Join the Fun!

Owiella Freddie 6 years ago

well, it DOES say "hastily prepared." I'm not sure they were referring to the food!

0points

Robert Williamson 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Gayle Bynum Cardosa 6 years ago

I mean it's no wonder our mothers and grandmothers grew up with this attitude. It was everywhere in their society.

9points

Jordan Fire Star 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Kathleen League 6 years ago

According to Logopedia website, that logo is from the 2007-2017 period, later than the 'original' ad purports to be from. So, seems something more was photoshopped than the 'reversed' ad. http://logos.wikia.com/wiki/Hardee%27s

7points

Robert Williamson 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Analyn Lahr 6 years ago

I haven't seen one of Carl's Jr/Hardee's burger porn adds in awhile (you know, the ones with the sexy women models). Maybe they wised up about how stupid those were.

7points

Connie Martin 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Connie Frances 6 years ago

The ad was later and meant as a slap to those "good old days" so this is a take off on a take off not realizing it was a take off!

4points

Connie Martin 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Anouk 6 years ago

Is this a Trump-endorsed ad?

4points

Simonne 4 years ago

Probably.

0points

anarkzie 6 years ago

Apparantly this company is still getting it self in trouble with sexist adds, It's "name our holes" and "More Than a Piece of Meat" campaigns have drawn criticism from feminst.

3points

David Toh 6 years ago

The worst part of this ad is that the purpose is not clear. What does Women dont leave the kitchen have to do to bringing customers to Hardees.

3points

dire wolf 6 years ago

Look closely and you'll see that sexism and racism are both HUGE parts of Carl's Junior/Hardee's ad campaigns to this day

2points

Marnee DeRider 6 years ago

Very interesting! Can you point to an example?

0points

Kristi Zoebelein 6 years ago

That was not Hardee's logo. The star came from their merger with Carl's Jr. in the late 90s. They wouldn't also describe their own food as "sloppy and hastily prepared".

2points

Carlos Dearmas 6 years ago

The best is the butt.

2points

LoneWolfie 6 years ago

The first ad enrages me so much!! >:(

1point

Lisa Greene 6 years ago

Only problem with this is... he isn't barefoot and pregnant!

1point

Jeri Cooley 6 years ago

His sink has no faucet..

1point

Diana Bodell 4 years ago

Remind me never to eat at Hardee's again

0points

Debbie Cooper 5 years ago

High heels, LOL

0points

Biana Weatherford 5 years ago

I really appreciate his kicked up heel

0points

Christina Sersif 6 years ago

idc how long ago this was, makes me never want to eat at hardee's again.

0points

Jude Daniel 6 years ago

😀

0points

Derpicorn 6 years ago

That’s add is just aweful!

0points

Trish Christoffersen 6 years ago

Sloppily and hastily prepared? Sheesh! I wouldn't go there whether I was single or not!

0points

Jackie Page 6 years ago

Why would Hardee's advertise that their food was "sloppy and hastily made"?

0points

Judy Hobart 6 years ago

I love it!!

0points

Marnee DeRider 6 years ago

Should have put him in uncomfortable shoes! Who walks around the kitchen in heels?! I guarantee you they did NOT do that in the 50s!

0points

Debbie Andersson 6 years ago

At least they´re honest with sloppy and hastily prepared...Mcdonalds needs to take notes on how to be honest.

0points

basson6 6 years ago

I LOVE the updated version!

0points

Michelle Line 6 years ago

Wow. The original ads were so sexist and belittling to women! How horrible!! (and the new ones are to men). I'm not sure I understood some of the Legg's ads, though. Standing on an animal skin with the head of a woman? What's that have to do with pantyhose? Anyway, I knew women were "beneath" men during this era, but oh... my.... gawd...

0points

dire wolf 6 years ago

At the time, L'eggs had begun selling men's dress slacks

0points

Joan Churton 6 years ago

I love these! I laugh out loud. The "little woman" in Raleigh, North Carolina

0points

Cynical Jester 6 years ago

Maybe would be really daring and original in the actual 1950s, in this day and age it is just another run of the mill 'girl power' thing. Something that has been force fed to us daily in the media since the 1990s.

0points

Leston James 6 years ago

The reversed one is therefore justified

0points

Jordan Fire Star 6 years ago

In the 1950s woman didn't work, only men worked. Woman cooked because they had to have some responsibility, if men didn't work and woman worked only I would expect men to do their job and cook food and stuff like that, its basic logic. Feminists want no responsiblity and to have the man to do everything for them.

-3points

A 6 years ago

The sad thing is, these ads are really sexiest. However, life isn't anywhere near like this anymore, so why did they feel the need to do this. Feminism is about eradicating and shaming men now, instead of trying to be equal. This is just sad.

0points

A 6 years ago

"Feminism is about eradicating and shaming men now" what a joke, you've never read a book on feminism, have you? You just learn things off the internet, like this article, and your assumption that "life isn't anywhere near like this anymore". my question, FOR WHO? not the majority, I can assure you of that. We all suffer under capitalism, but women have it worse, don't deny it.

1point

Larry Deavenport 6 years ago

Let them women go to work and deal with all that stress. I am retired after 40 years. My wife works and gets stressed out at her job, while I clean and cook with fewer worries. I even have time to relax and enjoy my hobbies now I wish I had known this earlier I would have sent my wife into the work force long before now.

0points

Jordan Fire Star 6 years ago

-1point

Brittany Harris 6 years ago

That's not Hardee's logo from the 50s. Was that really the ad copy? Hmm...

0points

Matthew Hyder 6 years ago

Sure a perfect housewife sounds nice but I don't think it should be enforced or a matter of it's the only thing their good at or that it's even that easy... It's like turning every woman into someone's personal maid. :p Also, I didn't know hardee's was that old. o.o

0points

Marnee DeRider 6 years ago

Not sure why you got down-votes on this. I liked your comment.

0points

Jarrod Lee 5 years ago

While you're at it, take good movies and replace the characters with women... oooo... nevermind.

-1point

Jarrod Lee 5 years ago

It's like those crappy movie reboots that replace good actors with a bunch of vaginas.

-1point

QUITTED BORED PANDA! 5 years ago

Still sexist

-1point

Robin Wu 6 years ago

Cool ad and the first one is true. The second one is a forced reality. Not sexist at all.

-1point

Patrick McKenna 6 years ago

are we done freaking out what was advertised 70 years ago? now, know that future generations will judge our current "perfect" society.

-1point

Jordan Fire Star 6 years ago

-2points

dire wolf 6 years ago

Saying that women didn't work in the '50s is beyond ignorant. Women have always worked. Granted, in the fifties most were confined to undervalued, stereotypical "girls' jobs" like teaching, nursing, secretarial, and the service industry. Oh, and anyone who doesn't believe that child rearing and the rest of the spectrum of domestic work isn't "work" should be taken off life support. The brain's dead and ain't coming back.

