films: by Anjelica Huston in the 1990 adaptation, and Anne Hathaway in the 2020 iteration, both of the same name and based on this same novel. Besides the films, Eva was also portrayed by Tora Augestad in the opera version, and voiced by Amanda Laurence in the radio drama version.
Original version of the Witches will always be better imo. The "true forms" in the original were absolutely horrific, in the remake, they just looked too cartoony... which is probably better for the kids watching lol, they don't have to be scarred for life :D (though the mouse transformation scene was still quite horrific)
The new movie though... it's too scary for children and too disturbing for adults.
Lara Croft
This one’s a bit of a double whammy. Lara Croft was first a video game character, not a movie personality, but in both the games and the movies, she has changed. In the games, it was partly a natural progression of computer graphics, but the change was a bit more drastic in the tenth title in the series in 2013. The same happened in the movies: Angelina Jolie kicked it off in 2001’s Tomb Raider and continued in 2003’s The Cradle Of Life, and Alicia Vikander took over the role in 2018’s reboot.
I wish Jolie carried on as the last Lara Craft. Total Hollywood BS. Sexist producers want a younger, prettier actresses.......Harvey Weinstein.
They rebooted Tomb Raider because the game was rebooted.
Load More Replies...Jolie will always be Lara Croft. The new movie ok if you do not compare it to the early ones. Tomb raider was a game I sucked at greatly but I enjoyed it a lot even only exploring most of the time. I could spend hours at the mansion even if it was supposed to be the tutorial.
I hated Vikander's portrayal of Lara, but tbh it might have been the script.
Jolie was the best. I just wish they had done a couple more while she was young; though, she still looks great and...
I don't think either of them did very well at portraying Lara. The rebooted games made a more 'human' Lara but the film did not pull it off. The Jolie films were better stories but I wasn't keen on her performance.
I was really disappointed in the Vikander movie because the game it was based on was so good and there was a lot that they could have done with it. Jolie was awful but that's because the games back then really were pretty crap from a story and character perspective.
Load More Replies...I can't find it with a quick Google search now, but I have dim memories of a 1990s film of Tomb Raider, so Angelina Jolie isn't the first actress to portray her, if that's the case. Still, she was great, I respect and like her, but I was hoping to find out more about the very first one.
The first actress/model to portray Lara Croft was Rhona Mitra. She was the fleshy counterpart of our heroine but never appeared in movies of sorts, only commercials and comic fairs and so on. In some commercials is the "real" Lara (digital) appearing (did more than her actual "live" counterpart). Angelina Jolie is the first to portray Lara Croft in a blockbuster movie, even if Paramount's first choice was Ashley Judd.
Load More Replies...Carrie White
Carrie may be a comparatively modest horror movie franchise, based on Stephen King’s novel of the same name, but a significant one to have left its mark in film history. The series’ protagonist Carrie White was portrayed by Sissy Spacek in the 1976 original and its 1999 sequel. Then in 2002, Angela Bettis got the role for the 2002 re-imagining of the novel, and in the latest film from 2013, Chloë Grace Moretz was cast to play the film’s and novel’s namesake.
Yes! I actually thought she was very fitting, because she actually looked unusual and awkward (no offense at all!). Don't get me started on the Chloë version...
Load More Replies...Spacek was nearly 30 when she was playing a school kid and it showed. Moretz was actually a teenager and it showed.
Irene Adler
Being a long-lasting and legendary franchise, the Sherlock Holmes films and series have seen numerous changes in all regards. One of the more significant ones is the wide variety of actresses who played Irene Adler. Adler was only mentioned in one original story by Arthur Conan Doyle, but has become one of the most notable characters in the Sherlock Holmes series.
Now, seemingly the first possible visual representation of Adler was back in ca. 1882, particularly of actress Lillie Langtry, but the first credited appearance of Irene Adler in film history was actually in 1921’s A Scandal in Bohemia, where she was played by Joan Beverley. Sadly, the earliest picture that we could find was of Larisa Solovyova’s Adler from 1983’s The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson: The Treasures of Agra TV mini series, but even there, we see a stark contrast in how it was and how it is.
As mentioned, many women were in this role: besides the ones mentioned previously, there were also lga Edwardes, Liliana Komorowska, Anne Baxter, Morgan Fairchild, Charlotte Rampling, Anna Chancellor, Rachel McAdams, and many more. The latest live-action incarnation of Adler is Natalie Dormer in Elementary (2012-2019).
Margaret "Meg" March
Little Women has a bit of an interesting history to it. Originally appearing as a two-volume book written by Louisa May Alcott, the book was adapted into a silent drama film in 1918, which is today deemed lost—no longer known to exist in any archives or personal collections. In the 1918 version, Isabel Lamon played the role of Meg.
