People Are Sharing All The Signs That A Movie Is Going To Be Terrible, And Here Are 30 Of The Most Accurate Ones
Interview With AuthorYou grab your giant tub of delicious crispy popcorn (salted, not sweet, of course) and with a wide smile on your face, you take a seat in one of the red velvet cinema chairs. It’s been ages since you’ve seen a movie at the cinema and you’re practically vibrating with happiness!
The previews are always awesome, but then the movie starts and… oh, sweet Jesus no! It’s--it’s terrible. Yuck. You should’ve seen it coming—there were plenty of signs after all. And now you feel like you’ve wasted your money and time. Oh well, at least you’ve still got your popcorn, right?
You’re not alone if you’ve started mentally collecting all the telltale signs that a film’s going to be a waste of your time. The folks over on r/AskReddit have shared their own red flags that a movie is bound to be awful and we invite you to scroll down and have a read. Got any other signs that they missed but you’d love to share? That’s what the comment section is for, dear Pandas! Meanwhile, let’s check out these horror movie signs and pick out the most accurate ones.
I had a lovely and in-depth chat about the line between good and bad movies with redditor Thats_What_Sh3_Sa1d who is an aspiring filmmaker and who created the viral thread in the first place. They told Bored Panda that everyone's responses helped them get a sense of where quality does and doesn't lie.
"I wanted to create this thread because I want to make movies myself, and I thought that if I could get some of Reddit's opinions on what makes a bad movie, then I could get a better sense as to what makes a good one. I had wanted to get at least a little bit of attention so I can get some answers to what makes a bad movie, but I didn't expect this much attention," they shared. You'll find our full interview with the original poster below, so be sure to read on.
This post may include affiliate links.
When they need to save the world, but it's just America....
Yes. Just like calling American domestic sports competition winners 'world champions'.
Load More Replies...When every single alien event happens in the US. That's why I really like District 9.
US movies focus on America? Shocker. Go watch some non-US content for variety.
Chinese films are China Based. German films are German based... but, on this site, whatever insults the US is a pass it seems.
Load More Replies...Yes and if there are other countries it’s only America that has the solution (see Independence Day with those godawful British soldiers).
Not really, srly, is might be eye rolling, but it doesn't make it a bad movie
We know from COVID-19 that the USA is useless. Any film about the US saving itself, is now officially fiction
Which alien-invasion movies have you seen that aren't "officially fiction"?
Load More Replies...If they show a map of the world in a disaster movie and it shows hot spots where the thing is happening we never get a red dot (Ireland)
When you've basically seen the entire plot of the movie and all main scenes in the trailer.
Yes, they show every funny joke, every epic showdown, every plot twist in trailers out of fear the audience wouldn't watch it, but actually it makes watching the movies obsolete.
Load More Replies...All the best scenes—-especially the best jokes if it’s a comedy—-too.
I feel like a lot of movies tend to repeat a certain joke in many of their trailers, to the point in which it's not as funny in the movie itself anymore. An example I can think of is the movie "Soul". It was an excellent movie, but they used the whole "You can't eat pizza as a soul" scene in what felt like every damn trailer.
Load More Replies...I don't know if we can blame the trailers for that....the source material was bad to begin with. Teenage me loved that saga...adult me sees how bloody creepy it was.
Load More Replies...The first movie's trailer pretty much did, too. They showed the scene where the theater flooded, FFS!
Load More Replies...Right? I tend to avoid watching trailers these days for this very reason, and hope that many of the trailer scenes aren't even in the actual movie/are shown out of context.
The people who do the publicity have heard this complaint many times, their reaction is, "We don't care, our only job is to put asses in the seats on opening night."
It has anything to do with Steven Seagal.
Disagree. Under Siege(1) was the good egg.
Load More Replies...There are bad movies including Steven Seagal? I think they are hillarious! Steven Seagal vs Tommy Lee Jones in Under Siege is just awesome: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDaBg56pU2k
if you just listen to the last half of the youtube footage of Steven Seagal vs Tommy Lee Jones in Under Siege it sounds like people eating in a posh restaurant with all the cutlery on the go.
Load More Replies...Completely in agreement on this one, it always surprised me how there were so many movies with this actor as the main character.
Steven Seagal vs Tommy Lee Jones in Under Siege is just awesome: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDaBg56pU2k
The thread, started up by redditor Thats_What_Sh3_Sa1d, quickly grew in popularity. At the time of writing, it had gotten over 49.2k upvotes in the span of a single day. What’s more, it got a whopping 21.7k comments. And that proves that redditors really do care about what they watch. (And, let’s be honest… who doesn’t like complaining about the movie industry from time to time?) Keep in mind though, even awful movies can have some merit. We’ve all been there—a movie we’re watching is so mind-numbingly bad that at some point it starts to be good.
In redditor Thats_What_Sh3_Sa1d's opinion, the dialogue and all of the various movie effects help determine whether the project will be a success or not. "I'm not exactly a movie critic, but I will say that the line between a good and a bad movie depends on dialogue, whether or not the lines that characters say to each other makes sense or contributes something to the film, whether or not the CGI or maybe the VFX looks good or not because that really makes an impact on a movies likeability, at least for me," they said.
"And of course if it has a good back story, if it's really going to catch your attention, that also plays a part in a movies likeability," they added.
The preview shows a girl who’s Just Too Focused On Career to find love going back to her small hometown for whatever reason.
