Prince Harry is set to receive the Pat Tillman Award for Service at the 2024 Excellence in Sports Performance Yearly (ESPY) Awards on Thursday (July 11). However, the decision to award the Duke of Sussex with the prize created in honor of NFL player-turned-US Army Ranger Pat Tillman sparked outrage.
Mary Tillman, the mother of late former Arizona Cardinals safety-turned-US Army soldier Pat Tillman, heavily criticized the ESPY Awards’ choice, as she was allegedly not consulted.
- Prince Harry will receive the Pat Tillman Award for Service at the 2024 ESPY Awards, sparking controversy.
- Mary Tillman, Pat Tillman's mother, criticizes the decision, calling Harry a 'controversial and divisive individual.'
- Mary claims she was not consulted about awarding Harry and feels more deserving candidates exist.
She told The Daily Mail on Sunday (June 30): “I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award.
“There are recipients that are far more fitting.”
Prince Harry is set to receive the Pat Tillman Award for Service
Image credits: Karwai Tang/WireImage
“There are individuals working in the veteran community that are doing tremendous things to assist veterans.
“These individuals do not have the money, resources, connections, or privilege that Prince Harry has.
“I feel that those types of individuals should be recognized.”
The award is given by the sports TV network ESPN each year to a “person with a strong connection to sports who has served others in a way that echoes the legacy of the former NFL player.”
Image credits: espn
Among notable recipients, Manchester United star Marcus Rashford was awarded the accolade in 2021 after helping raise millions of dollars during the COVID-19 pandemic to help feed children in England.
Set to be hosted this year by tennis legend Serena Williams, ESPN announced its list of nominations and recipients last week.
“It’s our privilege to recognize three incredible individuals — Steve Gleason, Dawn Staley, and Prince Harry,” Kate Jackson, VP Production at ESPN, said in a press release.
“These honourees have used their platforms to change the world and make it more inclusive for marginalized and suffering communities, demonstrating incredible resilience, positivity, and perseverance, and we’re thrilled to celebrate them at The 2024 ESPYS.”
He will be awarded at the 2024 Excellence in Sports Performance Yearly (ESPY) Awards on Thursday (July 11)
Image credits: ESPN
ESPN said the 39-year-old noble was being honored for his “tireless work in making a positive impact for the veteran community through the power of sport” with Invictus Games.
The Games is a multi-sport event held for wounded, injured, and ill servicemen and women, and it has been running since 2014.
But backlash has continuously grown since the network’s decision, as a petition was created over the weekend demanding ESPN to think again, claiming Harry had been “involved in controversies that call into question his suitability to receive an honor of this magnitude.”
The petition reads: “Awarding this honor to someone who does not reflect the award’s intent diminishes its value and disrespects Tillman’s memory.”
Image credits: Columbus Ledger-Enquirer
Royal commentator Angela Mollard told Sky News Australia on Sunday she felt it was a bit odd the award was going to Prince Harry, despite his work creating the “amazing” Invictus Games.
She said: “The fact is, this award is going to Harry … I am going with the detractors.
“I don’t know why these organizations – this is about sport, honor, and awards – and of course, Harry organized the Invictus Games.
“But I have a theory on this because this guy keeps getting awards and you are kind of thinking he is a bit adjacent to the actual topic that the award is being given to.”
The decision to award the Duke of Sussex with the prize created in honor of NFL player-turned-US Army Ranger Pat Tillman sparked outrage
Image credits: Tom Williams/Roll Call/Getty Images
The royal commentator then suggested some award organizations could be after extra publicity in bestowing honor on the Duke, as she claimed: “I think that these … awards want some coverage so they will give it to Harry one year rather than giving it to somebody who is probably a bit more deserving.
“Maybe somebody who in this case is American for a start.
“To be fair his Invictus Games is amazing but does it determine he should get this award? I don’t think so.”
According to an exposé published by the Daily Express in January 2024, Prince Harry served in the British Army for a decade, beginning his military career in 2005 at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst.
Image credits: The Times and The Sunday Times
He rose to the rank of Captain and undertook two tours in Afghanistan, first as a Forward Air Controller and later as an Apache helicopter co-pilot and gunner.
The dad-of-two’s service led to his involvement in veteran support initiatives like the Invictus Games. He retired from active duty in 2015.
As per the Pat Tillman Foundation, Patrick was selected by the Arizona Cardinals in the seventh round of the 1998 NFL Draft, becoming the team’s starting safety and breaking the franchise record for tackles in 2000 with 224.
Following the attacks on September 11, 2001, Pat enlisted in the U.S. Army with his brother, Kevin.
Mary Tillman, the mother of late former Arizona Cardinals safety-turned-US Army soldier Pat Tillman, heavily criticized the ESPY Awards’ choice
Image credits: Gene Lower/Getty Images
Pat and Kevin joined the U.S. Army in 2002, committing to a three-year term. They were assigned to the second battalion of the 75th Ranger Regiment in Fort Lewis, Washington.
The brothers served tours in Iraq during Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003 and Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom in 2004.
On the evening of April 22, 2004, Pat’s unit was ambushed as it traveled through the rugged canyon terrain of eastern Afghanistan.
His heroic efforts to provide cover for fellow soldiers as they escaped from the canyon led to his untimely and tragic death via fratricide.
“What a shame,” a reader commented
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Harry was well-protected when he did his tours, being more of a millstone for the troops there due to his status, and also got up to some shameful shenanigans while there. He participated in racist name-calling among other things. And I do think an American award should go to an American vet.
Well, there have been American recipients of the Victoria Cross (as an example), so I'm not too on board with the "American awards for Americans only!!!" part, but I do think Harry wasn't exactly a "distinguished" serviceman during his service. He doesn't deserve the award on THOSE grounds, not because he's British.
Load More Replies...
Ok, I should point out that quoting anyone who appears on Australia's Sky News is a daft idea, as Sky "News" here in Australia is our version of the USA's Fox "News". It's nothing but rage-bait commentary, populist hatemongering, purile "analysis" and fear-spreading garbage.
Harry was well-protected when he did his tours, being more of a millstone for the troops there due to his status, and also got up to some shameful shenanigans while there. He participated in racist name-calling among other things. And I do think an American award should go to an American vet.
Well, there have been American recipients of the Victoria Cross (as an example), so I'm not too on board with the "American awards for Americans only!!!" part, but I do think Harry wasn't exactly a "distinguished" serviceman during his service. He doesn't deserve the award on THOSE grounds, not because he's British.
Load More Replies... Ok, I should point out that quoting anyone who appears on Australia's Sky News is a daft idea, as Sky "News" here in Australia is our version of the USA's Fox "News". It's nothing but rage-bait commentary, populist hatemongering, purile "analysis" and fear-spreading garbage.
-18
33