2points

Ann McNeil 6 years ago

This is an actual ad for Hardees from 1961- not fake. I could go for some "sloppy and hastily prepared" food myself sometimes. I think this is hilarious!

-2points

cayenne523 6 years ago

HA HA HA She has a sissy, not a man.

-3points

Brier Random 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Mont 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Adrian Ceroni 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Наталья Габовская 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Daniel (ShadowDrakken) 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

60's Ads

Final score:

150points

POST

Petra Christovová 6 years ago

Wow. This one is especially disgusting.

71points

60's Ads

Final score:

150points

POST

Daniel (ShadowDrakken) 6 years ago

Eh, this one is pretty demeaning both ways. Not cool in either case.

65points

60's Ads

Final score:

140points

POST

Alia Gail 6 years ago

just noticed the guy is a cow lol

95points

60's Ads

Final score:

128points

POST

David Toh 6 years ago

Nice touch to have the man wear tight clothes.

82points

60's Ads

Final score:

123points

POST

Kjorn 6 years ago

either way it's not ok. but people seem to be ok when the role are reverse and it's the men who are in that situation. people find it funny.

32points

60's Ads

Final score:

97points

POST

Ladies and Gentlemen 6 years ago

Damn, these are really sexist ads. I had never seen them. Glad to see things changed for good.

83points

60's Ads

Final score:

80points

POST

Anouk 6 years ago

She's holding a pooper scooper....bwahahaha!

84points

Dutch Swimmer Goes Viral For Super Revealing Trunks During 2024 Olympics: “Is This Legal?”

See Also on Bored Panda

Thrill-Seeking Diver Jumps Down Extreme Waterslide, Ignoring The Strict Ban For Women

60's Ads

Final score:

78points

POST

Michael Vickery 6 years ago

Who uses 750 dishes a month? That's 25 a day.

56points

#10

60's Ads

Final score:

69points

POST

Lynda Touart 6 years ago

Erm, those are tights, not leotards.

25points

Fascinated by music, movies and sitcoms, I'm passionate about social media and can't live without the internet, especially for all the cute dog and cat pictures out there. I wish the day had about 40 hours to be able to do everything I want.

Read less »

What do you think ?

POST

Lodogg 3323 6 years ago

If these offend you... you really won't want to see the ethnic and black ads from back then. Yes, by today's standards, they are offensive. It's called progress. As a society we've matured. We don't marry off our kids for dowry at 12 anymore, do we? No. Now go call your grandmothers and thank them for fighting for change.

91points

Lin Larsson 6 years ago

I don't have to thank my grandmother, she didn't do anything to make a change. It's quite the opposite, she never understood the movement, which is a whole different type of sad, really.

38points

Donna Morrow 6 years ago

Actually a lot of children are married off underage - 1 in 9 children are still married off below the age of 15. http://www.unfpa.org/child-marriage

6points

Patrick McKenna 6 years ago

while so many are offended and whine and complain about morays of decades past, future generations will condemn what we do.

3points

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

my grandma is dead thank you very much, and i find both extremes offensive, both posters are wrong, so...

2points

Biana Weatherford 5 years ago

thanks! perspective is important! I'm glad we find these offensive...and I'm grateful to my foremothers.

1point

Ruslan Nikolov 6 years ago

Thank you!

1point

Reni Playz and Says 2 years ago

"We don't marry off our kids for dowry at 12 anymore, do we?" Only royals did that. They have found the average ages at marriage for women during the Elizabethan, Stuart, and Hanoverian ages, and they are much higher than you think 1566-1619 27.0 years 1647-1719 29.6 years 1719-1779 26.8 years 1770-1837 25.1 years

0points

Legenda Aurea 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Mylah Rose 6 years ago

These originals are shocking! Such a good idea to do these parallels, and beautifully executed.

77points

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

both are wrong

23points

Carmen Elena 6 years ago

Shocking. Can´t believe those were for real.

43points

Hari Onago 6 years ago

True but we still have all those TV ads overwhelmingly stereotyping women as housewives: whether it is detergent or dish soap advertising, etc. as if it were women's responsibility alone.

55points

None 6 years ago

Woooooman, let me tell you about the advertisements telling women to clean their vaginas (you're reading right here, not vulva, vagina!!!) with Lysol!!!! And all ads were pretty much blaming the woman for destroying a relationship because she didn't keep her nether parts tidy clean (from a chance of babies as well, since Lysol was seen as a kind of contraceptive as well) ... Google about it, it's horrific!

5points

Marco Danelli 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Semi-transparent Panda 6 years ago

For the people whining that "both of these are wrong" and "this is degrading to men." That's. The. Point.

25points

Leonard Abs 6 years ago

It's not degrading to men. I don't the majority of men would be affected by this at all and any guys here complaining are just trolls.

2points

Pamala Knowlton 6 years ago

I’m of an age where I remember most of these ads. They’re not jokes or exaggerations. Women really were expected to be brainless, helpless, and happy to serve their husbands without complaint.

21points

Kelly G 6 years ago

Equality for all gender. Men love your kitchen and take care of your kids too. Hello Pamela

1point

Valerie Sinkavich 6 years ago

some places in our country, guys don't know those are out of date. they think it's still that way.

18points

Morgan Fisher 6 years ago

Yup. Like, the Whitehouse :-/

17points

Petra Christovová 6 years ago

Wow, those original advertisements are really disgusting. Quite shows at what position were women basically a few years ago.

15points

Bart Dierickx 6 years ago

True, and this was the position of many many men. Spoiler, it's no better. It's only better if we look at the top of the top of the topf of the iceberg. 800px-Dolc...9b8475.jpg

1point

Nina Wum 6 years ago

The saddest part is that advertisement for woman-oriented goods haven't really changed all that much. In the thisties it was "douse your ladyparts in Lysol or HE WILL LEAVE YOU YOU SMELLY CREATURE". Now it's much subtler, but the underlying message "get this product or no man ever will find you attractive" is still predominant. Just flip open any ladies' magazine and see for yourself.

12points

None 6 years ago

Not only Lysol was seen as a cleaning agent for those parts, it was also a contraceptive in a time when those were seen as a bad thing, so those ads were basically saying "if you get pregnant and he's not into it, it's YOUR fault because you didn't use this harsh chemical to kill all of his seeds inside you". Like, WTF????

2points

Cynthia McCarver 6 years ago

So revealing to read the comments from the men with hurt feelings. :-)

12points

Kelly G 6 years ago

Women has been partially treated and ignored since time past. Hi Cynthia

0points

King Old Man Bob 6 years ago

So revealing to read comments on how butt hurt they are that these ads were a thing. We men use to be f*****g drafted in wars.