Male writer: how do I tell women finding a husband and being a wife is the most important thing in a woman's life...I know, Romantic Comedy with Holiday themes!!!! Women everywhere: yaaaaaay!
Another red flag I notice are the actors as portrayed on Movie Posters. The above is a great example! Without even having a clue of what the TV show or movie is, I often look at the poses of the actors and you can see on their faces and body language "who" their character is. Always the Tough Guy, the Overweight Buffoon, the Sex Pot Bitch, the Sweet Happy girl-woman, the Stern, Capable Female who is just as capable as the Boys, the Drunk Goof who will come through in the end, the crabby old guy who really as a heart of gold...etc. Zzzzz. I make a game out of reading the body language and expressions. I figure if movie or show has to try this hard to put it all out there and show you the stereotypical beings of their stereotypical roles, it's going to be a dog of a movie. Heaven forbid you just figure it out as you watch, and the characters are multifaceted, interesting and don't have to explain the whole thing using 1 photo.
How many times I've started a movie showing a strong independent woman with a great career only to end up with a husband and kids in the end... it's disappointing if the movie is not advertised like this and is focusing on the woman so you really don't know where it's going....
Or they shake it up with a guy who's too focused on his career, finding love in the hometown he didn't want to go back to.
She inherits her great aunt's home. Her father is being sued by his florist neighbor. Her employers want acquire the quaint..... and turn it into a high rise.
When the main actors name is bigger than the title on the poster.
On book covers it's just to cash in on the popularity of the author. You probably wouldn't pick up a book called "The Tommyknockers" unless it was written by Stephen King. As an author, I guess you know you made it when they write your name bigger than the title
Load More Replies...I don't want to sound contrarian, because I know the actor name is huge, but you can tell that the movie title's font is a tiny bit bigger.
Madonna's name is smaller than the title. Measure it if you don't believe me.
The original film was pretty intense... With Giancarlo Gianinni & Mariangela Melato. This one with Madonna was terrible.
If the whole synopsis is a terrible idea, like making a movie about emojis
They didn't even try to be subtle about the fact that it was just a 1 and a half hour long advertisement.
The LEGO Movie knew what it was and didn't try to take itself too seriously. Those kinds of movies can be a lot of fun. When it's done in a more cynical way, the cynicism outweighs the silly fun and it just becomes painful.
Load More Replies...I personally thought the emoji movie was cute. Downvote all you want, but that’s just what I think.
Now I actually liked that movie, so I guess the bar is just set really low 🤷
See Mr. Show's "Coupon: The Movie" (search on youtube or something - bonus because it's got Saul Goodman in it)
I have 3 movie-loving children and I can assure you this wasn't as bad as Trolls.
I was curious to get the redditor's take on whether we all instinctively know whether a movie is going to be a waste of our time or not. In their mind, it all depends on the audience in question. "I personally like action movies, but I also like a little bit of romance, so if I was going to watch a movie about the history of a company, for example, I would think that it would be a waste of time. Whereas some people might think the exact opposite."
As for why filmmakers tend to make the same mistakes over and over (and over) again boils down to their lack of taste which they may not have fully developed yet. "The people making the movie either don't know what makes a good movie, or they think that a bad movie is a good one. Now again, I'm not saying that I'm a movie critic and I know everything there is to know about film, but I, and most people I think, know a bad film when they see one, and maybe some people don't. And in my opinion, for the situation to be able to change, the people making the movie should be informed as to what makes a good film rather than what makes a bad film," they shared.
When it’s a Disney remake. Solid.
Not just Disney. Remakes in general. I don't mind it when the original movie dates from the dark ages and no one heard of it, but when it came out 2 days before...nope. And then we have the remake of the remake of the remake...Aren't there enough books out there to get some inspiration?
They're targeting the box office attraction that they got previously and I muss say its not working, we are tired
Load More Replies...I came here to say that! I agree about remakes but Aladdin was the nice exception!
Load More Replies...I wish they would stop making mediocre live action remakes of their classics. The new Mulan is such a dry, soulless, designed-by-committee film. Nothing like the animated film.
It's not a terrible movie, just has very few similarities to the animated film, making it decent at best,
Load More Replies...Counterpoint to "all remakes are bad": There have been dozens of good, worthy remakes, where the director has another take/makes other points about then-current society. True Grit, Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978 remake!), some Godzillas, Scarface, The Magnificent Seven (almost as good, and different, to Kurosawa's). And of course, Hitchcock remaking his own film 20y later, better (The Man Who Knew Too Much). And Cronenberg's The Fly!! There's dozens of versions of Dracula, and the best are the second ("Nosferatu") and Coppola's 1992 version. Little House on the Prairie? Anne of Green Gables? War and Piece? Of most classic books there's multiple good versions.
Yessss! I love the classic Disney movies. I love the animation, the attention to detail, characterization in many of them and the hand drawn images. I hate the Disney live action versions which strip the movies of their magic. Lion King itself is a great example of that. Simba is so animated and expressive as a cartoon character that a CGI lion just cannot be. The thing with Disney is that they've lost most of their creative and immensely talented people. They lost them because they stopped caring about originality and creativity. Now they only care about profits and they are cashing on the element of nostalgia that the older Disney movies generate. Every other year, they repackage some old movie and destroy its authenticity because they can't be bothered with working hard. The original, hand drawn movies would take years to complete but they were masterpieces for a reason. You can see the labor of love in them.