The earliest available Little Women film by default is the 1933 adaptation of the same name, where Meg is played by Frances Dee. Two other films came after this, one in 1949 and the other in 1994, where the role of Meg was played by Janet Leigh and Trini Alvarado respectively. The most recent one from 2019 starred Emma Watson as Meg.
cause it's Emma Watson most likely due to HP is more "famous" I don't particularly think she's a great actress, she's not bad but not one to brag about.
Load More Replies...why no mention of the 1994 version with Winona Ryder? That a brilliant film. The latest one not so much.
I don't understand why everyone raved about the newest one... It sucked, Jo and Laurie had no chemistry, I despise Pugh and her acting, and the costumes were all wrong. It was all so disjointed and badly written too.
Load More Replies...Little Women 2019 was an abomination costume-wise... also Emma Watson is not a bad actress but also nothing special.
Stupid book, stupid movie. Although I do have to say the 2019 version was not as tedious as the rest were.
Don't be salty and spout your incorrect opinions. Some people just have higher appreciations for literature than you do
Load More Replies...April O'Neill
Fun Fact: April made her debut as a computer programmer in the 1984 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles comics, but was later portrayed as a news reporter in the 1987 animated series of the same name. Talk about consistency!
It wasn’t until 1990 that the franchise got a movie adaptation. April was first portrayed by Judith Hoag, but just a year later, The Secret Of Ooze came out and Paige Turco took over, which was also the case for Turtles In Time in 1993. After quite a while—in 2014—April made her next physical appearance, played by Megan Fox, who was also cast in the 2016 Out Of The Shadows sequel.
Women in superhero tales can't be anything but magazine editors or reporters, it seems
Except for all the female superheroes and sci-fi and fantasy character (and there are TONS of them).
Load More Replies...Cleopatra
Cleopatra is another one of those female personalities that have many incarnations in film. And it’s not just films dedicated solely to her, but also films that include Cleopatra into the plot, like Asterix & Obelix: Mission Cleopatra (2002).
Throughout history, she has been portrayed by a number of actresses, including Claudette Colbert, María Antonieta Pons, Loray White, Janet Suzman, Helen Gardner, Anna Valle, Alessandra Negrini, Theda Bara, Vivien Leigh, Leonor Varela, and many more. Cleopatra’s earliest credited appearance in film was in 1912, played by actress Helen Gardner, while the most recent ones are by Alessandra Negrini and Lyndsey Marshal in 2007.
agreed, she's honestly the only one that sticks to mind and they don't even mention her. ridiculous.
Load More Replies...Miss Moneypenny
Everyone who is familiar with James Bond is bound to know Ms. Moneypenny. If not under this exact name, then at least under the names Eve or Jane—cause, you know, spy movies.
Anyway, throughout the years, several different actresses have taken on playing Moneypenny, starting with Lois Maxwell, who played the secretary in Dr. No from 1962. She’s actually made over 15 appearances as Moneypenny in various Bond movies between 1962 and 1985 and is considered the iconic face of the character.
Today, Naomie Harris has taken over as Ms. Moneypenny, having done so as early as 2012 for the movie Bond movie Skyfall, but has also voiced the character for the video game 007 Legends. In 2021, she will appear in No Time To Die.
My cat's name is Penny, so I call her Miss Honey Penny. She's too young to get the reference though...
I must have missed Mr. No. Is that a prequel before he got his doctorate?
Princess Diana
There are at least 40 unique movies about the British Royal Family out there, making it one of the most popular royals in the industry. And though Queen Elizabeth II has been the highlight of many of them, there is a surprising amount of movies about Princess Diana, whether it is about life or her death.
Catherine Oxenberg is one of the earliest to play Princess Diana in the biographical drama The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana from 1982. Many actresses have taken on the role of Princess Diana since then, including Caroline Bliss, Genevieve O'Reilly, Julie Cox, and Naomi Watts, among many others. And quite surprisingly, all of them looked just like the real person!
Emma Corrin is one of the most recent actresses to play the late Princess in the Netflix Original The Crown, but Elizabeth Debicki has been cast in the show and will take over in 2022. Kristen Stewart is also reported to play Princess Diana in the upcoming movie Spencer, which doesn’t yet have a release date, but is said to be in the filming stage.
Didn`t know Princess diana was a film caracter. I thought she was a respected actual person...
I'm sorry - having blue eyes and a similarly blond hair cut DOES NOT make you look like Princess Diana. If any of them had been taller, maybe. They were all too short, & quite frankly, just didn't pull it off. Sorry ladies, you all kind of sucked.
