So guys who wear pants are busy sexualising their bodies, highlighting their legs, curves and rear ends? Awesome logic

Everything sexualizes women when you are that horny

Dude, have you never seen a man that works out a lot in a pair of well fitting trousers?

So he means leggings wouldn't sexualise men's "body parts"? Or is the real meaning "men own their bodies, female bodies are public property"? Also, great answer lol

Uh and pants don’t specialize men’s bodies?? Pants also highlight men’s legs, rear ends, and penis bulges. Unless they’re so saggy that they look like a baby who pooped his pants.

Trousers were worn by both sexes around the 6th century BC in Iran for horse riding. It is possible that it dates back further than that, but this is the first recorded instance of trousers/pants.

No pants, so you want me to walk around in my underwear?

Says the Victorians putting clothing on piano legs to reduce the effect of all that unbridled lust.

Yeah, nothing to see in the crotch department on a man in jeans.

Does he think that skirts and dresses don't highlight those things?

they were invented for women. Skirts were for men. Think about it. It makes more sense.

Even Jesus cringed in heaven from this post

That dickhead has half a brain.

In other words: Let's guess which of MY body parts controls MY entire life. I can't even walk outside without thinking about sex.

This comment has been deleted.

The same applies to men. Pants accentuate their butts, legs and other things. So maybe no one should wear pants....

Funny thing is that women were often told by people who weren't used to it that they "looked like a boy" when wearing pants.

What is this guy, Ancient Greek or Roman? They thought Persians were sissy's for wearing pants lol.

Was this dude born in the 1800's?

Youse the one thinking that legs, butts and curves are sexualized.

Men in short skirts and tights (with the bulge fully visible) was the height of fashion for *years.* I'd like to see this dude try it.

Normalize both pants and skirts for everyone and anyone

Oh yes because everything about a woman needs to be sexualized. Why right for women if it's not pants? Anything else shows you legs, so I would assume those would be worse in thai mindset.

Is this man talking or woman?? Cos I'm hella confused

Incel

Ancient romans considered pants as barbarian :-)

I dont understand his logic. What about wearing pants s3xulizing woman? A skirt or a short dress show more than a pant? Also longer dresses who are right show the womans figure. I could understand him (not agree with him though) if he said the same about skirt and dresses but pants? Nah dude.. As the person commented under, I believe no woman want him and instead of thinking what he can change to be more attractive, he chose to play the victim and talk down about all woman. I can see why no one want to date him. He dont sound like a nice guy...

Nobody will flick me?

bUt It'S cOmFoRtAbLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

well, he has a point--pants DO call attention to ones legs--whereas a caftan doesnt

They do the same thing for men, thank God. 😁

Why assume that women want to be "modest," however you define that term? Perhaps women want to wear clothes that are functional. Years ago a woman rep from IBM came to my workplace and fell on the ice. She was wearing a skirt because IBM did not allow its woman employees to wear pants.

It’s not them, it’s you.

You need therapy!