Or a remake with the genders reversed. I'm looking at you Ghostbusters 2016
Remakes, or as Yogurt calls it "The search for more money". No new or novel ideas for a movie? Just do a remake! It's like movie by committee just doesn't offer spontaneity or originality...
If there are multiple trailers for a comedy movie, but they use the same joke in all of them.
I love the movie the cat in the hat, used to watch that ridiculously silly movie a lot when I was deep down in hopeless depression. It will forever mean comfort to me and I'm not ashamed of it!
My sister says the same thing about specific movies she watches over and over on days she's struggling to feel ok. I get it.
Load More Replies...
If the character points out something that is blatantly obvious. IN A WORLD, WHERE ONE MAN, HAS TO SAVE THE WORLD. Man: ‘I have to save the world.’
In a world where The Evil Scissor Lords reign supreme. 'I have to save the world' - The Rock
Yes!! I was watching a trailer of a corean tv show where a woman saves the man! I was excited to see it but in the end of the trailer it seems that she saves the man cause he is the only one that can save the world🙄
Load More Replies...Something very interesting that redditor Thats_What_Sh3_Sa1d pointed out to me was movie directors may not be at fault for making bad films. "A film can be bad just because it's bad," they told Bored Panda, pointing to 2017's 'Justice League' as an example.
"Justice League 2017 was not the best movie out there. It was so bad in fact, that they had to re-make it. And the remake was a lot better than the original because it had different directors/ However, just because it was better, doesn't mean that everybody liked it. I'm sure there were people who didn't like the better remake for whatever reason. And that's what I mean when I say a film can be good or bad despite the director," they shared that there's far more nuance involved than we expect. And reality is far from black and white, just like the view on the silver screen.
Blatantly bad re-casting to the point where you wonder if it would have been better to just drop the character (Mummy 3)
Also, the trend with movies and movie sequels reviving protagonists. It's like: "We have run out of plot ideas, let's just kill and revive one of the main characters." I just want to scream: My God, Jesus was a one-time thing, stop recreating it.
If you don't plan on having the full cast throughout a trilogy. STOP.
Load More Replies...Agree. Rachel Weisz was awesome in the role of Evie. This casting was also important because it broke up Brendan Frasier's marriage. He went off with Maria Bello and left his wife hanging in the breeze.
Oh, I was so mad about that one. Rick and Evie were such an iconic couple, they should not have tried to recast her. That movie was so bad...
They had zero chemistry between them and that horrible English accent doomed this movie!
Load More Replies...Yes! Mummy 3 wasn't bad but the fact that they recast Evie just made it horrible. They should've just used archive footage of her and killed her off. Or just had her doing her own thing in some other country while the McConnel boys got themselves into trouble.
In all my life I have only ever walked out of a movie twice. And one of those movies was The Mummy 3. I should have asked for my money back while I was at it. >:(
When the person re-cast can't quite manage the accent of the original cast member.
I thought this particular movie sucked, but maybe it has to do with the fact that I simply can't stand Maria Bello.
Critics did not receive an advance screening in order to write a review. It means the studio is hoping to at least recover an opening weekend of ticket sales before word gets out.
Honestly, what critics say never matters to me so I don't check they have to say. Movies they rate crap I have actually enjoyed and movies they rate supreme I couldn't watch for 10 min so they are useless to me. I think with critics it's like horoscope effect if you read your horoscope before starting the day you will find thing to prove it right throughout the day and cling to any little thing that resembles happing according to it. If you read it at end of the day you will laugh at it. Same thing if you read critic first you already made up your mind how movie is going to play out. Now even if you watch it you will not enjoy it.
Critics pretty much always receive an advance screening but there are different embargo times, so they're not allowed to publish the review until the embargo is lifted. Some dude actually found a decent correlation between embargo times and movie ratings (both critics and viewers).
He is one of my favourite actors and he is brilliant in his films.
Segal always has that borderline "almost-Hernandez", but not Hispanic-enough look going. You wouldn't buy a used car from him, but also wouldn't buy guns, either, just in case he's undercover.
If Adam Sandler is in it.
That's bullshit... he might have shitty movies at times, but he's got fun movies as well... people hate on grown ups, but that thing was fun
Yes and Uncut Gems is brilliant (as is Punch Drunk Love). Just because he’s made a few duds it doesn’t mean they all are.
Load More Replies...c'mon - i get its not to everyone's taste - but Happy Gilmore is brilliant.
I enjoy many of Adam Sandler movies, he has had a few flops like Jack and Jill, punch drunk love and little Nicky but he does have some good ones. A few of my faves are big daddy, blended, grown ups, wedding singer, Billy Madison and 50 first dates.
I really cannot fathom why I like "Little Nicky"...but I do. At least when I watch it, I don't feel ripped-off like I do when I forget how truly awful "Yellowbeard" is (what a waste of a fabulous cast).
Load More Replies...Nah, can't do Adam Sandler like that. He makes goofy movies, that's the point. No one is expecting an Oscar contender from him (except Uncut Gems). His movies are those that you watch just to laugh.
It's just a shame when it doesn't get to the laugh part
Load More Replies...There are "Adam Sandler movies", which suck, and then there are" movies with Adam Sandler", which tend to be pretty good.
sorry, but Happy Gilmore, Billy Madison, and Little Nicky are funny. every. single. time.