-1point

Paul Osborne 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Jessica Joseph 6 years ago

Just remember that when Conservatives harken to the 'Good old days' and how happy they were, just remember this is what they are harkening to. Art reflects life. This is actually what life was like for women. They often got through it by drinking, smoking and scarfing down lots and lots of pills. Surely the men were happy but not the women and that is why the Women's Movement happened. It would have never happened if women were contented and fulfilled being treated like that.

11points

Reg Fife 6 years ago

That's like saying liberals all want to go back to the good ol' days of the hippies. No conservative I know of wants to see a return to keeping women exclusively in the kitchen.

4points

Jade 6 years ago

Crazy - both make me uncomfortable. They are both as bad as each other (I guess that was the point, of course). Unreal that these really were allowed!

11points

Cherie Barnard 6 years ago

These are infuriating af. I'm nauseated thinking that people actually thought this was okay and that women just accepted it. And that in some households this is still the norm.

7points

Annette Easton 6 years ago

For the people saying both are wrong, reversing it doesn't make it any better etc -- yes, that's the point. Because if you JUST look at the originals then you can think "oh my, wasn't society quaint back then" and *sometimes* the reality of exactly how wrong those ads are doesn't hit you. Until you do a gender reversal on them and then suddenly it makes it really clear for some people.

6points

Dean Leonard 6 years ago

Exactly.

1point

Louise Shippey 6 years ago

I am amazed (thought shouldn't be) at all the dumbos pointing out that both versions are ''wrong'' WELL OF COURSE THEY ARE !....so call yourself a feminist and get with the programme.

5points

Elizabeth Brothers 6 years ago

That last one shouldn't show the man nipples. We still have that little misogynistic societal rule that women can't show their nipples and have to wear padded bras to hide even the hint of them. While it's very acceptable for men to walk around without shirts on.

3points

Allie Love 6 years ago

this just made me sick....

2points

Jean-luc Picard 6 years ago

It was probably the wrong thing to do, but I had a chuckle. I tried not to overthink the whole situation and I certainly wasn't offended nor feel the need to offend anybody else. People need to chill a bit, I reckon.

2points

Nomadus Aureus 6 years ago

I remember in the 90's in my country almost everything was advertised with naked women. Car tyre? Nude. Electric heater? Nude. Even the effing bathroom tiles... It kind of suited the mentality of the majority back then. I remember asking the logic of it. An otherwise highly educated, talented and usually nice middle aged gentleman explained that it's because man pay for these things and when we'll be the ones paying, it'll be male nudes. Still looking for the tyre ad featuring a hunk. (please note the sarcasm...)

2points

anarkzie 6 years ago

It's kind of like over in here, in England in which some newspapers have Page 3, which is basically just a topless woman smiling at you when you turn the the cover, I never really occurred to me how odd this is until a friend of mine from another country pointed it, "Why do you porn in your newspapers?" me, "erm.....tradition...wait...I don't know"

2points

Nicu Buculei 6 years ago

I find the most amusing how in the last one (leotards) they photographer had to include the nipples and make clear is a guy.

2points

Gayle McDonald 6 years ago

No matter how any ads are made the are always going to be offensive to somebody, either by race disability, gender, weight, age, etc etc. They use shock tactics because it is what we will remember. We will never see advertising that is neutral all the time. The whole women should stay home thing has been done to death. Not many men can earn the amount of money it would take to be able to cover the costs of living and raising a family comfortably so women also have to try work. This means the woman had to be let out of the kitchen. shock horror.

2points

Anneke Kuilman 6 years ago

It’s not only about the money that women are working.

1point

Margaret Harper 6 years ago

These are really brilliant!

2points

Ben Mitchell 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Jus 5 years ago

They are all absolutely disgusting! Why would any woman agree to be part of this or to marry one of those a-holes?!

1point

Dannielle Sommers 6 years ago

love these. the role reversal is beyond awesome

1point

Derpicorn 6 years ago

I hate how sexist adds used to be! I’m so glad we aren’t like that as much these days... now if you’ll excuse my I need to print and burn some of these horrible adds! 😁

1point

Aron Reichardt 6 years ago

let's make none of both sides come true

1point

Sam Ramirez 6 years ago

might have been better if they got a man that looks like he could change a tire

1point

Martin Williams 6 years ago

The originals are beyond sexist - truly misogynistic. The remakes are funny and most of them work better than the original! As a man, the remakes don't offend me at all, whereas the originals fill me with shame.

1point

Jackie Page 6 years ago

So, Hardee's really advertised that their food was sloppy and hastily prepared??

1point

Vexor Shadewing 6 years ago

Honestly I can name several men and women who'd happily conform on both sides of this, but enough about my sex life.

1point

Poseidon Cheez 6 years ago

Oh my gosh how did these people not get that men and women do the same things if your a woman you dont have to serve your husband if your a man you dont have to serve your wife! A happy marriage is a couples cooperation

1point

Jerome Goodwin 6 years ago

How about ads where they are equal and help each other?

1point

Loretta D la Spriella 6 years ago

Everytime I see these old stuff I get indignation and feel bad for those women who accepted that life. What makes me laugh about the entire situation: some Men today say, that no woman and no man should be treated that way...

1point

Christa Cartwright 6 years ago

I'm really surprised anyone thought #6 was ok.

1point

Kelly G 6 years ago

I'm not. Christa

0points

Emily Bachy 6 years ago

I think we should stop dragging up ads from the past. It's the equivalent of poking a bear ready for hibernation. It's calming down, but now you have to wake it up.

1point

Susie Sheridan 6 years ago

That’s kinda like saying we shouldn’t recognize the sexism that still exists (#metoo) or the racism that still exists (BLM) because things are better now than in the fifties. We should know our history and how we got to where we are today. Bringing up history doesn’t cause the way things are today; it explains it.

8points

lib 2 years ago

Wow! We made these sexist ads sexist in a new way! Applaud our genius!!! 😒

0points

Jarrod Lee 5 years ago

Next we should take good movies and reboot them with women..... ooooooo... nevermind.

0points

Kururi.Orihara 5 years ago

I knew it was like this, but I never knew it was THIS bad!

0points

Thomassen Bart 6 years ago

They are not really offensive because they simply don't work as commentary on the gender or human conditions. The reason that such ads could be made in the past is because they reflected a reality, even if it was extreme. To simply reverse the roles fails due to the same logic. Women do occupy nor have they replaced men in the hierarchy. Men do not do house work, are not primary care givers, (with exception), do not stay home cooking etc...nor are they physically weaker and or concerned with traditionally female themes. So the whole thing is a no go.

0points

Vladimir Krstic 6 years ago

I get it but why did they make the man faminine? Hiow do you now see the irony?

0points

Kat Robin Shulder 6 years ago

this is moderately amusing, but it's sexist both ways. people are equal, not magically better than one another.

0points

Johnette Pace 6 years ago

The rug one... ewwwww

0points

Leroy Green 6 years ago

I found all of the alternatives entertaining, cute, and playfully erotic. I'd be proud to bring my wife breakfast in bed on my knees. Maybe she'll tie me up with her Van Huesen ties and spank me for the quality of my coffee.