Wicked Witch Of The West
The Wizard Of Oz franchise was first and foremost a children’s novel written by L. Frank Baum, that quickly became a cultural phenomenon that has spawned many movies, series, animations, comics, theater plays, and much, much more.
And though a lot of things have changed over the 120-plus years of its existence, one of the key characters who has changed the most is the Wicked Witch. Not only did the witch have a different name in many of the live-action adaptations, but the look has also undergone some drastic changes.
Starting in 1910’s The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, the Witch (named Momba) looked like a traditional witch. This continued throughout much of the series, including the famed 1939 The Wizard Of Oz adaptation where the Witch, now named Bastinda, is seen being green. Me green, me mean, right?
Well, all of that was completely revamped in the 2017 drama series Emerald City, where the Wicked Witch of the West (appropriately named West) now has no green skin and is quite a dark and grim-looking character in general, making for one of the most drastic transformations in film history.
It went from them trying to make her look super ugly to making her look... you know what I mean
I was just thinking that a lot of these characters have been ... "enhanced" so to speak. Unnecessarily in my view, but there ya go.
Load More Replies...She was a great actress and her story is really worth telling indeed... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hamilton_(actress)
Load More Replies...Anna, if you were asking where you can see this (I was wondering that too), it looks like it was on NBC at some point and was canceled. https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/emerald-city-nbc-series-cancelled-renewed-season-two/
Load More Replies...Alice
Lewis Carroll’s Alice's Adventures in Wonderland is a timeless classic that much of the world knows about—it has been translated into over 170 different languages, after all. And adaptations to other various media soon followed.
Alice first hit the screen in 1903 with the release of British silent film Alice In Wonderland, which starred May Clark, an actress turned cinematographer, as Alice. Throughout the years, the number of adaptations grew, reaching over 40 different live action and animated films and miniseries, and even a ballet!
The most recent manifestation of Alice is the fantasy drama from 2020 called Come Away. It isn’t an Alice in Wonderland film strictly speaking, but rather an homage to Peter Pan and Alice In Wonderland. Regardless, Alice is there and she is played by Keira Chansa.
The one in the middle is a classic mini-series from the 80's.
Load More Replies...Ahem. Tim Burton's masterpiece with Mia Wasikowska as Alice was amazing
Really bad adaptation. The whole thing is a slap in Lewis Carroll's face. Why oh why did Tim Burton change the story?? It's ridiculous
Load More Replies...I'd say a 35 year old man, not 10 year old girl. Very weird choice of actor/actress.
Load More Replies..."Alice" and "Looking Glass" were NEVER meant as children's books. They were biting political satires based on the politicians and royal family members of the day. Like many political satires (Gulliver's Travels, in only one of many), they were destroyed by Disney, and whatever we see on film now has NOTHING to do with the reason they were written in the first place.
Completely forgot Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland and Alice Through The Looking Glass.
Okay? And? She's a fictional character, which means anyone can play her. She wasnt based off from a historical figure. Please take that negative energy somewhere else.
Load More Replies...Here's another one...Mrs. Coulter from The Golden Compass(top one) and His Dark Materials(bottom one). Ruth Wilson(bottom one) is by far the best psycho villain actress in my opinion, that I hate and love her for it. Mrs-Coulte...ae-png.jpg
Ruth Wilson's acting was exceptional, I couldn't take my eyes off her. So much anger, pain, hurt, defiance written on just her face alone. No words needed to be spoken. It was just a perfect performance.
Load More Replies...I was expecting Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace, Rooney Mara and Claire Foy) to be on this list...
Wow. I've seen some trash articles on here before, but this is just world class dumb.
No premise here. Actors aging naturally or different performers entirely. So what?
the point is to show how the character changed over the years.
Load More Replies...Hail Princess Diana, one of the best 'female characters' of all time!
Here's another one...Mrs. Coulter from The Golden Compass(top one) and His Dark Materials(bottom one). Ruth Wilson(bottom one) is by far the best psycho villain actress in my opinion, that I hate and love her for it. Mrs-Coulte...ae-png.jpg
Ruth Wilson's acting was exceptional, I couldn't take my eyes off her. So much anger, pain, hurt, defiance written on just her face alone. No words needed to be spoken. It was just a perfect performance.
Load More Replies...I was expecting Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace, Rooney Mara and Claire Foy) to be on this list...
Wow. I've seen some trash articles on here before, but this is just world class dumb.
No premise here. Actors aging naturally or different performers entirely. So what?
the point is to show how the character changed over the years.
Load More Replies...Hail Princess Diana, one of the best 'female characters' of all time!