TBF. I really liked him in 'Click' and 'Pixels'; he was pretty good in them and they weren't bad films.
i loved the longest yard and the waterboy. big daddy was good too his amazing classics tho happy gilmore, billy madison, wedding singer, 50 first dates and little nicky
That's unfair. If Adam Sandler *wrote* it is a better criteria. As an actor he's made some okay films.
People will laugh at me but I liked that hubie Halloween movie on Netflix. I grew up watching his movies so they're nostalgic to me
Load More Replies...Whether the creators of the movie were self-aware or you learn to find the humor in the bad taste, either way, you inexplicably start enjoying yourself. It doesn’t happen with every gosh darn bad movie, but when it does, it’s magical. It’s a cult hit. It’s something you recommend to your friends.
The secret to bad movies being good, according to Uku Tooming in ‘The Puzzle of Good Bad Movies’ published in the Journal of Aesthetic Education, is that they give filmmakers a chance to experiment with the artistic possibilities of the project more than if the film were more mainstream. In other words, good bad filmmaking is intrinsically linked to the freedom of artistic expression.
So while many (probably most) bad films will remain truly amazingly awful because of how unadventurous and downright boring they are (who likes blatant exposition? Nobody!), a small handful might become cult classics because they dared go where others didn’t.
Reviews state that it's "Scariest"/"Funniest" movie of the year. It rarely is
And adverts where people are giving soundbites about the movie after it’s finished. Shut up Karen and just go home.
Load More Replies..."#1 Comedy in the nation!" ....yeah, 'cause it's the ONLY comedy out right now.
Isn't that every movie ever made. Every movie trailers have words like those or similar like "most captivating story of all times" "A must see". Same as all detergents being "x% extra strong compare to leading brands" Who the heck is leading brand and if your product is x% strong why aren't you leading brand?
My favorite quote used is "The most terrifying movie since The Exorcist" meanwhile I'm trying to keep myself from falling asleep.
Or "#1 Movie in America". I feel like every new movie is the "#1 Movie in America".
When I can tell how it's going to end by just watching the trailer.
Or when the narrator of the trailer tries to speak in a hyper-badass voice sounding like he's on the toilet having a hard time releasing the load. You pretty much know that he's trying too hard to make a boring no-plot movie appear suspenseful and action-packed.
😂🤣😂 "tries to speak in a hyper-badass voice sounding like he's on the toilet having a hard time releasing the load." This is exactly how ads for tools or beer are made in Germany.
Load More Replies...That is annoying, but a trailer that doesn't show anything isn't better.
Load More Replies...I'm happy to just watch the trailers because the last, oh, 37 Tom Cruise movies just seem to be extreme close ups of his giant nose, giant nostrils, or his hair blowing in the wind.
Mission Impossible, while being played by a complete bad-actor jerk IRL (Scientologist cult-leader), has proven it is NOT impossible. Tom Cruise cannot land an acting job unless he is either the producer or director as well. This says a LOT about his acting, and even more about his misguided ego.
Disagree, just because you know how it'll end doesn't mean you can't enjoy the journey, story, and characters that bring you there. Look at Titanic, nobody walked into the theater thinking the boat would make it to harbor. Predictability doesn't make a story bad, and endless twists don't make one good.
That one ended with Tom Cruze becoming a scientologist. Really bad ending to any story.
At least when I watch it on TV I don't have to leave the house to watch it.
When the advertising is "[Famous movie] meets [Famous movie]"...
When Harry Met Sally Meets Shrek... (dinner scene plays with Shrek climaxing)
This goes very high on my list of things I wish I hadn't read 🤢
Load More Replies...From the creators of... and... (aka this movie sucks but here are our references)
So true. The ad is trying to say: "This is a knock-off of _____ and _____"
The female lead gets naked in the first 10-15 minutes.
You know they were already running on fumes for plot, so out come the ta-tas.
can't we just get rid of movie sex scenes all together? I mean, they're kind of lame and everyone can look up internet porn if that's what they want to see?
It depends how they're interpreted and between which events. For example, the film Parasite, without that scene, it wouldn't be the same. Also, okay, this is about comics and animation rather than film, but Maison Ikkoku and Rose of Versailles had them played out very well.
Load More Replies..."That's bullshit, I did not hit her, I did nawt! ...oh hai, Mark!" The Room might be a terrible movie, but at least it's endlessly quotable. XD
This. Sometimes, if the first 5-10 minutes shows an explicit sex scene for NO REASON, I'll start hunting for something else to watch. It's like the writers decided that X-rated sex, violence, or foul language is the only way to grab folks' attention. It's a cheap ploy.
What's really distressing is how often that works.
Load More Replies...Yeah! And you almost never see the male protagonist naked (except Viggo Mortensen in... I forgot the name of rhe movie)
Or Ewan McGregor in just about every movie he ever made.
Load More Replies...Then you would have to think every Mila Jovovich movie is bad... Some are pretty good.
I've never seen The Room, it's bullshit, I did not see it, I DID NAWT.
An exposition in which one character explains everything that's going on to another character that should already know what is going on.
The picture does not work, though. Spaceballs is one of the greatest parodies of all times.
Hey it was spaceballs before! I didn't notice at first they'd changed the picture to aquaman
Load More Replies...Bad example picture. Kal Drogo lived on land so would have no idea what was up in abusive Ariels world.
It stars Amy Schumer.
There are a couple of movies that look appealing based on the story line but Amy Schumer plays a lead role and put me off. I actually find her extremely annoying. Kinda the same way I feel about Will Ferrell.