0points

Amby Stanyer-Hunter 6 years ago

These modern ones don't offend anyone!

0points

Leasa Ryan-Janssen 6 years ago

Why did the male in the new copy ads have to be so effeminate? I would have made more of a point had the man been a typical masculine man. Also, that was just the way it was in those days. No one was offended as it just was. Most women wanted to be in the home and enjoyed their roles back then. The funny part was, men and women worked equally back then, he put in long hours and did the heavy lifting, she nurtured her children and made the home a place of health and well being for the family. Also, finances were shared and both had a goal of providing for the home and family. It wasn't all bad.

0points

Marius Dumas 6 years ago

The roles are already reversed much worse than that, we se ads of women kicking men in the nuts, men as buffoon with smart women who knows better. The ads against males today are brutal. I think this article still sells it way to short compared to what is out there. just imagine you change the roles of March and Homer Simpson, and see how we would react to stupid useless March. No my friend you are way to late to make any difference in what is already mainstream. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFZat3oIbhU

0points

Elena Mendiola Illescas 6 years ago

I think it will be more clever to do the new ones with sexist ideas towards men that are true, like men are the ones that get money in the house, or men can't cry etc..

0points

Billy Jackson 6 years ago

WoW some of those are pretty embarrassing to think we allowed that kind of thinking..

0points

Krieger Strauss 6 years ago

Yes but women are biological housewives this just doesn't work and serves as sarcastic humour to hide that fact.

0points

Elizabeth Brothers 6 years ago

0points

Jovy Jergens 6 years ago

Such a clever fellow and, as a woman who remembers the humiliation of and the discrimination against women of that era, THANK YOU!

0points

Kevin Minh-Sang 6 years ago

I masturbated to new ones to be honest.

0points

Connor Certa 6 years ago

This is just lazy and unimaginative. And, most importantly, they add nothing to the conversation whatseoever. The onlunreason why anyone would even remotely be speaking about these photographs is because they are paired with the legitimately shocking adds beside them. The photographs themselves are a weak attempt at social commentary. After all, can you really compare adds from decades ago with current gender expectations? Of course not. This is just pathetic.

0points

Brianna LaPoint 6 years ago

This is awesome. I mean people should never have had these ads, but cant unring that bell.

0points

Debbie Andersson 6 years ago

How did every woman not commit suicide or started cults in the deepest forests against men amazes me...I was boiling in my head already when a fellow archer ( a man ) didn´t take my archery skills seriously cause I was a woman.

0points

Vlad Sicoe 6 years ago

God, the originals are awful :O

0points

Jerome Goodwin 6 years ago

How about ads where they are equals and help each other.

0points

Néjib Ghediri 6 years ago

Except that these men look more like men playing women's roles than regular men. The photographers themselves couldn't see "real men" pictured like that.

0points

Maria Kyriakidou 6 years ago

if the roles were reverse and they broke stereotypes in new ads the working women shouldnt have all been wearing suits. the classic men's garment. they stilll hide stereotypes.....

0points

Jonathan Eatsalot 6 years ago

It's almost as if times change.

0points

Surbhi Bansal Halder 6 years ago

These were really astonishing and surprising and yes offensive too. I am glad I am born today and not in that era.

0points

Buzz Covington 6 years ago

This might have been relevant 50 years ago. Just sad and tired now.

0points

Redd Swain 6 years ago

I encourage you all to read an etiquette book. That will give you the realest look into the society these women had to live and follow. Men, too. Far more scary than these adds.

0points

im lost 6 years ago

Hey feminists are making its soon the case 65% of college grads are female ,men are in fact under the iron boot of social marxism & feminism

0points

Donny Meanie 6 years ago

It's...... just an ad. An ad from the 1950s. Why should anyone in 2018 give a s**t?

0points

Debbie Cooper 6 years ago

I am not offended because it was a very different time. These ads were very typical. I love to watch old TV shows and how women were portrayed, doing housework in a dress and heels. I was there when the "feminist" movement surfaced. Women burning their bras and such. I remember my parents, my father serving his country in the Air Force, not being able to find a place to live due to segregation. I remember Sambo's restaurants. Seriously, it was called Sambo's? And Anita Hill being ridiculed by congress when she complained of the inappropriate behavior and harassment she suffered under Clarence Thomas. Times have indeed changed.

0points

Kelly G 6 years ago

Let's have some time to talk. I don't mind

0points

Sarchis Dolmanian 6 years ago

Excellent opportunity to remember that 'two wrongs don't make a right'!

0points

Nani Thomas 6 years ago

Why do people say it's wrong on both sides? Everyone sees that it's wrong to do that to a man. It's doing that to a woman that people don't see as wrong.

0points

Brian Gibson 6 years ago

I liked the last one lmao

0points

Tyler Phillips 6 years ago

this is biased af

0points

Leonard Abs 6 years ago

Reversing the stereotype doesn't work in the slightest. It's visually interesting but not thought provoking to anyone born in the last 50 years.

0points

Kimberlea Abtosway 6 years ago

.... But I would be happier with a new hoover.

0points

Glenn Poignee 6 years ago

the absurdity of 60 year old ads...The absurd part is redoing them at all. It draws a contrast to something that simply isn't done anymore. That's absurd

0points

Lulli Viddo 6 years ago

We need more artworks like this

0points

Danny Archer 6 years ago

If there are guys out there who are offended by this in anyway, let me give some info. Feminists have pussified you! There is nothing particularly clever about this because the purported modern male stereotypes are simply not true while many of the 50s female ones still are. The ability to open bottle tops is still the domain of the man, for example. Why, I had to do it the other day on a bottle of squash for a friend's wife who is a financial manager. I really don't know any guy that is EXPECTED to stay in the kitchen and cook and clean. Those of us who do, do it because we either have no one else to do it or are sharing duties in the house. I really am not offended about these role reversal because they're not highlighting any real social structure for modern men whereas the 50s ads did regarding women. Let's have a photo series about divorced dads, homeless men, convicted males and juxtapose them against their female counterparts if you really want to get up nose.

0points

anarkzie 6 years ago

The originals are shocking enough, the role reversals does nothing for me, as a man I'm not looking at a man being told to stay in the kitchen and thinking "now I understand what women feel/felt" or "This is offensive". I think some feminist don't understand that times have moved on and that mens attitudes(in the west at least) have changed and so they do stuff like this to educate us but just leave us feeling that their fighting an invisble spectre from the past. The originals shocking, the updates meh.

0points

David Payne 6 years ago

The "Original" Hardee's ad features a logo they didn't use until they merged with Carl's Jr, in 1997.

0points

Paul Osborne 6 years ago

It was a different era, things that were acceptable then aren't acceptable now. In another 60 years things today will seem outdated.

0points

A dose of reality... 6 years ago

To imagine that these sexist photos were mostly accepted back then. I don't know if / why the reversed pictures should be better or help change anything...