I've intentionally watched a few of her stand-ups to see what the big deal was and found myself hardly laughing. Getting up on strange and being vulgar and telling us about your vagina isn't funny.
She copies material from small comedians... she is the worst comedian.
Load More Replies...I have never liked Amy Schumer- she is next level nasty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W3wNnTMyo4
Amy Schumer has become the antidote to comedy. Even Netflix has relegated her to cobweb-corners of the very, very end of your scroll-searches.
A comedian who hasn't been funny in ten years stars in it and plays multiple roles. (Looking at you Sandler, Murphy, and Myers)
This is something that will most likely get downvoted... but some comedy will be liked by black people and not white people or asian people and vice versa. For example, Norbit was very popular with my group of friends in high school but if you check online with a different demographic, they hate hate it
Yup. Comedy tends to be situational. Just because the majority of the world thinks [comedy movie] is awful and unfunny doesn't mean that there won't be a group that finds it hilarious.
Load More Replies...Must be just me but I love anything from Will Ferrel or Adam Sandler.
They have been always funny, perhaps the audience intelligence changed?
Not always. Depends on what humor you like and what kind of character they are playing. Some comedians are great in more serious roles.
I'm not arguing with the fact that when they play all the roles, it usually won't end well. But Eddie not being funny for 10 years? Well... Did you see his SNL return? Or Dolemite? Then again Sandler and Eddie are not even in the same ballpark. Not even at their peaks, then Eddie was miles ahead.
Right. Coming to America Part 2 wasn't as funny as the first part either.
If it starts with a sex scene.
But yet,"Bridesmaids" did and it was pretty funny!
Load More Replies...Yeah, they're bad if they don't, like ta hell with the plot, let's get to the action!
Load More Replies...Not so much a sex scene, but, Whiteout with Kate Beckinsale. First, the promos made it seem like a scifi movie. Second, it starts with her walking through an Antarctic camp, getting to her room, stripping down, and taking a shower. Served no purpose but titillation.
...or if the trailer show an aereal view of New York with a trending song.
Starts with too much exposition: "Mary, just because you have a medical degree from Harvard, I'm still your older brother!"
Wait....so you're only still her older brother because she has a medical degree? That sounds like an interesting enough premise to me.
Um. Clearly, they mean that even though she is highly educated, he knows better because he's her older brother.
Load More Replies...You may have a medical degree from Harvard, but I'm still your older brother, so let me lecture you on crap I read on Reddit proving that vaccines cause terrorism.
Any movie with Tom Cruise sucks. Well the movies themselves do not suck, many have great plots/writing etc, but Cruise sucks as an actor. All he ever does is play the same role he played in Risky Business in different outfits. You know an actor sucks when he buys the rights and produces a movie like Jack Reacher, when the character is supposed to be like 6' 4" and 230 pounds of mean fighting muscles and stars in it himself when he is 5'4" and 150 pounds.
Tom Cruise one of my favourite actor loved him in the remake of the Mummy
When the opening scene involves a shoot out with so many cuts you litterally cannot see what is happening, or who is shooting at whom.
And ‘bad guys’, even though they are trained in weaponry, are COMPLETELY unable to fire a shot on target. But the ‘good guys’, who, more often than not, are naive in the handling of guns are surprisingly good.
Basic Instinct is legendary though... It started with a sex/murder scene...
I often rant at the screen, wondering why producers spend SO so so much money on the CGI and stunts but they use undercranked cameras that are choppy or cut so fast you don't even know what you were looking at.
Who was it that said the funniest battle would be stormtroopers vs. red shirts. No one hits their target, but everyone dies anyway.
When they hype the movies soundtrack more than the film it’s self
Ex. Suicide squad
Huh uh, stop it right there! Suicide squad was a brilliant DC movie (even thou marvel always smacks on movies)
With musicians like that working on the soundtrack, I see why it got so hyped. In my opinion, it was worth it.
It is a really good soundtrack though! Same with Cool World.
Load More Replies...
If it's from the studio that brought you, "insert decent movie here". Dreamworks still milks Shrek.
What?? Dreamworks make plenty of other good movies, not just Shrek. Madagascar, The Croods, How to train your dragon and Kung fu panda just to name a few.
If anything, they should be flexing Kung fu panda (RIP Master Oogway).
Load More Replies...Not sure about this one, unless the new movie and the referenced one are clearly very different. It is generally a clue that they are going for the same vibe / feel as that movie.
Shaky cam and quick cut editing. Jumping over a fence? 20 quick cuts. Take it or leave it.
"Taken" series. That's why John Wick is so cool, it's one fluid shot most times
John Wick is a great series of movies but for me it's because he was motivated by the murder of his doggo. The Taken series were good - Liam Neeson is a legend - but not as good. Probably because he was motivated by the kidnapping of his rather whiny daughter instead. Sometimes the quick cuts and shaky camera add to the frantic nature of the scene or build tension. It's not a deal breaker for me. The original Blair Witch Project (1999) was a perfect example.
Load More Replies...Or the entire film is shot without a key light. All the scenes are drab.
I HATE shaky cam. I hate split-second cuts almost as bad. They do not increase action or tension -- they f*****g RUIN what could otherwise be a great action sequence. Steadycam was invented for a reason.
Disagree. Fight at the cornucopia in the hunger games uses shaky cam and adds to the tension of the scene
Load More Replies...Add: - Paper-thin depth of field. They're so determined that you look at one specific thing, that everything else is fuzzed out. I have to close my eyes. - Talking at level 2, normal things at level 5, and every annoying and harsh sound at 11. I have stopped watching possibly good movies because of this crap.
"Get ready to see ____ back in action in the big screen!" This line is used in many bad movie trailers of old properties which are made into movies
Better than Scorcher 4 but not as good as Scorcher 10.5
Load More Replies...
ANY movie made that stars Melissa Mccarthy where it happens to also be directed by her husband. She is incredibly funny and extremely talented as is he when they're acting. But when he's in the director's chair, It always spells out "doomed-to-fail."
I don't know if he was the director for Spy but that was hilarious lol Also...Jason Bateman is always a win.
Spy was AMAZING! I couldn't stop laughing it was so hilarious!
Load More Replies...Yes. Their movies are awful. I was subjected to "Thunder Force" recently and. . .my God.
Or Milla Jovovich starring in a movie directed by her husband, Paul W. S. Anderson. Actually all of his movies are bad.
It's an edgy reboot of a children's property that stopped being relevant a decade ago
I’m still pissed about that. Absolute garbage, and the books gave them so much to work with too.
Load More Replies...What about Transformers? ... Oh, sorry, that stopped being relevant at least 20 years ago.
Like how The CW Network is doing with Powerpuff Girls. Anyone see the leaked script for the pilot? Good lord.
It's been in production for too long.
There's always a reason, for a recent example; 'Chaos Walking'. It changed screenwriter, director and production company so many times over 10 years but was sold on it been "A Charlie Kauffman movie starring Daisy Ridley and Tom Holland". Kauffman left in 2013, Ridley and Holland filmed it over years due to so many reshoots and failed screenings. Then Lionsgate said the negative reviews were shocking to them.. Really??
Typically Yes, but not always, IT was in production limbo for years but it's still today the highest grossing horror movie. Also Mad Max Fury Road. I never saw it but I understand it's very good. Jurassic Park IV was in limbo for years until it developed into Jurassic World. Look at the Avatar sequels. Obviously there's no way of knowing the quality yet, but they've been postponed 8 times over 11 years.
Exactly, like many in this list, it is an indication that something *might* be wrong, but it isn't a death knell for the property. For every "we've got to just get something out to recoup what we spent on this disaster" there is another "director was difficult and took longer than budgeted/etc, but their vision paid off". Sometimes that's even the same movie.
Load More Replies...It's called "Development Hell". Such as Akira, Crow (reboot), Gambit, Sandman, Beetlejuice 2... the list goes on. Previously Ghostbusters 3 was on the list. I wish it has never left the list.
High RT critic score, low audience score
But it's a good sign it's for pretentious wankers: even its intended audience was surprised how bad it is.
Load More Replies...High critic score, high audience score, high gross box office amounts, 0 oscars! Oscars must fall, really
I disagree with this one completely. Apocalypse Now was a brilliant movie that critics gushed over...but audiences hated, largely because they expected a gung ho "America First" war movie, not a developing existential crisis. (Do not, however, watch the Director's Cut. Yikes.)
This post is about the site Rottentomatoes. Audience rating for Apocalypse Now is 94%. Critics rating 98%.
Load More Replies...This one is super sketchy. I'd say just watch it and find out yourself. There are definitely times where I side more with critics and vice versa of course.
#31 If they take some children fairy tale and make it more "adult".
I never watch a movie that critics praise. I guess my taste doesn't jive with their taste. I always wait to hear reviews from the public who paid to go and see it.
When the trailer gives away the twist or climax of the movie. Remember that Terminator movie where they reveal **** was a terminator in the trailer? That’s when I knew I wasn’t gonna watch it.
Casting a star that has long been retired and can't remember how to act.
The most recent Terminator movie undid what we had been told ever since the first film regarding Skynet and John Connor.
I hated it for that. I was so excited to have Sarah Connor back, but it sucked to see all she suffered through made pointless, leaving her to exist in misery just so the franchise can score "woke" points by replacing John with a woman of color. Which is doubly stupid when you consider Sarah Connor, the actual main character, is already one of the most iconic female characters in film, so what was the point anyway? Yay girl power, f**k good storytelling?
Load More Replies...What really messed up this particular Terminator movie, in addition to others, was how they tampered with the storyline. Terminator 2 follows Terminator, Terminator 3 follows Terminator 2, there's another Terminator that I've never seen, then Terminator Genesis follows Terminator 3, then this one follows Terminator Genesis but completely ignores everything that happened past Terminator 2. It could have been a good movie with Linda Hamilton reprising her role, and Kyle Reese still being alive, but old, since in Genesis, they opted not to have John Connor just in case he ended up turning bad, as he did in genesis. And then everything else about the story would have made sense. The Arnold Terminator would still be there, and perhaps Linda Hamilton would be calling it Pops. But they screwed it up so many ways from Sunday that ... it was just horrible!
The biggest issue was that they twisted the original story to a same story... if that makes any sense the movie will
That happened with the Terminator Salvation trailer and the films general marketing as well. Whoever is in charge of marketing these films needs to be fired.
It also happened with Genisys, the trailer revealed the John Connor is a terminator twist. So it seems to be a recurring issue.
Load More Replies...
If it's being released in January. That isn't the case every time, just most of the time. January is basically the cinematic dumping ground month.
I'm guessing too late for a possible (if any) Oscar nomination and, being just after Xmas, audience levels would be low because money is tight.