0points

Monilip 6 years ago

they are not better, that's the point. They are just to show people, by comparasion, how bad these ads were

1point

Mikko Karjalainen 6 years ago

Even today we see ads that on purpose paint the other gender as simple, weak or stupid - who just needs something (like a product) to succeed (or do better) at certain place (like home, work etc) or task? People back then in the 60's were not stupid! We are, if we take these silly ads seriously.

0points

Karla Thompson 6 years ago

I think we should all stop and give a big kudos to the male model in the “after” ads. He problem felt super uncomfortable but was willing to do it for the sake of humor and social commentary.

0points

Karla Thompson 6 years ago

*probably (dumb autocorrect)

0points

Morgan Fisher 6 years ago

I am just wondering why the "hidden" messages here were hidden? I was expecting them to be extremely violent, obscene, racist, etc. They are just unpopular and received some "minus" votes, it seems. Is that a big problem?

0points

Ben Mitchell 6 years ago

It's automated

0points

Cenk Karaferya 6 years ago

Shocking...

0points

makki 6 years ago

Now days I feel like men are the ones women are being sexist towards! let the past sit and the future continue

0points

Bradley Auerbach 6 years ago

I've always thought of what that kind of parallel universe would look like! What about switching the roles of races or gender preferences?

0points

Sancha Fung 6 years ago

I wonder where we saw them. Like are they actual ads that were on newspapers or just comedic fun?

0points

Connie Martin 6 years ago

I don't see the point of this. Does someone really need to see men in parallel positions to know these attitudes are wrong?

0points

Nancy Massi 6 years ago

Love this

0points

Lena Tuszewska 6 years ago

BRILLIANT

0points

Yvonne Gacheru 6 years ago

Me thinks these models might not be as good (acting wise) or as we illustrated as the females.. You must consider the talents involved in 20s-50s print Ads, considering these ads are renderings of an artist based on great acting/modelling and some great editing to furnish a slogan. Not every Ad from the time would be thought provoking when gender reversed. Challenge yourself Author.

0points

Yvonne Gacheru 6 years ago

Sorry *'these male models might not be as good (acting wise) or as *you illustrated as the females.

0points

Leo McKinnon 6 years ago

Where is the ad for barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen ?

0points

Sunako 6 years ago

Wow..

0points

melissa brown 6 years ago

wow

0points

Kjorn 6 years ago

either way it's not ok. but people seem to be ok when the role are reverse and it's the men who are in that situation.

0points

Betsy Braddock 6 years ago

I agree that it's not okay, but I completely disagree with the rest of what you said, the point of these isn't to say it's okay to subjugate men, it's simply to point out how wrong it is by providing a parallel depiction.

35points

BERT 6 years ago

I don't 'like the result' because it's trite and unoriginal. Howa bout the artist use their noggin and think up something new. I recall a recent female comedy sketch that went viral. They went all Led Zeppelin on the male construction worker catcall. Here's how they did it. Ready? The women construction workers. Wow. Hilarious. That being said. Funny is funny. Kristen Wiig, Tina Fey, even Amy Schumer I like. Another good example was Jan Hooks. She placed her angst on TV/Media that feed us with glorified B.S. rewarding marginal effort/talent. Watch her scene in Pee Wee's Big Adventure. Or her SNL sketches 'The Sweeney Sisters. There was always anger behind her characters enthusiastic facade. A grade.

-1point

Stephan Riediker 6 years ago

why don't you also reverse the gender roles in sexist advertisements in which men get raped, slapped or sexually harassed by a woman and the audience is expected to laugh about it? I'm wondering what the reactions about this would be.....

-1point

Jerry Mathers 6 years ago

The before pictures are "Great America" trump was referring to.

-1point

SlyNine 6 years ago

Men don't really give a s**t. We see much worse ways men are depicted by media.

-1point

aaron bur sir 3 years ago

oh really. How? Because man can go to court for grouping someone and become president. So go f**k yourself

0points

Yioryos Ninjitsu 6 years ago

Of course some men are not gonna like them you idiot..If anyone at all remotely liked them it really would be disturbing. These ads are sexist as f**k! Why would you ever want to revert to such a twisted time in history is beyond me....There was a time when Hitler ruled the Germans, which tortured and killed many Jewish people. Would it be ok with you if at this day and age the roles were reversed and we saw Jewish people gashing Germans?! ''Photographer reverses victimhood roles in nazi Germany....and some Germans are nooot gonna like it''.....what the actual f**k dude xD. Twisted f***s...the whole point of history is to help us move forward, not repeat it like some f****n brainless meatbags!!!

-1point

Gage Franke 4 years ago

Relax, dude. No one wants that. It's not meant to be taken seriously.

0points

JohnnyandRebecca Jones 6 years ago

when this country lived with these values divorce wasnt over 55% drug abuse was not where it is now and there was alot more respect for ones elders and their parents

-1point

Von Awesome 6 years ago

Divorce was less common because women in the 1950s were completely dependent on their husbands. They had no money, education, or careers of their own and thus couldn't support themselves if they left. Thank guy in the sky that this "stay together for the kids" mentality is on its way out. As for "respect", people often had to show it because they'd be beaten if they didn't. There were no rules against corporal punishment like there are today; violence should never be an acceptable response for anyone or any age or gender.

1point

Tammy Hubatsek 6 years ago

Back then, it wasn't considered "sexist". It was just how things were. I found it much more offensive when my role as a wife, mother, and homemaker was belittled and made to appear as not important, or lazy, or worse, not as hard as it actually is. I took pride in what I did and I don't need any liberal woman (or man) trying to convince me otherwise.

-1point

Bart Dierickx 6 years ago

Every ad is insulting, 'cos we view it with today's glasses. But I think these are an oversimplification of history. And sure those values are out of fashion and we shouldn't bring them back! But the reality was not that women their place was in the kitchen, and the men were free to choose. For most families the reality was women stayed at home - they had no choice-, and men had to work s****y jobs -they had no choice. Many men worked jobs that significantly reduced their life expectancy and quality. Just to provide for their families. Only a small small percentage of men were able to have glamorous careers and enjoy higher education. Today we have no choice. We only have the illusion of choice. Either gender must work outside the home and bring our children to day care. Many parents don't even witness the first steps and words of their own children. Careers ain't worth that price of admission. Ps: I am dreaming of encountering a woman that earns so much I can stay home with the kids

-1point

Susie Sheridan 6 years ago

Maybe you could find a woman who earns more if society weren’t still sexist.

2points

Lonnie Santrock 6 years ago

I think that all these lawsuits against everybody is making everybody afraid to be the sexual beings that we are let's not forget none of us would be here without sex and I don't see anything wrong with a little harmless titillation as long as nobody's rights are being stepped on and no children are being harmed. Society just lighten up already.