Coco was released in November, Spider Man in December.
Load More Replies...When they try forcing memes into it. It's either cringe or so outdated that it just looks stupid.
An early example of this would be the "Jitterbug" musical number from the 'Wizard of Oz': It was cut because of running time and deemed that it would date the film.
TIL that! Wow, that would be cool to see, I wonder if there's any footage kept of it? You know lots of cool facts (I remember you helped me with the petrichor thing too)
Load More Replies...I feel like a good example of a movie that did this without coming off like they're going "We're still relevant, dammit!" was "The Mitchells vs. the Machines". Part of it probably comes from the fact that the meme references were sparse and from 6+ years ago (so intentionally outdated), and didn't feel too forced in. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for one of Sony Pictures Animation's movies from July 2017...
If it opens with a narration starting with, "I know what you're thinking..." It just screams desperation from a crowded writer's room.
Showing what is obviously the best part/climax in the trailer. If it isn't strong enough to catch my interest with the lead-up, it's likely gonna suck.
It’s not likely it’s gonna suck, it’s guaranteed it’s gonna suck.
Whenever they start promoting their movie by constantly comparing it to one of the all time greats in the genre. If you are a fantasy movie and you have to state in the advertising that you are great just like Lord of the Rings, it makes me think you're movie is probably shit. Because you are not LOTR.
Can't watch LOTR either. All because of the scene on the way to Shelob's lair. Frodo would NEVERsend Sam away. Gollum would NEVER NEVER touch the lembas bread, since it was made by Elves, and Sam if he was sent, would never have even started to leave. DON'T EFF WITH THE CHARACTERS! I refuse to ever see The Hobbit, or anything else directed by Peter Jackson
If there are too many celebrities in the cast
Agreed! Everyone in that filmed was AWESOME in the part they played. I think All star ensembles or either really bad (Movie 43) or super good (The Usual Suspects or Saving Private Ryan)
Load More Replies...I have to disagree with this one. If the actors are talented and fit the roles, then it doesn’t matter if they’re unknown or super-famous.
There are a few exceptions to this one... "It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World" is a prime example of a movie with an insane number of famous comdians and actors appear, and it's got to be one of the top comedies. Ensemble casts really can work, there are just some really bad ones that stand out...
Robert Altman??? The ensemble cast (of celebs) is his consistent motif and he is a revered director and auteur.
There are some disappointing spectacular misses that this statement applies to but there are more well packed movies where the cast has a great chemistry and everyone knows their character and how they fit into the story. Tarantino films do this but there are a plethora of others that this statement is more personal opinion then generalized.
If the character points out something that is blatantly obvious
Or using million times recycled paradoxical phrases such as a psychopathic mass murderer telling the righteous, justice-loving vengeful protagonist: "You and me, we are the same..."
Or magically pulling the big resolution to the problem out of their ass (One I just watched: Fear Street Part One 1994) In my defense, I played it for background noise while trying to nap lol)
It's clearly being released in a desperate attempt to capitalize on a different studio's success. (WB keeps trying to rival the MCU with DC films but their meddling repeatedly ruins them, also the Divergent series trying too hard to be Hunger Games).
DC have such good source material, but they decided to go crazy with the "gritty" approach, and made aquaman (the guy is a standing joke to most DC characters) before the flash or a decent superman film. Green lantern could have been good, but no. Wonder woman was mostly good, but then the sequel...??
WW was pretty poor IMO. Speaking of knowing right away that a movie is going to be bad, it was when all the Amazons had to put on a weird accent to match Gal Gadot. I also find that MCU usually seem to hit the right tone both with humour and in the more sincere moments. I found that WW failed on both counts. And considering that it's supposed to be the best of the current DC batch, I think I'll give the rest a miss.
Load More Replies...I loved the Divergent books (great characters, interesting storyline) and they massacred it. I was sitting there watching it, and I was like, "Alright, I get it, Tris, you're too edgy."
DC is soooooooooooooooooooo good with cartoons and Marvel is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo good with films, period!
When the narrator sounds bored.
oooh, exception to the rule - theatrical cut of BladeRunner... Yeah the DC (and Final Cut) was WAY better without Ford's VO, but the original version is still awesome with it in
I must confess that I prefer the theatrical release of Blade Runner. Sorry.
Load More Replies...The amusing thing is they all seem to miss the real warning signs: "From the producers of..." i.e. the people who paid for something that turned out good once, not the ones who actually made it. "From the minds behind..." again.. nebulous people who were somewhere near the production that made something good once, or referencing the original author who had nothing to do with the film.. looking at you Stephen King. Spoiler filled trailers are nothing new, even for superb films. Watch the trailer for John Carpenter's The Thing (1982). When they front load a movie with an expensive opening 15mins it's to get more investment money.. "Here look what we can do.. if we get more money" doesn't always mean it will flounder.. but disjointed productions that stop n start rarely land.
I'm the biggest King fan ever, and more of his movies suck than are successful: Pet Sematary, The Running Man, Maximum Overdrive, the Carrie remake, The Dark Tower, the original It (the new one is better but still not great) etc etc!
Load More Replies...When critics call it “delightful”
critics should critic themselves honestly, I am starting to suspect that those people always watch other movies to critic the best movies in town.
When they try adding a irl trend in the movie, it's just cringe
Yeah, Like the IRL trend of actually having common sense. Why do the people in the horror movies have no sense at all?? 😒
If Bill went up to the attic and didn’t come back, so Hank went up to the attic and neither of them came back, so Hilda went up to the attic and nobody came back, I am not going up to the attic. I’m calling 911 from my locked car which I have driven three blocks away.
Load More Replies...When one villain wasn't enough to make a movie, so they shoehorn in multiple half-arse villains instead.
Sometimes two villains can work (maybe I'm wrong, but I liked Batman Returns), but it had to be done right. Three villains is a death sentence
It can work if the minor villains are treated as such: Into the Spider-Verse, for example, regulated Scorpion and Tombstone to henchman status, while keeping Kingpin, Doc Ock and Prowler as strong characters still not stepping on each other's toes. On the other side, you have Spider-Man 3, with Sandman and Venom just tripping each other up PLUS Junior Goblin's poorly-planned story arc stumbling to its conclusion as Sam Raimi once again gets bored with his already-shaky franchise.
When the characters say the title of the movie less than 20 minutes in.
Cop:"I don't like that stuff in my town, I'm a family guy." Peter: "Hah see he said it!" One of my fave episodes of family guy lol. Oh no now i said the title!
When the commercials all have one or two word reviews.
This is questionable in books, as well, when they advertise reviews that are just one word, like "Refreshing", "Magical" etc.
As my mom used to say "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all" Smashing!
Starts with a ridiculous amount of exposition
They release the first 7 minutes of the movie weeks before it's released, and it's so glorious you just know the rest of the movie will definitely live up to that teaser. (I'm looking at you, new Mortal Kombat movie...)
I agree with the exception of Synder's Dawn of the Dead (2004 i think). They did the 1st 10 or 15min as a Fox promo for the movie & it was awesome! Psyched us all up!!! The movie is still a favorite of mine too!
has too many of what unknown critics say on the movie poster or trailer
Regardless of how one feels about the movie itself, always beware of phony critics with an agenda. Does that sound insane? A critic in my local paper trashed a movie with a certain political leaning; he wasted a LOT of space trying to make a big deal about the director's "German sounding" name. A year or two later I remembered the article and, on a whim, looked up the reviewer's name online. Well, I TRIED to; no one of that name ever wrote anything else before or after that one review.
When the movie was supposed to be a drama and they changed it during filming to a comedy.
When it's a mainstream movie about Time Travelling. ALWAYS missed the point and are irrational! i.e: Avenger Endgame, Terminators "reboots", Looper,...
Terminator 1 and 2 are mainstream movies with Time Travel, the Time Machine, Endgame, About Time are all great movies.
Terminator 1 and 2 ... okay ( I wrote "reboots"),. [Endgame]: all plot is bull***t. At the beginning "oh, we must not encounter Thanos from the past nor kill him, because paradox... at the End: kill Thanos" [Time Machine] nice, based on a book... perhaps it is a special point to the rule. [About Time]: no real time travelling
Load More Replies...I liked 'Primer', but generally all Time Travelling films have too many plot holes and are convoluted.
Agree. It is not forbidden to like movie with plot hole...
Load More Replies...Time travel is great as a fancy effect - but when it's the literal plot it tends to get dragged out the back and violently butchered.
DONT YOU DARE TOUCH ENDGAME BECAUSE THERE IS NO MOVIE ON THIS ENTIRE PLANET THAT DISTINGUISHES TT BETTER THAN IT, OR ANYTHING. AVATAR HAD TO BE RE-RELEASED TO BEAT ENDGAME IN BOX OFFICE.
For me it's when they call it a "comedy" but all the humor is just sex jokes.
I'll take sex jokes over 'lets all laugh at the awkward person' movies.
Load More Replies...Is it just me or do 95% of the movies nowadays just suck? I can remember back in the 90s you can almost guarantee to have 5-8 excellent films a year. Now you are lucky to get 1.
Movies get made by accountants now. They only allow films that they think will make money to be made. That's why reboots, movies based on comic books or games, and bad copies of other studio's movies dominate.
Load More Replies...I feel like a lot of this post was just ripping on good movies. A lot of the movies mentioned here, I personally thought were really good!
You know it's going to be bad when they turn a harmless animated movie into a cursed live action movie that scars everyone for life (yeah i'm looking at you PINOCCHIO).
Yes, why can't people leave animated movies be? They are lovely, not everything needs to be live action
Load More Replies...If a couple's relationshio is based in a "little lie" you know the last 10 minutes of the movie is an exibition of selfless doings to win the other ine's heart again.
For me it's when they call it a "comedy" but all the humor is just sex jokes.
I'll take sex jokes over 'lets all laugh at the awkward person' movies.
Load More Replies...Is it just me or do 95% of the movies nowadays just suck? I can remember back in the 90s you can almost guarantee to have 5-8 excellent films a year. Now you are lucky to get 1.
Movies get made by accountants now. They only allow films that they think will make money to be made. That's why reboots, movies based on comic books or games, and bad copies of other studio's movies dominate.
Load More Replies...I feel like a lot of this post was just ripping on good movies. A lot of the movies mentioned here, I personally thought were really good!
You know it's going to be bad when they turn a harmless animated movie into a cursed live action movie that scars everyone for life (yeah i'm looking at you PINOCCHIO).
Yes, why can't people leave animated movies be? They are lovely, not everything needs to be live action
Load More Replies...If a couple's relationshio is based in a "little lie" you know the last 10 minutes of the movie is an exibition of selfless doings to win the other ine's heart again.