-1point

CbusResident 6 years ago

All the women and male feminists who are raging on here about how all of the old gender stereotypes were chauvinist, you have a point. But please, please don't turn around after you rage about stuff like this and say things about how 'men have man colds and complain about their man colds too much.' That too is a gender stereotype.

-1point

Geoffrey Froment 6 years ago

Absolutely pathetic. Women are as much stupid as men ? That is the message i see there

-2points

aaron bur sir 3 years ago

The message is just to reverse gender roles

0points

Jeff Goodhall 6 years ago

As a man who looked after his daughter for the 1st year of her life because mum wanted a career I find this offensive. I didnt wear makeup cleaning or doing the dishes, so why is every man in these pictures wearing makeup? why is being at home STILL portrayed as feminine??? I looked after my daughter, looked after the house, started a BNB and made furniture when mum came home. This is a very very dumb way of showing gender inequality. You prove nothing by posting this c**p. I hope for a day when we talk about PEOPLE being equal. not men / women being in charge and simply swapping roles. idiotic.

-2points

Yioryos Ninjitsu 6 years ago

So much hate and bitterness in the comments...It's disheartening to see so many women applauding the idea of degrading someone like that. Even if it's just the idea. So many people seem to be willing to revert to twisted times, and while wearing a malicious smile as well!..Do you honestly believe that is how the human race will move forward?..Why not gas some Germans while we're at it as well? wtf?

-2points

Monilip 6 years ago

You missed the point. The point is not "it's revenge time, now we put men in stupid position" but to show how bad those adds were by showing adds in reverse (who are as much bad as the first ones).

2points

Sarjana Lastname 6 years ago

this is all about clothes, nothing else. woman can wear men clothes and oppsite it doesent have nothing to do whit sexuality, then is prvet separate, fetish who get exited from clothes, but home work rarely is sexual habit.

-2points

Sarjana Lastname 6 years ago

now days is no law to use men clothes, certain roles go along chiren, fire and cooking has always been wooo-man work, it doesent matter what is in pants or what kind of outfit they have

-1point

Svetoslav Dimitrov 6 years ago

Men and women ain't equal, they never were they never will be... equal RIGHTS... this is something else people. Make the difference between f*****g genetics and rights

-2points

Kostas 6 years ago

Let's fix sexism with more sexism...

-2points

Allen John 6 years ago

The #metoo movement getting out hand?

-2points

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Shut up.

2points

Konstantin 6 years ago

so, you're fighting sexism with sexism, great

-2points

Enomfon Asuquo 6 years ago

I think that reversing the gender roles isn't bringing awareness to the problem it's just poking fun at it. We should be progressing not moving backwards.

-2points

Monilip 6 years ago

that was the point...

-1point

Elina Edison 6 years ago

It's all very disturbing and, frankly, how don't see how this will change any man's mind since the parallels are just ridiculous. The originals are horrible, no doubt about it, but the parallels are ridiculous.

-2points

Tony Hernandez 6 years ago

What I find hard to believe is that someone actually thought these new "revisions" would make men mad, or offend us ("trigger us", maybe?). I think most men would be amused by them. Except liberals, of course. But then again, I did say men would be amused...

-3points

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Pathetic.

2points

Dasholzhaus 6 years ago

Am I the only guy that doesnt give a rats a*s about the reversed ads? For either gender, letting an advertisement get you all butt hurt is childish. Grow up and just worry about yourself and your day. So many snowflakes.

-3points

Shvaba Baranda 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Jim Kissaglis 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

makki 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Shvaba Baranda 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Alia Gail 6 years ago

Dude, we don’t WANT for men to be in these positions, we’re just showing what it would be like.

1point

makki 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

JustLooking46 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Stille20 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Willie Senekal 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Full Name 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Ooh look, you said SJW! Good for you. Did you make your quota of saying overused right-wing nonsense words for the day now?

5points

Dan Z 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

John Smith 6 years ago

Totally my point dude, but this is Bored Panda, and the majority of browsers are hopeless f**s and libtards.

-3points

John Smith 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Nothing says "I"m a huge closeted gay person" like hating gay people for no reason. John, you're not a man. Not anywhere near it. You're a sad sack little child who hates himself and projects your self hatred on the world around you. Real men think you're a b***h.

7points

happyhippie 6 years ago

LOL does this dude really think he's a real man? LOL HAHAHAHAAA!

6points

Louise Shippey 6 years ago

neither would any ''real'' woman......dumbo. Way to completely miss the point

5points

Julie Julie 6 years ago

I agree with your comment regarding missing the point by using effeminate men, it actually reinforces the feminine stereotype. But gays and/or effeminate men are just as much "real men" as lubberjacks, machos, and yourself. If you can't cook, clean, or do the dishes, you're not a "real man" you're just a loser.

3points

A Ghost 6 years ago

I have a few issues with this. Firstly, you don't know their gay. Secondly, gay men could be considered the most real because they're with another man so that means double the man. Tertiary, the reason they look effeminate is because they're remaking ads that have effeminate women.

1point

POST

Lodogg 3323 6 years ago

91points

Lin Larsson 6 years ago

I don't have to thank my grandmother, she didn't do anything to make a change. It's quite the opposite, she never understood the movement, which is a whole different type of sad, really.

38points

Donna Morrow 6 years ago

Actually a lot of children are married off underage - 1 in 9 children are still married off below the age of 15. http://www.unfpa.org/child-marriage

6points

Patrick McKenna 6 years ago

while so many are offended and whine and complain about morays of decades past, future generations will condemn what we do.

3points

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

my grandma is dead thank you very much, and i find both extremes offensive, both posters are wrong, so...

2points

Biana Weatherford 5 years ago

thanks! perspective is important! I'm glad we find these offensive...and I'm grateful to my foremothers.

1point

Ruslan Nikolov 6 years ago

Thank you!

1point

Reni Playz and Says 2 years ago

0points

Legenda Aurea 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Mylah Rose 6 years ago

These originals are shocking! Such a good idea to do these parallels, and beautifully executed.

77points

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

both are wrong

23points

Carmen Elena 6 years ago

Shocking. Can´t believe those were for real.

43points

Hari Onago 6 years ago

True but we still have all those TV ads overwhelmingly stereotyping women as housewives: whether it is detergent or dish soap advertising, etc. as if it were women's responsibility alone.

55points

None 6 years ago

5points

Marco Danelli 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Semi-transparent Panda 6 years ago

For the people whining that "both of these are wrong" and "this is degrading to men." That's. The. Point.

25points

Leonard Abs 6 years ago

It's not degrading to men. I don't the majority of men would be affected by this at all and any guys here complaining are just trolls.

2points

Pamala Knowlton 6 years ago

I’m of an age where I remember most of these ads. They’re not jokes or exaggerations. Women really were expected to be brainless, helpless, and happy to serve their husbands without complaint.

21points

Kelly G 6 years ago

Equality for all gender. Men love your kitchen and take care of your kids too. Hello Pamela

1point

Valerie Sinkavich 6 years ago

some places in our country, guys don't know those are out of date. they think it's still that way.

18points

Morgan Fisher 6 years ago

Yup. Like, the Whitehouse :-/

17points

Petra Christovová 6 years ago

Wow, those original advertisements are really disgusting. Quite shows at what position were women basically a few years ago.

15points

Bart Dierickx 6 years ago

True, and this was the position of many many men. Spoiler, it's no better. It's only better if we look at the top of the top of the topf of the iceberg. 800px-Dolc...9b8475.jpg

1point

Nina Wum 6 years ago

12points

None 6 years ago

2points

Cynthia McCarver 6 years ago

So revealing to read the comments from the men with hurt feelings. :-)

12points

Kelly G 6 years ago

Women has been partially treated and ignored since time past. Hi Cynthia

0points

King Old Man Bob 6 years ago

So revealing to read comments on how butt hurt they are that these ads were a thing. We men use to be f*****g drafted in wars.

-1point

Paul Osborne 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Jessica Joseph 6 years ago

11points

Reg Fife 6 years ago

That's like saying liberals all want to go back to the good ol' days of the hippies. No conservative I know of wants to see a return to keeping women exclusively in the kitchen.

4points

Jade 6 years ago

Crazy - both make me uncomfortable. They are both as bad as each other (I guess that was the point, of course). Unreal that these really were allowed!

11points

Cherie Barnard 6 years ago

These are infuriating af. I'm nauseated thinking that people actually thought this was okay and that women just accepted it. And that in some households this is still the norm.

7points

Annette Easton 6 years ago

6points

Dean Leonard 6 years ago

Exactly.

1point

Louise Shippey 6 years ago

I am amazed (thought shouldn't be) at all the dumbos pointing out that both versions are ''wrong'' WELL OF COURSE THEY ARE !....so call yourself a feminist and get with the programme.

5points

Elizabeth Brothers 6 years ago

3points

Allie Love 6 years ago

this just made me sick....

2points

Jean-luc Picard 6 years ago

2points

Nomadus Aureus 6 years ago

2points

anarkzie 6 years ago

2points

Nicu Buculei 6 years ago

I find the most amusing how in the last one (leotards) they photographer had to include the nipples and make clear is a guy.

2points

Gayle McDonald 6 years ago

2points

Anneke Kuilman 6 years ago

It’s not only about the money that women are working.

1point

Margaret Harper 6 years ago

These are really brilliant!

2points

Ben Mitchell 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Jus 5 years ago

They are all absolutely disgusting! Why would any woman agree to be part of this or to marry one of those a-holes?!

1point

Dannielle Sommers 6 years ago

love these. the role reversal is beyond awesome

1point

Derpicorn 6 years ago

I hate how sexist adds used to be! I’m so glad we aren’t like that as much these days... now if you’ll excuse my I need to print and burn some of these horrible adds! 😁

1point

Aron Reichardt 6 years ago

let's make none of both sides come true

1point

Sam Ramirez 6 years ago

might have been better if they got a man that looks like he could change a tire

1point

Martin Williams 6 years ago

1point

Jackie Page 6 years ago

So, Hardee's really advertised that their food was sloppy and hastily prepared??

1point

Vexor Shadewing 6 years ago

Honestly I can name several men and women who'd happily conform on both sides of this, but enough about my sex life.

1point

Poseidon Cheez 6 years ago

1point

Jerome Goodwin 6 years ago

How about ads where they are equal and help each other?

1point

Loretta D la Spriella 6 years ago

1point

Christa Cartwright 6 years ago

I'm really surprised anyone thought #6 was ok.

1point

Kelly G 6 years ago

I'm not. Christa

0points

Emily Bachy 6 years ago

I think we should stop dragging up ads from the past. It's the equivalent of poking a bear ready for hibernation. It's calming down, but now you have to wake it up.

1point

Susie Sheridan 6 years ago

8points

lib 2 years ago

Wow! We made these sexist ads sexist in a new way! Applaud our genius!!! 😒

0points

Jarrod Lee 5 years ago

Next we should take good movies and reboot them with women..... ooooooo... nevermind.

0points

Kururi.Orihara 5 years ago

I knew it was like this, but I never knew it was THIS bad!

0points

Thomassen Bart 6 years ago

0points

Vladimir Krstic 6 years ago

I get it but why did they make the man faminine? Hiow do you now see the irony?

0points

Kat Robin Shulder 6 years ago

this is moderately amusing, but it's sexist both ways. people are equal, not magically better than one another.

0points

Johnette Pace 6 years ago

The rug one... ewwwww

0points

Leroy Green 6 years ago

0points

Amby Stanyer-Hunter 6 years ago

These modern ones don't offend anyone!

0points

Leasa Ryan-Janssen 6 years ago

0points

Marius Dumas 6 years ago

0points

Elena Mendiola Illescas 6 years ago

I think it will be more clever to do the new ones with sexist ideas towards men that are true, like men are the ones that get money in the house, or men can't cry etc..

0points

Billy Jackson 6 years ago

WoW some of those are pretty embarrassing to think we allowed that kind of thinking..

0points

Krieger Strauss 6 years ago

Yes but women are biological housewives this just doesn't work and serves as sarcastic humour to hide that fact.

0points

Elizabeth Brothers 6 years ago

0points

Jovy Jergens 6 years ago

Such a clever fellow and, as a woman who remembers the humiliation of and the discrimination against women of that era, THANK YOU!

0points

Kevin Minh-Sang 6 years ago

I masturbated to new ones to be honest.

0points

Connor Certa 6 years ago

0points

Brianna LaPoint 6 years ago

This is awesome. I mean people should never have had these ads, but cant unring that bell.

0points

Debbie Andersson 6 years ago

0points

Vlad Sicoe 6 years ago

God, the originals are awful :O

0points

Jerome Goodwin 6 years ago

How about ads where they are equals and help each other.

0points

Néjib Ghediri 6 years ago

Except that these men look more like men playing women's roles than regular men. The photographers themselves couldn't see "real men" pictured like that.

0points

Maria Kyriakidou 6 years ago

if the roles were reverse and they broke stereotypes in new ads the working women shouldnt have all been wearing suits. the classic men's garment. they stilll hide stereotypes.....

0points

Jonathan Eatsalot 6 years ago

It's almost as if times change.

0points

Surbhi Bansal Halder 6 years ago

These were really astonishing and surprising and yes offensive too. I am glad I am born today and not in that era.

0points

Buzz Covington 6 years ago

This might have been relevant 50 years ago. Just sad and tired now.

0points

Redd Swain 6 years ago

I encourage you all to read an etiquette book. That will give you the realest look into the society these women had to live and follow. Men, too. Far more scary than these adds.

0points

im lost 6 years ago

Hey feminists are making its soon the case 65% of college grads are female ,men are in fact under the iron boot of social marxism & feminism

0points

Donny Meanie 6 years ago

It's...... just an ad. An ad from the 1950s. Why should anyone in 2018 give a s**t?

0points

Debbie Cooper 6 years ago

0points

Kelly G 6 years ago

Let's have some time to talk. I don't mind

0points

Sarchis Dolmanian 6 years ago

Excellent opportunity to remember that 'two wrongs don't make a right'!

0points

Nani Thomas 6 years ago

Why do people say it's wrong on both sides? Everyone sees that it's wrong to do that to a man. It's doing that to a woman that people don't see as wrong.

0points

Brian Gibson 6 years ago

I liked the last one lmao

0points

Tyler Phillips 6 years ago

this is biased af

0points

Leonard Abs 6 years ago

Reversing the stereotype doesn't work in the slightest. It's visually interesting but not thought provoking to anyone born in the last 50 years.

0points

Kimberlea Abtosway 6 years ago

.... But I would be happier with a new hoover.

0points

Glenn Poignee 6 years ago

the absurdity of 60 year old ads...The absurd part is redoing them at all. It draws a contrast to something that simply isn't done anymore. That's absurd

0points

Lulli Viddo 6 years ago

We need more artworks like this

0points

Danny Archer 6 years ago

0points

anarkzie 6 years ago

0points

David Payne 6 years ago

The "Original" Hardee's ad features a logo they didn't use until they merged with Carl's Jr, in 1997.

0points

Paul Osborne 6 years ago

It was a different era, things that were acceptable then aren't acceptable now. In another 60 years things today will seem outdated.

0points

A dose of reality... 6 years ago

To imagine that these sexist photos were mostly accepted back then. I don't know if / why the reversed pictures should be better or help change anything...

0points

Monilip 6 years ago

they are not better, that's the point. They are just to show people, by comparasion, how bad these ads were

1point

Mikko Karjalainen 6 years ago

0points

Karla Thompson 6 years ago

I think we should all stop and give a big kudos to the male model in the “after” ads. He problem felt super uncomfortable but was willing to do it for the sake of humor and social commentary.

0points

Karla Thompson 6 years ago

*probably (dumb autocorrect)

0points

Morgan Fisher 6 years ago

0points

Ben Mitchell 6 years ago

It's automated

0points

Cenk Karaferya 6 years ago

Shocking...

0points

makki 6 years ago

Now days I feel like men are the ones women are being sexist towards! let the past sit and the future continue

0points

Bradley Auerbach 6 years ago

I've always thought of what that kind of parallel universe would look like! What about switching the roles of races or gender preferences?

0points

Sancha Fung 6 years ago

I wonder where we saw them. Like are they actual ads that were on newspapers or just comedic fun?

0points

Connie Martin 6 years ago

I don't see the point of this. Does someone really need to see men in parallel positions to know these attitudes are wrong?

0points

Nancy Massi 6 years ago

Love this

0points

Lena Tuszewska 6 years ago

BRILLIANT

0points

Yvonne Gacheru 6 years ago

0points

Yvonne Gacheru 6 years ago

Sorry *'these male models might not be as good (acting wise) or as *you illustrated as the females.

0points

Leo McKinnon 6 years ago

Where is the ad for barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen ?

0points

Sunako 6 years ago

Wow..

0points

melissa brown 6 years ago

wow

0points

Kjorn 6 years ago

either way it's not ok. but people seem to be ok when the role are reverse and it's the men who are in that situation.

0points

Betsy Braddock 6 years ago

35points

BERT 6 years ago

-1point

Stephan Riediker 6 years ago

-1point

Jerry Mathers 6 years ago

The before pictures are "Great America" trump was referring to.

-1point

SlyNine 6 years ago

Men don't really give a s**t. We see much worse ways men are depicted by media.

-1point

aaron bur sir 3 years ago

oh really. How? Because man can go to court for grouping someone and become president. So go f**k yourself

0points

Yioryos Ninjitsu 6 years ago

-1point

Gage Franke 4 years ago

Relax, dude. No one wants that. It's not meant to be taken seriously.

0points

JohnnyandRebecca Jones 6 years ago

when this country lived with these values divorce wasnt over 55% drug abuse was not where it is now and there was alot more respect for ones elders and their parents

-1point

Von Awesome 6 years ago

1point

Tammy Hubatsek 6 years ago

-1point

Bart Dierickx 6 years ago

-1point

Susie Sheridan 6 years ago

Maybe you could find a woman who earns more if society weren’t still sexist.

2points

Lonnie Santrock 6 years ago

-1point

CbusResident 6 years ago

-1point

Geoffrey Froment 6 years ago

Absolutely pathetic. Women are as much stupid as men ? That is the message i see there

-2points

aaron bur sir 3 years ago

The message is just to reverse gender roles

0points

Jeff Goodhall 6 years ago

-2points

Yioryos Ninjitsu 6 years ago

-2points

Monilip 6 years ago

You missed the point. The point is not "it's revenge time, now we put men in stupid position" but to show how bad those adds were by showing adds in reverse (who are as much bad as the first ones).

2points

Sarjana Lastname 6 years ago

-2points

Sarjana Lastname 6 years ago

now days is no law to use men clothes, certain roles go along chiren, fire and cooking has always been wooo-man work, it doesent matter what is in pants or what kind of outfit they have

-1point

Svetoslav Dimitrov 6 years ago

Men and women ain't equal, they never were they never will be... equal RIGHTS... this is something else people. Make the difference between f*****g genetics and rights

-2points

Kostas 6 years ago

Let's fix sexism with more sexism...

-2points

Allen John 6 years ago

The #metoo movement getting out hand?

-2points

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Shut up.

2points

Konstantin 6 years ago

so, you're fighting sexism with sexism, great

-2points

Enomfon Asuquo 6 years ago

I think that reversing the gender roles isn't bringing awareness to the problem it's just poking fun at it. We should be progressing not moving backwards.

-2points

Monilip 6 years ago

that was the point...

-1point

Elina Edison 6 years ago

-2points

Tony Hernandez 6 years ago

-3points

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Pathetic.

2points

Dasholzhaus 6 years ago

-3points

Shvaba Baranda 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Jim Kissaglis 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

makki 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Shvaba Baranda 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Alia Gail 6 years ago

Dude, we don’t WANT for men to be in these positions, we’re just showing what it would be like.

1point

makki 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

JustLooking46 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Nahuel Benvenuto 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Stille20 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Willie Senekal 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Full Name 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Dave Roger 6 years ago

Ooh look, you said SJW! Good for you. Did you make your quota of saying overused right-wing nonsense words for the day now?

5points

Dan Z 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

John Smith 6 years ago

Totally my point dude, but this is Bored Panda, and the majority of browsers are hopeless f**s and libtards.

-3points

John Smith 6 years ago

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Dave Roger 6 years ago

7points